Pakistan vows retaliation after India launches air strikes
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Pakistan has promised to retaliate after India launched military strikes on Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, fuelling fears of a broader confrontation between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
Pakistan's government on Wednesday pledged to respond 'at a time, place and manner of its choosing to avenge the loss of innocent Pakistani lives and blatant violation of its sovereignty'.
Pakistan's military said at least 31 civilians were killed and 46 others injured in the Indian attacks and ensuing cross-border shelling, describing the strikes as having 'ignited an inferno in the region'.
In New Delhi, Indian officials briefed more than a dozen foreign envoys, telling them: 'If Pakistan responds, India will respond'.
It comes amid spiralling tensions following a deadly attack last month on Hindu tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir, which India blamed on Pakistan-based fighters. Islamabad has denied any involvement.
Cross-border shelling
India's government said its forces targeted nine sites it described as 'terrorist infrastructure', including facilities allegedly linked to the fighters who killed 25 tourists and one local in last month's Kashmir attack.
However, in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, residents said Indian missiles struck a mosque-seminary in the city centre.
Indian security force personnel stand guard near the site of a fighter jet crash in Wuyan in Indian-administered Kashmir's Pulwama district, May 7, 2025 [Sharafat Ali/Reuters]
The building, which included residential quarters, was left in ruins, with five missiles reportedly killing three people inside the two-storey structure.
Meanwhile, heavy cross-border shelling and gunfire continued along the Line of Control (LoC), the de facto border dividing Kashmir. Officials said 13 civilians were killed and 43 wounded on the Indian side, while at least six civilians were killed on the Pakistani side.
Pakistan's Prime Minister's Office claimed that five Indian fighter jets and drones were shot down during the escalation. The Indian embassy in Beijing dismissed reports of downed aircraft as 'disinformation'.
Sharif promises response
Pakistan's Foreign Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar told TRT World that there had been communication between the national security advisers of the two countries, while Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif pledged that Pakistan would respond decisively.
'For the blatant mistake that India made last night, it will now have to pay the price,' Sharif said on state broadcaster PTV. 'Perhaps they thought that we would retreat, but they forgot that … this is a nation of brave people.'
Al Jazeera's Osama Bin Javaid, reporting from Islamabad, said that retaliation from Pakistan was widely anticipated.
'Pakistan is expected to retaliate within the next 24 to 48 hours, and that's something we've been hearing from politicians across the board,' he said.
'They're citing Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, which says that a country has the right to respond to an unprovoked act of aggression.'
India defended its actions, with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh claiming its 'targets we had set were destroyed with exactness according to a well-planned strategy'.
'We have shown sensitivity by ensuring that no civilian population was affected in the slightest,' he added.
Islamabad claims six sites targeted by India were not linked to armed groups.
A paramilitary soldier stands guard outside the Government Health and Educational complex after Indian strikes in Muridke, about 30 kilometres, or 20 miles, from Lahore, on May 7, 2025 [Arif Ali/AFP]
'I want to see it stop'
The Pakistani military said 57 commercial aircraft from multiple countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Thailand, South Korea and China, were in Pakistan's airspace at the time of India's attack, putting thousands of passengers at risk.
India has since ordered the closure of at least 21 civilian airports in the northern and western parts of the country for passenger flights until May 10, The Hindu reported.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan spoke with Prime Minister Sharif and expressed Ankara's support. According to the Turkish presidency, Erdogan praised Pakistan's 'calm and restrained policies' during the crisis.
In Washington, United States President Donald Trump said he hoped to help de-escalate the situation. 'I want to see it stop. And if I can do anything to help, I will be there,' he told reporters at the White House. 'We want to see them work it out.'
