Governor Hobbs takes Colorado River helicopter tour, urging upper basin states to take water cuts
Western states are ramping up negotiations on the allocation of Colorado River water.
During a helicopter tour with officials from the Central Arizona Project, Governor Katie Hobbs emphasized the importance of securing a fair share for Arizona.
Hobbs says the state is working on solving an ongoing water crisis and would be much worse off without conservation efforts and previous cuts.
PHOENIX - In the next few months, western states will have to get on board and agree on how much water each state will get from the Colorado River.
It has been a decades-long battle and tense negotiations with other states are ramping up again.
We are getting closer and closer to a critical moment in our state's water security.
Governor Katie Hobbs helped explain what is being done to ensure we get a fair slice during a helicopter tour of the Colorado.
The backstory
The tour took off from the Central Arizona Project's (CAP) campus in North Phoenix.
Inside, Governor Katie Hobbs listens as CAP General Manager Brenda Burman describes how the canal from the Colorado River is pumped uphill to bring water through the Valley and onward to Tucson.
"Before cap growth was very much constrained in the Valley," said Burman.
What we know
Colorado River water was a large piece of the Arizona water puzzle and we have something called "junior rights" to it, meaning other states have bigger claims to the water before it ever even gets here.
"We have already taken real cuts and done a lot to do our part in conservation, and we need the upper basin states to do the same thing," said Hobbs.
The canal leads to Lake Pleasant, known for its boating and sunshine, but CAP thinks of it as a water storage facility.
"This is where the water both comes in and is taken out so it's our intake towers," said Burman.
What's next
Soon, the states along the Colorado River will need to come to an agreement on how much each state gets.
Arizona received water cuts in 2022 and our negotiator is fighting for upper basin states like Utah and Colorado to make cuts as well.
It hasn't gone over well.
Why you should care
Flyovers help Hobbs and her negotiating team to gain more perspective during the negotiations.
"We're in a position where the lower basin states have taken the brunt of the cuts until now and if we don't reach agreement with the upper basin we're going to be in a far worse position," she said.
At a water roundtable, state, city, and tribal leaders stressed why CAP water is so valuable.
"It doesn't seem like the upper basin is willing to do anything," said Terry Goddard, CAWCD Board President.
"It's really critical at this point of time. Time is short," said Tom Buschatzke of the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
What they're saying
Katie Hobbs believes the state is in a water crisis.
"Oh, absolutely, but we're solving it," she said.
Moments later she clarified that answer.
"I think if we weren't taking the action that we are now that we would get there, but we're taking action. We're avoiding that," said Hobbs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
32 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump says Putin wants a deal as Kremlin says Ukraine war aims remain ‘unchanged'
ANCHORAGE — Vladimir Putin is lavishing praise on President Trump ahead of their high-stakes summit in Alaska on Friday, thanking his host for 'energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting' in Ukraine over three years since the Russian leader attempted to conquer the country. Trump, at the White House, also expressed optimism ahead of the talks, telling reporters he believes Putin 'would like to see a deal' after suffering more than a million Russian casualties on the battlefield. Yet Russian Foreign Ministry officials said Wednesday that Putin's war aims remain 'unchanged.' And an aggressive Russian advance along the front lines this week provided evidence to military analysts that Moscow has no plans to implement a ceasefire. It was a day of diplomatic maneuvering ahead of an extraordinary visit from a Russian president to the U.S. homeland, and the first audience Putin has received with a Western leader since the war began. 'It's going to be very interesting — we're going to find out where everybody stands,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. 'If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly. And if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the very near future.' Putin's positioning ahead of the summit, and Trump's eagerness for a deal, continue to fuel worries across Europe and in Ukraine that the Alaska negotiations could result in a bilateral agreement designed by Moscow and endorsed by Washington that sidelines Kyiv. In London, Britain's prime minister, Keir Starmer, hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday, offering support for Trump's effort while placing the onus on Putin to 'prove he is serious about peace.' 'They agreed there had been a powerful sense of unity and a strong resolve to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine,' 10 Downing Street said in a statement. Trump said the Alaska summit, to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, is meant to 'set the table' for direct talks between Putin and Zelensky that could include himself and European leaders. But addressing reporters, Trump suggested that denying Putin dominion over all of Ukraine — and allowing him to hold on to the territories he has seized militarily — would be concession enough from Moscow. The president had said in recent days that land 'swapping' would be part of an ultimate peace settlement, a statement rejected by Kyiv. 'I think President Putin would like to see a deal,' Trump said. 'I think if I weren't president, he would take over all of Ukraine.' 'I am president, and he's not going to mess around with me,' he added. Russian state media reported Thursday that Putin had gathered his advisors to inform them of 'how the negotiation process on the Ukrainian crisis is going.' Trump, 'in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the fighting, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict,' Putin said. But U.S. efforts to get Russia to halt the fighting have proved futile for months, with Moscow pressing forward in an offensive that has secured incremental gains on the battlefield. 'Putin thinks that he is winning this war militarily,' said Frederick Kagan, director of the Critical Threats Project, which collaborates with the Institute for the Study of War to produce daily battlefield assessments on the conflict. 