Scotland's rubbish is England's only reward
What does the rest of the UK get in return for the 'Union dividend' – currently totalling £52 billion – the sum that Scotland receives from the UK taxpayers to help persuade it to remain part of Britain?
Around 100 truckloads of rubbish to be dumped at various landfill sites throughout the North of England seems a likely answer.
Despite the extra cash received by the SNP government being arguably a fair old 'bung' – the product of the four decades-old Barnett formula – the payback is shaping up to be many thousands of black bags, including commercial waste, to be sent to the likes of Cumbria and Northumberland because of SNP incompetence or arrogance.
They're to be heading south because the Scottish Government does not want its green and pleasant acres spoiled by any more rubbish being buried at landfill sites north of the border after December 31.
We are not talking here about just the odd black bag. One waste expert told BBC Scotland that it would require between 80 and 100 trucks running seven days per week to move up to 600,000 tons to English landfills.
The only real alternative to landfill is incineration, but SNP ministers have halted the building of any more incinerators because they can't afford them, even if they're receiving what's been described as a record £52 billion 'war chest' for use in the Scottish Parliament election campaign next May. I suspect the public will find that a hard one to swallow.
Energy minister Gillian Martin blamed inflation and higher material costs for the hold-up in building new incinerators, but she also cited 'outside factors' for the delay – usual SNP code to signal that the government in London is to blame.
And Ms Martin didn't apologise for the fact that the lack of incinerators might last another three years, saying that getting rid of landfill sites in Scotland 'far outweighs' any downsides that might arise from sending the rubbish over the border.
But as any fair-minded person might ask: who will pick up the bills? In financial terms it is Scottish business leaders who will have to pay for the trucking of their commercial waste to landfill sites in England. And in environmental terms, I can't imagine that the northern English will be overjoyed at receiving all of this Scottish muck.
The whole project is an example of nationalist insensitivity at best or arrogance at worst. Many Scots are too ready to see insults – real or imagined – in the words and actions of the English yet refuse to take care when it comes to their southern neighbours' feelings.
Speaking as a Scot I was pleased to see criticism of this stupid affair emanating from most parts of the political spectrum. The Lib Dems' Liam McArthur, who is the party's climate spokesman, accused the SNP of planning to make England 'their dumping ground for waste'.
The Tories' Douglas Lumsden said there should be 'red faces all round among SNP ministers at this news'.
I doubt if he'll get his wish, because of that other piece of embarrassing news – regarding the Scottish headteacher who banned pupils from bringing Union flags to school as they were deemed to be potentially offensive or sectarian.
The flags had been brought to school for a special end of term event and the head's action in effectively banning the United Kingdom's flag provoked a storm of criticism, after she had told pupils that their action had been 'contrary to the school's values of respect and kindness.'
The local council, East Renfrewshire, has issued an apology, but that hasn't prevented Jackson Carlaw, a local MSP and former Scottish Tory leader, from saying that to equate the Union flag with sectarianism was 'totally unacceptable and deeply offensive'.
There has been no response from the SNP on this issue but then anyone who knows anything about the party will know that a large proportion of its members and supporters hate the Union flag; indeed many call it 'the butcher's apron'.
Following his humiliating loss to Labour in the recent by-election, First Minister John Swinney has sought to keep his troops happy with yet another speech promising that he'd fight for independence.
However when it comes to flags, as well as black bags, it seems his party is determined to get nothing right.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Will new school rules help cut violence in the classroom?
