Changes to bathing water status test will deny rivers protection, say critics
River activists have reacted with fury as details of the reforms were revealed on Wednesday.
In an unexpected move, ministers are imposing a feasibility test on any waterway where a community is seeking a bathing water designation. If water bodies are deemed too polluted to improve to at least 'sufficient' water quality they will not be given a designation.
River campaigners have said the restriction is very likely to exclude river sites from being granted bathing water status. No single stretch of river in England is in good overall health and the rivers that have bathing water status at the moment all record poor water quality, as a result of sewage and agricultural pollution, which will take time and investment by water companies to improve.
The EU-derived bathing water regulations are being used by campaigners as a driver to clean up toxic rivers, which suffer from sewage pollution and agricultural runoff.
When a waterway gets the status it is subjected to a much tougher testing regime by the Environment Agency to determine the level of faecal pollution at the site. Waterways are given the status: poor, sufficient, good or excellent.
Becky Malby of the Ilkley Clean River Group, who was behind the campaign to make part of the River Wharfe the first river to be designated as a bathing water area, said: 'We are shocked at the move to only designate waters that have the potential to meet sufficient water quality. Bathing status is awarded where people use rivers to protect them. This new restriction means that at many rivers in England where people paddle, play and swim there will be no information on water quality, and those rivers will not have to comply with bathing status requirement to reduce raw sewage pollution to 10 episodes a year.'
When the Wharfe received the designation in 2020, it was classed as being poor quality, she said. It has taken five years and a multimillion pound investment from Yorkshire Water to get to the stage where the river is expected be given sufficient or good status in the years to come.
Chris Coode, the chief executive of environmental charity Thames21, said other government changes to the rules such as testing bathing water sites all year round rather than just in the summer were a step in the right direction. But he joined Malby's criticism of the new feasibility test.
'This change would significantly reduce the chances of inland river sites achieving designation, diverting monitoring and investments to already clean sites and preventing essential improvements needed to make our rivers safe for swimming, paddling and playing,' he said.
Surfers Against Sewage also attacked the new feasibility test. Dani Jordan, the director of campaigns and communities, said: 'The proposed 'feasibility test' that deems some areas as too polluted to protect will feel like a snub to communities who are simply asking the government for help in tackling the pollution of their local bathing spots so that they can enjoy them safely.'
A government source said the changes were designed to ensure that 'poor' sites were only fully designated where it was feasible and proportionate to improve the water quality to 'sufficient' standards. The source said public health needed to be protected.
Under the changes, which cover England and Wales, the definition of 'bathers' will be expanded to include participants in watersports other than swimming, such as paddle boarders and surfers, the bathing water season will be extended to the whole year from its current term of May to September and multiple testing points will be created at the bathing water sites.
Emma Hardy, the water minister, said: 'Bathing water sites are the pride of local communities across the country. But safety and cleanliness is paramount, and we must go further and faster to open up our waterways for families to enjoy.'
Applications for bathing water status, which have been on hold during consultation over the changes, will reopen in May.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Feargal Sharkey's fishing club in Herts threatens legal action
An angling club whose members include singer and environmental campaigner Feargal Sharkey has threatened to take legal action if a river's water flow is not Magna Fishery (AMF) in Stanstead Abbotts, Hertfordshire has instructed lawyers over the Environment Agency's decision to reduce the flow of part of the River Undertones frontman Sharkey said the agency was engaged in "decimating the oldest populations of breeding brown trout in the River Lea". The Environment Agency said managing water levels was complex, and it constantly looked to "strike the right balance" between demands on resources. AMF, which was founded in 1841, said the decision to reduce the flow was "devastating the watercourse".Lawyers representing AMF said it was not clear why water was being abstracted, but it comes as England battles with droughts, prompting water companies to ask for permission to abstract water from rivers to help shore up to their letter sent via its lawyers, the Environment Agency began reducing the flow of the River Lea between Ware and Stanstead Abbotts on 3 is claimed that originally, about 156 million litres of water per day were flowing and this was cut to 66 million litres per day. AMF, as a holder of fishing rights in the area, said low water levels had previously led to significant damage to the aquatic ecosystem, and the club said wildlife and biodiversity were now being adversely club is represented by Leigh Day partner, Ricardo Gama, who said: "We have now sent a judicial review pre-action letter requesting that the agency urgently restores flow to our client's stretch of the river."The Environment Agency said there were many demands on river levels "from fisheries and nature, maintaining assets such as flood defences, prolonged dry weather, and public water supply and navigation"."We are committed to working with all communities and stakeholders to improve our rivers, within our legal duties," it added. Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
