Ex-NY Giants player is helping deported migrants in Guatemala, blames Biden for the problem
EXCLUSIVE: Retired New York Giants safety Jack Brewer and his global ministry are on the ground in Guatemala City this week, helping officials receive migrant families deported from the U.S., providing food, support and prayer as they essentially start life anew.
Brewer and his Jack Brewer Foundation have years of experience working in impoverished areas of the world like Haiti, Malawi and Central America, which Brewer said has allowed him to work closer than most and interact with the returning families.
While it is President Donald Trump and border czar Tom Homan enforcing U.S. law and deporting illegal immigrants, Brewer said it is clear former President Joe Biden's "broken" policies are truly to blame for the heartache and hardship.
"Three years ago, I started to follow the fatherlessness crisis that is happening right here in Guatemala, where a lot of men were leaving their households and coming to Joe Biden's open borders – and just seeing it literally devastate families."
Brewer said Guatemala was losing much of its workforce and that a lot of those poor families trying to get to the U.S. actually did not know a "legal" immigration route existed, and they instead took the cartels and others at their word and paid thousands of dollars to be trafficked north.
"They've been told by coyotes and different people that you can just come [to the U.S.], and if you come here, if you bring your child, they'll just let you in," Brewer said.
"And so, you know, there's a huge education gap there on the ground."
Brewer also met with Raul Berrios from CONAMIGUA – the National Council for Attention to Migrants of Guatemala – as well as Sergio Samuel Vela-Lopez, head of the Guatemala Penitentiary Department.
Berrios, Lopez and others are trying to create an effective system for welcoming the migrants and processing those who are innocent families versus those who may have criminal records or other issues requiring government attention, according to Brewer.
Many families returning to the capital city live hundreds of miles into the countryside and have no established way of getting there. Some buses, however, have been hired to take migrants closer to home, and Brewer visited one of them and spoke to its driver.
"It's really a unique perspective, I think, and just some of the things that we've witnessed since we've been here," he said, adding stories ranged from familial hardships to reports that more than a dozen people have been burnt alive by Mexican cartels for failing to pay for passage.
"It's just pretty tough to see and witness and watch."
When a U.S. military plane arrived carrying migrants, Brewer was on the tarmac.
"We were able to provide them with food and, most importantly, with Bibles, and we preached the Gospel of Jesus Christ."
Brewer said the Guatemalan Migration Authority is focusing its efforts on children ages 8 and under. Many of these children have been "lied to," Brewer said.
"They're told it's their life's mission to migrate to the U.S. illegally," he said, recounting stories told by some returning migrants of children on the backs of cartel coyotes and others drowning in rivers.
Then-Vice President Kamala Harris made her own trip to Guatemala City in March 2024, seeking to understand the "root causes" of illegal migration.
"When you look at the root causes, we're also looking at issues of corruption. Again, we're looking at the issue of climate resiliency and then the concern about a lack of economic opportunity," Harris said in 2021.
Brewer rejected that Harris' work made any difference, saying she and her then-boss's policies "empowered human traffickers" and that half of Guatemala still lives in extreme poverty with little education.
He said the former leadership at the State Department "misguided resources" through USAID, a practice that Trump is now aggressively cutting back on.
"We need to first put our resources into addressing the issues that are fueling a multibillion-dollar human trafficking industry. Walls, deportations and enforcement are a must, but educating indigenous populations on the truths of coyotes will deliver a devastating blow to the modern human slave trade," Brewer said.
"Guatemala is not enforcing their migration issue in the country. Haitians and Venezuelans are warned of the dangers of migrating, but there is no enforcement at the time."
"There needs to be arrest and enforcement, but they require resources. Guatemala prisons are already overcrowded, and they don't have immigration beds available for enforcement," added Brewer, who said he also visited those prisons and saw conditions for himself.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Millions around the world rely on money sent by family members working in the U.S. Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would deal them a financial blow.
