logo
ROLAND WHITE reviews Death In The Desert: The Nurse Helen Mystery - 'How Foreign Office covered up the suspected murder of British nurse'

ROLAND WHITE reviews Death In The Desert: The Nurse Helen Mystery - 'How Foreign Office covered up the suspected murder of British nurse'

Daily Mail​4 hours ago

Is there anything that politics can't make a great deal worse? One night in May 1979, a young nurse called Helen Smith was enjoying herself at an illegal alcohol party in a block of flats in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
She was dancing with a Dutch tugboat captain called Johannes Otten, and they eventually left together. That was the last time anybody saw them alive.
The following morning, Helen's body was found on the street outside, while Johannes was impaled on nearby railings. She was 23.
The Saudi authorities insisted the couple had accidentally fallen from a balcony while having sex. Last night's Death In The Desert (Ch4) made a convincing case that they were both murdered.
If they fell from the balcony, why weren't their bodies spotted by some fellow guests, who left the party at 3am?
Why weren't Helen's injuries consistent with a 70ft fall? A Home Office pathologist - who conducted a second post-mortem after a long campaign by her family - concluded she had probably been raped and beaten.
The producers of the documentary, using the Freedom of Information Act, managed to obtain 121 Foreign Office files about the case. These show that, behind the scenes, officials were far from convinced by the Saudis' story.
And the Director of Public Prosecutions wrote to the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire to report 'a strong suspicion that both people were murdered'.
The trouble was, nobody in government was prepared to say this out loud. It was politics, of course, that got in the way.
Margaret Thatcher had only recently become Prime Minister, and relations with Saudi Arabia were particularly delicate.
Ministers feared that any shift in the price of oil could cause inflation, which Mrs Thatcher was struggling to bring down.
If we offended the Saudis, they could also cancel valuable arms contracts.
To make matters worse, there was already tension between the two countries after ITV's Death Of A Princess documentary - about the execution of a Saudi princess for adultery.
As barrister Geoffrey Robertson put it: 'It's quite clear from these papers you've discovered that it suited the Foreign Office for this to go away'.
It did go away, eventually. This was partly because Helen's campaigning father Ron died, and partly because there was no obvious suspect.
Last month, the Mail reported a new development in a similar case. When Julie Ward was found dead in Kenya in 1988, local officials said she'd been eaten by lions.
But evidence now suggests that the late Jonathan Moi, son of former president Daniel arap Moi, should have been arrested.
It's reassuring, I suppose, that injustices like these can be exposed by newspapers and television programmes so many years later. By then, of course, it's usually far too late to do anything about it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apocalyptic Iranian 'messiah' theory 'proves the country CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons': PETER VAN ONSELEN on the deranged belief system of Iran's ayatollahs
Apocalyptic Iranian 'messiah' theory 'proves the country CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons': PETER VAN ONSELEN on the deranged belief system of Iran's ayatollahs

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Apocalyptic Iranian 'messiah' theory 'proves the country CANNOT be allowed nuclear weapons': PETER VAN ONSELEN on the deranged belief system of Iran's ayatollahs

It is concerning when any country has nuclear weapons - but it's a threat the world has learned to manage. There's a basic assumption that most nuclear-armed countries refrain from using atomic bombs out of self-preservation. That is, if they fired nuclear warheads, their country would be destroyed. Defence experts call this 'Mutually Assured Destruction'. But what if a state doesn't fear destruction? What if it welcomes it, viewing it as a gateway to divine salvation? That's long been the concern with Iran. And it's not an exaggerated risk. Iran's nuclear ambitions don't exist in a vacuum. They sit within a broader ideological framework that includes what's known as millenarianism: the belief that the world is heading for a final, transformative clash between good and evil. Years ago, as a university academic, I supervised an honours student whose thesis examined millenarianism. It opened my eyes to its impact on politics in the Middle East. In Shia Islam, millenarianism is tied to the return of the Mahdi, or the Hidden Imam. He is a messianic figure who will emerge in an era of chaos to establish a just Islamic order. This isn't just background noise, by the way. Former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad openly embraced this worldview. During his presidency, he not only referred to the Mahdi in speeches, including at the United Nations no less, but his government poured funds into religious preparations for the Mahdi's return. Ahmadinejad believed the apocalypse wasn't to be avoided but welcomed - even hastened. Road upgrades to Jamkaran, home of the mosque linked to the Mahdi's reappearance, were budgeted as national infrastructure. The line between religion and state planning was deliberately blurred. While not every Iranian leader is a millenarian, enough are, and the political system gives them real influence. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), which would almost certainly be in control of any Iranian nuclear arsenal were that to eventuate, has leaders who parrot similarly apocalyptic language. General Hossein Salami, the head of the IRGC - before he was recently killed by Israeli strikes - had repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. He described Israel as a 'cancerous tumour' that must be 'destroyed'. There's not a lot of room to move with such rhetoric. It can't be treated as a metaphorical flourish. It is a statement of intent, rooted in a belief that conflict with Israel is religiously sacred. This is why Israel acts the way it does - from targeted assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists to cyber sabotage and the recent airstrikes in Iran. The moves by the US and Israel this past fortnight aren't just about national defence. They're about preventing the unimaginable: a nuclear-armed state run by people who don't fear a true Armageddon. The US under Trump hit three separate nuclear-linked sites, facilities buried deep underground, because no other country has the capability to strike those types of bunkers effectively. The message was clear: diplomacy has its limits when dealing with a state like Iran, which in many ways is a much more dangerous actor than somewhere like North Korea precisely because of its millenarian tendencies. While Iran has always claimed its nuclear program is civilian, about energy not weapons, that claim doesn't pass the sniff test. Places like Fordow, the nuclear fortress buried under mountains, were deliberately shielded from airstrikes precisely because it's not an energy enrichment site. It's designed for survivability in the event of war, which only makes sense if the goal is to build a weapon, not a civilian reactor. The US has now apparently taken care of that. Iran getting the bomb poses other risks. If it was armed with nuclear weapons, we would see nuclear proliferation across the Middle East. If Iran got the bomb, Saudi Arabia would want one (it has said as much), and potentially, so would Turkey. Egypt might seek to build one too. Some in the West forget, or wilfully ignore, that Iran is not the underdog in the Middle East. It is the regional bully. Far from being a besieged victim of aggression Iran is the primary source of destabilisation right across the region. As a Shia theocracy in a predominantly Sunni region Iran's rise is deeply feared by Sunni Arab states. Its nuclear ambitions are seen as part of its ideological mission to reshape the Middle East in its image. It's a revolutionary regime, where parts of the leadership believe global chaos isn't to be avoided, it's to be embraced, because it brings the end times closer. If that doesn't justify aggressive containment measures, what does?

Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire : what we know so far
Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire : what we know so far

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump announces Iran-Israel ceasefire : what we know so far

US president Donald Trump has announced in a social media post that Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire. 'On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, 'THE 12 DAY WAR,' Trump wrote on his platform, Truth Social. 'This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn't, and never will!' Trump later told NBC the ceasefire was 'unlimited' and would last 'forever'. Trump brokered the ceasefire through talks with Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday while his team, including vice-president JD Vance, held talks with Tehran, a senior White House official told Reuters. The official, providing details of the ceasefire on condition of anonymity, said Israel agreed to it so long as Iran does not launch fresh attacks. Iran signalled that no further attacks would take place, the official said. After the ceasefire was announcement by Trump, Israel's Defence Forces issued an evacuation warning for several parts of the Iranian capital, ahead of a planned Israeli strike. On social media, some users reported massive explosions in Tehran, which they said was the most intense since Israel first started bombing Iran 12 days ago. Iran's foreign seemed to suggest that a cessation of hostilities had begun in a post on social media, saying Iran's military attacked Israel 'until the very last minute, at 4am.' Earlier he said that if Israeli strikes ceased at 12.30GMT Iran had 'no intention to continue our response afterwards'. Qatar's prime minister reportedly secured Iran's agreement to the US ceasefire proposal in call with Tehran, an official briefed on the matter told Reuters. Trump's declaration comes after Iran announced it had launched a missile attack on a US base in the Gulf state of Qatar, in what it said was retaliation for US participation in Israel's bombing campaign against Iran the day before. Qatar's foreign ministry said that 'Qatar's air defences successfully thwarted the attack and intercepted the Iranian missiles' and there had been no casualties. Iran reportedly provided advance warning of the attack. Trump at the weekend launched an unprecedented attack on three nuclear sites in Iran, including Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow. Codenamed 'midnight Hammer,' the attack deployed American B-2 bombers, and so-called bunker buster bombs. Trump was quick to claim that US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities had 'completely and totally obliterated' them, it remains unclear how much physical damage has been done or what the longer-term impact might be on Iran's nuclear programme. US bombing probably caused 'very significant' damage to the underground areas of Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment plant dug into a mountain, though no one can yet tell the extent, UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi said on Monday. 'Given the explosive payload utilised and the extreme vibration-sensitive nature of centrifuges, very significant damage is expected to have occurred,' Grossi said in a statement. The comments follow a meeting by the national security committee of Iran's parliament, which approved the general outline of a bill meant to fully suspend Tehran's cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. According to the bill, installing surveillance cameras, allowing inspections, and submitting reports to the IAEA would be suspended as long as the security of nuclear facilities is not guaranteed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store