Last-minute call for people to share pandemic experiences
The chair of the Covid-19 Inquiry has put out a last-minute call for people to share their experiences during the global pandemic.
Public submissions, which opened on February 3, close at midnight this Sunday.
More than 7300 submissions had already been received, with vaccine mandates a topic of significant focus for many submitters to date from across the country, an Inquiry spokesperson said. The use of lockdowns was also a frequent topic, particularly among residents of the Auckland and Northland regions, where lockdown was extended in late 2021.
Inquiry chair Grant Illingworth KC said it was important to hear from as many people as possible, as everyone experienced the pandemic and its impact in different ways.
"[It] was an incredibly difficult time, and many people are still feeling the effects of the pandemic and the response to it, whether those be physical, emotional, or financial."
Hearing from the public was "a very important" part of the work of the Inquiry, he added.
"By hearing about a wide range of experiences, we can understand the impact the pandemic and New Zealand's response to it had on New Zealanders, as well as what the public think should be done to address future pandemics."
Illingworth said he wanted to hear from "everyone from individuals, communities, businesses, iwi, and others on how their lives were affected and changed during the pandemic".
These experiences would help the Inquiry "provide careful, considered recommendations" to the government on how New Zealand could be prepared to respond to future pandemics, he added.
The inquiry was currently reviewing key decisions the government made in response to the pandemic between February 2021 and October 2022. It said a "key decision" was one made by the government that had a "significant impact on a large number of people or had a significant cost at a national or regional level (or both)".
The Inquiry's focus is on three main areas:
- Vaccines, including the use of mandates, the approval of vaccines, and vaccine safety
- Lockdowns, especially the national lockdown in August and September 2021 and the Auckland/Northland extended lockdown late 2021.
- Testing, tracing, and other public health tools.
Over the coming months, the inquiry will hold interviews with policy makers and advisors, and meet with some of the communities most affected by the pandemic. It will also collect information and evidence, including from government departments. The inquiry will hold public hearings later in 2025.
Anyone who wants to make a submission can either go to the [www.covid19inquiry.nz Covid 19 Inquiry website] or call 0800 500 306. Submissions close on at midnight on 27 April 2025.
To find out more about the Inquiry go to: https://www.covid19lessons.royalcommission.nz/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
On Teachers, Ferries And The Really Wasteful Spending
In the context of yesterday's teachers strike, Judith Collins claimed that teachers with ten years of experience 'can' (not 'do') earn $147,000 a year. In reality though, teachers have to pay their mortgage/rent and put food on the table with their actual earnings, not with an aspirational figure. Moreover, Cabinet Ministers earning $396,000 a year (plus a myriad of valuable perks and subsidies) are hardly in a position to decry others getting fair pay for the work they do, and for the value they give back to society. (Every backbench MP is paid $20,000 a year more than Collins' theoretical example.) The people who teach our children day in, year out are being offered a net pay cut - 1% a year for the next three years – at a time when inflation is currently running at just below 3%, and rising. Finally, the accusation that the PPTA walked out prematurely – after six days of formal negotiation – ignores the fact that months of engagement preceded these talks, and plainly, the Ministry was not willing to budge from its inflammatory position. There's no point in coming back from the picket lines to talk, when the government is dead-set against compromise. That inflexible mindset is what the strike action has aimed to change. The government, which dearly wants to distract public attention away from its wider failings, is probably welcoming this stoush. Housing for some A year ago this month, the coalition government launched its new policy on emergency housing, which - traditionally – has been the last resort for people with nowhere else to go. The new guidelines made access to emergency housing more difficult to get, and harder to keep. As a result over the past year, city footpaths and shop doorways have been seeing a sharp influx of homeless people. On the Spinoff, Joel McManus has written a solid backgrounder on the issues involved. Yet in a sideshow of extravagance last week.. Defence Minister Judith Collins opened a huge $250 million building at Ohakea Air Base that will house the Air Force's four Poseidon P-8A surveillance aircraft. Good to know that this fleet of hugely expensive aircraft (the original price tag for the basics was $2.34 billion before upgrades and add-ons) will be housed in a state-of-the-art 20,000 square metre building, in between the times they fly off around the Pacific looking for Chinese submarines that may (or may not) be out there. Priority: spend a quarter of a billion dollars on lavish housing for four aeroplanes, while cutting the ability of Kainga Ora to build housing for the tens of thousands of New Zealanders in need of a roof over their heads. Go figure. Ferries follies More revealing numbers surfaced last week about the cost of cancelling the iRex Cook Strait ferries. The total payments to