
Moe, Smith call for federal support of energy projects, end to some industry regulations
Social Sharing
The premiers of Saskatchewan and Alberta met Wednesday in Lloydminster — a city that straddles their shared boundary — for a joint caucus meeting.
As they've done in the past, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and Alberta's Danielle Smith called for federal support for energy projects and the abandonment of some industry regulations — this time seated side-by-side.
Their demands are outlined in a joint statement released after Wednesday's meeting. Those include an end to federal interference in the development of provincial resources.
"The national self-sabotage that has happened over the last ten years has to end," Smith said.
Moe said this moment is a chance for Canada to take its place as an energy superpower.
"This is an opportunity that I would say is unlike any opportunity that I've seen in my lifetime for each of us as Canadians. And I'm, you know, very hopeful and excited on where this conversation will go in the next number of months," he said.
Moe said he is optimistic about Prime Minister Mark Carney's nation building plans. Smith said she too is hopeful, but wants the two provinces to have more of a say.
The premiers want the feds to eliminate the proposed oil and gas emissions cap and repeal any federal law regulating industrial carbon emissions, plastics or the commercial free speech of energy companies.
"If I understand where the Prime Minister is attempting to go, if he very soon is able to announce a project list that has 20 or more substantial projects on it that include mining projects and transmission projects and power projects and pipeline projects, I think that would send a pretty big message to the world about the direction that we're going," Smith said.
But Alberta's premier said legislation should also encourage private sectors to invest in big energy projects. Moe shares that view.
"Policies certainly matter. And the policies are much larger than a single pipeline that might have to be built," he said.
Along with oil and gas pipeline access, the two premiers are also demanding the exploration of export potential in critical minerals, agriculture, and forestry product.
Moe says Canada's top priority should be building an energy corridor that connects the northwest coast to the coast of Hudson Bay.
"A port-to-port corridor in Western Canada connecting northwestern Pacific ports to the Hudson Bay would provide the opportunity for us to have access to Asian [and] European markets for years into the future, for generations into the future," Moe said.
Concerns with Bill C-5
The joint press conference comes after the Liberals passed a closure motion Monday morning to speed through study and debate of Bill C-5 by week's end. Multiple MPs and premiers were critical of the swift timeline.
Government House leader Steven MacKinnon defended the bill's timeline, arguing that the government has public buy-in since the bill delivers on major campaign promises from the recent election.
"We just had the ultimate democratic test, and you know what we heard?" he said. "Get this country moving. We need a response to the threats coming from down south."
The legislation would give the federal cabinet the ability to set aside various statutes to push forward approvals for a small number of major industrial products, such as mines, pipelines and ports, if the government deems them to be in the national interest.
The government expects to pass the bill by the end of Friday.
Moe and Smith said if Prime Minister Mark Carney wants Canada to have the strongest G7 economy, he needs to repeal policies like the West Coast tanker ban and net-zero electricity regulations.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Globe and Mail
31 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada is not for sale – and neither are our skies
Ajay Virmani CM is the founder and executive chair of Cargojet. Thursday's recommendations from the Competition Bureau to open Canada's skies to foreign airlines may sound like a pro-consumer move. But beneath the surface, the move risks undermining our aviation industry, threatening Canadian jobs, and handing over control of a vital sector – all without getting a single thing in return. The bureau suggests allowing foreign carriers to fly domestic routes in Canada – a move known as 'cabotage' – and phasing out foreign ownership restrictions entirely. If adopted, these changes would fundamentally alter the aviation landscape in Canada. And not for the better. Watchdog says Ottawa should allow foreign-owned airlines to fly domestic routes to boost competition Let's start with the obvious: There is no reciprocal access. The foreign carriers most likely to cash in on this opportunity will be American ones, because of geography. But the United States, our closest trading partner, does not allow foreign carriers to operate domestic routes. It guards that privilege closely – as does many other major nations. Why, then, should Canada unilaterally open our skies? Competition is healthy – but only when it's fair. We cannot be the only country willing to give away our market while others protect theirs. That's not strategy – that's surrender. Canada is a country of extremes. We are the second-largest nation by landmass, but with a population spread thinly across vast geography. Air travel isn't just a convenience – it's a necessity. But let's be blunt: Canada is not big enough to support even three major airlines as the past two decades have shown. More than 15 carriers – from Jetsgo to Lynx – have gone out of business trying. Foreign airlines, with deep pockets and no long-term obligation to our infrastructure, will swoop in to cherry-pick profitable urban routes – Toronto to Vancouver, Montreal to Calgary – and leave Canadian carriers to subsidize unprofitable regional and remote routes. When the local players fold, who will serve the North? Who will fly to the small towns? Prices will go up, and service will disappear. The impact won't just be felt in boardrooms – it will hit everyday Canadians across the aviation workforce. We're talking about pilots, engineers, mechanics, technology professionals, baggage handlers, call centre teams and support staff. Foreign carriers have no incentive to hire in Canada beyond what's absolutely necessary. Opening the door to