logo
Report finds big drop in FBI's use of intelligence database to search for information on Americans

Report finds big drop in FBI's use of intelligence database to search for information on Americans

Independent06-05-2025

New federal statistics show a steep decrease in the number of times the FBI searched a vast foreign intelligence repository for information about Americans and others in the United States last year.
The number of 'U.S. person queries' plunged from 57,094 in 2023 to 5,518 in 2024, according to the report published Monday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The report details the use of a surveillance program, known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, that allows the U.S. government to collect without a warrant the communications of targeted foreigners located in other countries — including when they are in contact with Americans or other people inside the U.S.
National security officials have said the program is vital to protecting the country, but civil liberties advocates have condemned it as a violation of Americans' privacy.
The report concludes that the decrease is due in large part to the adoption of tighter rules governing the program, including a requirement that the FBI enter a justification for a database query about an American before conducting it.
The numbers have dropped consistently in recent years. In 2022, the FBI racked up nearly 120,000 U.S. person queries.
Former President Joe Biden signed legislation reauthorizing the surveillance law last year after debates over civil liberty protections nearly forced the statute to lapse.
A key source of concern — uniting an unusual alliance of far-right Republican supporters of President Donald Trump with Democratic champions of civil liberties — is that FBI analysts have repeatedly run improper or unjustified database queries about people in the U.S.
The surveillance tool was first authorized in 2008.
The latest figures are included in an annual report, mandated by law, that provides statistical data about a broad array of the U.S. government's surveillance powers.
The FBI had no immediate comment on the report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-China trade talks: ‘framework' deal amid dispute over rare earths
US-China trade talks: ‘framework' deal amid dispute over rare earths

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

US-China trade talks: ‘framework' deal amid dispute over rare earths

Officials from the US and China have agreed on a 'framework' to move forward on trade after two days of talks in London stemming from their confrontation over tariffs. The US commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, expressed optimism on Tuesday that concerns about critical or 'rare earth' minerals and magnets 'will be resolved' as the deal is implemented. Lutnick told reporters that the framework puts 'meat on the bones' of a deal reached last month in Geneva to ease retaliatory tariffs. Its implementation had faltered over China's curbs on critical mineral exports. The deal also would remove some US export restrictions that were recently put in place, Lutnick said. 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents,' Lutnick said. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework.' In a separate briefing, China's vice commerce minister Li Chenggang said a trade framework had been reached that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. 'The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting,' Li told reporters. Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of critical minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement. 'Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming,' Lutnick said. 'You should expect those to come off, sort of as President Trump said, in a balanced way.' Li said: 'Our communication has been very professional, rational, in-depth and candid.' All eyes were on the outcomes of negotiations as both sides were at an impasse over export restrictions, with US officials earlier accusing Beijing of slow-walking approvals for shipments of critical minerals. The world's two biggest economies were also seeking a longer-lasting truce in their escalating tariffs war, with levies reduced temporarily. 'We're moving as quickly as we can,' US trade representative Jamieson Greer told reporters. 'We feel positive about engaging with the Chinese.' With Reuters and Agence France-Presse

Industry associations highlight cybersecurity risks at US regulatory agencies
Industry associations highlight cybersecurity risks at US regulatory agencies

Finextra

timean hour ago

  • Finextra

Industry associations highlight cybersecurity risks at US regulatory agencies

Four industry trade associations have called for significant reforms to how federal financial regulators handle sensitive data following a data breach at the Office of the Comproller of the Currency that exposed over 148,000 private correspondences containing sensitive supervisory information about US financial institutions. 0 In a letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, The Bank Policy Institute, American Bankers Association, MFA and Sifma say that growing threats from hostile nation-states targeting US critical infrastructure serve as a reminder of the urgency to address vulnerabilities. 'Government agencies are increasingly the target of persistent and sophisticated nation-state attacks that could disrupt financial markets and our economy,' the organizations wrote. 'It is imperative that federal regulators recognize that they are equally a target of malicious actors and implement the same or substantially similar cybersecurity and incident response practices that they expect financial institutions to maintain.' Financial institutions are legally required to share sensitive, proprietary and non-public information with their regulators as part of the supervisory process. This information can range from capital and liquidity management to cybersecurity protocols. However, centralizing large amounts of data can create a prime target for illicit actors seeking to harm US economic security, says the organisations. They point out that over the past two years, both the Treasury Department and the OCC have suffered significant cyber incidents. At the OCC, hackers were at work inside its systems for over a year-and-a-half before the intrusion were discovered. Immediately after the breach was reported both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of New York Mellon scaled back electronic information sharing with the agency. To mitigate risk and prevent similar problems in the future, the groups are urging the Treasury to hold federal agencies to the same security and data protection standards as private companies. They want to limit data collection to only what is necessary and avoid centralisation of sensitive data, allowing companies to maintain control and access to their data. The letter states: 'As firms are required to share non-public, highly sensitive information with regulators as part of the supervisory process, compromises at regulatory agencies could expose institutions' vulnerabilities and business information to malicious actors, putting them at strategic disadvantage.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store