logo
Mitchell comes together for local woman battling ovarian cancer

Mitchell comes together for local woman battling ovarian cancer

Yahoo26-04-2025
Apr. 25—MITCHELL — When 24-year-old Tiffany Vobr of Mitchell was diagnosed with stage three ovarian cancer in January, her world changed overnight. She went from a schedule filled with work at Wendy's, Special Olympics sports and LifeQuest programming to undergoing chemotherapy sessions at Sanford Health in Sioux Falls.
To help offset medical and travel expenses, Tiffany's family is hosting a community benefit on Saturday, April 26, at Thirsty's Bar in Mitchell. The event will feature a silent auction with over 50 items donated by local businesses, as well as a T-shirt sale and custom merchandise, including bracelets, pens and keychains branded with "Tiffany's Tribe."
"The support has been amazing," said Austin Vobr, Tiffany's brother, who helped organize merchandise sales. "I sold out of the first box faster than I expected. People have really shown up for her."
Tiffany is undergoing intensive chemotherapy — one seven-hour session every three weeks. So far, she has completed two rounds, though her second round was delayed due to a port infection. Her third and hopefully final round is scheduled for next week. If her scans look promising afterward, doctors will move forward with a hysterectomy that was originally planned for January. However, that surgery was postponed when doctors discovered the cancer had spread extensively throughout her abdomen during the first attempt.
"She's tough," said her mother, Kristy Vobr. "She's handling it the best she can, but it's hard watching her be away from the people and things she loves most."
Tiffany's life was once filled with practices, games and her job at Wendy's. She played basketball, bowling, softball and track with the Mitchell Special Olympics and the Sioux Falls Fireworks team — where she's known for her upbeat personality and determination.
"She's always smiling and tries her best, no matter the sport," said Becky Brennan, a coach with the Fireworks. "She has such a kind heart — she always makes sure to say hi to everyone."
Though chemotherapy has sidelined her from competing, Tiffany was able to walk in with her team at the recent Special Olympics basketball tournament held in Mitchell.
"It meant the world to her," Kristy said.
Her absence has been felt throughout the community — especially at LifeQuest, where she was a regular participant in activities and events, and at Thirsty's Wednesday night bingo, where she used to join in weekly. Tiffany tried attending recently, but the noise was too overwhelming. Still, Thirsty's is pitching in for the benefit, donating proceeds from $5 bingo cards to Tiffany's fund and providing light food for attendees.
Kristy has even stepped in to bowl on Tiffany's Sunday night league.
"I'm the better bowler, though," Tiffany said.
The Vobr family is no stranger to this kind of fight. In 2011, Austin was diagnosed with leukemia. After five months and four rounds of chemo, he's now been cancer-free for 13 years.
"Cancer sucks," Kristy said. "It's the hardest thing we've gone through as parents. No family should have to go through this twice."
Still, despite the setbacks, Tiffany remains optimistic. Recently, she delayed one of her treatments by a day just so she could take her young nephew to the circus. She also picked out a new wig in a bright purple hue — her favorite color and a perfect match for her bold spirit.
"She's had some really hard days, but she always bounces back," Kristy said.
Looking ahead, Tiffany is hopeful that she'll be back on the field and court soon. After recovery, her goal is to return to sports and spend more time at LifeQuest — and maybe take a break from working to focus on what brings her joy.
The benefit for Tiffany Vobr will take place Saturday, April 26, from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. at Thirsty's, located at 1500 N. Duff in Mitchell. The silent auction will begin around 4:30 p.m., and bingo will run throughout the evening. All proceeds will support Tiffany's ongoing treatment and recovery.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tibremciclib for Advanced Breast Cancer: Is It Worth It?
Tibremciclib for Advanced Breast Cancer: Is It Worth It?

Medscape

time6 days ago

  • Medscape

Tibremciclib for Advanced Breast Cancer: Is It Worth It?