South Korea's Hyundai Mipo shipyard amount to $222 million, which is the initial deposit plus the $144 million penalty imposed for breaking the contract. Reportedly, an additional $449 million has been spent on the portside infrastructure, and on the project management expenses that have included the cost of negotiating the exit. The government has made it clear that it intends to scale back the renewal of the portside infrastructure. Much of that work will simply be kicked down the road. As a result, taxpayers/travellers/firms will have to cope for years to come with rundown and already inadequate terminal facilities. The smaller ferries now being purchased will also provide a less reliable, less comfortable service during the sort of adverse weather that led to the ferry cancellations last week. There will also be a significant delay until those inferior ferries are delivered. As yet, there has been no official estimate of the economic cost of deferring the arrival of new ferries from 2026 (when the iRex ferries were due to enter service) until 2029, which is the earliest estimated arrival time of the replacement vessels. How many hundreds of millions will be lost via this avoidable delay? The government isn't asking, or telling. As yet, we don't know which shipyard will be contracted to build the new ferries. If, at year's end, this proves to be Hyundai Mipo, one can only conclude that the $144 million breakage fee was a concession, as part of a package deal. To put that another the lucky bidder turns out to be Hyundai Mipo, will that decision have been based on merit, or will it be the by-product of yet another cost cutting exercise, and a condition imposed by the South Koreans for halving the breakage fee from its original ballpark estimate of circa $300 million. This fiasco is being played out on our main domestic trade and tourism link. Footnote: As indicated above, Defence spending occurs in a silo that's largely exempted from the government's austerity measures. Despite the absence of any credible foreign threat to this country – apart from US tariffs – the coalition government will be spending $12 billion of taxpayer money on armaments and weapons delivery systems over the next few years. This irrational diversion of the nation's resources has become so normalised that it is easy to overlook just how much New Zealand society could be transformed if a fraction of that money was spent on the actual needs here at home. Consider for example, that $144 million iRex ferries contract breakage fee alone. How could that amount of money have been spent more usefully? Here are a few options, estimated on the basis of the averaged-out labour costs. Registered nurses (Reg nurse pay rates $74,000 to $153,000 pa. Average of these figs = $113,500 p.a.) Divide $144m by $113,500 = You could pay 1,269 nurses for a year merely from the breakage fee for the ferries contract. OR Support workers ("help people with health problems or disabilities to do daily tasks, such as housework, and be as independent as possible.") (Per hour rates only given: $24 to $28 /hour = $49,920 to $58,240 p.a. Average of these = $54,080 p.a.) Divide $144m by $54,080 = you could pay 2,663 support workers for a year OR Teacher aides (Per hour rates : $28 to $35 /hour = $58,240 to $72,800 p.a. Average of these = $65,520 p.a.) Divide $144m by $65,520 = you could pay 2,198 teacher aides for a year OR Early childhood teachers EC teacher $49,000 to $78,000 p.a. Average = $63,500 p.a.) Divide $144m by $63,500 = you could pay 2,268 Early Childhood teachers for a year. These are the kind of options not being taken. Billions are being wasted on (a) the shonky ferries replacement(b) Defence procurements to combat phantom enemies and (c) that $3 billion tax handout to landlords. Social services are being starved in order to make these follies possible. Thomas the Rhymer And now, a poem about bargaining, and the costs to be paid. In the 1970s, many people became aware of the medieval tale of Thomas the Rhymer through the hit song of the same name by the British folk group, Steeleye Span. Around the same time, I ran across this reading of the poem – in ye olde English – by Ian Stewart. It brings out the inherent musicality of the old language. This is a poem to be said, not read. More to the point, Stewart brings to life the otherworldly nature of the encounter between True Thomas, and the sad, seductive Queen of fair Elfland. In the video, the olde 78rpm recording is a reminder of how incredibly fast those ancient brittle discs would spin around on the turntable:
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Auckland Council meets to decide if it will support new intensification plan
The government will require Auckland Council to allow apartments of at least 15 storeys around three City Rail Link stations. Photo: RNZ / Kate Newton Auckland Council is meeting to decide whether it will support and consult on a plan to increase intensification and strengthen hazard rules for new buildings. The draft changes to the Auckland unitary plan aim to replace Plan Change 78, while retaining its focus on housing in town centres. The council's Policy and Planning Committee is meeting on Thursday to discuss the changes that would allow for more apartments and terrace homes in walking distance of train and bus stations, more restrictive consenting requirements to increase resilience, and an increase in mixed housing suburban zones. Council will decide if it wants to endorse the plan to go out for consultation with iwi authorities, government, and local boards. It will have to decide in September whether it will withdraw from Plan Change 78 and proceed with the replacement