Are the Scottish Greens descending into civil war?
In a social media campaign video, three activists - Ellie Gomersall, Iris Duane and Councillor Seonad Hoy - argue that "a fresh start" is needed, and that internal power has been "consolidated into a smaller and smaller group of people".They're critical of the time the Greens spent in government with the SNP, saying there was a lack of investment in communities during that period.I contacted all three to try and speak to them for this article but couldn't secure any interviews.Patrick Harvie spoke to me for 30 minutes near his office in Glasgow.He gave a passionate defence of the Bute House Agreement – the deal that took the party into government with the SNP between 2021 and 2024.The outgoing co-leader insisted that politics requires compromise, adding that "for a long time the Greens sometimes were guilty of - and sometimes even felt satisfied about - just saying 'we're right, everyone else is wrong'."Sometimes that can make activists feel satisfied. But it doesn't achieve very much. And I think to a lot of voters it comes across as smugness."He won't name names but says some individuals "never accepted the legitimacy of the decision on the Bute House Agreement and set out to try and undermine not just the position of the party but some of the individuals [involved]. That behaviour is out of order".
But one party insider, who wanted to remain anonymous, accused the Green leadership of using "a made-up tale about 'factions' to shore up their own position and drive out any minor dissent".They added that a lack of tolerating alternative views about the Bute House Agreement made the Greens look "petty".The disagreements go beyond this one selection battle in Glasgow.One vocal critic of the party leadership, Niall Christie, was a candidate in Glasgow at the general election last year.After complaints, he's been suspended as a member while candidate selections are under way. Some have questioned if there's a political motivation behind this development.The party refused to comment on this disciplinary matter.Another Green Party figure told me that despite a "happy clappy" reputation there's been a "civil war" going on for some time, with members leaking material to journalists and briefing against one another.They said the culture had become "much worse" since the recent leadership contest began. And they claimed that arguments framed as policy disagreements were actually more to do with "personal beefs".The same individual was critical of the "Glasgow Faction", saying these activists believed "if we go out with our banners and flags eventually we'll win. They think we can activate the proletariat, but that's not how the world works".
These divisions may well spill into the ongoing leadership contest.Current co-leader Lorna Slater is seeking re-election to one of the two positions. And fellow MSPs Gillian Mackay and Ross Greer have also launched bids.Mr Greer is close to outgoing party leader Patrick Harvie and was involved in the drafting of the Bute House Agreement. Ms Mackay said she was "upset" when that deal came to an end.The co-leaders don't have to be MSPs, and some are predicting a challenge from a grassroots candidate.The Scottish Greens are perhaps suffering from the inevitable consequences of their own success.Nowadays they're an important political party - with a taste for government and a cohort of engaged activists.Political relevance can often intensify internal disagreements. There's more at stake for each "side" in these disputes.But do these internal squabbles really matter to anyone beyond the 7,000 members the party has?When you cast an eye over at the polls looking ahead to the Holyrood election in 2026, it's looking likely that any government will need the support of at least one other party.The Greens have the potential to be kingmakers. And whether or not they will support a government – and the terms on which they will do so – could ultimately have a much broader effect.The direction this party takes in the coming months, and how these arguments play out, may have an impact well beyond the Scottish Green membership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Homeowners could pay new property tax instead of stamp duty
Homeowners with properties worth more than £500,000 could have to pay annual property taxes under radical plans to replace stamp duty. The Treasury is reportedly considering a proportional property tax in the budget this autumn, according to The Guardian. Rather than paying stamp duty (which ranges from 2 per cent on the purchase price between £125,000 and £250,000, through to 12 per cent on the portion of the price above £1.5 million) anyone buying a home worth more than £500,000 would face an annual tax. For years there have been calls to overhaul stamp duty, which raised £13.8 billion for the Treasury in the 2024-25 tax year but has been criticised for putting homeowners off moving. There are no firm details to the proposal, but it was reported that the Treasury was looking at suggestions from the centre-right think tank Onward, which would involve homeowners with properties worth more than £500,000 paying a 0.54 per cent annual tax on any value above £500,000. Professor Tim Leunig from the London School of Economics, who came up with the proposals last August, said: 'The way Britain taxes households is both impractical and unfair. Stamp duty raises transaction costs, preventing people from