
Airbnb hosts blindsided by luxury new feature offering guests access to private chefs, massages and glam
The travel-booking company announced in May that guests can purchase add-ons to enhance their getaway.
Under the AirBnb app's 'Services' tab, customers can hire professionals including photographers, hairstylists, personal trainers, massage therapists and chefs that come directly to the property they booked.
Those offering up their talents have been vetted and approved by Airbnb. They must submit their credentials before they are allowed on the platform.
But many people who have listed their houses, condos and apartments on the site feel they are getting the short end of the stick because they don't get a cut of Airbnb's profit from it and are not notified when someone books a service at their property.
'Most hosts don't need more headaches, and that's what this feels like,' Rhonda Stephens, who lists her historic farmhouse near Nashville on the app, told the WSJ.
Stephens has noted on her listing that services are banned. And while all hosts have the choice to opt out of the add-ons, some believe this could drive visitors away.
Orlando-based massage therapist Marie Moreau was contacted by AirBnb to see if she wanted her business promoted on the platform.
She had since booked several sessions through the short-term accommodation site, which she says went fantastically.
Despite her success so far, Moreau said she understands why some hosts are turned off by allowing people to provide services in their homes.
'But the more restrictions you put on something, the more it doesn't really look appealing to the public,' she told the WSJ.
Amy Maynor, who has three rentals in Jacksonville, Florida, said despite verification from AirBnb, she still opted out.
She has earned super-host status, meaning she has been highly ranked on the app, and worries her reputation could be tarnished by a reckless third party.
Maynor, who has privately arranged excursions and other offerings for her guests, said their is no way for her to independently check if providers are screened, licensed or insured.
Her home owner's insurance explicitly applies to guests, but not those hired through AirBnb.
She is also deterred from the idea because some of the service choices listed, such as massages, may simply make a mess.
'I don't want to get the oils all over the couch or the beds, or what have you,' she told the outlet.
AirBnb said professionals must have liability insurance to operate under them. The company's own Aircover policy also included this kind of insurance, the WSJ reported.
Regardless of Airbnb's reassurance about providers, infuriated hosts have taken to social media to express their discontent.
In a Reddit forum devoted to hosts, one person wrote: 'I actually don't want to provide any services or have anything to do with any of this.
'I don't like the idea of anyone coming to my place to offer any services and I am pretty happy not to deal much with the guests and they seem like it that way too.'
Another said that Airbnb has failed to consider that some properties may have limitations.
'Airbnb just doesn't seem to grasp that everyone's property is different and has different needs,' they wrote.
'Some have strict parking restrictions. Some have strict septic conditions. Some have neighbors that are nice enough but just don't want to be pushed too far.'
'Another issue that comes to mind is that if they provide a poor service,' one person chimed in.
'The guest might take it out on Airbnb hosts and rate our listing poorly because they will bundle the whole thing into one negative experience.'
CEO Brian Chesky introduced 'Services' and re-introduced 'Experiences' in May as a part of the company's mission to handle all things travel-related.
He previously announced his intention to turn his business into the 'Airbnb of anything.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
NIH executive fired amid allegations of steering $3.3 million contract to company that named his wife as a potential staffer
A senior leader at the National Institutes of Health has been fired as officials investigate a multi-million-dollar contract with a company that named his wife among potential staff. NIH Chief Operating Officer Eric Schnabel was escorted out of the agency's headquarters in Bethesda, Maryland, on Monday, The Washington Post reports, citing three anonymous officials with knowledge of the incident. He was hired in April, and his departure was so abrupt that some of his employees still showed up to meetings scheduled with him for Tuesday, only to discover he had been fired, according to the outlet. Eric Schnabel was removed from his post as the agency investigates a $3.3 million contract to Argo Chasing, a Louisiana company that named his wife, Trish Duffy Schnabel, on a list of prospective staff, the Post reports. The NIH approved the contract earlier this month. The award is designed to support research on several topics, including counterintelligence, strategic research security and autism, the Post reports. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. vowed to direct agency resources toward researching autism earlier this year. Trish Schnabel is a licensed professional counselor. She would have been among those supported by the contract, but she would not have received the full $3.3 million, the anonymous officials told the Post. She was being onboarded as a senior analyst in the company's Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, the Post reports, citing an internal company document. Trish Schnabel also appears to have competed on the U.S. game show Wheel of Fortune in January 2020, winning tens of thousands of dollars, including $50,000 from the bonus round. Eric Schnabel joined the NIH in April, as Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency was gutting federal agencies. He came to the NIH after more than 20 years in the U.S. Army. An NIH spokesperson told The Independent the agency does not comment on personnel matters. Argo Chasing also declined to comment. The NIH saw widespread cuts to their agency this spring, forcing them to abruptly cancel more than 2,000 research grants valued at more than $12 billion. These cuts have impacted patients in clinical trials, with the agency forced to cut off medication regimens to some participants or leave them with unmonitored device implants, the Associated Press reports. Nearly 100 NIH staff sent a letter to the agency's leader, Jay Bhattacharya, last month expressing concerns with the cuts. "The life-and-death nature of our work demands that changes be thoughtful and vetted. We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political momentum over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," the letter reads. "Many have raised these concerns to NIH leadership, yet we remain pressured to implement harmful measures,' it continues. 'Today, we come directly to you."