Poor countries around the world are still dealing with the impact of America's foreign aid programs being essentially shut down in the early days of President Trump's second term. Now Republicans in Congress are poised to deal a smaller yet still significant blow to another crucial financial lifeline: Money they receive from loved ones working in the U.S. Money transfers from the U.S., often sent by immigrants who came here specifically to earn cash they can use to support the people they left back home, are a vital source of income for people in developing countries around the world. Cumulatively, U.S. residents sent more than $79 billion abroad in 2022, the most recent year with available data. That's more than the federal government spent on direct foreign assistance the same year and double the amount that was sent from any other country. The GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' includes a provision that would impose a new tax on these transfers, which are formally known as remittances. As it's currently written, the bill would place a 3.5% tax on all outbound remittances. If that rate holds, it would mean billions of dollars intended for the poorest people across the globe would instead go to the government. The bill is still being negotiated, however, and some Republicans in Congress would like to see the rate cranked up substantially. Even if the rate does not change, the bill would still make the U.S. one of the world's most expensive wealthy countries to send money from, when you combine the new tax with the fees that banks typically charge for international transfers. Most of the money that leaves the U.S. goes to countries with the most immigrants living here. Mexico received $52 billion in remittances in 2021, equivalent to about 4% of the country's gross domestic product. India was a distant second with $15.8 billion. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum denounced the proposal last month, calling it 'an injustice' and a 'tax on those who have the least.' While Mexico would lose the most in terms of sheer dollars, the impact would be felt most acutely in poorer nations with small economies that are heavily dependent on money from overseas. Remittances account for more than a quarter of the GDPs of Nicaragua, Honduras and El Salvador. Some of the poorest countries in Africa would also be significantly affected. The amount of money the new tax would generate would be a drop in the bucket in the government's budget. Proponents of the proposal say its value would be much more than the revenue it would generate. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the anti-immigration think tank Center for Immigration Studies, told the Associated Press that the extra costs would help reduce the incentives that people have to travel to the U.S. illegally. 'One of the main reasons people come here is to work and send money home,' he said. 'If that's much more difficult to do, it becomes less appealing to come here.' Critics of the plan say that, while the most severe harm would fall on vulnerable people who are already reeling from the Trump administration's aid cuts, Americans would also suffer negative consequences. 'The tax is likely to create collateral damage by imposing compliance burdens on people who are not the intended target of the tax while struggling to collect revenue from the intended targets,' Alan Cole and Patrick Dunn of the Tax Foundation wrote earlier this month. Some financial services groups also oppose the tax because they believe it will create unnecessary and harmful hurdles for international business. 'This remittance tax provision in particular mandates a massive invasion of privacy by private businesses and the federal government on American citizens, creates undue tax burden for law-abiding Americans, reduces business revenue, complicates regulatory efforts, and hinders law enforcement,' the heads of seven lobbying groups for the finance sector wrote in a joint statement. The 'big, beautiful bill' passed the House last month and is currently being negotiated in the Senate. The remittance tax is a relatively minor part of the massive tax and spending plan, but there are some indications that it could be the source of disagreement within the GOP caucus. Insider reports say that some key senators are 'weighing concerns' about the tax, but it also has some strong backers. The most fervent supporters of the plan are in the House, which will have to approve whatever bill comes out of the Senate before it can become law. Several far-right GOP representatives — including Marjorie Taylor Greene and Chip Roy — reacted to Sheinbaum's criticisms by calling for the rate of the tax to be dramatically increased. Rep. Eric Schmitt wrote on social media that he would introduce a proposal to increase the rate to 15%. 'America is not the world's piggy bank,' he wrote. 'And we don't take kindly to threats.'
Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Where the Money Goes: Map, Charts Show Migrant Remittance Payments
A provision in President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" making its way through the United States Congress would place additional taxes on money immigrants want to send back to their home countries. In 2023, the last full year of data available, over $650 billion was received in remittances by countries worldwide. Roughly a third of that comes from the U.S., with countries with high levels of immigration to American benefitting most from the payments. Republicans in Congress want to recoup some of the money migrant workers in America are sending home, arguing the money should remain circulating within the U.S. economy. Those opposing the move, and some who have studied remittances for years, argue that a remittance tax could drive up immigration to the U.S. rather than hinder it. "Undocumented migrants play a huge role in the U.S. economy, not only as they participate in the labor force, and part of this is that they do send money back home, but a large number of them actually do pay taxes," Rubi Bledsoe, a research associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) told Newsweek. "They also participate in supporting social programs that Americans get access to, without necessarily being able to access them themselves." Bledsoe argued that if remittances aren't being sent back to family and friends, or if the funds are reduced, then those who depend on them may look to come to the U.S. for work as well. Remittances from the U.S. to Mexico in 2023 were around $63.3 billion, or about 3.5 percent of Mexico's total GDP. Most of that money makes it way to some of the poorest regions of Mexico, Bledsoe said, which research from the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute (MPI) think tank supports. "For families in low- to middle-income countries who receive remittances from the United States, for instance, remittances are a lifeline that allows people to pay for utilities, services, and everyday expenses that they would otherwise not be able to afford," Ariel G Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at MPI, told Newsweek. "Remittances can also be turned into investments that benefit not just individual families but also communities through shared projects, like building hospitals, schools, or buying necessary supplies to improve infrastructure." Among the biggest recipients of all global remittances in 2023 were India ($120 billion), Mexico ($66.2 billion), the Philippines ($39 billion), France ($36.9 billion), China ($29.1 billion), and Pakistan ($26.5 billion), according to the World Bank. The data from the World Bank covers worldwide payments, meaning not all that money came from the U.S. — though in cases like Mexico, remittances from the U.S. make up the vast bulk of the total. Americans living overseas who send back money home also count in the data. The U.S. received around $7.7 billion in remittances in 2023. CSIS estimates Mexican workers are sending $300 a month back home in remittances, on average, meaning most of their paycheck is still being spent within the U.S. That means their money is going towards housing, goods and services in their communities, and often state and federal taxes. There has been a steady rise in the amount of money heading to certain countries in recent years, as migration levels and access to jobs in the U.S. have increased. This has caused concern among some on the right who want to see stricter regulations on remittances. "It is kind of a double-edged sword," Ira Mehlman, media director at the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) told Newsweek. FAIR advocates for a more restrictionist immigration policy. "Yes, it does send money back to people in the home countries, but it also becomes a dependency. If you're going to be sending your best workers out of the country to work in another country and then wait for the money to come back, it impedes the development that needs to happen in those countries." Mehlman said FAIR also has concerns that payments are making their way back to cartels and other organized crime groups, while American companies are getting away with employing those without legal status, enabling a cheaper workforce that is detrimental to U.S. citizens as well as immigrants with work authorization. While there is widespread agreement that stopping payments to criminal organizations is necessary, both Bledsoe and Ruiz Soto cautioned against introducing tougher rules on remittance payments. They say this could have an adverse effect on illegal immigration, predicting that, should remittances be cut off from low- and medium-income countries, then more people may look to make the journey to the U.S. "Because the migrant is already here, sending money back, it means that the family of that migrant isn't in the United States," Bledose said. "So it is preventing migration on some level." Ruiz Soto added that "by filling the void of government investment and development, remittances reduce the economic pressures for many people to emigrate irregularly over the long term." Mehlman said Congress could act to introduce stricter measures, as it is looking to do with the tax on remittances, while Ruiz Soto said more security measures to track the funds being sent abroad could be introduced in an attempt to root out abuse. Related Articles Migrants From Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela Told To Self-DeportLA Taco Chain Closes 15 Locations Amid ICE CrackdownWorld Cup Boat Party Canceled After DHS, Coast Guard OperationNew Jersey ICE Escapees: What We Know 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Associated Press
42 minutes ago
- Associated Press
New Hampshire jury acquits consultant behind AI robocalls mimicking Biden on all charges
A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats last year was acquitted Friday of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors alleged, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. Prosecutors argued the calls amounted to an attack on the integrity of the primary, while Kramer's defense tried to direct outrage at the Democratic National Committee instead. At Biden's request, the DNC dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar, but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there, but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The defense also said he didn't impersonate a candidate because the message didn't include Biden's name, and Biden wasn't a declared candidate in the primary. Jurors apparently agreed, acquitting him of 11 felony voter suppression charges, each punishable by up to seven years in prison. The 11 candidate impersonation charges each carried a maximum sentence of a year in jail. 'Our commitment to enforcing election laws remains steadfast,' New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella said in a statement. 'We will continue to work diligently to address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to protect the integrity of our elections.' Kramer also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission, but he told The Associated Press that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a possible shift toward loosening regulations. And though many states have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, House Republicans in Congress recently added a clause to their signature tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade.
