
cBrain appoints new CFO
Company Announcement no. 07/2025
cBrain appoints new CFO
Copenhagen, June 11, 2025
cBrain (NASDAQ: CBRAIN) is happy to announce that Lars Møller Christiansen has accepted the role as new CFO starting August 1st, 2025.
Lars Møller Christiansen comes from a position as Deputy Director at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), now known as the Agency for Green Land Use Planning and Aquatic Environment. Lars was responsible for financial management and digitization at the Danish EPA.
cBrain's current CFO, Ejvind Jørgensen, wishes to step down after nine years in the role. Following a transition period, Ejvind will take up other responsibilities, still being part of the cBrain journey.
Lars is known as a digital front runner, and he brings in-depth knowledge of eGovernment. During his career in Danish government for more than 24 years, Lars has engaged in positions within financial management as well as led projects from ministerial digitization to digitizing environment and climate processes. In parallel with his role as the new CFO, Lars thereby brings solid experience, supporting cBrain's international growth plan and leveraging Danish government expertise globally.
'Digital decision-making processes are crucial for the speed of the green transition. I am very much looking forward to applying my experience in an innovative tech company like cBrain, which has clear ambitions to make a difference for the climate and environment, both in Denmark and globally,' says Lars.
Best regards
Per Tejs Knudsen, CEO
Inquiries regarding this Company Announcement may be directed to
Ejvind Jørgensen, CFO & Head of Investor Relations, cBrain A/S, [email protected], +45 2594 4973
Attachment Company Announcement no. 2025-07 (CFO)
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump bids to scrap almost all pollution regulations – can anything stop this?
The Trump administration is attempting to unmake virtually all climate US regulations in one fell swoop. At an Indiana truck dealership on Tuesday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled a proposal to rescind the 16-year-old landmark legal finding which allows the agency to limit planet-heating pollution from cars and trucks, power plants and other industrial sources. Related: The renewable energy revolution is a feat of technology | Rebecca Solnit 'The proposal would, if finalized, amount to the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States,' said the EPA administrator, Lee Zeldin. The agency's primary argument for reversing the so-called 'endangerment finding' claims the Clean Air Act gives the EPA the authority to regulate only emissions that locally threaten health. Department of Energy officials also laid out another justification for the move, which experts say relies heavily on climate denialism. Once the proposal is published in the Federal Register, the EPA will open a public comment period. Once it finalizes the rule, it will face an array of legal challenges. But if the rollback prevails, it would leave the EPA without any authority to regulate greenhouse gas pollution amid ever-compounding evidence that a swift reduction in these emissions is needed to avert catastrophic global warming. 'The importance of the endangerment finding can't be overstated,' said the renowned climate scientist Michael Mann. 'It's been the primary tool that we have had to actually regulate carbon emissions and meet our obligations under various global agreements to address the climate crisis.' What is the administration doing? The endangerment finding, enshrined in 2009, found that greenhouse gases pose a threat to human health. It followed a 2007 supreme court ruling which found such gases were pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. The finding has long been a target for elimination by climate deniers. Democratic administrations used it and 'twisted the law, ignored precedent, and warped science to achieve their preferred ends and stick American families with hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes every single year', according to Zeldin. The proposed undoing of the finding followed Trump's January executive order on 'Unleashing American Energy', which directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. It comes as part of Trump's 'drill, baby, drill' agenda, which aims to boost already booming fossil-fuel production. Along with the scrapping of the endangerment finding, the EPA said it will kill off regulations limiting pollution coming from cars and will stymie a rule that curbs the amount of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, spewing from oil and gas drilling operations. Officials have laid out an array of legal justifications for the rollback. The main one rests on the idea that the Clean Air Act provides authority to regulate 'air pollution that endangers public health or welfare through local or regional exposure' – but not emissions that warm the planet. Zealan Hoover, former senior adviser to the EPA administrator, said that argument does not pass muster. 'The Clean Air Act requires the EPA to regulate any air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare,' he said. 