PropNex faces 2 lawsuits from property buyers who were penalised over ‘99-to-1' deals
PropNex faces 2 lawsuits from property buyers who were penalised over '99-to-1' deals
SINGAPORE – Real estate agency PropNex Realty is being sued by private property buyers who were penalised by the taxman for using the so-called '99-to-1' arrangement to reduce the additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD) on their purchases.
The property agents and law firms involved in the transactions have also been sued.
In one case, a couple have sued PropNex, property agent Amos Koh and law firm CK Tan Law Corporation.
Mr Kevin Rahim, 28, and Ms Jessica Tjitra, 32, are claiming a sum of nearly $850,000 that they had to pay the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) over their purchase of a unit at Riviere condominium.
In the other case, Mr Melvin Li, 43, has sued PropNex, property agent Ian Sng and law firm City Law.
Mr Li is claiming a sum of nearly $1.2 million he had to pay Iras over his purchase of a 1 per cent stake in his father's condo unit at Piccadilly Grand and in his mother's condo unit at Pullman Residences.
In both cases, the buyers contended that they had relied on the representations made by property agents about the legality of the 99-to-1 arrangement.
PropNex denied that it should be held liable for the acts of the property agents.
ABSD is an extra tax on property purchases that applies to Singaporeans who already own a home, and to permanent residents and foreigners.
The 99-to-1 structure was often used as a tax avoidance arrangement by buyers to reduce the rightful ABSD payable.
The arrangement typically involves a first-time buyer purchasing a property and, within a very short period of time, selling a 1 per cent share of the property to a person who owns another property.
It was used by those who already own a home to reduce the ABSD they pay as co-owner of an additional property.
The Straits Times reported in May 2024 that Iras was set to claw back about $60 million in ABSD and surcharges after it uncovered 166 cases of private property purchases that involved the use of the 99-to-1 or similar arrangements to dodge ABSD.
Couple said they were told it was legal
Mr Rahim and Ms Tjitra, who are from Indonesia, filed their lawsuit in the High Court in February 2025.
The couple, who are now permanent residents, are represented by Mr Gavin Neo of WongPartnership.
They said in their statement of claim that Mr Koh had told them the 99-to-1 method was a legal and workable structure to reduce the ABSD payable.
In July 2022, Ms Tjitra bought the condo unit in her sole name for $3.3 million, shortly after she obtained permanent residency.
The ABSD rate for PRs buying their first property was 5 per cent, compared with 30 per cent for foreigners.
The following month, she sold a 1 per cent share of the flat to Mr Rahim, who paid the 30 per cent rate on only this share.
In August 2024, Iras notified the couple that the arrangement amounted to illegal stamp duty avoidance.
Iras imposed a 30 per cent ABSD rate on the entire purchase price, as well as a 5 per cent surcharge.
In his defence filed in court, Mr Koh admitted making the alleged representations.
He said he learnt of this method from presentation slides prepared by CK Tan Law, and he believed it was a legitimate way to save on stamp duty.
PropNex contended in its defence that Mr Koh was an independent contractor, and not its employee.
It said he undertook that he would be personally liable for any unauthorised acts, wrongdoing, misrepresentations or fraud committed in the course of his work.
The agency added that Mr Koh did not act for the couple; his commissions were paid solely by the developer of Riviere for introducing buyers and brokering sales.
The law firm argued that the possibility that Iras could exercise its powers under the law to vary such an arrangement and impose a surcharge did not make it an illegal arrangement.
The case is scheduled for an administrative hearing on April 30.
Man said he was assured by property agent
Mr Li's lawsuit was filed in January 2025. He is represented by Mr Quek Mong Hua of Lee and Lee.
Mr Sng was the property agent who handled the sale of Mr Li's parents' house and the subsequent purchase of a semi-detached house in the names of Mr Li's brother and sister-in-law.
Mr Li said his parents, who lived with his brother, wanted properties of their own, but were not eligible for a bank loan.
According to Mr Li, his parents were advised by Mr Sng to each buy a unit at the Piccadilly Grand and Pullman Residences.
Mr Sng suggested that Mr Li then buy 1 per cent of both properties, which would enable him to take out a loan in his name.
Mr Li asked Mr Sng over WhatsApp if the transactions were legal, and the agent assured him that he did only 'legal stuff' because his livelihood was at stake.
Mr Li said Mr Sng also told him that the transactions were proposed by his manager and teammates from PropNex, and that they never had any issues.
To further assure him, Mr Sng recommended City Law to act for him and his parents.
Mr Li later sought clarification from Iras after he became aware that it was investigating similar deals.
Iras said his transactions contravened the law, and he was found liable to pay the full ABSD on both properties – at a 17 per cent rate for one, and 25 per cent for the other – as well as surcharges.
