logo
Inside the mind of the 'Candy Man's' apprentice: Serial killer expert's chilling interview with a murderer's accomplice

Inside the mind of the 'Candy Man's' apprentice: Serial killer expert's chilling interview with a murderer's accomplice

Daily Mail​2 days ago
Elmer Wayne Henley Jr. seemed to be the hero of the story when officers responded to a shooting at a home in Pasadena, Texas, on the morning of August 8, 1973.
Inside the house lay the bullet-riddled, naked body of 33-year-old Dean Corll - a man known locally as the 'Candy Man' as he gave out free candy from his mom's store to local children.
Police also found a trove of disturbing torture tools including restraints, sex toys and plastic sheeting laid out on the ground.
Outside, were three shaken teens.
The teens told police they had passed out inside the home after spending the night drinking and huffing acrylic paint to get high. When they woke, they found themselves bound and Corll standing over them, telling them he was going to sexually assault and kill them.
Corll had then untied Henley and ordered him to participate in his plot.
At that moment, the 17-year-old grabbed Corll's gun and shot him dead.
The teen had saved himself and his two friends from a horrific murder at the hands of a sick predator.
But this was only the beginning of the story.
Within hours, Henley revealed that Corll was a serial killer responsible for the murders of dozens of boys who had vanished from the Houston Heights neighborhood over the past few years.
And, in an even more explosive twist, Henley confessed that he had been his accomplice.
Between 1970 and 1973, Corll lured, sexually assaulted, tortured and murdered boys, with the help of his two teenage accomplices Henley and David Brooks.
With Corll dead, Henley and Brooks led police to three mass graves where the victims' bodies were buried.
The remains of 28 boys aged 13 to 20 were found.
Five decades later, there are fears that more victims are still out there.
The case, known as the Houston Mass Murders or the 'Candy Man' killings, shocked the community and the nation long before the term serial killer had even been coined.
Both Henley and Brooks were sentenced to life in prison for their part in the murders. Brooks died in May 2020, leaving Henley the sole survivor of the team of killers.
Now, Henley is speaking out for the first time in 50 years in conversations with top serial killer expert and criminologist Dr. Katherine Ramsland in the new ID documentary 'The Serial Killer's Apprentice'.
Speaking to the Daily Mail, Dr. Ramsland - who famously co-authored a book with the BTK killer Dennis Rader and was Idaho killer Bryan Kohberger's professor - said the case is different to the countless serial killer and mass murder cases she has studied.
'This case was unusual because it was a team killer case, but involving three people,' she said.
'So you had an adult predatory serial killer using two teenage boys as accomplices.'
Despite participating in the murders, Dr. Ramsland explained that the power dynamic was not equal between the three killers.
'The two teenagers were compliant accomplices. They were not co-equals. They did not want to be killers, but they wanted to please Dean Corll and also they were afraid of him,' she said.
'So that dynamic for them was that they were doing things they didn't really want to do, even though they were doing it for a long period of time. Corll, who was the adult predator, is the one with the fantasy that led the way, and he dominated the other two.
'They were submissive to him. And so whatever he said is what they had to do.'
In other team killer cases she has studied, the individuals are typically 'the same in their depravity'.
'They both want to do this. They come up with the most horrible things together. That's very different from a predator and a compliant accomplice,' she said.
'The predator leads the way. The compliant accomplices go with them.'
But there was something else unique about the Houston Mass Murders too: the way the killings stopped.
'Henley is the only accomplice to a serial killer who killed the killer to end it,' she said.
In their conversations, Dr. Ramsland said she wanted to delve into what led Henley to cross the line to become a killer.
Henley was 14 when he was recruited through Brooks to join the murderous team.
Corll drew his teen accomplices in by telling them there was a so-called 'Syndicate' - a powerful trafficking ring where teenage boys were sold as houseboys to wealthy clients across the US.
He claimed he was part of the Syndicate and that, if Brooks and Henley brought him boys, he would sell them for money.
Initially, Dr. Ramsland explained that this financial reward was appealing to Henley.
Henley has said he didn't know Corll planned to kill the victims at first.
When he brought a boy to Corll, who then sexually assaulted and killed him in front of him, Henley was implicated in the murders.
Plastic sheeting was found laid down on the ground inside the Pasadena home of the Candy Man killer
'If I go down, you go down. So there was that mutually assured destruction,' Dr. Ramsland said.
After some time, Henley also committed some of the murders himself.
The first time he killed was a 'pivotal moment'.
'It was a very pivotal moment, in part because he had this firm belief in God. He read the Bible every day and carried a little pocket Bible with them. And, for him, it was really the end of his faith because nothing happened to him,' Dr. Ramsland said.
'He really expected to be struck dead by God because that's what he was taught. And it didn't happen. Nothing happened… for him, it was a hugely pivotal moment in his whole belief system, his sense of himself.'
Fear was a major factor in Henley's role, she said, with the threat of the Syndicate coming after him if he didn't do what they wanted.
'So Wayne had to decide: "If I went to the police would they believe me? A 15-year-old kid against an adult? And if they let Corll go, I'm in danger. Or if they don't let Corll go, the Syndicate is going to come after me." So he's in this no-win situation.'
She added: 'Corll played a long game. He had decided that Henley was going to become this accomplice so little-by-little, he pursued him.'
Dr. Ramsland learned there were times when Henley did try to get away from Corll.
At one point, he confided in his uncles about the murders but they didn't believe him.
He then gave his mom a confession letter but she tore it up and booked him an appointment with a psychiatrist. Before he could make it to the appointment, Corll was dead.
Based on her expertise, Henley is both a victim and a perpetrator.
'Wayne is a victim. He was also sexually assaulted by Corll. He was also leveraged. He was made to do things he didn't want to do,' Dr. Ramsland said.
'But then he also did things he did want to do.'
While she said Henley's 'status as a victim is in no way anything like the victims who were tortured and killed', she described him as a 'complicated individual'.
'I think everybody who's human knows the feeling of being compromised and doing things that are out of character for them and they wonder how they were able to do that,' she said.
Having spent years talking to Henley and studying his case, Dr. Ramsland believes he might never have become a killer if he hadn't met Corll.
'Henley wanted to be a minister or a cop. He was a very protective kind of guy, and he was kind of like a hang-back hippie type,' she said.
'There's nothing in his background that would suggest he, on his own, would have ever become a killer… to even think about killing somebody was just not in his DNA.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White male Port of Seattle worker was best candidate for promotion...then a gay Asian woman applied, lawsuit alleges
White male Port of Seattle worker was best candidate for promotion...then a gay Asian woman applied, lawsuit alleges

