
Woman Gets Puppy, Thinks It's Black Yorkshire Terrier—Then Comes the Shock
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Yorkshire terrier's dramatic fur change over the course of a few years has in equal parts stunned and amused viewers online, after catching even her owner off guard.
The canine's owner took to TikTok under @patriciaivyvo on June 17, to highlight the stark contrast in her adorable terrier's looks. The footage showed the dog first as a puppy nestled in her owner's arms with a distinctive dark brown-and-black coat. The video then cut to the present day, revealing the same Yorkshire terrier lounging in bed, now nearly unrecognizable with a light, blond coat.
The post has been viewed more than 647,000 times and liked by almost 100,000 users to date, prompting comments from pet owners who have had similar experiences.
Dr. Liza Cahn, an Embrace Pet Insurance contributor, told Newsweek that dog coats can sometimes change, even as drastically as the transformation shown in the video.
"A dog's coat color is caused by a complex interplay of genetics, though it can also be affected by factors such as aging, diet, overall health, and environmental exposure," Cahn said. "While most dogs maintain their adult color throughout life, there are a few interesting examples of how genetics can contribute to color change.
"Color fading, also known as progressive graying, and this dominant gene causes puppies born with dark coats to gradually lighten in color over their first few years of life, going from black or brown to silver, café-au-lait, or beige," Cahn added.
She said that this progressive lightening affects the hair itself, with the dog's skin, nose, and eye rims typically remaining dark.
"Another distinct genetic example associated with faded coat color is known as color dilution," Cahn said. "Unlike progressive graying, dilution affects the coat color from birth, essentially watering down the pigment to appear gray or fawn.
"Color dilution impacts all pigment, so these dogs will also have lighter coloring on their nose, paw pads, and eyes," Cahn added.
An overlaid text on the video read: "Nobody prepares you for the color change," while a caption below added: "I had no idea that Yorkies could change colors like that once they've grown out their puppy hair, and to think I almost named her boba."
For many viewers, the transformation was not just a novelty—it was relatable.
In the comments section, TikTok users flooded the post with their own stories of pet glow-ups, expressing surprise, affection, some tips, and even mild regret at not knowing what to expect.
"You still have two more color changes to go prepare," one viewer said.
"And they change color once you give them a cut," another added. "So don't cut them too early."
"Mine was the beige-blue color, and she got blonder and blonder over years, it's the cutest thing ever," a third viewer shared.
"Nobody warned me either my baby was chocolate brown now he's the color of your baby," one comment read.
As Cahn said, the change in a Yorkshire Terrier's coat color is not unusual. The American Kennel Club said that Yorkie puppies are typically born with black-and-tan coats. As they mature—usually between 9 weeks and 1 year—the black fur often fades to show lighter hairs.
This transformation is influenced by the dog's genetics, which is also what is responsible for many Yorkshire terriers turning silver as they grow older.
Newsweek reached out to @patriciaivyvo for more information via TikTok.
Stock image: A blonde Yorkshire terrier sits on a towel in front of a woman.
Stock image: A blonde Yorkshire terrier sits on a towel in front of a woman.