A joint defence filed by PropNex and Mr Sng noted that he acted as the marketing salesperson for the developers of both Piccadilly Grand and Pullman Residences.
The defence stated that Mr Sng told Mr Li he had learnt about a method commonly referred to as the '100-sell-1' method – another name for the 99-to-1 arrangement – from training sessions conducted by law firms and bankers.
After checking with law firms including City Law on whether the method could be used for this situation, Mr Sng passed the information to Mr Li.
Mr Sng denied making false representations.
City Law asserted in its defence that it did not advise or affirm that the transactions were legal.
The firm added that by the time it dealt with Mr Li, he and his parents had already committed to the purchases using the 99-to-1 arrangement.
The case is understood to be headed for mediation.
Selina Lum is senior law correspondent at The Straits Times.
Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
16 minutes ago
- Business Times
Changi Travel Services cuts 30 staff amid market shifts
[SINGAPORE] Changi Travel Services (CTS) is laying off 30 staff as part of an ongoing restructuring process to tackle changing market conditions, it said on Thursday (Aug 21). Affected staff will receive a severance package of four weeks for every year of employment, with no minimum service period. A company spokesperson said: 'The decision was made after careful consideration and is aimed at strengthening CTS' positioning and ensuring sustainable growth. 'We are committed to supporting the affected employees through this transition, including working with relevant parties to identify suitable vacancies in Changi Airport and elsewhere.' CTS is a Changi Airport Group subsidiary that provides foreign exchange and other services to travellers. The firm did not elaborate on which business segments were affected by the layoffs or changed market conditions that spurred the move. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The spokesperson added that the company's focus is now on executing its strategy to ensure sustainable growth after the restructuring exercise. Azman Osman, president of the Attractions, Resorts & Entertainment Union (AREU), which is affiliated to the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), said on Aug 21 that CTS is not a unionised company. However, he added: 'In retrenchment exercises where there are union members working in non-unionised companies, NTUC's affiliated unions or associations will extend assistance to these members should they be affected by the exercises.' The union will provide assistance and resources to any affected union member, including connecting them to networks such as NTUC's Employment and Employability Institute (e2i). Eligible union members can also tap the Union Training Assistance Programme to offset training costs if they need skills upgrading. More broadly, Azman said Singaporeans and permanent residents can tap e2i's job matching services, career coaching and skills upgrading advisory services. Affected workers who are Singaporeans can also receive more employment support through the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support scheme by participating in e2i's job search activities, he added. The scheme provides temporary financial support of up to S$6,000 for up to six months for involuntarily unemployed individuals. 'The scheme serves to increase the chances of finding a job that makes better use of job seekers' skills and experiences,' Azman said.
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Changi Travel Services cuts 30 staff amid market shifts
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Changi Travel Services is a subsidiary of Changi Airport Group that provides foreign exchange and other services to travellers. SINGAPORE – Changi Travel Services (CTS) is laying off 30 staff as part of an ongoing restructuring process to tackle changing market conditions, it said on Aug 21. Affected staff members will receive a severance package of four weeks for every year of employment, with no minimum service period. A company spokesperson said: 'The decision was made after careful consideration and is aimed at strengthening CTS' positioning and ensuring sustainable growth. 'We are committed to supporting the affected employees through this transition, including working with relevant parties to identify suitable vacancies in Changi Airport and elsewhere.' CTS is a subsidiary of Changi Airport Group that provides foreign exchange and other services to travellers. The firm did not elaborate on which business segments were affected by the layoffs or changed market conditions that spurred the move. The spokesperson added that the company's focus is now on executing its strategy to ensure sustainable growth after the restructuring exercise. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore Parliament releases seating plan for 15th term: Find out who is sitting where Singapore Courier tip-off leads to HSA seizure of Kpods, drugs in Tampines and Grange Road raids Singapore District judge signals sterner penalties for vaping offences, cites public concern Singapore S'pore students shine in Paris with record medal haul at history Olympiad Singapore 3 people taken to hospital after fire at Bukit Purmei flat Singapore Playing down Tuaspring's energy business the core of Hyflux's investor relations strategy: Defence Singapore Alleged vape seller faces new charge after he was found with more than 190 Kpods Singapore Police looking for car driver after hit-and-run incident with lorry in Kallang Mr Azman Osman, president of the Attractions, Resorts & Entertainment Union, which is affiliated to the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), said on Aug 21 that CTS is not a unionised company. However, he added: 'In retrenchment exercises where there are union members working in non-unionised companies, NTUC's affiliated unions or associations will extend assistance to these members should they be affected by the exercises'. The union will provide assistance and resources to any affected union member, including connecting them to networks such as the NTUC's Employment and Employability Institute. Eligible union members can also tap into the Union Training Assistance Programme to offset training costs if they need skills upgrading. More broadly, Mr Azman said Singaporeans and permanent residents can tap e2i's job matching services, career coaching and skills upgrading advisory services. Affected workers who are Singaporeans can also receive more employment support through the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support scheme by participating in e2i's job search activities, he added. The scheme provides temporary financial support of up to $6,000 over up to six months for involuntarily unemployed individuals. 'The scheme serves to increase the chances of finding a job that makes better use of jobseekers' skills and experiences,' Mr Azman said.