'The Trump administration is staking out the extreme position that climate pollution does not harm the physical or financial health of Americans. That flies in the face of decades of scientific research and the firsthand experience of millions facing sea level rise, extreme heat, floods and fires.' The EPA is also using the so-called 'major questions doctrine' as an argument for the rollback, said Michael Gerrard, a professor of environmental and energy law at Columbia Law School and faculty chair of Columbia's Earth Institute. Embraced by conservative justices, it says congressional authorization is needed for action on issues of broad importance and societal impact. 'They're saying that, regardless of what the text of the Clean Air Act may say, the endangerment finding is so economically and politically significant that the EPA can't issue it without explicit congressional authorization,' said Gerrard. In a 150-page report also published on Tuesday, the Department of Energy (DoE) also laid out a separate argument for the move, which attempts to undercut the scientific consensus on the climate crisis. Experts say it relies on misleading scientific claims, such as the idea that carbon is beneficial for agriculture, which downplays research suggesting climate-driven extreme weather damages crop yields, and the debunked idea that extreme cold is more dangerous than extreme heat. Reached for comment, a Department of Energy spokesperson, Ben Dietderich, said: 'This report critically assesses many areas of ongoing scientific inquiry that are frequently assigned high levels of confidence – not by the scientists themselves but by the political bodies involved, such as the United Nations or previous presidential administrations.' The UN and the US have regularly convened top scientists to produce scientific climate reports, which warn that urgent action to curb emissions is needed. Last week, the secretary general of the UN, António Guterres, gave a speech in which he said the world is on the brink of a breakthrough in the climate fight and fossil fuels are running out of road. What could the impact of the Trump administration's move be? In its proposal, the EPA claimed eliminating US carbon pollution 'would not have a scientifically measurable impact' on the global climate or on public health. But by warming the planet and increasing the likelihood of extreme weather events like wildfires and floods, greenhouse gas emissions pose grave threats to society, said Mann. 'It isn't remotely credible to argue that carbon pollution isn't a major, if not the greatest, threat now to human health,' he said. With the proposed change, 'the EPA is telling us in no uncertain terms that US efforts to address climate change are over', said Abigail Dillen, president of the environmental legal non-profit Earthjustice. 'For the industries that contribute most to climate change, the message is: pollute more,' she said. 'For everyone feeling the pain of climate disasters, the message is: you're on your own.' Though the rollback aims to create a regulatory environment friendly to fossil fuels, it could, ironically, also threaten oil companies' attempts to fend off lawsuits aiming to hold them accountable for the climate crisis. To fight some challenges by cities and states, companies have argued that because the EPA regulates greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, those suits should be void. Throwing out EPA's ability to regulate those emissions could leave energy companies open to further challenges. 'I know that industry groups have been asking the Trump folks not to reverse the endangerment finding,' Jeff Holmstead, of the oil and gas law firm Bracewell, told E&E News in February. What happens next? Zeldin's proposed rulemaking on the endangerment finding initiated a 45-day comment period, when the public will be able to weigh in on the proposed change. 'EPA will then have to respond to the comments, make any necessary changes, and issue the rule in final form,' said Gerrard, of Columbia. The final rule is expected to be met with an onslaught of lawsuits, which will go to the DC federal appeals court. The losers of those cases – either the government or the challengers – are expected to take them to the supreme court. Shaun Goho, legal director at the pollution-focused nonprofit Clean Air Task Force, said the proposal was 'unlawful'. 'Greenhouse gas emissions endanger public health and the climate, and the Clean Air Act mandates that EPA regulates harmful air pollution,' he said. Some experts are confident the challenges will be successful. But Gerrard says he is not so sure. 'The US supreme court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has issued a series of decisions in the past three years cutting back on federal environmental regulations,' he said. 'So I'm concerned.' Asked about experts concerns about the health-harming impacts of greenhouse gases, the EPA said its proposal 'is primarily legal and procedural'. 'The endangerment finding is the legal prerequisite used by the Obama and Biden administrations to regulate emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines,' a spokesperson said. 'Absent this finding, EPA would lack statutory authority under [the Clean Air Act] to prescribe standards for greenhouse gas emissions.' The spokesperson said 'many of the predictions made and assumptions used' for the endangerment finding 'did not materialize'. However, scientists have in recent decades produced many new findings showing greenhouse gases are dangerous.