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

White male Port of Seattle worker was best candidate for promotion...then a gay Asian woman applied, lawsuit alleges

An electrician working at the Port of Seattle has claimed he was passed over for promotion because he is a white, straight male - and a gay Asian woman had applied for the position. Lawyers representing Chris Linhardt, 50, argue in a lawsuit filed last month in King County Superior Court that he had been working in the port's electrical division and even served temporarily as its electrical foreman for several months in 2022. So when the Port sought to permanently fill the position the following year, Linhardt jumped at the opportunity. 'Plaintiff ranked highest in the first-round interview; nevertheless, management scheduled an unprecedented second-round interview,' the lawsuit claims. Another employee, an Asian woman who identifies as gay, was then allegedly coached by the head of maintenance - who served as an interview committee member. That created an 'unfair advantage' in the interview, Linhardt's attorneys argue. The other employee ultimately wound up receiving the foreman position, though Linhardt's lawyers say she had 'substantially less supervisory and hands-on experience.' 'Upon information and belief, Defendant's decision makers were motivated by Plaintiff's race, sex and/or sexual orientation in deciding not to promote him,' the lawsuit argues. 'Plaintiff alleges that Defendant favored promoting an individual with different demographic characteristics over Plaintiff because of these protected characteristics, rather than basing the decision solely on merit.' In doing so, Linhardt's lawyers say the port violated the Washington Law Against Discrimination, which bars discrimination on the basis of race, creed, national origin, marriage status, family status, sexual orientation, age and more at workplaces in the state. He is seeking damages from the lost compensation as well as from the emotional distress he has endured in the years since, plus attorney's fees. According to government records, Linhardt was receiving an annual salary of $115,066 in 2021, after several raises since he began working as a wireman in 2019, when he received nearly $10,000 less. The woman who received the promotion, meanwhile, received an annual salary of $132,267 in 2023. 'Plaintiff has experienced humiliation, indignity, frustration and anguish due to Defendant's discriminatory actions,' the suit claims. His lawyer, Vanessa Vanderbrug, told the Seattle Times her client is 'fully supportive, of course, of diversity in the workplace, but has concerns that the manner in which the Port is attempting to achieve those diversity ends is really not serving the entire workforce.' 'Our anti-discrimination laws are designed for the purpose of allowing individuals to be judged based on merit, not based upon skin color, sexual orientation or other immutable characteristics,' she noted. 'From my perspective, these laws are designed to protect us all - not simply traditional minority groups.' A spokesperson for the Port of Seattle, which manages both the seaport and the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, said it does not comment on personnel matters. However, attorneys representing the government agency have argued in court documents that while Linhardt was a qualified candidate, he was not the most qualified for the role. They argued that the Port of Seattle 'acted reasonably and in good faith.' The lawyers also claimed that Linhardt only received the highest score in the first-round interview 'due to a skewed rating by [Linhardt's] direct supervisor and friend.' The Port was then forced to conduct a second round of interviews over the concerns of potential bias, and the other employee ranked higher. The lawyers are now seeking to get the lawsuit dismissed.