Getty Images
Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures of your pet you want to share? Send them to life@newsweek.com with some details about your best friend, and they could appear in our Pet of the Week lineup.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The Foods Linked to Short-Sightedness in Kids—and What to Eat Instead
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids may help protect children from developing short-sightedness, new research suggests. The study examined more than 1,000 Chinese children aged 6 to 8, drawing participants from the ongoing Hong Kong Children Eye Study. Researchers tracked the children's eye health and analyzed their diets through a detailed food frequency questionnaire covering 280 different food items categorized into 10 groups. These included breads, cereals, pasta, rice and noodles, vegetables and legumes, fruits; meats, fish and eggs, milk and other dairy products, drinks, snacks including dim sum, fats and oils, and soups. Children's hands eating fish with creamy sauce and broccoli in white plate, top view. Children's hands eating fish with creamy sauce and broccoli in white plate, top view. vaaseenaa Roughly 27.5 percent of the children studied had myopia or short-sightedness. Those with higher dietary intake of omega-3 fatty acids—commonly found in fish oils—had a lower risk of the condition, while children with the highest intake of saturated fats—found in foods such as butter, red meat and palm oil—were more likely to show signs of the disorder. Measurements of axial length (the distance from the front to the back of the eye, a key marker of myopia progression) revealed that eyes were longest in children with the lowest intake of omega-3 fatty acids, and shortest in those with the highest intake. Similarly, measures of refractive error were most severe in children consuming the least omega-3s. The reverse pattern was seen among those with the highest saturated fat consumption. No other nutrients were associated with the development of myopia. While the study is observational and cannot prove cause and effect, the authors suggest that omega-3 fatty acids may suppress myopia by boosting blood flow through the choroid—a vascular layer in the eye that delivers oxygen and nutrients—thereby preventing oxygen deficiency in the sclera, a key factor in the onset of short-sightedness. The prevalence of myopia is increasing worldwide and is expected to affect half of the global population by 2050, with East Asia experiencing particularly high rates. Risk factors are believed to include excessive screen time, limited outdoor activity and genetic susceptibility. "This study provides the human evidence that higher dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intake is associated with shorter axial length and less myopic refraction, highlighting omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a potential protective dietary factor against myopia development," the authors wrote in their paper. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about eye diseases? Let us know via health@ Reference Zhang, X. J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y. J., Yu, J., Tang, F. Y., Li, Y., Yeung, S., Kam, K. W., Agrawal, K., Loh, N. C., Ip, P., Wong, I. C. K., Zhang, W., Young, A. L., Tham, C. C., Pang, C. P., Chen, L. J., & Yam, J. C. (2025). Dietary omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a protective factor of myopia: The Hong Kong Children Eye Study. British Journal of Ophthalmology.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Expert debunks city official's misleading claims about controversial energy project: 'Keep spreading the truth and educating'
Expert debunks city official's misleading claims about controversial energy project: 'Keep spreading the truth and educating' The TikTok account Tigers Against Pollution (@ brings together diverse student voices from the University of Memphis all united under one banner: creating a more environmentally friendly Memphis, Tennessee. In a recent video, one member of the group debunks Memphis Mayor Paul Young's guest column in local newspaper The Commercial Appeal about the Memphis xAI project. The Memphis xAI project is run by a company founded by Tesla CEO Elon Musk. This supercomputing facility has recently come under fire for operating gas-powered turbines without proper permitting and for releasing pollution beyond limits, the Southern Environmental Law Center reported. According to the Tennessee Lookout, "The supercomputer facility is located in a poor, predominantly Black Memphis community with historically high rates of pollution-related illness and disproportionate rates of industrial pollutants." The video from Tigers Against Pollution sets out to "debunk [Mayor Young's] debunks," demonstrating that the Memphis xAI project is harmful and that the mayor is not unbiased. The first point of contention is around the number of turbines allowed for the supercomputing center. The speaker notes that the mayor's point about the number of permitted turbines cannot be correct because, at the time of the video, the public hearing for the permit had not even been completed. In the second point of the guest column, the number of turbines that the facility is operating legally is presented as 21, when the mayor said that the permit allowed 15 in the prior point. The speaker calls attention to this discrepancy and shows an image from the Southern Environmental Law Center that shows 32 operational turbines. The turbines are important because they burn dirty energy, releasing pollutants into the atmosphere that are harmful both for the climate and for the local population, as the Union of Concerned Scientists explained. The third and fourth claims related to the mayor's potential signing of an NDA and reasons for his support for the project, which cannot ultimately be proven or denied. The fifth claim involves the city's financial gain from the project. According to the mayor, the city stands to gain $12 million in tax revenue in just the first year. Do you worry about air pollution in your town? All the time Often Only sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The speaker for Tigers Against Pollution notes that the city's budget for this year is $900 million, according to Action News 5, which makes the $12 million seem inconsequential in light of the environmental concerns it raises. Those in the comments seemed to respect the work that the organization was doing. One wrote, "Keep spreading the truth and educating." Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword


Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Top Scientist Issues Stark mRNA Vaccine Warning to U.S.