Business Upturn
4 hours ago
- Business Upturn
XRP Crypto Powers Ahead in Global Payments — HashJ Introduces Participation Contracts for 2025 Users
London, United Kingdom, Aug. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MGPD Finance Limited, doing business as HashJ, today announced the official rollout of its XRP participation contracts, offering users a simplified way to engage with one of the most established digital assets in global payments. This launch comes as XRP continues to demonstrate resilience and institutional appeal, buoyed by legal clarity and renewed adoption across financial sectors. At the time of publication, XRP is trading at approximately $2.74, with a market capitalization near $40 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. The asset remains within the top 10 globally by valuation. Recent developments, including a U.S. court ruling confirming that XRP is not a security when traded on exchanges, have reinforced confidence among both retail and institutional participants. HashJ's participation contracts aim to make engagement with XRP more accessible by providing short-term, fixed-return instruments that eliminate the need for technical management or high-risk trading exposure. How HashJ is Expanding Digital Asset Participation Through Simplified Contracts HashJ's XRP participation contracts mark the latest addition to its growing portfolio of structured digital asset instruments designed for mainstream users. Built for accessibility, these short-term contracts allow individuals to engage with XRP-linked performance without navigating complex trading platforms or managing technical infrastructure. Available via HashJ's mobile-based interface, each contract offers a defined term and a fixed reward structure. Participants can select from multiple durations—starting at just a few days—while benefiting from a straightforward entry process that does not require advanced financial knowledge or experience in digital asset markets. HashJ's User-Centered Design for Broader Engagement The launch reflects HashJ's commitment to creating inclusive financial tools that reduce barriers to entry. By eliminating price speculation mechanics and minimizing the decision-making overhead often associated with digital asset investing, the participation model appeals to a broad demographic of users—including those new to the space. As with its earlier BTC, DOGE, and ETH-based contracts, HashJ's XRP contracts are designed to respond to market movement while offering a predictable outcome over a fixed duration. This approach has attracted over 2 million users across more than 90 countries, many of whom cite ease of use and risk clarity as key differentiators. Welcoming First-Time Users with Platform Credits To support adoption of the XRP contract line, HashJ is offering new users a welcome package valued at $118, comprising $100 in contract trial credits and $18 in platform incentive provides first-time users an opportunity to engage with the platform at no upfront cost, and to experience the structure and flow of short-term participation firsthand. Product Expansion and Global Reach HashJ's addition of XRP contracts follows growing interest from users in Asia, Latin America, and parts of Europe, where simplified tools for accessing high-cap digital assets have seen increased demand. The platform's infrastructure is built for mobile environments and supports fast, secure, and transparent participation without requiring traditional account funding mechanisms. By enabling users to align with major asset movements through structured contracts, HashJ aims to help more individuals participate in the digital asset economy—on their own terms and timelines. About MGPD Finance Limited (HashJ) MGPD Finance Limited, doing business as HashJ, is a fintech company based in the United Kingdom. Founded in 2018, the company provides contract-based digital reward systems for BTC, ETH, DOGE, and XRP, with over 2 million users across more than 90 countries. For more information, visit: User Benefit: Register and receive $18 and $100 sign up reward. Business Inquiries: [email protected]


Business Upturn
4 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence – Former Pentagon Insider Warns of 2025 Collapse Plan and America's Final Signal
New York, Aug. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Created by a former Army logistics officer and structured by an investigative researcher with decades of survival study, Dark Reset offers an organized framework for families seeking clarity before systems fail. Rather than pushing fear or politics, the system focuses on practical, moral, and spiritual preparation — the kind of step-by-step resilience training built for people who want to lead quietly, not panic loudly. With infrastructure cracks growing more visible and public trust in emergency systems faltering, more Americans are asking the same question: What would we do if everything just stopped working? From power grids to payment networks, food supply chains to digital communications, the warning signs are no longer abstract. Dark Reset is a guide written for that moment — and for those who'd rather prepare while there's still time. Explore the full Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence resource and see how families are preparing for a different kind of disruption. Why Interest in 'Survival Before the Silence' Is Surging in 2025 There's a new type of search history taking over the internet in 2025 — and it's not about travel hacks or recipe trends. It's about blackout survival. EMP attacks. Grid-down prepping. How to filter water when stores are closed. How to preserve food when the fridge dies. And most alarmingly — how to protect your family when phones go silent and help never arrives. The spike in survival-related queries has been unmistakable. Google Trends shows a sharp rise in searches for 'off-grid protection,' 'emergency grid collapse,' and 'how to survive the first 24 hours of total failure.' At the same time, platforms like YouTube and TikTok are flooded with creators dissecting hypothetical EMP attacks, digital banking