logo
U.S. expecting NATO members to show them the money at leaders' summit

U.S. expecting NATO members to show them the money at leaders' summit

CBC4 hours ago

Social Sharing
Short and sweet is not usually a phrase associated with the annual NATO leaders' summit, but arguably that's what many member nations are hoping for as U.S. President Donald Trump returns to the table.
The gathering of allied leaders will be the first for Prime Minister Mark Carney and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who is hosting in his home country, the Netherlands.
What was originally expected to be a broad, bold agenda has been narrowed to perhaps a single catchphrase: Show me the money.
Member nations will debate increasing the benchmark for defence spending from the current two per cent of the gross domestic product to a combined five per cent (3.5 per cent for direct military funding and an additional 1.5 per cent for defence infrastructure).
WATCH | Carney signs defence deal with EU:
Canada and EU will 'pool our resources' to bolster military: Carney
13 hours ago
Duration 2:22
Allies agreed to the tightly focused agenda in order to minimize the potential of facing the wrath of Trump. There will be a dinner with the Dutch royal family on Tuesday and then a meeting of the North Atlantic Council on Wednesday before leaders fly home.
Canada arrives at the summit fresh off Carney's pledge to increase defence spending by $9.3 billion this year in order to meet the existing two per cent target.
Going to five per cent is another matter entirely. Carney has said it's not about picking a number and spending up to it.
Prior to the summit, there were published reports that NATO countries all agreed to hit the five per cent target over the next decade. That is unlikely to please countries such as Spain, which openly balked at the U.S.-imposed target.
Even Belgium's conservative prime minister, Bart De Wever, was skeptical when asked about it on Monday.
"I'm not comfortable at all with the five per cent figure. It's huge," De Wever told Canadian journalists following a Second World War commemoration ceremony in Antwerp.
"The breakdown in 3.5 and 1.5 helps a bit … but 3.5 means that we almost have to triple what we're spending on defence. We've jumped to two per cent, we're more or less in the same situation as Canada."
Veteran Canadian diplomat Sen. Peter Boehm said avoiding the new target would be hard in the current geopolitical climate.
"There may not be much of a choice," Boehm told CBC News in a recent interview.
A former U.S. ambassador to NATO, Kurt Volker, said no one should underestimate Washington's single-minded focus on the target — and the words Trump wants to hear.
"The emphasis that the U.S. is looking for is everybody to say, 'Yeah, we mean it,'" said Volker in a briefing by the Center for European Policy Analysis. "We have a plan. Five per cent is real. We're going to get there. We have a real threat in Europe. We have to do more."
Reaching the combined five per cent goal would require Canada to spend perhaps as much as $50 billion more annually on the military and defence infrastructure.
"I'm fairly confident that Canada and the whole of the alliance can do this," Rutte told CBC's Power & Politics last week during the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta.
He said the current pledge, agreed to more than a decade ago, is no longer enough in light of the growing conflicts in the world.
WATCH | Can Canada find another main military procurement partner?:
How can Canada reduce its military dependence on the U.S.?
23 days ago
Duration 9:25
Chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton speaks with former NATO secretary general George Robertson about how the ReArm Europe plan could help Canada reduce its military dependence on the U.S.
"With the two per cent, we simply cannot go and defend ourselves," Rutte told host David Cochrane. He said it may be enough in 2025, but not in three to five years.
"We have ramp up the defence spending."
Boehm says he believes the five per cent goal is achievable for Canada depending "on the timeline and the effectiveness of procurement."
The country's moribund defence procurement has been the country's "Achilles' heel since almost forever" and Boehm said it will "require creativity to achieve those percentage goals."
In a change from past years, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was invited only to attend the leaders' dinner, not the meeting of allies.
Rutte insisted on Monday that Ukraine would remain a vital topic.
"You will see important language about Ukraine, including connecting the defence spending up to 2035 to Ukraine, and the need for Ukraine to stay in the fight," Rutte told reporters in Brussels ahead of the summit.
Zelenskyy, however, hasn't yet publicly confirmed he'll attend the dinner.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2/3 of Canadians Give Clean Energy Higher Priority, 3/4 Want Climate Policy Linked to EU's
2/3 of Canadians Give Clean Energy Higher Priority, 3/4 Want Climate Policy Linked to EU's

Canada Standard

time13 minutes ago

  • Canada Standard

2/3 of Canadians Give Clean Energy Higher Priority, 3/4 Want Climate Policy Linked to EU's