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Rick Bright, the former director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) has warned that Department of Health and Human Services' decision to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development could threaten American national security. "BARDA wasn't the only government agency making early investments in mRNA research," Bright wrote in an opinion piece for The New York Times. "The Department of Defense and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency had already recognized mRNA's potential for swift action against emerging biological threats, including those that might be weaponized." It comes after HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the termination of 22 mRNA development investments and the reallocation of roughly $500 million at the beginning of this month. Why it Matters Bright said the mRNA platform had been central to the fast response to COVID-19 and that abandoning the technology would undermine the nation's ability to respond quickly to future biological threats. Multiple scientists and doctors have spoken out against this decision, including infectious diseases expert Dr. Thomas A. Russo, who told Newsweek that mRNA vaccines "will be critical when the next, inevitable infectious diseases crisis rears its ugly head." What To Know On August 5, the HHS confirmed it would cancel $500 million in mRNA vaccine development contracts, impacting research teams and proposals—including those from Emory University, Tiba Biotech, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur and others. The projects reportedly targeted respiratory viruses including seasonal influenza, COVID-19, RSV and H5N1 and included work by major industry and academic teams. Secretary Kennedy argued that the data showed mRNA vaccines had not met expectations for preventing upper respiratory infections and that HHS would shift funding toward other vaccine platforms. But Bright praised mRNA technology, saying that the "unprecedented speed" with which a COVID-19 vaccine was developed in 2020 "was possible only because years earlier, the United States had invested" in it. "This decision undercuts one of the most significant medical advances in decades, technology that could protect millions more people from the threats ahead," Bright said. "I know the stakes because I was BARDA's director when the United States made the decision to invest heavily in mRNA," he said. "That investment did not begin with Covid-19. It began in 2016, when we faced the Zika virus outbreak." "We needed a way to design a vaccine in days, not years, to protect pregnant women and their babies from devastating birth defects. Older vaccine approaches were too slow," Bright continued. "The solution was mRNA: a flexible, rapid-response technology that could be reprogrammed for any virus once its genetic sequence was known. That early investment laid the groundwork for the lightning-fast Covid-19 response four years later." Kennedy said in a post on X the time: "We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted. BARDA is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu," Kennedy said in a post on X. "We're shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate." Newsweek has contacted the HHS, via online inquiry form, for a response to Bright's comments. File photo of an employee of the Bavarian Red Cross (BRK) preparing the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 for vaccination in a vaccination center, taken in Bavaria, Germany, in January 2021. File photo of an employee of the Bavarian Red Cross (BRK) preparing the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 for vaccination in a vaccination center, taken in Bavaria, Germany, in January 2021. AP What People Are Saying Former BARDA director Rick Bright said in his NYT op-ed: "Like every technology, mRNA has limitations. Vaccines meant to protect against respiratory infections, whether developed through mRNA or older technologies, are generally better at averting severe disease than preventing infection. It is a scientific challenge we can address with next-generation vaccines. The answer to limitations is improvement, not abandonment. "Political narratives about mRNA have fueled confusion, which leads to mistrust, yet the scientific evidence consistently shows that this technology is safe and effective and holds enormous potential for future vaccines and treatments." Children's Health Defense, an anti-vax nonprofit founded by Kennedy Jr. which focuses on childhood health epidemics, said in a post on X: "CHD applauds this most recent announcement to defund 22 mRNA vaccine projects under BARDA. While we believe that the mRNA shots on the market are unsafe and should be off the market, this is a welcome step in the right direction. The pandemic preparedness industry as it exists today is a threat to human welfare." What Happens Next HHS said it would shift funding toward other vaccine platforms but did not provide detailed timelines or specify which programs would receive redirected support. Scientific organizations, industry groups and public-health leaders said they would assess the impact and consider next steps, while some public-health advocates announced initiatives to defend vaccine science and provide public information.