California sues to challenge Trump's $4 billion high-speed rail clawback
A lawsuit challenging the rescission as an "arbitrary and capricious" abuse of authority was filed on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles by the California High Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project.
Trump's announcement on Wednesday added yet another hurdle to the 16-year effort to link Los Angeles and San Francisco by a three-hour train ride, a project that would deliver the fastest passenger rail service in the United States.
Newsom said the move by Trump's Transportation Department came as the high-speed rail project was on the verge of laying track, with "active construction" under way on the initial 171-mile segment between Bakersfield and Merced in California's politically conservative Central Valley.
The governor said termination of the grants amounted to "petty, political retribution, motivated by President Trump's personal animus toward California and the high-speed rail project, not the facts on the ground."
The rail system, whose first $10 billion bond issue was approved by California voters in 2008, has built more than 50 major railway structures, including bridges, overpasses and viaducts, and completed more than 60 miles (97 km) of guideway, the governor said.
"California is putting all options on the table to fight this illegal action," Newsom said in a statement hours before the lawsuit was filed.
The funding cancellation marked the latest confrontation between the Republican president and a Democratic governor widely viewed as a leading contender for his party's 2028 White House nomination.
The two men have clashed over issues from transgender athletes and electric car rules to the use of National Guard troops during Los Angeles protests and even egg prices.
Ian Choudri, chief executive officer of the California High Speed Rail Authority, said that canceling the federal rail grants "without cause isn't just wrong, it's illegal."
"These are legally binding agreements, and the authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025," Choudri said, adding that the program has created some 15,500 jobs.
The Federal Railroad Administration issued a 315-page report last month finding the project was plagued by missed deadlines, budget shortfalls and questionable ridership projections.
Choudri's rail authority has called those conclusions "misguided," saying they failed to reflect "substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California."
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy chided the project for having failed to lay a single mile of track after spending $15 billion over 16 years. But Choudri said installing track is a final step after land acquisition, environmental clearances and construction of supporting structures.
Still, the project has faced its share of setbacks.
The San Francisco-to-Los Angeles route was initially supposed to be completed by 2020 for $33 billion. But the projected cost has since risen to $89 billion to $128 billion, and the start of service is estimated no sooner than 2030.
As designed, the system would feature electric locomotives traveling at up to 220 mph (354 kph), powered entirely by renewable energy. Planners said it would eliminate 200 million miles driven by vehicles on highways.
A second phase of the project called for extending the rail line north to Sacramento and south to San Diego. A separate project plans to link Los Angeles and Las Vegas with high-speed rail.
Duffy said on Thursday that he was confident the Trump administration will defeat any lawsuit challenging the department's move.
"We have to pull the plug," he told reporters outside the department's headquarters.
In 2021, Democratic President Joe Biden restored a $929 million grant for the project that Trump revoked in 2019 during his first term in office after calling the project a "disaster."
State Assembly member Corey Jackson, a Southern California Democrat who has questioned the project's soaring costs, said Newsom's call to fight the funding cut could galvanize support for Democrats from organized labor and voters in the area where the first railway jobs would be created despite its Republican leanings.
"The people of San Joaquin Valley will now know that their economic engine is coming from the Democratic Party," Jackson said. "This is also a message to our labor friends. Democrats continue to deliver these high-paying jobs. Republicans continue to try to kill them."