With Prime Minister Mark Carney pledging to develop all forms of energy, both clean and conventional, two-thirds of Canadians want the federal government to prioritize clean, and three-quarters want Canadian climate policy aligned with Europe rather than the United States, according to new public opinion data released this week by Clean Energy Canada. The research by Abacus Data found that, assuming both were priorities, 67% of Canadians "would generally favour clean energy projects such as critical minerals, renewable power and transmission, and energy storage," Clean Energy Canada explains. "The remaining 33% would prefer conventional fossil fuel projects like oil and gas, including [liquefied natural gas] development." View our latest digests Among the 2,585 Canadians who took place in an online panel between June 2 and 5, 87% said clean energy will be "very" or "pretty" important, and 83% said the same of fossil fuels. Some 45% said clean energy would be "very" important, compared to 36% for fossil fuels. The research uncovered overwhelming support-a margin of 76 to 24%-for shifting Canadian climate policy to align more with Europe, rather than the United States. And "as Canadians face another summer of wildfires, support for continued climate action remains extremely strong, with only 14% of Canadians saying the federal government should do less to combat climate change and transition the country to clean energy," Clean Energy Canada writes. But while a large plurality of respondents, 44%, wanted Canada to do more on climate, 41% said governments are doing about the right amount. The European Union is currently far ahead of Canada in its efforts to drive down climate pollution and shift to renewable energy technologies, and analysts have pointed out that Canada would be by far the biggest per capita emitter in any new trade relationship with the EU. The Abacus research also found that Canadians support building new homes with lower-carbon, sustainable materials by a margin of 64 to 15%, while 70% definitely or likely want to see EV hookups and heat pumps in new homes as long as the cost is minimal. "It's easy to wonder whether views on important issues have shifted as Trump, tariffs, and national security dominate headlines and the worried minds of Canadians," Clean Energy Canada Director of Communications Trevor Melanson said in an online statement. "And yet the consensus on climate action and the transition to clean energy remains overwhelmingly positive. What's more, as Canada forges stronger trade relationships with the likes of Europe and Asia, we may see a growing economic and values alignment with jurisdictions that are all-in on clean energy." Source: The Energy Mix

Trump expresses frustration with Israel and Iran as ceasefire deal teeters and strikes continue
Trump expresses frustration with Israel and Iran as ceasefire deal teeters and strikes continue

Winnipeg Free Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trump expresses frustration with Israel and Iran as ceasefire deal teeters and strikes continue

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says Israel and Iran violated ceasefire terms by carrying out attacks against each other after an early Tuesday deadline to stop hostilities. Trump, in comments to reporters at the White House before departing for the NATO summit at The Hague, expressed disappointment over the continued attacks. 'They violated it, but Israel violated it, too,' Trump said. He added, 'I'm not happy with Israel.' 'I didn't like the fact that Israel unloaded right after we made the deal,' Trump said. 'And now I hear Israel just went out because they felt violated by one rocket that didn't land anywhere.' The Republican president expressed deep disappointment with both sides after holding out the agreement he helped broker as validation for his strategic gamble of ordering U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed that Iran would stop its attacks if Israel would. And Israel also confirmed that it had reached its aims of its operations and would cease hostilities. But the tentative truce faltered Tuesday when Israel accused Iran of launching missiles into its airspace after the ceasefire was supposed to take effect and vowed to retaliate. Iran's military denied firing on Israel, state media reported, but explosions boomed and sirens sounded across northern Israel midmorning, and an Israeli military official said two Iranian missiles were intercepted. Trump's frustration was palpable as he spoke to reporters, using an expletive to hammer home his point. 'I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with Iran, either, but I'm really unhappy with Israel going out this morning,' Trump said. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f—- they're doing.' The president then took to his Truth Social platform to warn Israel to end its attacks. 'ISRAEL. DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS. IF YOU DO IT IS A MAJOR VIOLATION,' Trump posted. 'BRING YOUR PILOTS HOME, NOW!' ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at

FIRST READING: Just how far behind the world Canada has been allowed to lag on LNG
FIRST READING: Just how far behind the world Canada has been allowed to lag on LNG

National Post

time24 minutes ago

  • National Post

FIRST READING: Just how far behind the world Canada has been allowed to lag on LNG

First Reading is a Canadian politics newsletter curated by the National Post's own Tristin Hopper. To get an early version sent directly to your inbox, sign up here. Article content TOP STORY Article content Article content Early on Sunday morning, word leaked out from the Pacific Coast port of Kitimat, B.C. that Canada had produced its first-ever liquid natural gas for export. Article content Unnamed sources told Reuters that at 4 a.m. local time, the $40-billion LNG Canada terminal was first able to turn Canadian natural gas into a super-chilled liquid destined for Asian buyers. It's set to be loaded into the LNG tanker Gaslog Glasgow, a ship that as of press time was just entering Canadian territorial waters. Article content Article content Although the milestone is being feted as the beginning of a new multi-billion-dollar Canadian resource sector, it also neatly illustrates how far behind Canada has been allowed to lag in an industry where it could feasibly have been a dominant power. Article content Article content In all the world's other major producers of natural gas, this moment came years if not decades ago. The United States exported its first LNG in 2016, Qatar dispatched its first LNG vessels in 1997 and Australia was pioneering LNG export technology as early as 1989. Article content All three are now raking in hundreds of billions in annual LNG money that could have been Canada's if it been able to reach the starting line earlier than Sunday morning. Article content In Australia, the LNG export sector is now bringing in the Canadian equivalent of $220 million per day. According to the most recent figures from Australian Energy Producers, annual LNG export earnings were now worth $81.5 billion CDN. Article content This kind of money added to the Canadian economy would represent a three per cent rise in overall GDP. Put another way, it would be akin to adding a Manitoba's worth of extra GDP to the economy (Manitoba's GDP was $91.9 billion in 2023). Article content Article content In the nine years since the United States' first LNG export, the country has turned into the world's largest single exporter of the fuel. Article content Article content The United States now has eight dedicated LNG export terminals, the most recent having opened in December. Article content That same month, a report by S&P Global estimated that LNG exports had added a cumulative $400 billion ($550 billion CDN) to the U.S. economy. Article content Canada could have feasibly been an early contender in the LNG trade for the simple reason that — just like the U.S., Qatar and Australia — the country has lots of natural gas as well as the technology to produce it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store