outages, and artificial intelligence fail-safes. These aren't niche fears anymore — they're trending topics. It's not paranoia driving this surge. It's pattern recognition. From cascading cyberattacks in Europe to water supply hacks in the U.S., global infrastructures have proven more fragile than many assumed. And with public trust in centralized systems at a historic low, the cultural narrative has shifted. People aren't waiting to be told what to do. They're watching events unfold — and quietly making backup plans. The turning point came when mainstream headlines began reporting 'unprecedented disruptions' with no clear source. Banks freezing accounts. Communications blinking out for minutes — then hours. Sudden shortages in fuel and food distribution chains. These cracks in modern life are no longer theoretical. They're being felt at the checkout line, in delayed prescriptions, and in the dead zones where cell towers used to provide lifelines. And with global tensions escalating, the sense of looming disruption feels closer than ever. Analysts who once downplayed such concerns now speak cautiously about 'grid resilience' and 'urban decentralization.' Meanwhile, private citizens — from urban apartment dwellers to rural families — are waking up to the same conclusion: Preparedness is no longer fringe. It's functional. That's why programs like Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence are catching fire — not because of sensationalism, but because people are finally asking the right question: What if tomorrow is too late to prepare? Dark Reset as a Response to This Shift In a time when the average household depends on over 100 interconnected systems to function — from cloud banking to digital thermostats — the idea of a full-scale failure feels too abstract for most. But for those who've studied history, lived through conflict zones, or worked inside critical infrastructure, the question isn't if systems fail. It's how long people last when they do. Dark Reset was not created in response to fear. It was built from conviction. Designed by former military logistics officer Thomas Reeves and shaped into a civilian framework by investigative researcher Daniel Cross, Dark Reset is structured to answer one specific question: how does an average family survive the first 72 hours of engineered silence? Unlike traditional prepper manuals that focus on long-term homesteading or tactical survival, Dark Reset was architected to be fast, accessible, and immediately relevant. It draws on firsthand experience from war zones, blackout events, and off-grid communities — translating years of study and stress-tested strategies into a streamlined, household-ready system. Reeves, who spent time embedded with low-tech communities across the U.S. and Europe, built his life around the idea that the collapse wouldn't be loud. It would be quiet. That mindset shaped every page of Dark Reset — from its emergency blueprints to its no-tech redundancy drills. This is not about bugging out. It's about staying calm, protected, and self-sufficient while others are still waiting for a government response that may never arrive. The system begins not with gear, but with insight. It teaches users how to audit their vulnerabilities, how to use what they already own, and how to prepare without drawing attention. Because in a real blackout, visibility is risk. And survival depends not just on supplies — but on strategy. As families increasingly question the reliability of modern systems, Dark Reset offers a blueprint forged in reality and grounded in responsibility. Its purpose isn't to scare. It's to simplify the steps needed to protect the people who matter most. Learn more about how Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence was designed to close the gap between panic and preparation. Inside the Dark Reset System Dark Reset is not a product of theory. It's a system forged from practical necessity, tested under pressure, and refined for the realities most Americans now sense on the horizon. Rather than overwhelm users with exhaustive lists or tactical jargon, the program delivers a focused, results-driven survival protocol rooted in three pillars: simplicity, stealth, and sustainability. At its core, Dark Reset teaches families how to navigate a total grid failure with calm precision. The structure is delivered through a step-by-step survival blueprint — combining decades of off-grid experience, low-tech field methods, and spiritual preparation into one cohesive framework. This is not a one-size-fits-all solution. It is a modular system designed to adapt to households with varying levels of readiness, resources, and risk exposure. The first module introduces what the creators call 'The Quiet Audit' — a guided vulnerability assessment that helps users evaluate their daily dependencies on fragile infrastructure. From there, users are taught how to repurpose everyday items for emergency functionality, secure their homes with zero electricity, and develop backup communication and heating strategies without requiring technical knowledge or military experience. What sets Dark Reset apart is its inclusion of rare, field-tested knowledge often absent from mainstream prep materials. These include stealth storage techniques, natural medicine preservation without refrigeration, and methods for sourcing clean water in urban environments. Every section is intentionally designed to bypass complexity — focusing instead on what works when seconds matter and support systems fail. The guide also includes Reeves' 'Emergency Blueprint' library — a compilation of contingency checklists and fallback drills that cover high-risk scenarios like power grid blackouts, cellular network collapse, fuel shortages, and digital banking freezes. These aren't abstract protocols. They are direct responses to the vulnerabilities currently visible in daily American life. Dark Reset is not a gadget. It's not a theory. It's a layered, high-utility system meant to empower ordinary families to function, adapt, and protect — even in the most disorienting moments of systemic failure. What Online Users