The best time to teach a child not to throw a chair in a classroom is not as it is being projected across the what an educational psychologist told me last week as we discussed how teachers should respond to disruptive behaviour in people in education agree building positive relationships is the key to preventing violence in schools but teachers say they also need to be able to use "consequences" as the past few months I've spoken to dozens of teachers who say the balance between "nurture" and consequences has been no-one wants to have a chair thrown at them. In response to concerns from teachers, the Scottish government has now published guidance for schools on how to deal with violent and aggressive behaviour from the Conservatives dismissed it as "waffle", saying it gives no clear instructions on when and how to exclude violent or disruptive pupils. What's the problem? Karen Simpson taught in a primary school in Inverness for 14 years but in 2018 she quit to become a said she loved the job but there was a "gradual" erosion of a teacher's ability to use boundaries that made it impossible to maintain story chimes with the stories of so many leaving the profession because the classroom behaviour has become too difficult, too overwhelming. Parents too have told me their children are too nervous to go to school. They say their kids are traumatised by the disruptive behaviour of other pupils who have repeatedly got away with swearing or violence and faced no boundaries. Some call for a return to the days of corporal punishment in schools, when unruly children were disciplined by "the tawse".It was outlawed in the 1980s in Scotland, for very good reasons, but some think the pendulum has swung too far with many councils focusing on the principles of "nurture". What does the new guidance say? For low-level disruptive behaviour the guidance suggests a range of include offering children "an alternative activity to the rest of the class that allows the child to regulate their emotions or behaviour" or asking the pupil to "take a break for a short time". The guidance also suggests access to learning support for pupils struggling to regulate their behaviour. But teachers have told me there is already not enough learning support in different levels of difficult behaviour the appendix to the guidelines suggests different staged children who are being violent one consequence is to give them a laminated piece of paper with bullet points reminding them how to behave and step away. Other inventions include keeping the child in school but taking them to a different area to allow them to calm down. What about exclusions from school? For years there has been a presumption against removing kids from at Edinburgh University found that being expelled from school massively impacts young people's life chances in all the worst dramatically cut its exclusions as did many other local in recent times teachers have been expressing growing concerns about some local authorities and schools misinterpreting the nurture principles by removing all or any her foreword to the guidance, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said exclusion should only be used as a "last resort".The guidance says exclusion can be used in response to violence or anti-social behaviour, saying this measure can "allow matters to calm, time for planning, meeting with parents etc". What was the reaction to the guidelines? Teachers' unions have broadly welcomed the new guidelines but the EIS said they won't solve the behavioural problems in schools without significantly more resources and staff to support Secretary Jenny Gilruth said they will empower teachers in the face of rising levels of disruption and emotional dysregulation. However, Tory education spokesman Miles Briggs said they were a pathetic response to the epidemic of violence in Scottish said: "Teachers are still being given no clear rules on when and how they can exclude violent or disruptive pupils."Jenny Gilruth only mentions it as a last resort. Instead teachers are being fed waffle about eye-contact, hand signals and merits."These are utterly insufficient for dealing with the extreme behaviour that we've seen recently in classrooms up and down the country."Rather than clear rules, this document is full of Holyrood blob buzzwords about multi-agency processes, positivity and inclusion."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
How could politics shape the Scotland of 2050?
Scotland's politicians are all pretty focused on 2026 right now, with a Holyrood election less than a year should they be concentrating on longer-term objectives - and what Scotland could look like in 2050?A conference in Edinburgh invited leaders to think beyond the short-termism of the five-year electoral in an era where many voters feel politicians are all the same, perhaps we can learn more about their policies via their ultimate vision for the country. Scotland and the world are likely to be largely unrecognisable by back at the last 25 years and think about how the way we work, communicate, socialise and navigate our way through our lives has advances are a massive part of this. At the turn of the millennium you had to ask your mum to get off the landline phone so you could use the dial-up the WiFi hub connected to every other item in the house is probably the only thing plugged into that phone that change is not slowing down - it is accelerating exponentially. Algorithms already help decide what we watch on TV, who we date, and what content scrolls through our social media it so hard to imagine that in a few years' time they'll be driving our cars, diagnosing our illnesses and managing our financial markets?Politicians are always very keen to talk about new technology; nobody wants to be left Scottish government