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pie Company that appeared on ‘Shark Tank' files for bankruptcy
A gourmet pie company that pitched to billionaires on Shark Tank earlier this year has filed for bankruptcy amid a pending lawsuit. Joyebells, a family-run bakery in Virginia that launched in 2019, initially achieved success thanks to a string of local media appearances following its launch, culminating in a 2022 appearance on Today. The bakery's biggest hits were its sweet potato, peach, and pumpkin pies. CEO Joye Berry-Moore took her pies to Shark Tank in February, and despite being praised for the quality of her baked goods, the sharks ultimately decided not to invest in the company. Now, just five months later, Joyebells has filed for Chapter 11 after being sued by its main lender for defaulting on a $350,000 loan, according to Richmond BizSense. On June 30, Locus Bank – formerly known as VCC Bank – filed the suit in Henrico Circuit Court, naming Joyebells LLC, Joye Berry-Moore, and her husband, Eric Moore, as defendants. The bank states that it loaned Joyebells up to $350,000 in May 2023, but after the loan was renewed last year, the maturity date was set for May 11, 2025. On May 12, Locus sent the company a default notice and demanded payment from Joyebells, according to court filings. The bank is seeking a minimum of $344,500 from the pie company. Three days before the maturity date, Berry-Moore and her husband filed for personal bankruptcy, court records show, as seen by Richmond BizSense. In the court filing, the couple stated that their debts, totaling around $1.27 million, were a combination of business-related expenses and credit card debt. Two names that appeared, both claiming to be owed money, include the Internal Revenue Service, with a claim of $144,000, and Apple Valley Foods, a Minnesota pie manufacturer, which is owed $570,000. Berry-Moore's had credited her business with turning her life around after she went from being homeless to 'becoming a first-generation business owner.' 'I ran away from home at 14 years of age and remained homeless until age 17 years old until the end of my senior year of high school. I lived in abandoned houses and ate out of dumpsters in South Dallas, Texas,' she states on the company's website. However, the legal battle is not the first challenge experienced by the baked goods company. It previously faced problems in 2023 when over 315,000 of its peach pies were pulled from shelves after a manufacturing issue led to the pies being made with unripened peaches, according to Richmond Bizsense. This resulted in reduced profits as Joyebells only sold products through QVC in 2024.


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump calls it ‘highly unlikely' he'll fire Fed chair Powell after reportedly telling House GOP he ‘likely will soon'
Less than a day after telling a group of House Republicans that he planned to sack the head of America's independent central bank after months of grousing over interest rates he says are too high, President Donald Trump appeared to back down from the unprecedented move, telling reporters on Wednesday it was 'highly unlikely' that he would upend nearly a century of precedent by attempting to sack Federal Reserve Board of Governors Chair Jerome Powell. Speaking in the Oval Office during a media availability alongside the Crown Prince and Prime Minister of Bahrain, Trump was asked whether he was considering attempting to remove Powell from his position, a move that would potentially trigger months of litigation and spook financial markets. He replied with a derisive stemwinding set of remarks in which he assailed Powell for not pushing the central bank's board to cut interest rates, citing the European Central Bank's multiple rate cuts in recent months, and accusing Powell of only having assented to cuts during last year's election to benefit the Democratic candidate, former vice president Kamala Harris. 'The only time he cut him was just before the election to try and help Kamala or Biden, whoever the hell it was, because nobody really knew ... I think he does a terrible job. He's costing us a lot of money,' Trump said. But the president added later that he isn't planning to fire Powell. 'No, we're not planning on doing anything,' he said. 'So he's doing a lousy job. But no, I'm not talking about that. We get, fortunately, we get to make a change in the next, what, eight months or so, and we'll pick somebody that's good.'