'He's also confident that Western support for Ukraine, and particularly U.S. support, will break, and that when it does, Ukraine will collapse, and he'll be able to take control of the whole thing.' 'It's been his theory of victory for a long time,' Kagan said, 'and it's a huge part of the problem, because he's not going to make any concessions so long as he's confident that he's winning.' Russian incursions along a strategic portion of the front line, near a crucial Ukrainian logistics hub, spooked Ukraine's supporters earlier this week. While serious, Kagan said that Russia does not hold the territory, and said that the conditions for offensive Russian operations had been set over the course of months. 'The Russians continue to have the initiative, and they continue to make gains,' he added. 'The first step in changing Putin's calculation about the war is to urgently help the Ukrainians stop the gains.' Zelensky, after meeting with Starmer in London, said that he and the British leader had 'discussed expectations for the meeting in Alaska and possible prospects.' 'We also discussed in considerable detail the security guarantees that can make peace truly durable,' Zelensky said, 'if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killings and engage in genuine, substantive diplomacy.' Trump and Putin plan on arriving of the U.S. airbase within moments of one another, and are expected to meet on the tarmac before retreating into a private meeting. Afterward, Trump and Putin will take questions from the press, the White House said.
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Switzerland is eyeing cuts to its F-35 stealth fighter order amid price battles with the US
Switzerland is considering reducing its F-35 order in response to price negotiations with the US. It said the US government had abandoned a fixed price plan, leaving Switzerland vulnerable to inflation and tariffs. Some US allies and partners have questioned the F-35 over Trump's treatment of allies. Switzerland said it might scale back its order of US-made F-35 fighter jets after failing to fix the price in its negotiations with the White House. Amid shifts in US attitudes toward allies and partners, some Western nations have questioned the jet and, in at least one case, even rejected the fifth-generation fighter for European alternatives. Switzerland still wants the F-35, considering its high-end capabilities, but it may cut its order. Switzerland said that attempts to negotiate a fixed price for the F-35A fighter jet, made by the US's Lockheed Martin, were unsuccessful, with higher costs expected as a result. Switzerland may now order fewer F-35s, the defense minister, Martin Pfister, said in a press conference on Wednesday, per Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger. He said that other options include asking parliament for another loan for the jets and deducting operating costs from the purchase price, among other possibilities. Switzerland committed to buying 36 F-35As after signing a contract in 2022, with the jets expected between 2027 and 2030. However, Pfister said the defense department must now examine whether that figure is really what the country needs. Switzerland's government explained in a press release on Wednesday, that while options were on the table after failed negotiations with the US, Switzerland remains committed to procuring F-35As, citing "a significant technological advantage over other aircraft" that would help "to protect Switzerland from airborne threats." Pfister said that Switzerland must continue the procurement of the jets, or else it won't have the defense it needs by the early 2030s. The Swiss government described the US government's actions in negotiations as an "abandonment of the fixed price." It previously viewed the price as fixed at what is now $7.2 billion. In a situation without a fixed price where the cost is subject to volatility as a result of inflation and tariffs, Switzerland is unable to determine the total price of its procurement. It says that the additional costs for procuring the jet could be more than $1.6 billion, which would represent a tremendous cost growth. The government said that the unsuccessful negotiations were with senior White House representatives and that there was a conversation between Pfister and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. It said "the discussions clearly showed that the USA is not prepared to deviate from its position." The Swiss defense department was thus instructed to consider other options by the end of November, with the government saying the department "will examine whether current air defence requirements still correspond to the principles on which the evaluation of the F-35A was based." Lockheed Martin told Business Insider in a statement that "since foreign military sales are government-to-government transactions, questions about F-35 cost, schedule and procurement are best addressed by the armasuisse and US government." Switzerland is a neutral country, and while it's not a member of NATO, it is seen as a partner nation and has deepened its cooperation with the alliance since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. While it remains committed to the F-35, some US allies are no longer sure. Some wavering on the F-35 NATO member Spain said last week that it would not buy the F-35 and would instead focus on European alternatives. The country's decision came after some other allies publicly questioned the fighter jet amid Trump's treatment of allies, which has included criticizing the NATO alliance and European defense spending. Trump's approach to the alliance and questions of US reliability, amid growing security concerns, has sparked a new focus within Europe on investing in the continent's defense firms. Politicians across all of Switzerland's political parties said earlier this month that the country should withdraw or reconsider its planned purchase of F-35s in response to Trump's tariffs. So far, Spain is the only ally to formally step back from the jet, which is used by 19 US partner nations. The F-35 is a top-class fifth-generation fighter that many nations want, and any country that steps away from it after already committing to it would likely encounter huge costs and logistical issues, among other challenges. The jet's widespread use among allies and partners is also an advantage. It lets militaries operate together more easily, something that could be key in a conflict on the continent. The Swiss government noted that its desire for the jet is driven by how widespread F-35 usage is across Europe. But Europe's view of the US has changed. When asked on Wednesday if the US is seen as a reliable partner for future arms purchases, Pfister responded by saying that they are not reliable when it comes to tariffs. The depth of that concern is unclear.