foreign dominance means exporting opportunity, experience and expertise – and leaving a skilled Canadian workforce behind. In today's geopolitical climate, the last thing we should do is hand over our aviation sector to foreign ownership. Aviation isn't just another business – it's a strategic asset. In emergencies, natural disasters and national defence, a strong domestic aviation backbone matters. Foreign ownership comes with no such loyalty. If the government truly wants to improve Canadian aviation, it should start with what's in its control: modernize our airports, lower sky-high airport rents and fees, invest in regional infrastructure and overhaul NAV Canada, which operates our civil air navigation system. These structural issues are what make flying in Canada expensive – not a lack of foreign players. Opinion: Stop the charade. Ottawa isn't prepared to do what it takes to improve airline competition Opening the door to foreign carriers without fixing the broken foundation is like inviting guests into a crumbling house and hoping they'll renovate it for you. The promise of cheaper fares is always tempting. But the reality is, foreign carriers will skim the cream off the top – and leave Canadian operators to handle the rest. Once Canadian carriers are weakened or gone, what leverage will we have left? The decisions will be made in boardrooms far away, with no regard for Canadian jobs, service standards, or national resilience. We need smart competition, not blind deregulation. We need policy that supports homegrown carriers and gives them the tools to grow and compete globally. And we need to recognize that our aviation sector isn't just about profits – it's about sovereignty, accessibility and nation-building. Canada is not for sale – and neither are our skies. Let's not let short-term thinking cost us our long-term future.


National Post
37 minutes ago
- National Post
Justice minister says he doesn't like 'soft on crime' slogans, but won't 'diminish' those concerns
OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says that while he does not believe in using labels like 'soft on crime,' which critics employ to describe the justice system, he says it is important not to dismiss the concerns of those who use them. Article content 'I don't necessarily agree with the sloganeering approach, but that doesn't mean someone who may agree with it doesn't have a point that deserves the government's attention,' he told National Post in a recent wide-ranging interview on Wednesday. Article content Article content Fraser enters the justice and attorney general portfolio at a time when premiers and police chiefs are pressing the federal government to further restrict access to bail, particularly in Ontario, as a strategy to stem the rising tide of auto thefts and home invasions, which police across the Greater Toronto Area and other regions of the country have reported. Article content Article content Making bail more difficult for those accused of these crimes, particularly when violence is used and when they are connected to organized crime, was a promise made by Prime Minister Mark Carney in late April's federal election, which saw the Liberals elected to a fourth term. Article content The Liberals also campaigned on a pledge to make bail harder for those charged with certain human trafficking and drug smuggling offences, as well as bringing in tougher sentencing guidelines for courts to follow for repeat offenders convicted of a home invasion or auto theft. Article content Crime was a major focus of Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre's campaign, with candidates handing out leaflets emblazoned with the percentages of how much car theft has increased in and around Toronto, where they flipped several seats from the Liberals. Article content Article content Conservatives have continued to draw attention to crime rates by laying them squarely at the feet of what they describe as 'soft on crime' and 'catch-and-release' Liberal justice policies. Article content Fraser says the discussion around tightening bail is rooted in legal analysis and not 'exclusively on the increased scrutiny that you may see from the public or from another political party.' It is also a multi-jurisdictional matter, he points out, and touches on issues like training for judges and justices of the peace, as well as the shortage of Crown prosecutors, which the Liberals have pledged to tackle. Article content 'When we hear the scrutiny that may come from the public on an issue that's an early warning system that you should be looking into, has there been a change? What is underlying that change?'

CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Nova Scotia government contracts new emergency alert app
The Nova Scotia government has contracted an Alberta company to help improve the emergency alert system in the province. The Emergency Management Department awarded Alertable a $1-million, untendered contract for a new app on March 25. The government has the ability to sign deals without open calls for bids in certain situations. A department spokesperson said there is no other provider that can deliver the option. "The vendor specializes in emergency alerting, successfully developing similar solutions in Saskatchewan and Alberta for about 10 years," Patricia Jreige said in an email. "More information on the app will come soon." According to the Alertable website, the company's mass notification software allows messages to be sent to a variety of social media platforms, as well as by text message, phone call and email. Some municipalities in Nova Scotia, including the Town of Digby and Town of Yarmouth, already use the company's software for notices about traffic disruptions, public meetings and other advisories. The Annapolis Regional Emergency Management Organization also uses the app. There have been ongoing questions and concerns about emergency alerts in Nova Scotia in the face of natural disasters and a mass shooting in recent years. Alerts were delayed by several hours during fatal floods in the Annapolis Valley in 2023. There were also concerns about how emergency alerts were used during wildfires in Halifax Regional Municipality that same year. during the mass shootings that started in Portapique in 2020, leaving 22 people dead over a two-day period. The force relied instead on social media to provide updates.