Rufus Jeffris, senior vice president of the Bay Area Council, a business-sponsored policy group in the San Francisco area, pointed to economic benefits associated with high-speed rail and called the funding cut unfortunate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
There is now a backlog of 27,000 student loan complaints at the Department of Education
The Department of Education's office for handling student loan complaints has a backlog of 27,000 after the Trump administration gutted the department of most of its staff. The Federal Student Aid ombudsman office handles hundreds of thousands of complaints each year from student loan borrowers experiencing issues with their loan information, loan servicer, school, and more. In 2024, the office received more than 200,000 complaints. But since the president signaled for Education Secretary Linda McMahon to essentially close the department, more than half of the workforce has been fired or offered buyouts. That has left the ombudsman office without enough staff to deal with cases, creating a backlog of 27,006 complaints. The office revealed its backlog in a letter sent from the department's Office of Legislation and Congressional Affairs to Senator Elizabeth Warren at the end of July. The letter was obtained by NBC News. 'The Trump administration is abandoning Americans who have been scammed by their student loan servicers or have problems with their loans,' Warren said in a statement to NBC News. 'I'm pushing Secretary McMahon because families across this country deserve answers about her efforts to dismantle the Department of Education,' Warren added. The Independent has asked the Department of Education for comment. Those having problems with their student loan lenders or federal loans with their schools have complained about difficulty in reaching the ombudsman office for several months – even before the Trump administration assumed power. In a Reddit thread, one person said that in December, a representative for the ombudsman's office worked directly for the loan lender and refused to escalate their complaint. The user said they eventually directly mailed a complaint to the complaint office, but never received a response. Another Reddit user echoed similar sentiments, saying a Federal Student Aid representative informed them that the ombudsman's office no longer had an operation number in December. Other Reddit threads complain of similar issues getting help through emails, calls, and physical mail. In February, one person said a representative in the ombudsman's office informed them that the office was no longer processing complaints and was told to direct complaints to their state ombudsman instead. But complaints about the office's pace have been around long before the Trump administration. Some Reddit threads raising concerns about the office's responses go back two years. Every year, the ombudsman's office is supposed to provide a review of its performance in the Federal Student Aid annual report. In 2022, the office said it received approximately 101,516 cases, and by the end of the fiscal year, 1,747 cases remained unassigned. But the number of complaints has dramatically increased each year since then, likely making it more difficult for people to respond. In the federal court case between McMahon and New York, in which the administration successfully requested the Supreme Court to allow the department to fire employees, a former employee who worked in the office of the ombudsman was already compiling a backlog in March. 'As of March 14, 2025, I had an open caseload of 322 complaints and the Ombudsman Office had a backlog of 16,000 complaints from borrowers awaiting research and resolution,' Rachel Gittleman said in her court filing. That means within four months, the office has received more than 11,006 complaints, which have gone ignored.
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘I'm willing to take the heat': Immigration lawyer is facing sanctions from Trump's DOJ over deportation case
The Department of Justice wants 'substantial monetary sanctions' against a California immigration attorney, marking a dramatic escalation of the Trump administration's threats to lawyers and law firms taking up cases against the president's agenda. Joshua Schroeder appears to be the first attorney to be singled out by Justice Department lawyers in court documents following the president's push to punish law firms and immigration attorneys over what he considers 'frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious' claims. 'I am not worried. I willingly take hard cases, and I'm not afraid to lose them,' Shroeder told The Independent on Thursday. 'When the motion came in, I didn't know it would be a story. I just kind of thought, 'well, I guess I'm gonna fight that too.'' The sanctions motion, first reported by Politico, followed Schroeder's attempts to block the government from deporting his client, a Hmong immigrant identified in court documents as V.L., who has a green card and immigrated to the United States as a child in 1987. He was living with his wife in Oklahoma when he was arrested during a routine Immigration and Customs Enforce check-in. The government pushed to deport him to Laos, according to court filings. In court filings, Schroeder argued that his removal to Laos 'could be deadly.' Schroeder had successfully temporarily blocked his removal while the legal challenge continued, but V.L. was moved to detention in Guam from another facility in Texas to prepare for his removal. Despite Schroeder's appeals, V.L. was deported in June. Schroeder, who is working on the case pro bono, had asked for court orders to block V.L.'s removal — pointing to, among other things, the Trump administration's aggressive push to summarily deport immigrants to a brutal El Salvador prison and so-called 'third countries' beyond the jurisdiction of U.S. courts. 'The president is using orders of removal as permission slips to do whatever he wants,' Schroeder told The Independent. 'The reason we don't know what he would do is we have no notice or an opportunity to be heard about how broad these orders can be used.' In March, Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport Venezuelan men accused of being members of the Tren de Aragua gang, which many of their attorneys and family members have denied. Government attorneys have also admitted that 'many' of the dozens of immigrants deported under the law — and then sent to El Salvador's notorious CECOT prison — have no criminal records whatsoever. In court filings, Schroeder said Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act unleashed 'unbounded war powers that could apply to any immigrant or disfavored U.S. citizen,' and argued that V.L. may similarly be targeted. In June, the federal judge overseeing the case in Guam District Court dismissed the case, noting that the government's removal 'is not based' on the Alien Enemies Act, and that Schroeder had made an 'improper invocation' of that law to challenge V.L.'s detention and removal. Nearly two months later, the Trump administration is now asking that judge to punish Schroeder over those arguments. 