South Wales Guardian
2 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Woman, 88, fears her clifftop home will be lost to the sea if nothing is done
Jean Flick, 88, remarried in 1999 after the death of her first husband from cancer and later bought the seaside property in Thorpeness, Suffolk, with her second husband for a fresh start. She said they were 'very happy' in their coastal home before her second husband also died of cancer. Ms Flick said coastal erosion has worsened in recent years, with a section of her garden wall dropping to the beach below earlier this year. Another home in her street was demolished in 2022, and Ms Flick fears she could lose her home too. She and her daughter Frances Paul, who lives nearby, are trying to secure planning permission for rock-filled cages called gabions to be placed at the foot of the cliffs to slow the erosion. This would be a self-funded project, after previous defences were washed away. Ms Flick said she has been told that if the cliff edge gets to within five metres of the house, the property will have to be demolished. 'If nothing is done, if it comes within five metres of the house it will be pulled down,' she said. 'No compensation, we have to pay for it to be pulled down and my heart will just break because it's my home. 'I know a lot of people have this problem (on) the coast and I sympathise with them because until it happens to you you don't realise the emotion that goes into the fact you're going to lose your home. 'Without any compensation, where do you buy a house with nothing? 'Your home is gone and it's just devastating really.' The house was built in 1928 and had five bedrooms, now four after one was turned into a sitting room for the sea view. 'I just absolutely love it,' said Ms Flick, who is from a farming family. 'It's my home, I know the people, it's a village, we have lots of things going on in the village.' The property is around two miles south of Sizewell, where a new nuclear power station is being built. Ms Flick said that Storm Babet in 2023 'really ravaged' the cliffs. 'It really came with full force and I think that weakened the whole system along because it is sandy and there's no way of making sand stay still,' she said. 'Sand erodes.' The policy in the Shoreline Management Plan – developed by agencies including the Environment Agency and the local authority – for the stretch of coast is of managed realignment. This means measures might be allowed that slow – but do not stop – the erosion. 'We're working with the council and all the other people who are involved in it but it's a job getting them all to meet together and agree together,' said Ms Flick. 'We would have liked to have carried on with rocks as our next door neighbour has but we're not allowed that.' She said it was a 'case now of getting paperwork signed which seems to be taking ages' before they could get permission for gabion defences. 'It's very urgent because most days you see another little bit gone,' Ms Flick said. 'It's the erosion coming underneath that brings the top down. 'My wall that was there is now on the beach.' She continued: 'You just don't know. 'When I draw the curtains in the morning it can be there, when I draw them the next morning another piece can be gone.' Her daughter Ms Paul, a retired retail worker, said: 'Even the low tides now are quite high.' She said that as they would need to fund defences themselves, if permission were granted it would then be 'a question of what's it going to cost, is it possible'. An East Suffolk Council spokesperson said: 'Our key priority is to keep people safe while managing a rapidly eroding coastline at Thorpeness. 'We are supporting affected residents to explore potential temporary, short-term interventions that could be applied within an achievable timescale while plans are explored for any possible longer-term solutions. 'We have been working closely with the community for a number of years and due to recent accelerated rates of erosion the options available are now quite limited.' Defences must accord with the Shoreline Management Plan policy of managed realignment and would only be permitted to slow erosion, the spokesperson said. 'Therefore, it is important to consider alternatives to hard defences, to adapt and become more resilient to the risks of climate change and sea level rise.' The village of Thorpeness was developed as a fantasy holiday resort by a wealthy friend of Peter Pan author JM Barrie. Scottish playwright and barrister Glencairn Stuart Ogilvie had inherited an estate there in 1908, and Thorpeness was officially opened in 1913. Thorpeness, with its large artificial boating lake and Peter Pan-inspired islands, is the earlier of two complete planned resort villages in Britain built before the advent of holiday camps such as Butlin's. The other is Portmeirion in North Wales, designed by Clough Williams-Ellis between 1925 and 1975.
Glasgow Times
2 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Woman, 88, fears her clifftop home will be lost to the sea if nothing is done
Jean Flick, 88, remarried in 1999 after the death of her first husband from cancer and later bought the seaside property in Thorpeness, Suffolk, with her second husband for a fresh start. She said they were 'very happy' in their coastal home before her second husband also died of cancer. Jean Flick pictured with her late husband on the beach below their home in North End Avenue, Thorpeness, Suffolk (Family photo/PA) Ms Flick said coastal erosion has worsened in recent years, with a section of her garden wall dropping to the beach below earlier this year. Another home in her street was demolished in 2022, and Ms Flick fears she could lose her home too. She and her daughter Frances Paul, who lives nearby, are trying to secure planning permission for rock-filled cages called gabions to be placed at the foot of the cliffs to slow the erosion. This would be a self-funded project, after previous defences were washed away. Ms Flick said she has been told that if the cliff edge gets to within five metres of the house, the property will have to be demolished. 'If nothing is done, if it comes within five metres of the house it will be pulled down,' she said. 'No compensation, we have to pay for it to be pulled down and my heart will just break because it's my home. Jean Flick, 88, with daughter Frances, 60, in the garden at her home in Thorpeness, which is at risk of falling into the sea following coastal erosion (Joe Giddens/PA) 'I know a lot of people have this problem (on) the coast and I sympathise with them because until it happens to you you don't realise the emotion that goes into the fact you're going to lose your home. 'Without any compensation, where do you buy a house with nothing? 'Your home is gone and it's just devastating really.' The house was built in 1928 and had five bedrooms, now four after one was turned into a sitting room for the sea view. 'I just absolutely love it,' said Ms Flick, who is from a farming family. 'It's my home, I know the people, it's a village, we have lots of things going on in the village.' Jean Flick looking through family photos at her home (Joe Giddens/PA) The property is around two miles south of Sizewell, where a new nuclear power station is being built. Ms Flick said that Storm Babet in 2023 'really ravaged' the cliffs. 'It really came with full force and I think that weakened the whole system along because it is sandy and there's no way of making sand stay still,' she said. 'Sand erodes.' The policy in the Shoreline Management Plan – developed by agencies including the Environment Agency and the local authority – for the stretch of coast is of managed realignment. This means measures might be allowed that slow – but do not stop – the erosion. Jean Flick with daughter Frances in the garden at her home in Thorpeness (Joe Giddens/PA) 'We're working with the council and all the other people who are involved in it but it's a job getting them all to meet together and agree together,' said Ms Flick. 'We would have liked to have carried on with rocks as our next door neighbour has but we're not allowed that.' She said it was a 'case now of getting paperwork signed which seems to be taking ages' before they could get permission for gabion defences. 'It's very urgent because most days you see another little bit gone,' Ms Flick said. 'It's the erosion coming underneath that brings the top down. 'My wall that was there is now on the beach.' She continued: 'You just don't know. The garden wall is seen on the beach below (Joe Giddens/PA) 'When I draw the curtains in the morning it can be there, when I draw them the next morning another piece can be gone.' Her daughter Ms Paul, a retired retail worker, said: 'Even the low tides now are quite high.' She said that as they would need to fund defences themselves, if permission were granted it would then be 'a question of what's it going to cost, is it possible'. An East Suffolk Council spokesperson said: 'Our key priority is to keep people safe while managing a rapidly eroding coastline at Thorpeness. 'We are supporting affected residents to explore potential temporary, short-term interventions that could be applied within an achievable timescale while plans are explored for any possible longer-term solutions. 'We have been working closely with the community for a number of years and due to recent accelerated rates of erosion the options available are now quite limited.' Jean Flick with daughter Frances in her garden in Thorpeness (Joe Giddens/PA) Defences must accord with the Shoreline Management Plan policy of managed realignment and would only be permitted to slow erosion, the spokesperson said. 'Therefore, it is important to consider alternatives to hard defences, to adapt and become more resilient to the risks of climate change and sea level rise.' The village of Thorpeness was developed as a fantasy holiday resort by a wealthy friend of Peter Pan author JM Barrie. Scottish playwright and barrister Glencairn Stuart Ogilvie had inherited an estate there in 1908, and Thorpeness was officially opened in 1913. Thorpeness, with its large artificial boating lake and Peter Pan-inspired islands, is the earlier of two complete planned resort villages in Britain built before the advent of holiday camps such as Butlin's. The other is Portmeirion in North Wales, designed by Clough Williams-Ellis between 1925 and 1975.