moving for new job opportunities, and undermines growth.' Any home worth more than £1 million would pay 0.81 per cent on the portion of its value over that threshold. Onward's proposals were that the new tax would not be applied retrospectively but would be paid by anyone who bought a home after it was introduced. The 5 per cent stamp duty surcharge for additional homes would remain and those owners would not pay annual levies. Leunig also proposed scrapping council tax and replacing it with a 0.44 per cent annual property tax levied by local authorities on house value between £800 and £500,000 (a maximum of £2,196 a year). Then you would pay 0.54 per cent on the portion above £500,000 to the government, instead of stamp duty. Someone with a £650,000 home would pay £3,006 a year — 0.44 per cent of £499,200 (the maximum £2,196) to their council and then another £810 a year to the government. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Treasury officials are reportedly considering a local property tax 'in the medium term' according to the Guardian, while replacing stamp duty could come earlier. The campaign group Fairer Share is calling for the abolition of stamp duty and council tax and for them to be replaced with a flat 0.48 per cent annual property tax. Andrew Dixon from Fairer Share said the reported plans would be a 'step in the right direction'. 'We look forward to working closely with the government to deliver long-overdue reform — creating a modern property tax system that supports local services, reflects real property values, and shares the burden more fairly across homeowners,' he said. The Times reported in May that 83 per cent of homeowners in England would pay less under a 0.48 per cent annual property tax than they did under the council tax system. The biggest losers would be those in London and the south east according to the estate agency Hamptons. House prices in those areas have gone up the most since April 1991, when council tax bands were set based on property values. Dixon said: 'By taxing property transactions, stamp duty discourages homeowners from moving — be it an older couple downsizing or a growing family upsizing. Removing it would lead to a more effective use of housing.' Some 85 per cent of homeowners in England and Wales were 'under-occupiers' with one or more spare bedrooms, according to a survey of more than 4,300 by Barclays. Of those, 73 per cent were over 45, and 37 per cent were over 65. The proportion of homebuyers who were 45 or older has fallen from 45 per cent in the 2015-16 tax year to 39 per cent in 2023-24, according to the estate agency Savills. Some 41 per cent of 2,000 homeowners aged over 55 polled by the estate agency Jackson-Stops said they would downsize within two years if stamp duty was reduced or removed. David Fell from Hamptons said: 'Who is better off will come down to how closely the government chooses to follow any recommendations. But I think in response to the general principle, the shift would probably cut the cost of buying the most expensive homes, but add to the annual cost of ownership, particularly given the artificially low levels of council tax charged by many places that have the most expensive house prices. 'The impact of a change to the system would probably depend on the level at which the rates were set, and the length of time it takes for the higher ownership charges to outweigh existing stamp duty and council tax bills.' The Treasury said it did not comment on speculation about the budget.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Starmer a ‘patriot' who backs flying the England flag, says Downing Street
Sir Keir Starmer is a 'patriot' who backs people flying the England flag, Downing Street has said. The Prime Minister's official spokesman insisted Sir Keir believed that pride in his country was 'an important thing' after two councils vowed to remove English or British flags. Local authorities in Tower Hamlets, east London, and Birmingham have both pledged to remove Union and St George's flags flown from lamp posts during the past fortnight. And on Monday, Reform-led council Worcestershire county council claimed that hanging British flags from lamp posts could put lives at risk. Challenged on the actions of the two councils, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I haven't asked him about specific cases of specific councils. 'But what the Prime Minister has always talked about is pride in being British, his patriotism in that – not least with the Lionesses in the Euros – and patriotism will always be an important thing to him.' The spokesman was then asked whether Sir Keir thought people should put up English and British flags, and replied: 'Absolutely. Patriotism, putting up English flags… We put up English flags all around Downing Street every time the English football team, the women's and men's, are around.' Downing Street went on to emphasise that the Prime Minister was not familiar with events in Birmingham or Tower Hamlets, adding: 'It's a matter for those councils. But when it comes to the PM being a patriot, he's been clear it's important to him in the past. 'The PM's always been clear about his pride in Britain, reflected in the fact we often have the St George's flag, and other flags, flying in Downing Street.' On Monday, Worcestershire county council became the third to express opposition to the flags when a spokesman said St George and Union flags hung from lamp posts in Wythall, a village south of Birmingham, risked endangering pedestrians and motorists. The spokesman told The Telegraph that 'lamp columns on the highway should not have anything attached to them' without its consent. 