plan. In June, the government announced it would require Auckland Council to allow apartments of at least 15 storeys around the Mount Eden, Kingsland, and Morningside Stations, and 10 storeys around the Mount Albert and Baldwin Avenue stations. The changes will be part of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other Matters) Amendment Bill which allows Auckland Council to withdraw its intensification plan change, PC78, with a requirement to notify a new plan change by 10 October this year. In June, Housing Minister Chris Bishop said the new directive from the government was supported by Auckland mayor Wayne Brown and most councillors. It was important to unlock housing capacity around public transport in Auckland, Bishop said. Auckland Council recently approved a zoning change for the city centre to allow unlimited building heights for a small section of the central business district and double height limits for the rest of the city centre to 20 storeys, or 72.5 metres. It expects that will allow four times the number of homes and businesses to be built in the central city. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
The importance of clear laws shown in impressive evidence from Italy
If New Zealand's laws were as ambiguous, we would be worse off by $20 billion – or about $10,000 per household – every year. What family would not welcome avoiding that? What is 'poorly drafted' law? The researchers used 10 indicators of writing that likely lacks clarity. It assesses each of over 75,000 Italian laws. One measure is sentence length. According to experts, sentences with more than 25 words are likely to be unclear. The authors found that 85% of the millions of sentences in all of this law exceeded 25 words. That might seem staggering for those who do not read law books. Authors of children's books might think it was absurd. Lawyers are likely less surprised, but still disturbed. Greater clarity in drafting should be easy to fix. So why isn't it? The paper's answer lies in law-making imperatives. These include haste, compromise, personal career aspirations and short-term expediency. Ambiguity conceals likely outcomes. It shields blame and defuses critics' attempts to pinpoint a proposed law's problems. Even lawyers cannot be sure how courts will interpret unclear laws. Nor can judges in a lower court be sure about how a higher court will interpret them. This uncertainty creates a cascade of problems throughout the legal system. The authors examined 620,000 Italian Supreme Court judgments between 2004 and 2017. They found 32% of them reversed a decision of a lower court solely on legal grounds The rule of law is a precondition for national prosperity. The law should be clear and accessible. When it is not clear to judges, it cannot be clear to those who must obey it. The paper next assessed the effects on over 700,000 Italian firms of reversed court decisions. It looked, for example, at changes in their investment spending and output growth. This aspect was another exhaustive, path-breaking achievement. It found the adverse effects were significant. The estimated permanent 5% drop in Italian national income encapsulates that. The paper's approach is ingenious, but too complex to explain here. Are New Zealand's laws better drafted in these respects? It would be good to know, because low productivity is holding New Zealanders back. It should be easy to improve drafting quality. The bigger the gains, the more it should be a priority. To better inform this article, I used AI to count the word lengths of sentences in two of New Zealand's acts. From an Italian perspective, the results were encouraging. The proportion of sentences in the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 that exceeded 25 words was 'only' 70%. For the Resource Management Act 1991, it was 53%. Even so, the implication is that most New Zealanders would not find the Resource Management Act (RMA) law clear and accessible. Parliament could be more insistent about improving clarity. The Government's Regulatory Standards Bill would increase this discipline. One part requires the Government to tell Parliament if a bill is unclear and hard to understand – and explain why. Small comfort, but better than nothing. Of course, there is more to good law than just clear drafting. Its content surely matters even more. Prominent symptoms of content problems include unaffordable housing, and infrastructure delays and inadequacies. However, much more is hidden or accepted as 'part of the woodwork'. Content problems have many sources. Public pressure on governments to 'do something' about the latest adverse headline is one source. Appeasing that pressure can be the easiest option. More mundane are the relentless daily calls on ministers to regulate or spend for this or that partisan or public-spirited cause. Such calls often fail to consider the costs to others. The Italian paper acknowledges that content also matters. It cites literature that shows property rights and institutional quality are key determinants of economic prosperity. The RMA is deficient in both respects. It offends almost everyone. The Regulatory Standards Bill also recognises the importance of protecting private property. Ministers must tell Parliament of any grounds for concern but Parliament can ignore this information at will and continues to be supreme lawmaker. (Most public opposition to this bill ignores this limiting aspect.) Greater transparency about these matters could help inform voters. Governments would spend and regulate more judiciously if more voters rewarded them for doing so. This exhaustive Italian research helps make the potential gains more concrete.