Are Saying About This Category Across YouTube, Telegram, and private forums, the conversation around digital collapse and survival independence has shifted in tone. What was once mocked as paranoia is now being reframed as personal responsibility. And the people discussing it aren't fringe. They're engineers, mothers, former service members, and quiet professionals. Not shouting in panic — but sharing steps. Videos tagged with phrases like 'silent blackout plan' and 'how I built my grid-down kit' are racking up millions of views. Comments below those videos read less like fanfare and more like blueprints. People are openly comparing blackout drills, debating the best low-tech heat sources, and sharing real-world stories from power outages and supply chain disruptions they've lived through. In private chats, users trade notes about bank freezes, prescription gaps, and neighborhood security protocols. The language has matured. It's less about prepping for the end of the world — and more about preserving the world inside your home when the outside systems go quiet. The tone has also turned spiritual for many. Users reference parables, biblical foresight, and prophetic warnings — not to predict outcomes, but to frame their decisions around clarity and obedience. There's a collective recognition that governments may prepare for continuity — but families must prepare for survival. No one's waiting for permission anymore. Across online spaces, people are quietly running tests, building backup kits, and teaching their children what to do when the lights go out and the phones stop working. Some call it 'quiet prepping.' Others call it 'digital resilience.' But the message is the same: the collapse, if it comes, won't be announced. It will be discovered — too late — by those who didn't prepare. This cultural tone is exactly why Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence is resonating now. It doesn't demand belief. It offers structure — for those who already see what's coming. Discover what's included in the Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence program and how it translates global risk into clear next steps. Who Might Gravitate Toward This Product in 2025 Dark Reset was never designed for doomsday theorists or survival hobbyists. Its structure and tone suggest a different audience entirely — one that values preparedness not out of fear, but out of responsibility. In 2025, that group is growing rapidly. Many of today's early adopters are high-functioning professionals who've quietly begun reassessing their dependence on fragile systems. These individuals often work in logistics, cybersecurity, medicine, or finance — sectors where disruptions are not hypothetical, but observed daily. They're not broadcasting their decisions. They're preparing in silence. At the same time, there's a growing cohort of families — especially those with young children or aging parents — who are taking proactive steps toward basic self-reliance. For them, the question isn't whether the grid will fail. It's how to maintain stability if it does. They're not stockpiling for years. They're organizing for three critical days — the silent window that separates order from desperation. Others drawn to Dark Reset include rural homesteaders refining their systems, suburban households looking for quiet continuity plans, and urban residents building out minimalist fallback protocols using nothing more than tap water, candles, and conviction. Many of them turn to Dark Reset not because it promises perfection — but because it offers a calm, tested path through uncertain territory. Faith-driven communities have also shown strong engagement. The material's emphasis on biblical foresight and moral responsibility resonates with those who believe spiritual clarity must accompany physical preparedness. For these groups, readiness is not reactionary — it's an act of stewardship. And then there are those who've already lived through cascading failures: hurricanes, cyberattacks, regional blackouts, or global shutdowns. For them, Dark Reset is not theory. It's reflection — a system that articulates what they wish they'd known before everything went silent. In a time when fear-based marketing is easy to spot and easier to dismiss, Dark Reset stands out for its discipline. It speaks quietly to people who are listening carefully — and who recognize that resilience may be the most valuable currency of the decade. Market Category Reflections – Why This Niche Is Expanding Over the last five years, the preparedness industry has transformed from a niche market into a mainstream cultural shift. What was once considered fringe — emergency kits, water storage, analog backups — is now showing up in mainstream media segments, home design blogs, and even urban policy discussions. This isn't just about prepping anymore. It's about decentralization. Digital sovereignty. Quiet resilience. The rise of digital dependency has exposed new vulnerabilities. More Americans now understand that a simple password reset isn't the same as digital control — and that a centralized system failure could disconnect them from basic needs without warning. From online banking to food delivery, every modern convenience is now a single point of failure. That realization is pushing ordinary people to reexamine their exposure. At the same time, trust in large institutions has fractured. Whether due to data breaches, inconsistent emergency responses, or silent outages with no explanation, public confidence in 'the system' is waning. As a result, the demand for low-tech, low-cost, high-impact solutions has surged. People want strategies that work when the screen goes dark — not apps that require constant updates. This trend has given rise to a new category: structured survival systems for the digital age. Not off-grid communes or war-room simulations, but practical guides for modern households navigating a fragile landscape. The goal isn't isolation. It's insulation — the ability to stay calm, fed, and functional when infrastructure falters. Dark Reset fits directly into this emerging niche. It doesn't attempt to replace