is going to set up its own AI agency to make sure innovations are shared across the public is Scotland well placed to forge into a new digital future?At Scotland 2050, Michael McLaughlin from legal firm Shoosmiths talked about a "massive skills gap" in recently represented a company looking to hire 70 developers for a big tech project; they ended up finding 85% of them argues that politicians and the private sector need to "get round the table and decide what we want to be good at in 25 years' time" - to prioritise four or five sectors and encourage and train people to work in Spowage from the Fraser of Allander Institute also urged leaders to focus on the economic strengths we already have - like financial services and world-class universities - rather than chasing fads. If there was one theme which came from the business leaders involved in the event, it was the need for consistency and policy certainty. Firms simply will not invest in jobs, infrastructure or training without that investment and growing the economy is a priority shared by all political parties. But it is striking how different their approaches are to achieving SNP has long had big government at its heart, proudly championing universal allowances, interventions in the lives of citizens and in the market and higher taxes to pay for contrast the Conservatives are more keen to slim down the size of the state while cutting taxes and "red tape".Meanwhile Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar popped up at the conference to argue for something in the middle - cutting taxes, but replacing that with income from economic growth which would maintain public intelligence is a key example of a buzzword field which politicians love to talk about, but which will need a concerted effort to use in a joined-up point about skills and focus is an important one, given finite resources - but the conference also heard that there are opportunities which could be Airey from German energy giant EnBW pointed out that Scotland produces more energy than it uses, but that the current state of the national grid makes it hard to transfer it down that infrastructure is a UK government priority, but Mr Airey suggested that Scotland could also look to house power-hungry AI data centres, which are best located in cold could put us at the heart of an industry set for exponential growth - and the excess heat from the servers could even be funnelled to nearby homes and businesses. Using Scotland's potential for renewable energy production as a cornerstone of the economy of 2050 was also highlighted by John Swinney, with the first minister suggesting it could lead to cheaper food production as well as products being made closer to offered a vision of "energy rich Scotland meaning energy rich Scots".Energy and climate more generally is certainly an area where the Scottish government has set ambitious goals - although it has also routinely fallen short of insist they are still on track to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2045 - five years ahead of the UK government goal of on from fossil fuels will represent a seismic change - the oil industry still provides tens of thousands of jobs and billions of pounds of economic activity; household energy prices are set based on the price of will have plenty of knock-on effects too, like the move to electric cars. The sale of new petrol and diesel vehicles is to be phased out by 2035, so by 2050 there will be next to none left on the is well-placed to tap into alternative forms of energy, with a wealth of renewable potential from wind and wave this is still an area where there are stark differences in the vision of the Swinney's SNP is not quite the same party that declared a climate emergency and brought the Greens into government, but it is still clear that it is prioritising renewable detail beyond that is difficult to pin down, because the government has still not published its long-promised energy also has a clear goal of phasing out oil and gas, but is pushing for a bigger move towards nuclear energy - something the SNP Conservatives meanwhile have gone in the opposite direction, pushing opposition to the difficult trade-offs involved in the transition to net zero. Something we can't ignore in all of this is that Scotland's population is going to look very different by 2050 the National Records of Scotland has projected forward to 2047, and thinks we are on track for modest population the average age of Scots is projected to increase, with the number of people over 75 set to grow by 341,300, up against falls in the numbers under 15 (down by 79,900) and aged 16 to 29 (down by 57,300).That puts increasing strain on the state, given current commitments to things like free personal care and the "triple lock" on are issues which are inextricably knitted into questions about our future economy and workforce - and which politicians are notoriously shy of grappling with, given older people reliably turn up to with Holyrood's social security bill set to be £2bn higher than the block grant coming from Westminster by 2030, questions about how sustainable this is are Freeman was the social security secretary who set up Scotland's devolved welfare agency, and even she says that governments - including the one she served in - "dodge the decision" about what the care system should look like and how it should be paid said governments of all stripes need to have "proper conversations" with voters about big issues - including things like the triple lock, which she said was "well worth a debate".Ms Freeman also noted that the danger of short-term political promises is that increasingly, "people just don't believe them". Anything is possible That feels particularly true for younger conference reflected that many young