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
Fullerton Healthcare Corp co-founder admits approving falsified claims of over $213k
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox David Sin pleaded guilty to six counts of falsification of accounts. SINGAPORE – One of the three co-founders of Fullerton Healthcare Corporation (FHC) approved six expense claim forms submitted by another co-founder, which involved falsified sums totalling over $213,000. David Sin, 46, approved the claims on multiple occasions in 2019, despite knowing that Daniel Chan Pai Sheng, 51, had submitted them with the intent to defraud FHC, according to court documents. The prosecution, however, stressed that Sin did not enjoy financial gains and personal benefit from these offences. On Aug 21, he pleaded guilty to six counts of falsification of accounts. The third co-founder, Michael Tan Kim Song, 51, was not involved in these offences. All three men are Singaporeans. The court heard that FHC was in the business of investment holding, and had various subsidiaries, including Fullerton Healthcare Group (FHG) and Fullerton Health China. Deputy public prosecutors David Menon, Jonathan Tan and Ashley Chin stated in court documents that Tan and Chan were medical doctors by training. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore Parliament releases seating plan for 15th term: Find out who is sitting where Singapore 3 people taken to hospital after fire at Bukit Purmei flat Singapore Alleged vape seller faces new charge after he was found with more than 190 Kpods Singapore Police looking for car driver after hit-and-run incident with lorry in Kallang Life Bucking sluggish retail, Singapore brands commit to wowing with experience-driven physical stores Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE Singapore Continuing to ensure credibility non-negotiable for Straits Times: Editor Jaime Ho Singapore There's no 'I' in team: What PM Wong's National Day Rally message means for Singapore In 2010, the pair co-founded FHG, which provided healthcare solutions to corporations. Some time between 2010 and 2012, Tan approached Sin to invest in FHC. Sin then decided to do so in 2013 through a firm called Sin Capital Group, where he was chief executive at the time. In 2014, he employed Mr Tei Chu Pink, 45, to be the director of Sin Capital's investment team based in Hong Kong. Investigations revealed that four years later, Chan approached Mr Tei, a Malaysian, to claim certain business expenses from FHC. The DPPs said: 'Daniel (Chan) told (Mr Tei) that the business expenses would be paid from Fullerton Health China's accounts, using inflated entertainment invoices, and that Michael (Tan) had consented to the arrangement.' According to the prosecution, Chan also told Mr Tei that the payments were for 'consultancy services' provided by Collin Chiew, 57, who was the Singaporean chief executive of insurance broker Aon Singapore between January 2015 and July 2018. Mr Tei relayed this information to Sin, who consented to the arrangement. The DPPs told the court that in 2019, Chan submitted for Sin's approval six claim forms listing purported expenses of more than $334,000 in total, even though the actual expenses were less than half the amount - over $120,000. Sin approved the claims despite knowing that they had been inflated by more than $213,000. On Aug 21, the DPPs urged the court to sentence him to a fine of between $150,000 and $180,000. They said the amount involved was substantial, and that Sin was not the mastermind behind the offences. He is represented by lawyers Melanie Ho, Tang Shangwei and Neo Yi Ling, who pleaded for their client to be fined $120,000 instead. The team from WongPartnership said he 'trusted and assumed his co-founders had good reasons for deciding to pay Collin (Chiew) in such a manner'. They added: 'With the benefit of hindsight, (Sin) accepts that he ought to have done better and should not have turned a blind eye to the breach of corporate governance.' Sin is expected to be sentenced in the afternoon of Aug 21. Separately, he faces seven more charges for offences including graft. Without revealing any details, DPP Tan told the court that the prosecution intends to apply for him to be given a discharge amounting to an acquittal over these remaining charges. Individuals given such a discharge cannot be charged again over the same offences. In February 2024, the four Singaporean men - Sin, Chan, Tan and Chiew - were charged with offences including graft . The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau said in an earlier statement that at the time of the alleged offences, Sin was FHC's president, Chan was the president of Fullerton Health China and Tan was a director at FHG. They no longer hold the positions in the companies. The cases involving Chan, Tan and Chiew are still pending.