advanced systems. It teaches users how to stand independently when those systems fail. It also arrives at a time when audiences are more receptive to this messaging than ever. Major retailers have begun dedicating aisle space to blackout kits. Public libraries are hosting resilience workshops. And insurance companies are quietly rewriting risk tables to account for systemic interruptions. As the lines between preparedness and everyday life continue to blur, solutions like Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence are no longer outliers. They are the new baseline. Explore whether Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence fits the profile of what your household might quietly need. Public Debate – Supporters, Skeptics, and the Signals Behind the Buzz Like any movement gaining momentum, the survival readiness trend surrounding Dark Reset has sparked a wide range of public reactions. Supporters frame the conversation as overdue — a necessary rebalancing in a society overly reliant on digital systems. Skeptics, meanwhile, question whether such preparation signals unnecessary fear. And in between, a large segment of the public watches quietly, neither dismissing nor embracing the movement — just listening. Supporters often cite historical precedent. They point to past collapses — from natural disasters to economic shocks — and argue that preparedness isn't reactionary, but rational. To them, Dark Reset represents an organized way to take responsibility in an era of institutional instability. They highlight its field-tested simplicity and biblical tone as reasons it resonates beyond the typical prepper demographic. Some skeptics argue that survival narratives can easily slip into hyperbole. They express concern that framing global tension as personal threat may feed anxiety rather than clarity. However, these critiques rarely dismiss the vulnerabilities themselves. Even those who resist the tone of survival culture often acknowledge that basic resiliency — clean water storage, emergency heating, medicine access — makes practical sense. Others remain cautiously curious. These observers aren't looking for confrontation or confirmation. They're scanning headlines, noting the frequency of silent outages, bank disruptions, and power grid warnings. They're asking internal questions: what would we do? Are we ready? Could we stay calm if the phones went dead? That broad middle is where Dark Reset gains quiet traction. Its authors don't position themselves as prophets or provocateurs. They're not forecasting the end. They're offering a framework — one rooted in spiritual clarity, practical repetition, and the kind of calm decisiveness that many now find missing in institutional responses. In public forums, the conversation continues. Some call it preparation. Others call it overreaction. But the signals behind the buzz — the blackouts, the food disruptions, the silent system failures — remain stubbornly present. And for many, that's enough. About Dark Reset Dark Reset is not a traditional product launch or media campaign. It's the result of a quiet collaboration between two men with vastly different backgrounds, united by a shared concern: that most American families remain dangerously unprepared for what happens when systems fail. Built from field experience, research, and tested resilience strategies, the system is designed to help ordinary households develop extraordinary readiness — without requiring military training, specialized gear, or ideological commitment. The core values behind Dark Reset are clarity, stewardship, and adaptability. Its creators emphasize that the point is not to fear collapse, but to lead through it. By distilling years of study, firsthand experience, and spiritual reflection into a clear, implementable framework, the program offers a counterpoint to both panic-driven prepping and passive optimism. It's not about bunkers or bug-out fantasies. It's about the confidence that comes from being prepared, quiet, and calm when others are not. While rooted in tactical realism, the system is also unapologetically grounded in faith. Many of its principles are drawn from scriptural narratives — the foresight to store grain, the wisdom to prepare in times of peace, and the duty to protect those under one's care. That framing has made it especially relevant to faith-based communities looking for guidance that bridges both the spiritual and the practical. Dark Reset remains independently published, free from commercial sponsorship or institutional ties. Its creators made a deliberate decision to prioritize accessibility and utility over branding and polish. The result is a system that speaks directly to those who are already watching the signs — and who prefer action over theory. In an age of increasing volatility and digital fragility, Dark Reset positions itself not as the answer to every threat, but as a starting point. A framework. A tested roadmap for households who understand that resilience isn't just physical — it's mental, emotional, and moral. Learn more at the official Dark Reset: Survival Before the Silence resource page. Contact Final Disclaimer This press release is for informational purposes only. The content herein does not constitute financial, legal, or medical advice. Dark Reset is not intended to diagnose, treat, predict, or guarantee any result or outcome. Individual experiences may vary, and outcomes are not assured. Some links in this release may be promotional in nature and may lead to third-party websites. The publisher or author may receive compensation through affiliate commissions if a purchase is made through these links. This compensation does not affect the price you pay and helps support continued research and content publication. All statements made about product features, platform strategies, or training content reflect publicly available information, user discussions, or historical trends, and are not endorsed or validated by regulatory bodies. Please perform your own research before making financial, technological, or purchasing decisions. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash