Barclays fined £42m by watchdog over money laundering checks
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said the fines related to separate failings linked to the WealthTek and Stunt & Co businesses.
It fined Barclays Bank £39.3 million for 'failing to adequately manage money laundering risks' related to providing banking services to Stunt & Co, the firm run by socialite James Stunt.
Barclays 'did not gather enough information' after starting its relationship with the business and did not carry out 'proper' ongoing monitoring, the FCA said.
During this period, Stunt & Co received £46.8 million from Fowler Oldfield, a 'multimillion-pound money laundering operation'.
The FCA said Barclays failed to properly consider the money laundering risks 'even after receiving information from law enforcement about suspected money laundering through Fowler Oldfield, and after learning that the police had raided both firms'.
In March, James Stunt was cleared of taking part in a £200 million money laundering plot.
Meanwhile, Barclays Bank UK has been fined £3.1 million after it failed to check it had enough information to understand the money laundering risk before opening a client money account for now-collapsed wealth management firm WealthTek, the FCA said.
It added the Bank failed to see that WealthTek was not permitted by the FCA to hold client money, before clients deposited £34 million into the firm's account.
Barclays has agreed to make a voluntary payment of £6.3 million to WealthTek's clients who are facing a shortfall.
Therese Chambers, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: 'The consequences of poor financial crime controls are very real – they allow criminals to launder the proceeds of their crimes, and they allow fraudsters to defraud consumers.
'Banks need to take responsibility and act promptly, particularly when obvious risks are brought to their attention.
'In the first of these cases, Barclays secured a significant reduction in its fine through its extensive co-operation with our investigation and through making a voluntary payment to affected consumers at our request.'
Barclays has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How AI Is Finally Tackling America's Unclaimed Duty Crisis
In international trade, one of the best-kept secrets is also the most expensive: over $10 billion in refundable tariffs goes unclaimed each year. Despite being legally entitled to recover these funds, companies fail to file duty drawback claims on an estimated 78% to 85% of eligible transactions. Enter a new wave of AI-powered trade management companies that have collectively raised tens of millions in venture capital over the past eighteen months. The latest of these is Caspian, which just emerged from stealth with $5.4 million in seed funding led by Primary Venture Partners. The San Francisco-based company, founded by ex-Flexport engineers Justin Sherlock and Matt Ebeweber, focuses specifically on duty drawback—the process of reclaiming tariffs paid on imported goods that are later re-exported. Caspian founders: Justin Sherlock and Matt Ebeweber This follows a surge of venture-backed players in the broader supply chain space, suggesting investors see significant opportunity across the trade technology spectrum as tariffs dominate international headlines. London-based bagged $2.2 million in seed funding last year from Fuel Ventures and Plug and Play Ventures for its AI compliance platform. And Altana raised a splashy $200 million Series C to address global value chains. Market Forces Fueling Growth The numbers tell a compelling story about both opportunity and market growth. Estimates vary, but the global trade management software market is expected to exceed $2.2B by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of roughly 8.4%. Despite this expanding market, the duty drawback opportunity remains largely untapped. In 2017, the total amount claimed was about $838 million, but by 2023, this figure had increased to an estimated $3.9 billion. This trajectory suggests businesses are becoming more aware of drawback opportunities, but it also underscores how much money has historically been left on the table. The venture-backed players entering this space face an interesting dynamic: They're not just competing for market share in an existing software category, but essentially creating demand for a service many businesses don't realize they need. "After working for over a decade in trade with brands and manufacturers struggling to navigate this overly complex process, we thought there had to be a better solution for businesses to manage tariff exposure,' said Justin Sherlock, founder and CEO of Caspian. 'Over 90% of eligible businesses are leaving cash on the table because claiming duty refunds is so painful. We built Caspian to leverage AI alongside our expert staff to make organizations' trade data usable, making claims more compliant and refunds easier to recover.' Trade Technology Market Positioning The Hidden Cost of Complexity Billions of dollars are left unclaimed every year. Many businesses pay duties on imports without realizing they could get that money back. The reasons are telling: duty drawback involves navigating a maze of regulations, matching import and export records across years of transactions, and filing paperwork with U.S. Customs and Border Protection — a process that can take months using traditional methods. This complexity has created a peculiar market dynamic. Most existing solutions focus on compliance and risk management, rather than financial recovery. The established competitive landscape includes several categories of players. Software-centric companies like OCR Inc.'s EASE Enterprise Suite offer web-based automation with ERP integration, while full-service providers like J.M. Rodgers Co. (JMR) claim high recovery rates of up to 99% with their CBP-approved proprietary software. Logistics giants like DHL Global Forwarding and Flexport offer drawback services as part of broader trade solutions, while specialized consultants like TecEx and Tradewin focus on specific segments or geographic markets. Alliance Drawback Services and Livingston International represent the traditional consulting model, offering expertise-heavy approaches that promise high recovery rates but require significant manual oversight. Meanwhile, e-commerce focused players like Swap Commerce target high-volume returns using SKU and inventory tracking. The New Guard: AI-First Approaches to Trade Tech The current funding environment reflects broader investor enthusiasm for AI applications in traditionally manual sectors. AI startups received fifty-three percent of all global venture capital dollars invested in the