Federal judge orders closure of Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail
Federal judge orders closure of Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail

The Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Federal judge orders closure of Trump's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail

A federal judge in Miami late on Thursday ordered the closure of the Trump administration's notorious 'Alligator Alcatraz' immigration jail within 60 days, and ruled that no more detainees were to be brought to the facility while it was being wound down. The shock ruling by district court judge Kathleen Williams builds on a temporary restraining order she issued two weeks ago halting further construction work at the remote tented camp, which has attracted waves of criticism for harsh conditions, abuse of detainees and denial of due process as they await deportation. In her 82-page order, published in the US district court's southern district of Florida on Friday, Williams determined the facility was causing severe and irreparable damage to the fragile Florida Everglades. She also noted that a plan to develop the site on which the jail was built into a massive tourist airport was rejected in the 1960s because of the harm it would have caused the the land and delicate ecosystem. 'Since that time, every Florida governor, every Florida senator, and countless local and national political figures, including presidents, have publicly pledged their unequivocal support for the restoration, conservation, and protection of the Everglades,' she wrote. 'This order does nothing more than uphold the basic requirements of legislation designed to fulfill those promises.' No further construction at the site can take place, she ruled, and there must be no further increase in the number of detainees currently held there, estimated to be about 700. After the 60-day period, all construction materials, fencing, generators and fixtures that made the site a detention camp must be removed. The ruling is a significant victory for a coalition of environmental groups and a native American tribe that sued the state of Florida and the federal government. Williams agreed that the hasty, eight-day construction of the jail at a disused airfield in late June damaged the sensitive wetlands of a national preserve and further imperiled federally protected species. 'This is a landmark victory for the Everglades and countless Americans who believe this imperiled wilderness should be protected, not exploited,' said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends of the Everglades, one of the groups that filed the lawsuit. 'It sends a clear message that environmental laws must be respected by leaders at the highest levels of our government, and there are consequences for ignoring them.' The alliance plans to hold a press conference on Friday morning to discuss the ruling in detail. Conversely, the ruling is a blow to the detention and deportation agenda of the Trump administration. The president touted the camp, which recently held as many as 1,400 detainees, as a jail for 'some of the most vicious people on the planet', although hundreds of those held there have no criminal record or active criminal proceedings against them. There was no immediate reaction to Williams's ruling from the Florida department of emergency management, which operates the jail on behalf of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice), or from the Department of Homeland Security. But lawyers for the state told Williams in court last week that they would appeal any adversarial ruling, the Miami Herald reported. In addition, hundreds of detainees were moved from 'Alligator Alcatraz' to other immigration facilities at the weekend in anticipation that Williams would order its closure, the outlet said. Ron DeSantis, Florida's Republican governor, announced earlier this month that the state will soon open a second immigration jail at a disused prison near Gainesville to increase capacity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store