'This is to ensure that work can be carried out as quickly and safely as possible to the columns, that no damage is caused which could cost money to repair, that visibility isn't affected and no electrical hazards are caused,' the spokesman said. 'Those attaching anything to lamp columns could also be putting their own lives at risk, as well as those of passers-by and motorists.' The remarks drew a furious reaction from Cllr Jo Monk, the council's leader, who said she supported flying flags from lamp posts. 'In Worcestershire, we are proud of our English and British identities,' she said. 'I of course support flying both flags proudly on lamp posts throughout the county. Our national flags are a symbol of our national pride, and I will champion any effort that celebrates our nation.' Nigel Farage, the Reform leader, said it was 'not true' that the council would take down the flags. He said: 'A council press officer did this without authority. Radical reform of local government is needed.' Jacob Young, who is behind the flag campaign in Wythall, said he wanted to 'cover every street' in the village 'with our beautiful St George's cross'. But other local residents have been filmed taking down some of the flags. 'You're always going to get the odd few out of thousands in every community which in this case are calling it racist and taking it upon themselves to take the flags down,' said Mr Young. 'This is not racist, never has been, never will be. We have members of the community of all ethnicities and religions stopping by and praising what we are doing, so please don't call this racist. We are just patriotic and should be flying our beautiful flag.' The remarks came after Tower Hamlets, run by the pro-Gaza party Aspire, said it would remove any St George's flags from council property, including lamp posts, 'as soon as possible'. The flags were put up in the borough as part of an online 'patriotism campaign' called Operation Raise the Colours. In Birmingham, the Labour-run council – which declared effective bankruptcy in 2023 and has been grappling with bin strikes for more than five months – claimed the flags put the lives of pedestrians and motorists 'at risk'. But the campaign in the West Midlands city has continued, and on Monday it emerged that six mini-roundabouts had been daubed with red paint to look like St George's flags. Critics have accused the two councils of 'two-tier bias' because Palestinian flags were not taken down for months after popping up in the aftermath of the start of the Israel-Hamas war. British and English flags have also been hoisted on streets across England, including in Swindon, Bradford, Newcastle and Norwich. Government guidance published in 2021 states: 'Flags are a very British way of expressing joy and pride. The government wants to see more flags flown, particularly the Union flag.' The guidance warns, however, that flags must not 'obscure or hinder the interpretation of official road, rail, waterway or aircraft signs, or otherwise make hazardous the use of these types of transport'.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Reform UK deputy Leicestershire County Council leader removed
The deputy leader of Leicestershire County Council has been removed from the role after three months in the UK's Joseph Boam has also been removed from position as cabinet member for adult social care, with a party source saying he would now be taking on an unspecified "new role".The 22-year-old was one of 25 Reform councillors elected to the authority in May's local on social media on Sunday, Boam said: "Despite the recent news, nothing's changed, I'll keep fighting for Whitwick at County Hall and doing everything I can to help get a Reform UK government and Nigel Farage as our next prime minister." County council leader Dan Harrison told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) he would not comment on the matter until after the Reform group had met later this to the LDRS, Boam previously said: "I haven't stepped down from any role. I am no longer deputy leader or in cabinet. But have been offered a cabinet support role which I'm inclined to take." After winning 25 of the 55 seats on the council, Reform took control from the Conservatives to form a minority administration.A Reform UK source added: "Joseph deserves thanks for his role in helping to establish the Reform group at Leicestershire County Council and we wish him well, as he moves into a new role, where he will continue to support the group's efforts at County Hall."The Leicestershire Conservative group - the main opposition on the authority - has now branded Reform UK's local leadership a "shambles". Their leader Deborah Taylor said it was "no surprise" to her Boam "has been shown the door after just three months".She added: "He was wholly unqualified for such a critical role and lacked the experience or judgement to bring anything of value to the position. "Those of us who have led this council know that it takes at least six to 12 months for even the most capable new councillor to properly learn their portfolio, and that's with the benefit of mentoring from seasoned colleagues."A new deputy leader and cabinet member for adult social care is expected to appointed in due course.