first half of 2025, with trade technology representing a small but growing slice. The competitive dynamics are revealing. New entrants are targeting different stages of the trade process: Caspian focuses on financial recovery, on compliance, and others like Revenir AI on workflow automation. Together, they may challenge incumbents like OCR and J.M. Rodgers by offering faster, more streamlined alternatives to legacy systems.. This division of labor suggests the market is large enough to support multiple approaches, but also highlights the complexity of trade operations that no single solution can fully address. The duty drawback space has long been dominated by traditional customs brokers and consulting firms who charge hefty fees—often 30 to 40 percent of recovered duties—for manual, labor-intensive processes. Established players like Tradewin and larger customs brokerage firms have built businesses around this complexity, but their methods haven't fundamentally changed in decades. On the technology side, Oracle can help businesses check the eligibility of imports for duty drawback and help automate key processes such as document gathering, regulatory compliance, and filing duty drawback requests through its Global Trade Management suite. Similarly, OCR's duty drawback software solution allows for easy access to the data needed to recover duty paid to CBP, while MIC-CUST revolutionizes duty refund management by facilitating refunds of up to ninety-nine percent on duties, taxes, and fees. However, even established players like Flexport are doubling down on AI integration. In February 2025, the logistics giant rolled out a suite of new AI-powered tools, signaling that incumbents aren't ceding ground to startups without a fight. This creates an interesting dynamic where venture-backed specialists must compete not just with traditional brokers like DHL Global Forwarding and Alliance Drawback Services, but with well-funded incumbents rapidly deploying their own AI solutions. What sets the newcomers apart is their AI-first approach and, in e.g. Caspian's case, its rare distinction as both a licensed customs broker and CBP-approved technology vendor—a regulatory combination that allows it to file claims directly with customs authorities, similar to established players like J.M. Rodgers Co. but with modern automation capabilities. The Trump Factor: Tariffs as Business Reality The stakes have never been higher. President Trump's renewed focus on tariffs has dramatically increased the amounts businesses pay in duties, making recovery programs more valuable than ever. New reciprocal tariffs that went into effect earlier this year — with new deals rolling in — add an additional 10 percent ad valorem duty on most imported goods, creating fresh opportunities for drawback claims. This environment has forced businesses to reconsider their trade strategies. 'Centralizing this data and executing these cost savings so quickly is a game-changer for our margins and inventory planning,' said Jim Franz, President, North America at UltiMaker, a Netherlands-based manufacturer of 3D printers that uses Caspian. The AI Promise and Its Limits There is a broader trend toward using artificial intelligence to automate traditionally manual financial processes, while companies like focus on preventing compliance issues through better data classification and documentation, companies like Caspian lean towards AI. Both approaches promise significant time savings—Caspian claims to submit duty drawback claims in days rather than months, while automates customs clearance procedures that traditionally require extensive manual review. This tension between automation and expertise reflects a broader challenge facing the entire venture-backed trade tech sector. Yet they must navigate the same fundamental challenge that has allowed established players like J.M. Rodgers Co. and TecEx to maintain high recovery rates: trade regulations that require nuanced interpretation. The competitive benchmarks are daunting. Traditional providers like J.M. Rodgers and Alliance Drawback Services claim recovery rates of up to 99% of duties, with the ability to file retroactive claims up to three to five years prior. For venture-backed startups to succeed, they must not only match these recovery rates but do so while offering superior user experience and faster processing times. Market Dynamics and Consolidation Pressure The influx of venture capital into trade technology suggests investors believe the market is ripe for disruption. Primary Venture Partners' Emily Man frames it as creating an entirely new software vertical: "tariff management." However, the market faces natural consolidation pressures. Large enterprises often prefer working with established customs brokers who handle their full trade compliance needs rather than point solutions. Meanwhile, smaller businesses that could benefit most from automated duty drawback often lack the trade volume to justify the cost of any solution. This creates a challenging middle market opportunity that challenger companies must navigate carefully. Success will likely depend on demonstrating clear ROI while building the regulatory credibility that only comes with time and successful claim filings. The Regulatory Wild Card Perhaps the biggest unknown is how U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will adapt to increased automation in duty drawback filing. CBP completed sixty-seven audits in May that identified one hundred thirty-nine million dollars in duties and fees owed to the U.S. government, suggesting heightened scrutiny of all trade-related filings. While CBP has approved select technology vendors, the agency's capacity to handle a surge in automated claims remains untested. If AI-powered platforms dramatically increase filing volumes, it could create processing bottlenecks or trigger additional regulatory requirements. 'Long-term, we see ourselves as a strategic partner in modernizing U.S. trade infrastructure,' Sherlock says. 'We're helping businesses take advantage of export incentives to grow GDP and improve profitability for US-based inventory and manufacturing.' Looking Forward: Promise and Peril The emergence of AI-powered duty drawback solutions reflects a broader transformation in how businesses approach international trade costs. As tariffs become a more permanent feature of the economic landscape, tools that help companies optimize their trade expenses will likely see continued demand. Yet the industry faces fundamental questions about scalability, regulatory adaptation, and whether technology can truly solve problems rooted in policy complexity. Success will depend not just on technical capability, but on building trust with both customers and regulators in a field where mistakes can be costly. The billions of dollars in annual unclaimed duties represents a massive opportunity—but it also reflects the entrenched complexity that has kept money on the table for decades. Whether AI can finally unlock this value remains one of the most intriguing tests of automation's promise in financial services. For businesses struggling with rising tariff costs, the answer can't come soon enough. But in a field where regulatory compliance and financial recovery intersect, the path forward may prove more challenging than the technology alone suggests.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: By likening Nigel Farage to Jimmy Savile, Peter Kyle has handed Reform a free gift
Just when Nigel Farage and his tiny parliamentary party were beginning to be exposed as shrill and clueless, Peter Kyle, one of the most promising cabinet ministers, handed them a free gift. By saying that the Reform leader is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile', Kyle destroys his own arguments for the Online Safety Act. The attempt to link Farage with a notorious child sex abuser is gratuitous and offensive. It makes Kyle seem desperate, and allows Farage to pose as the wronged party. Farage's criticisms of the Act seem more credible after Kyle's outburst than before. It is surprising that Kyle has chosen to use this slur when Labour people were so indignant – and rightly so – when Boris Johnson used it against Keir Starmer. That was when Johnson was desperate: Sue Gray's report on lockdown parties in Downing Street had just been published and Johnson wanted some way of deflecting attention. His attack on Starmer had nothing to do with Gray's report. It was an aside referring to Starmer's time as director of public prosecutions, during which, Johnson said, 'he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out'. But it was more relevant than Kyle's attack on Farage. It is factually correct that the Crown Prosecution Service failed to prosecute Savile when Starmer was in charge, and it is unclear whether it could have done more to bring Savile to justice at the time. But Farage has nothing to do with Savile – at all. Kyle's attempt to smear the Reform leader was phrased thus on Sky News: 'If people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Nothing could be better calculated to distract from the real issue, which is whether Farage's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act is a sensible one. The Reform rhetoric about 'authoritarian' and 'dystopian' legislation is overdone, and Farage admitted yesterday that he didn't know how he would protect children online instead. But rather of exposing the weakness of Farage's arguments, Kyle allowed his opponent to protest on X that his comment was 'disgusting' and to demand an apology. Kyle responded: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' This is a terrible way to conduct a public debate. There are well-founded concerns about the Online Safety Act, which seems to put unworkable obligations on non-profit-making websites while doing little to ensure that the big tech companies behave more responsibly. A lot of well-informed people said it was badly drafted legislation even before it was passed by the Conservative government two years ago. Kyle is now overseeing the coming into effect of provisions of the Act relating to age-verification, and instead of acting on the concerns that have been expressed, he has ploughed ahead – in effect accusing anyone who has doubts, including for example Ella Dorn of the New Statesman, of being aligned with Savile. When Johnson gratuitously dragged Savile's name into his attempt to save his disintegrating premiership, the disgust at his deliberate attempt to invoke conspiracy theories driven by fears of paedophilia was felt across the political spectrum. Munira Mirza, Johnson's adviser who was consulted in advance, begged him not to do it, and resigned when he did. Kyle should not be using the same disreputable tactic, which not only speaks volumes about this government's self-confidence but also allows Reform off the hook. Only this morning, Sarah Pochin, Reform's newest MP, was struggling to explain what her party's policy on small boats actually is. All she could propose was that Britain should 'do something drastic', by which she seemed to suggest that we should let migrants drown in the Channel. If the next election really is a fight between Labour and Reform, Labour must fight it better than this.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
CBA cuts jobs amid AI chatbot rollout
The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) has announced the termination of 45 positions within its call centres following the introduction of an AI chatbot designed to handle customer inquiries. The bank has communicated to the impacted employees that consultations are ongoing regarding the job cuts, according to Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). CBA announced it is investing more than A$2bn ($1.30bn) in its operations, including frontline teams and technology services, which may result in "some roles and work can change," reported Reuters. The Finance Sector Union (FSU) has expressed discontent with the decision, advocating for the retraining of affected workers to transition into new roles that utilise AI technology. The CBA stated that it has recruited more than 9,000 individuals in the past year and currently has approximately 670 vacancies within its retail banking services and frontline teams. CBA spokesperson was quoted by ABC as saying: 'To meet the changing needs of our customers, like many organisations, we review the skills we need and how we're organised to deliver the best customer experiences and outcomes. That means some roles and work can change 'Our priority is to explore opportunities for redeployment and to support affected employees with care, dignity and respect throughout the process.' Last week, the CBA informed the FSU about the job reductions, marking a significant moment as it is reportedly the first instance where a bank has attributed job cuts directly to AI implementation. The bank has dismissed claims that these job losses are linked to offshoring, asserting that it plans to provide reskilling opportunities for those affected. A report from CSIRO indicates that 68% of Australian businesses have adopted AI technologies, leading to a notable shift in customer service roles, with many being replaced by chatbots and virtual assistants. "CBA cuts jobs amid AI chatbot rollout" was originally created and published by Retail Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