'I didn't make money from this. It was a very high cost to me, and very difficult,' he told The Independent. 'And the profession depends upon these pro bono cases. It depends upon normal, ordinary lawyers being willing to take time out of their schedule to help people who can't pay. And if we don't have that, if that all dries up, we're going to have a huge due process issue, not just for immigrants.' The president has raised dozens of legal threats aimed at his ideological opponents and issued a series of executive orders targeting the law firms representing them. In March, the president ordered Attorney General Pam Bondi 'to seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms who engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States' — including immigration lawyers. Lawyers for the government have accused Schroeder of arguing that he falsely claimed V.L. was facing removal under the Alien Enemies Act and continued to do so despite arguments and court orders stressing that V.L. was being deported under standard immigration law. A sanctions motion filed on August 1 accuses Schroeder of acting 'unreasonably and vexatiously.' The motion claims Schroeder continued to insist the government was trying to deport his client under the Alien Enemies Act while he 'knew that assertion to be false.' The 29-page complaint accuses him of making 'bad faith' arguments, 'and even if Schroeder did not know that his arguments were frivolous, at a minimum, he recklessly maintained his frivolous arguments.' The Justice Department is also seeking sanctions as a 'deterrent' to other lawyers to prevent 'frivolous claims that would stoke unnecessary controversy,' government lawyers wrote. Legal experts have warned that the motion amounts to a significant turning point in the administration's avalanche of legal battles that appears aimed at preventing other lawyers from taking on cases against the government. 'This is just harassment of good and reasonable lawyers [and] I expect judges and the bar will see through this ruse from Trump's DOJ,' wrote Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, a Fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law The Trump administration is 'stripping away a core tenet of our justice system — the ability to defend oneself against [government] accusations,' according to Justice Connection, a network of Justice Department alumni. 'This will have a chilling effect on lawyers willing to take on clients against DOJ,' the group said. Schroeder, meanwhile, says the motion will not prevent him from continuing to represent immigrant clients. 'I'm willing to take the heat. I'm not afraid. If bad things happen, they happen,' he told The Independent. 'I'm willing to go down, but I'm not going to give up.'
Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Moment lawmaker halts meeting about veterans killing themselves to scold colleague who used 'offensive' phrase
A Boston City Councilor derailed a discussion about preventing suicides in the city, including among veterans, to warn her fellow members not to use what she called a 'stigmatizing' phrase. Sharon Durkan, a Democrat, was the next to speak after Councilor Ed Flynn introduced a resolution on Wednesday to make it more difficult for people to jump off high rise parking garages. Durkan took issue with Flynn saying a man who jumped to his death from a Chinatown parking garage last week 'committed suicide'. 'I know many people that feel so strongly about the way that we talk about this particular issue, and I think it's very important that we not use stigmatizing language to describe those that have taken their own lives,' she said. 'I would prefer instead of "committed suicide" that we say something like...' she continued before trailing off without offering an alternative. 'I, having found a family member who attempted, I feel very strongly that we not use stigmatizing language,' she concluded. Flynn, who is also a Democrat, initially responded to Durkan's criticism by bringing up his veteran status — having served 24 years in the US Navy — and by talking about his dedication to advocating for disabled veterans. 'I don't want to make this into anything more than a little bit of criticism from a colleague,' he said. 'I'm disappointed in hearing those comments.' After Council President Ruthzee Louijeune said the correct term was 'died by suicide,' Durkan was recognized to speak again and said Flynn's comments were 'triggering'. 'This really for me, it just was triggering for me so that's why I wanted to say something because I think we owe it to our constituents that have suicidal ideations to know that if they lose their life it is not their fault. It is never your fault,' she said. The hearing went further off topic when Councilor Julia Meija agreed with Durkan that the phrase 'committed suicide' was triggering for her. Meija also spent time talking about her own suicide attempt and how her mother allegedly did not properly care for her. 'I always like to see things as teachable moments. It's all how we choose to experience feedback that we get, I think we're all a work in progress,' Meija said. It was after this that Flynn directly accused Durkan of derailing the conversation, which was supposed to be cutting down on the number of suicides at parking garages. Before the entire session was hijacked to speak about language, Flynn proposed adding higher railings, training garage employees and adding signs with suicide-prevention hotlines. 'Councilor Durkan felt it necessary to continue the conversation a second time,' Flynn said. 'For a colleague to distract from the purpose of this hearing is disappointing. I don't want to use a stronger word, but I'll just say, disappointing.' Dozens of people responded to the clip of her condemning Flynn's use of the phrase 'committed suicide' 'My concern is, going forward, what are we going to do about high rise parking garages that are easily accessible for people without any rails or infrastructure. That's my message. That message has now been lost because of this distraction,' he added. Durkan was heavily criticized online for her conduct during the meeting, which one person called 'performance empathy'. 'What did @rondurk even hope to accomplish with this statement?' they wrote. 'She only wanted the spotlight to perform. How selfish and pathetic.' 'Her in a nutshell. Focused on all the wrong things,' another person wrote. Someone else disagreed with her premise entirely, writing: 'I think calling it exactly what it is, is the right thing to do. Words matter and being honest matters. Everyone knows what it is no matter how you change the words so stop trying to make it pretty.'