Adding the novel CDK4/6 inhibitor tibremciclib (Betta Pharmaceuticals) to second-line fulvestrant significantly extended progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, but with the tradeoff of increased toxicity, new data suggest. Compared with fulvestrant alone, the combination prolonged median PFS for these patients by 11 months, according to results from the phase 3 TIFFANY trial. However, similar to existing CDK4/6 inhibitors, the tibremciclib-fulvestrant combination added to treatment side effects — including substantially higher rates of diarrhea, hematologic toxicities, and hypokalemia. The authors of the analysis, published in JAMA Oncology , described the toxicities as "manageable," emphasizing that few patients stopped treatment because of them. Study author Xichun Hu, MD, of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, told Medscape Medical News that tibremciclib compares favorably with other CDK4/6 inhibitors in terms of dose reduction and discontinuation rates. However, Hu noted, that's based on cross-trial comparisons, which have to be interpreted with caution. Kathy Miller, MD, who was not involved in the trial, had a similar take. 'Toxicity actually looks similar to ribociclib and palbociclib, with primarily myelosuppression and little non-heme toxicity,' Miller, of the Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center at Indiana University, told Medscape Medical News. Tibremciclib plus fulvestrant was recently approved in China for HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer following results from the trial, but the combination has yet to be approved in the US. The Benefits vs the Risks In the trial, Hu and colleagues studied the safety and efficacy of the new agent among patients from 69 centers in China who had experienced progression while on endocrine therapy and had received no more than one line of chemotherapy. A total of 274 patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either tibremciclib (400 mg orally, once daily) or placebo plus fulvestrant until disease progression, death, or treatment discontinuation over a median follow-up of 13 months. Eighty patients (43.5%) in the tibremciclib arm and 64 (71.1%) in the placebo arm experienced a PFS event (disease progression or death). Tibremciclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved PFS to 16.5 months versus 5.6 months with fulvestrant alone, reducing the risk of progression by 63% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; P < .001). As for safety, adverse events were higher in the treatment arm. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (79.3% in the tibremciclib arm vs 13.3% in placebo arm), neutropenia (75.5% vs 15.6%), leukopenia (73.9% vs 16.7%), and anemia (69% vs 21.1%). Nausea and vomiting were also more common with tibremciclib, at 37% and 40.2%, respectively — versus 18.9% and 11.1% in the placebo group. Most often, those adverse events were grade 1 or 2. However, 50.5% of patients in the tibremciclib group had a grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse event, versus 21.1% in the placebo group. The most common were neutropenia (15.2% vs 5.6%), anemia (12.0% vs 4.4%), and hypokalemia (12% vs 0%). Hypokalemia was often due to diarrhea and was managed with electrolyte monitoring and potassium supplementation, Hu said. One-third of patients in the tibremciclib arm developed hypertriglyceridemia (5.4% grade 3 or higher) — a rate higher than that seen with other CDK4/6 inhibitors. Cases were managed with lipid-lowering agents such as atorvastatin. More patients on tibremciclib experienced dosing interruptions due to adverse events (54% vs 23%), and dose reductions were also more common with the combination therapy (18.5% vs 4.4%). However, only four patients (all in the tibremciclib arm) discontinued treatment due to side effects. Overall, the adverse event profile of tibremciclib lines up with that of other CDK4/6 inhibitors and comes with better PFS, Hu said, noting that "the benefit-risk balance of tibremciclib plus fulvestrant appears highly favorable." In TIFFANY, the authors note d that cases of neutropenia and leukopenia were numerically lower than in trials of abemaciclib, dalpiciclib, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant. According to Hu, tibremciclib is structurally different from other drugs in its class, with a greater selectivity for CDK4 and less inhibition of CDK6 and CDK9, which may reduce the incidence of neutropenia as well as severe diarrhea. Plus, the PFS improvement seen in TIFFANY was greater, Hu said. Pa lbociclib in PALOMA-3 showed a median PFS of 9.5 months vs 4.6 months for fulvestrant alone (HR, 0.46); abemaciclib in MONARCH led to a PFS of 11.5 months vs 5.6 months (HR, 0.38, a Chinese population); and dalpiciclib in DAWNA-1 achieved 16.6 months vs 7.2 months (HR, 0.50, also in Chinese patients). While these are cross-trial comparisons, it's still unclear exactly how tibremciclib stacks up against other drugs in its class (including its impact on overall survival). The authors also caution that, because the trial exclusively enrolled Chinese patients without prior CDK4/6 inhibitor exposure, the findings may not be generalizable to broader populations, particularly in regions like North America and Europe. Miller pointed to the generalizability question as well, noting that fulvestrant monotherapy is typically not the standard of care in the US and other Western countries. 'This [study] joins a long list of second-line endocrine studies that show drug activity but don't compare to standard of care and don't really tell us how to best use the drug,' Miller said.

Wendy's wins an honor no restaurant wants
Wendy's wins an honor no restaurant wants

Miami Herald

time23-07-2025

  • Miami Herald

Wendy's wins an honor no restaurant wants

The pandemic and its afterburn decimated restaurants. Only one sector has been a bright spot: fast food. Fast-food joints like McDonald's, Chick-fil-A, Wendy's, and Taco Bell are still popular, thanks to convenience and value. We Americans love our fast food, but that convenience comes at a cost not reflected in the price tag. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter When you look at the nutritional data from many of the most popular fast-food chains, what you see is alarming, especially when you consider that 19.7% of children ages 2-19 years in the U.S. are obese. But the problem isn't just calories. Fast food contains fat, sodium, and added sugar that contribute to serious health problems like heart disease and Type 2 diabetes. Those fries, Frostys and bacon-laden burgers are definitely delicious, but a single meal from a fast-food chain often contains more calories than a person needs for a whole day. If you're trying to decide between a handful of your favorite spots, you might want to check out World Atlas' recent comparison of fast-food chains. They found that when it comes to unhealthy menu items, a couple of chains stand out from the rest. In their ranking, World Atlas looked at the nutritional data from nearly a dozen popular menu items. The survey factored in calories, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar. According to the findings, Wendy's is one of the unhealthiest chains in the U.S., but the legacy fast-food chain has plenty of company. Sonic Drive-In, Popeyes, McDonald's, Five Guys, Dairy Queen, and Carl's Jr. are also on the list of the worst for you. While Wendy's has made an effort to use and promote fresh ingredients, like its "Fresh never frozen beef" promise, and offers a variety of green salads prepared daily, its signature sandwich, the Baconator, rings in at more than 900 calories. When packaged with an order of medium fries and a medium Frosty, the tally jumps to than 1,600 calories. Related: McDonald's Snack Wrap causes alarming shortage The fat and sodium levels in this one meal are above daily recommended limits, yet Wendy's marketing embraces indulgence. Slogans like "You know you want it" and "Baconator. Resistance is futile," give off a "We know you can't help yourself" kind of energy. It's hard to beat the quick-service convenience and the fact that the Wendy's Baconator meal is just $12 (where I live in Nevada). A similar meal - bacon cheeseburger, fries, chocolate shake - at a sit-down restaurant like Red Robin will set you back more than $24. The bottom line is that fast-food chains are thriving, even as concerns around Americans' overall health grow. The one thing all the names on the unhealthiest list have in common is fiercely loyal fan bases, and appearing on lists like World Atlas' doesn't appear to hurt business much. Wendy's posted $2.9 billion in sales Q1 2025, down only slightly from the same time in 2024. Quick-service restaurants, including fast food chains, are popular and profiting because they offer value pricing and digital ordering and convenience. Customers also rate fast-food restaurants higher in terms of satisfaction than they do full-service restaurants. The American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) 2025 report indicates that customer satisfaction with quick-service restaurants is higher than that of full-service restaurants. It can also be difficult for healthier restaurant chains to compete with the fast service and extended hours offered by national chains. So, even though healthier chains like Sweetgreen and Cava are popular in urban markets, traditional fast-food brands still dominate everywhere else. Turns out we want our food fast and cheap, no matter how many calories are in the bag. Related: McDonald's secures honor no restaurant wants The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

This Is Officially The Unhealthiest Fast Food Chain In America Right Now
This Is Officially The Unhealthiest Fast Food Chain In America Right Now

Yahoo

time17-07-2025

  • Yahoo

This Is Officially The Unhealthiest Fast Food Chain In America Right Now

Every once in a while, hitting up the drive-thru or ordering your favorite indulgence from a fast food chain just slaps. A late-night cheeseburger and fries (obviously dipped in ice cream) is basically the stuff of dreams. Of course, I try to relegate myself to only a few treats a year (something that's become progressively harder as an editor at Delish). Fast food doesn't have a particularly healthy rap, but that doesn't mean you can't enjoy it from time to time. However, some chains are worse offenders than others. World Atlas to the rescue! The site set out to find the unhealthiest fast food in America by reviewing "nutrition data, menu gimmicks, and marketing tactics at major chains," to determine the biggest offenders—and the results might surprise you. According to World Atlas, the top 10 unhealthiest options "routinely serve meals that can eclipse daily calorie limits in a single sitting while encouraging visits through bargain pricing and around-the-clock service." Sitting pretty at the top of the list? Wendy's. Both the chain's burgers and beloved Frostys are calorie-dense, with some of its promotional meals exceeding daily calorie, sodium, and fat recommendations in one fell swoop. But how did the rest of America's most iconic chains fare? Well, you can feel relatively good if you're a devout fan of Burger King, Shake Shack, or Arby's, which didn't make it to the top 10. Here's how the rest shook out. Top Ten Unhealthiest Fast Food Chains In America Wendy's: The Triple Baconator meal clocks in at over 2,000 calories, and the chain's deals and late-night hours encourage frequent overindulgence. Sonic: With massive portions and sugary drinks, like the 44-ounce Reese's Peanut Butter Cup Master Shake, Sonic packs an alarming calorie and sugar punch. Taco Bell: Its loaded burritos and combos sneak in sky-high calorie and sodium levels. Dairy Queen: Blizzards and fried combo baskets often push a single meal past the 2,000-calorie mark. KFC: A three-piece Extra Crispy combo delivers about a full day's worth of salt, saturated fat, and calories in one go. Quiznos: Oversized subs like the Classic Italian hit about 1,300 calories and pack in excessive sodium, making it a heavy nutritional load. McDonald's: A standard Big Mac meal can hit 1,300 calories, thanks to its fries and soda pairings. Smashburger: Stacked burgers like the BBQ Bacon Cheddar burger, plus decadent shakes, make this chain a caloric heavyweight. Little Caesars: One pepperoni pizza—marketed as an everyday meal—can supply more calories and salt than most people should consume in a day. Chick-fil-A: Meals like the fried chicken sandwich with waffle fries quietly deliver major calorie counts, but not as high as others on this list. You Might Also Like Insanely Easy Weeknight Dinners To Try This Week 29 Insanely Delicious Vodka Cocktails Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store