people are finding it harder to make their way in the world than their parents' generation - from the job market to the housing emergency, to the constant scrutiny of social Barnes, from the John Smith Centre, warned that some young people have so little optimism for the future that they are losing faith in democratic politics group recently ran a poll asking young people whether they would prefer dictatorship to democracy, and 27% of respondents chose an extreme example, but it rings true after a decade where the defining political force in almost every corner of the world has been is inherently linked to an era of exponential change - it is unsettling, and it leaves people grasping for they feel the government of the day isn't delivering stability or certainty, it isn't surprising that dissatisfaction with institutions is growing - or that some are willing to throw votes behind those who promise to listen to them, and to shake things Swinney has certainly detected this mood; he talked about "listening to the public and addressing the strain they feel on the cost of living".Over the longer term his answer, unsurprisingly enough, is we didn't learn anything new about the parties' positions during this conference - Swinney didn't offer any new insight on how the SNP might force the matter if its calls for a referendum continue to be blanked, for when we think again about how much things have changed over the last few decades - devolution, Brexit, five prime ministers in five years - and how much our unpredictable world is likely to change again by 2050, it's fair to conclude that just about anything is possible.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Tice condemns Scottish plan to send 600,000 tonnes of rubbish to England
England should reject Scotland's rubbish, Richard Tice has said, after it emerged that up to 100 truckloads a day are to be sent over the border. The Reform UK deputy leader said it would be 'fair' for Scotland to 'sort its own rubbish' and manage the impact of the SNP's ban on landfill. Scots would be 'furious' at a situation in which large quantities of English waste had to be shipped north, he said. It emerged this week that a Scottish government ban on domestic black bin bag waste being sent to landfill from next year would result in about 600,000 tonnes of rubbish being shipped southwards from next year. Scotland does not have enough incinerators to cope with the surge in demand that the policy will cause. New incinerators and 'energy from waste' facilities that are still being built will not be ready in time. Scottish councils and commercial waste companies have approached firms in England to negotiate 'bridging contracts'. However, as there is also pressure on incinerator capacity there, much of Scotland's excess rubbish is expected to go to landfill in England instead. Experts have said that the equivalent of 80 to 100 trucks a day, seven days a week, will be needed to take the waste to England or even farther afield. Some lorries may have to travel for three days, it has been claimed, as there is particular pressure on sites in northern England. Tice, the Boston and Skegness MP, said: 'Scots would be furious if they were told to take English rubbish. The reverse is also true. Scotland should sort its own rubbish. Fair is fair.' The SNP government introduced the ban to protect the environment and deliver a 'net-zero society'. However, critics have pointed to the emissions which are set to be caused as a result of taking waste large distances — it cannot be disposed of in Scotland. The UK government also wants to eliminate biodegradable waste from landfill. It announced a consultation earlier this year, but there is no firm policy in place south of the border. Thomas Kerr, the Glasgow councillor who defected from the Conservatives to Reform in January, also said England would be within its rights to refuse to take Scottish waste. 'Like the SNP's disastrous deposit return scheme, this rushed-out policy is unworkable and will put huge pressure on English landfill,' Kerr said. 'At the very least, the SNP should wait till our national incinerator capacity is ready. Otherwise English landfills would be well within their rights to refuse to take this, and every day Scots will be left with the mess.' It had been hoped that the landfill ban, which was initially due to come into force in 2021 but was delayed due to the Covid pandemic, would coincide with an increase in recycling rates. However, these have barely shifted in a decade, with Scottish homes recycling 41.6 per cent of their waste in 2013, rising to 43.5 per cent in 2023. Kim Pratt, the senior circular economy campaigner at Friends of the Earth Scotland, said: 'By failing to prepare properly for the upcoming landfill ban, the Scottish government has missed an opportunity to move away from the current throwaway society. 'Without immediate action, Scotland will end up burning and exporting much of its waste. 'The solution is for the Scottish government to invest more in reuse and repair, provide better access to recycling services and close the loopholes in its incineration ban as soon as possible.' Gillian Martin, the SNP's climate action and energy secretary, blamed an 'incineration gap' on 'outside factors' such as inflation and the cost of building new facilities. The SNP government introduced an effective ban on new incinerators in 2022 but said existing plans for 11 sites could still proceed. Martin said: 'We've got plans for more incinerators, with energy from waste schemes, to come on in the next year and over the next three years — so it is a temporary situation.' She added that 'the positive environmental impact of stopping landfills' outweighed the impact of temporary measures to export the rubbish over the border.
