Bombay HC dismisses plea challenging constitutional validity of UAPA
Bombay High Court
on Thursday dismissed a petition challenging the constitutional validity of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (
UAPA
).
A bench of Justices A S Gadkari and Neela Gokhale said the Act in its present form was "constitutionally valid" and, hence, challenge to its vires fails.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
MBA
healthcare
Data Analytics
Public Policy
Technology
Operations Management
CXO
others
MCA
Finance
Cybersecurity
Artificial Intelligence
Digital Marketing
Design Thinking
Management
Others
Data Science
Product Management
Project Management
Degree
Healthcare
Leadership
PGDM
Data Science
Skills you'll gain:
Financial Management
Team Leadership & Collaboration
Financial Reporting & Analysis
Advocacy Strategies for Leadership
Duration:
18 Months
UMass Global
Master of Business Administration (MBA)
Starts on
May 13, 2024
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Analytical Skills
Financial Literacy
Leadership and Management Skills
Strategic Thinking
Duration:
24 Months
Vellore Institute of Technology
VIT Online MBA
Starts on
Aug 14, 2024
Get Details
The court dismissed a 2021 petition filed by one Anil Baburao Baile, who was issued notice in 2020 in connection with the
Elgaar Parishad case
by the National Investigation Agency.
Baile sought a declaration that the UAPA and also the now suspended Section 124A of Indian Penal Code (IPC) pertaining to sedition be declared as ultra vires and unconstitutional.
In his plea, Baile also sought the setting aside of the July 10, 2020 notice issued to him.
Live Events
As per the petition, the provisions of UAPA granted "unbridled power' to the executive to declare an organisation or an individual and their activity unlawful without defining the same in the law.
The amendment made in the UAPA to adopt the United Nations Security Council's 2001 resolution, which was for criminalising any person supporting international terrorism, made it possible for the government to declare an Indian citizen or an organisation as a terrorist, the plea added.
"Nowhere does the Constitution authorise a blanket power to the executive in deciding and Parliament cannot be granted blanket power to declare an organisation as unlawful," Baile's plea claimed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
5 minutes ago
- Mint
Chhangur Baba, accused of running religious conversion racket, money laundering, send to five-day ED custody
Chhangur Baba alias Jalaluddin was remanded to the Enforcement Directorate (ED) custody on Monday by a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court in Lucknow. The court was hearing a case related to a money laundering investigation against Chhangur and his associates linked to an alleged illegal conversion racket in Uttar Pradesh, officials said. According to a PTI report, Chhangur Baba alias Jalaluddin alias Karimulla Shah has been in jail in the predicate offence case being investigated by the Uttar Pradesh Police's Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS). The ED had applied to the court for his custody following which it was allowed a five-day remand of the accused till August 1, the officials said. He will be questioned in jail and his statement will be recorded under the PMLA, they added. Earlier this month, the federal agency had conducted searches at Chhangur's native place in Balrampur district and two locations in Mumbai. The ED had said that the accused had received funds worth ₹ 60 crore in 22 bank accounts, including 'large amounts' from abroad. The money-laundering case against Chhangur Baba stems from the ATS FIR filed at a police station in Lucknow's Gomti Nagar under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Act, 2021. Chhangur Baba, his son Mehboob and alleged associates Naveen Rohra alias Jamaluddin and Neetu Rohra alias Nasreen were arrested by the ATS. They are currently lodged in a jail. Chhangur Baba has been accused of being involved in a 'large-scale' conspiracy which includes religious conversions, utilisation of foreign funds, and activities posing a potential threat to national security, as reported by PTI. The ED said, 'Chhangur Baba and his associates are alleged to have established an extensive network operating from the premises of the Chand Auliya Dargah in Balrampur, where he regularly organised large gatherings attended by both Indian and foreign nationals.' 'He is accused of systematically inducing, coercing, and manipulating indiduals of other faiths, particularly Scheduled Castes, and economically disadvantaged persons belonging to Hindu religion, into religous conversion,' the probe agency added. The ED searches also led to the seizure of a number of documents that show that the 'proceeds of crime' (illicit funds) were majorly transferred to different people for purchasing a number of immovable properties worth crores of rupees and carrying out construction in these properties. All the immovable assets acquired by Chhangur Baba are in the names of Naveen Rohra and Neetu Rohra to conceal his actual involvement in money laundering, the ED has said.