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
The New Pragmatism Reshaping Syria, and the Risks Ahead
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa didn't take office through an election. He took it after a dominant military victory. His forces swept into Damascus last winter, ending Bashar al-Assad's decades-long rule and installing a transitional government with himself at the top. But for all the baggage he brings with him, as a former rebel commander, a onetime affiliate of jihadist networks, and a man who once ruled Idlib with an iron grip, there's a strange twist to the story: He wants in. Not only into Damascus, but into the world. From every credible indication, al-Sharaa is trying to internationalize Syria, economically, politically, and diplomatically. He's lobbying for trade, courting Western governments, and talking openly about modernization, transparency, and inclusion. This isn't window dressing for foreign cameras. It's a strategic reorientation, and by all appearances, he means it. But meaning it and achieving it are different things. And on that front, Syria's new president has a challenge. Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, on May 7, 2025. Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa after a meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris, on May 7, 2025. STEPHANIE LECOCQ/POOL/AFP via Getty Images The institutions that surround him weren't built for reform. They were built to survive. And survival has meant control—tight, centralized, often opaque. Even now, in what is nominally a transitional government, those old instincts remain. Al-Sharaa leads the cabinet himself. There is no prime minister. Of the 23 ministries, the most powerful, interior, defense, justice, are run by longtime loyalists from his Idlib-era base, and notably, just one is occupied by a woman. A third of the planned legislature will be selected by him directly. These are not the building blocks of pluralism. They're hedges against instability. And while politically understandable, they're also structurally limiting. The issue isn't that al-Sharaa is pretending to be a reformer. The issue is that his government still functions like a movement, loyal, insular, and wary of disruption. That presents a dilemma not only for Syrians, but for the foreign governments now racing to re-engage. Look no further than the Captagon crisis. Syria under Assad became the epicenter of the global amphetamine trade. When al-Sharaa's forces seized power, they made it clear the trade would end. Trafficking rings were exposed. Public burnings of seized pills were publicized. And yet the drug keeps moving. Captagon production hasn't disappeared, it's adapted. Supply chains have shifted, not vanished. Massive amounts are still flowing through Syria, with countries like Sudan now growing as a new transit point. Al-Sharaa promised a crackdown. What he delivered, so far, is merely a start. The same pattern is unfolding across the economy. Earlier this year, a Reuters investigation uncovered a quiet seizure campaign: more than a billion dollars in Assad-era assets transferred to the state, many via back-channel deals brokered by al-Sharaa's brother. In theory, this was a way to purge corruption and jumpstart recovery. In practice, it replaced one circle of insiders with another. It's not theft. But it's not reform either. This is where the friction lies. Al-Sharaa knows what's needed to bring Syria out of isolation. Western investment, diplomatic recognition, and the lifting of sanctions don't come without institutional change. He understands that. He says the right things, meets with the right people, and has made visible overtures to minority communities, international donors, and even U.S. allies. But the people he needs to hold the country together, the war-era operators, the militia commanders, the political loyalists, are not necessarily aligned with that vision. He is trying to drag a hardened system into a world it was never designed to join. That's not dishonesty. It's friction. And that's where the West needs to be careful. It's easy to assume Syria has turned a corner simply because its leader now wears a suit and talks about economic growth. But transitions aren't defined by optics. They're defined by what happens when the cameras leave. Al-Sharaa may be serious about rebuilding Syria. He may want to leave the insurgent years behind. But the road ahead will test his willingness to let go of the tools that brought him here: control, consolidation, and a closed circle of power. The international community should support his goals. But that support must be conditional. Recognition should be earned, not granted wholesale. Sanctions relief should be calibrated, not swept aside. Reform can't be assumed just because the rhetoric has improved. What al-Sharaa wants and what he can deliver aren't yet the same. The intent is real. But the structure may not be ready. And if we confuse one for the other, we won't be helping Syria emerge from its past. We'll be paving the way for it to repeat it, just under a different name. Brett Erickson is the managing principal of Obsidian Risk Advisors. He serves on the advisory boards of Loyola University Chicago School of Law's Center for Compliance Studies and DePaul University Driehaus College of Business. The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