India Today
35 minutes ago
- India Today
Supreme Court quashes FIR against Lakshya Sen in birth certificate forgery case
The Supreme Court on Monday quashed an FIR against badminton player Lakshya Sen, his family members and coach in the birth certificate forgery case. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar said the continuation of criminal proceedings against Sen was an abuse of the process of court. The top court observed the very allegations that were examined and debunked by competent authorities were now being sought to be revived as it ruled out any fresh evidence meriting reopening of the appellants, particularly appellant 1 and 3, are sportspersons of national standing, having represented India in international badminton tournaments and having earned multiple accolades, including medals at the Commonwealth Games and BWF international events," the court said. The top court went on, "To compel such individuals who have maintained an unblemished record and brought distinction to the country through sustained excellence,to undergo the ordeal of a criminal trial in the absence of prima facie material would not subserve the ends of justice."The invocation of criminal law in such circumstances, the bench held, would amount to an abuse of process, which this court cannot countenance. The top court observed the Sports Authority of India (SAI), upon receiving complaints, initiated a verification process in 2016, which included medical testing and factual players were stated to have undergone bone ossification and dental tests at government-run hospitals including AIIMS, Delhi."The findings of these tests supported the birth years as recorded in official documents. On that basis, the SAI closed the matter. The CVC, an independent oversight body, was also seized of the issue and recommended no disciplinary proceedings against D K Sen. These findings were accepted by the relevant authorities and have not been set aside or reopened," the bench M G Nagaraj alleged birth certificates of Sen and his brother Chirag Sen were top court was hearing a plea against a February 19 Karnataka High Court order rejecting the petitions filed by Sen, his family members, and his coach U Vimal high court found prima facie evidence, warranting an investigation into the alleged Sen's parents Dhirendra and Nirmala Sen, along with his brother, coach, and an employee of the Karnataka Badminton Association were involved in falsifying the birth to the complaint, the accused allegedly manipulated the birth certificates of the Sen brothers, reducing their age by approximately two-and-a-half alleged forgery was intended to allow them to participate in age-restricted badminton tournaments and avail government supported his claims with documents obtained under RTI Act and requested the court to summon original records from SAI and the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports in New on the evidence, the court directed the High Grounds police station to conduct an police subsequently lodged an FIR under Sections 420 (cheating), 468 (forgery), and 471 (using forged documents as genuine) of petitioners moved the Karnataka High Court in 2022, securing an interim order, which stalled the argued the complaint and subsequent FIR were baseless, motivated, and intended to harass was alleged to have acted out of personal vendetta, after his daughter applied to join the Prakash Padukone Badminton Academy in 2020 but was not selected after the evaluation a coach at the academy, was named in the high court, while dismissing the petitions, observed the petitioners' counsel did not present arguments despite being given sufficient opportunities.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat government stalls School of Excellence scheme following ‘negative feedback'
The Gujarat government's plan to exempt certain private schools from the Gujarat Self-financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 under the 'School of Excellence' scheme has been put on hold, said sources. The proposed exemption would have required an amendment to the 2017 Act, aiming to award at least 1% of private schools with 'Schools of Excellence' status, similar to the Centre of Excellence status for private universities. The move was aimed to exempt these schools from the fee regulation committee and grant them freedom in admissions. Sources cited a 'negative' feedback from the public as the reason for this red flag forcing the government to stall the decision for the time being. On July 2, the state government had laid down all the rules for the scheme, including who all will be eligible and how to apply among other things. On July 2, The Indian Express had reported that how the state government is set to amend Gujarat Self-financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017 after eight years of its implementation for at least 1 per cent private schools with 99% pass result and 75% average score under the 'School of Excellence' status. Earlier this week, the state government had invited feedback from the public regarding the same, following which the Education Department had received 25 suggestions, most of which were against the decision, sources revealed. 'We are looking into the feedback at the moment,' Principal Secretary, Education, Mukesh Kumar told The Indian Express. Sharing details of the feedback submitted by Gujarat State School Management Association, its president Bhaskar Patel told The Indian Express, 'We had suggested to the state government to exempt all private schools and not only a few from the fee regulation committee. Also, we had stated that the conditions put on private schools to be eligible under the scheme should not be there and they should be allowed to follow the natural course of action.' Three institutions, under the Udgam chain of schools, had, as per sources, submitted their feedback in support of the decision. Udgam chain of schools, Executive Director, Manan Choksi told The Indian Express, 'It is a good initiative which will focus on the results. However, we had also suggested that the government, in addition to the board results, should have added other criterias such as the number of years a student has studied in the school. There should be slabs under which the schools could be placed and they can push to aspire and achieve the School of Excellence status.' The state government cited old universities like Taxila, Nalanda and Kashi that had 'their own identity all over the world', the same week the scheme was put in the public domain for suggestions and feedback. The Gujarat Self-financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act, 2017, placed an upper limit on the amount of fees that can be charged from students. Around 4,500 self-financed secondary and higher secondary schools are registered under various education boards in Gujarat. As per the criteria that was laid down for School of Excellence, the schools should have a pass percentage of 99 to 100% in Board examination. Other criteria was that at least 60 students should have appeared in the Board examination from such schools. Besides, the average marks of students in Class 10 should be 80% or above. For Class 12, it was set at 75% or above. These would apply to all the schools registered in the state with the Gujarat Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board, CBSE, or any other boards. A Scrutiny Committee and an Empowered Committee was also formed to prepare the list of Schools of Excellence among the applications. 'In Gujarat, even if 1% of private schools will be given autonomy, they can focus on their own education and extra-curricular activities and try to take the same to the higher level. By bringing all the schools in the state under the same fee structure, all those schools will perform similar activities and instead of moving towards excellence, they will only work towards (being) homogeneous. If it is found necessary to take such special schools to their maximum potential of excellence, it is necessary to grant them partial exemption…,' the order issued by the state Education Department had stated. As part of the procedure, the state government was to invite applications from private schools that were to go through the scrutiny and empowered committees. As per the norms, if a school declared as Schools of Excellence fails to meet the eligibility criteria in the subsequent year, they were to be given one more term to meet the criteria, failing which they will be removed from the list. Under the Gujarat Self-financed Schools (Regulation of Fees) Act 2017, no-self financed school can collect any fee in excess of what has been fixed by the Fee Regulatory Committee (FRC) for admission of students to any class or course of study. The private schools could be slapped a fine of up to Rs 5 lakh for the first contravention. While the cut-off limit for pre-primary and primary schools is Rs 15,000 per annum, for secondary and higher secondary schools offering general stream, it is Rs 25,000. For higher secondary schools with science stream, the upper limit is Rs 30,000 per annum.