Uday Chandra, assistant professor of government at Georgetown University in Qatar, said while retaliation from Pakistan was expected, it appeared that neither country was seeking 'an all-out war'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Inside the harrowing attack on Syria's Druze — and why the US' first step in the right direction is vital
I woke to voice notes from Mazen, his Suwayda Druze dialect thick with tears. 'Jolani's ISIS are massacring us,' he said, referring to the forces of Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, formerly known as Jolani from his Al-Qaeda days. 'Please talk to anyone you know in Washington to help us,' he pleaded. Over the next five days, I exchanged information with Mazen, Muhannad, Makram, Gadeer, Shadi and other Druze in Syria, Lebanon and Israel, piecing together the unfolding horror. I was the only non-Druze in the group. Advertisement To us, it was clear: Damascus had ordered a massacre against the Druze in southern Syria. 5 Bedouin fighters walk near a damaged car, following the Syrian presidency's announcement of a ceasefire after days of violence in Sweida province triggered by clashes between Bedouin fighters and Druze factions. REUTERS As a Lebanese civil war survivor, I've faced near-death experiences and reported on assassinations. Despite losing close friends to violence in Lebanon and Iraq, I've trained myself to detach, keeping emotions separate from my work. But no one grows numb to massacres. Once you connect with victims, helplessness sets in. Advertisement On normal days, I make noise about Middle Eastern issues, but as Druze fell to Islamist bullets, I felt powerless. How do you stop death? How do you make the world hear? The Druze in Israel worked tirelessly, lobbying for the Jewish state to intervene and deter Sharaa. Israel eventually acted, destroying Islamist convoys heading south and striking a building in Damascus to warn Sharaa. 5 Following sectarian clashes this month between Druze and Bedouin tribes, Israel eventually acted, destroying Islamist convoys heading south and striking a building in Damascus to warn Sharaa. Getty Images Suddenly, the narrative shifted to international law — not condemning Syria for killing its citizens, but criticizing Israel for violating Syrian sovereignty. This same Israeli action had previously weakened Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syria, paving Sharaa's path to power. Advertisement Yet now, Syrian sovereignty was the focus. After Israel's warning, Sharaa paused but didn't stop. Cunningly, he continued the violence through proxies. 'He ordered his forces to swap military uniforms for tribal outfits, calling them clans,' Mazen said. 'Our guys in Suwayda captured several 'clansmen' who still carried military IDs.' Mazen, Muhannad and others eventually outlined the attacking force. Advertisement 5 Outnumbered and outgunned, the Druze suffered heavy losses over three days. Here, Druze women gather to cross back into Syria at the Israeli-Syrian border. AP Three of Sharaa's top lieutenants — Hussain al-Salama (Chief of Intelligence), Youssef Al-Hajr (HTS Political Chief) and Muhammad al-Jassim (Abu Amsheh, a Turkish-backed commander) — orchestrated the tribal attack. Salama and Al-Hajr, from the Aqidat clan, and Al-Jassim, from the Nuaym clan, both based in northeastern Syria, used state-supervised mosque networks to rally 15,000 fighters whom they bused over 350 miles to attack the Druze in the south. No ties linked the northern and southern clans. The 'revenge' narrative was bogus. Outnumbered and outgunned, the Druze suffered heavy losses over three days. 5 Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa. Getty Images Sharaa's Islamists entered homes, massacring families including Evangelical pastor Khalid Mezher and 20 of his relatives. An American citizen, Hosam Saraya, visiting Suwayda, was dragged in the street and executed with his family. A captured government fighter confessed that Sharaa's forces were instructed to wear civilian clothes and use civilian vehicles to evade Israeli airstrikes. They were ordered to kill any Druze they encountered, either by shooting or beheading. Of the 3,500 fighters transported in 800 vehicles, 200 were foreign Islamists from Chechnya and Central Asia, including suicide bombers tasked with targeting Druze gatherings. Advertisement As clashes continued, Mazen's updates grew grim: 'This is where my retired uncle was killed in his house,' or 'That's where my maternal cousins were gunned down.' We wanted to console him, but there was no time for emotions — not for Mazen, Muhannad, or any of us. US Envoy Tom Barrack claimed the perpetrators were Islamists posing as government forces. We were certain he was wrong, likely unaware of US intelligence and echoing Damascus's talking points. 5 Sharaa denied his government's role in the onslaught against the Druze people. Here, Tribal and bedouin fighters cross Walga town amid clashes with Druze gunmen. AFP via Getty Images Sharaa denied his government's role in the onslaught, yet water, electricity and internet were cut off in Suwayda. Government checkpoints blocked food and medicine. Advertisement Our sources went silent. Mazen explained that batteries were dying, and those with satellite phones were busy searching for missing loved ones or burying the dead. The Druze were drowning in blood and grief, unable to update us, their window to the world. Washington announced a ceasefire on Friday, but it didn't take hold until Sunday. When the shooting stopped, the scale of the disaster emerged. The tally stands so far at 3,300 dead Druze out of Syria's 700,000 Druze population — the equivalent of America's September 11 and Israel's October 7. With electricity and internet restored, videos surfaced: hundreds of summary executions, an unarmed Druze man shot by Sharaa's forces without question, another pleading for his life before being killed for being Druze. Government forces looted shops and homes, desecrated houses of worship and left graffiti vowing to exterminate the Druze and establish an Islamist state. Advertisement President Trump met Sharaa in May and announced the removal of sanctions on Syria. But the Suwayda massacre prompted the House Financial Services Committee to reconsider. Instead of fully repealing the 2019 Caesar sanctions, they voted to amend them, allowing removal only if Syria stops killing civilians, including minorities. Congress has taken a step in the right direction. Past experiments — lifting sanctions on Iran or funneling Qatari billions to Hamas — showed that Islamists don't moderate with money. There's no reason to believe Sharaa will be different. 'Trust but verify' must be America's policy on Syria. Washington isn't even demanding accountability. Hussain Abdul-Hussain is a Foundation for Defense of Democracies research fellow.
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
‘A nightmare that no one wants': GOP fears Mastriano's down-ballot drag in Pennsylvania
A person close to Trump's political operation — one of the four aforementioned Republicans — described the president's team as 'very concerned' that a Mastriano campaign 'could jeopardize or add to the jeopardization of multiple down-ballot congressional races.' Pennsylvania Republicans went even further, saying a Mastriano candidacy would all but certainly unleash a bloodbath across the state next November. 'If he's our nominee, we lose four House seats,' Pennsylvania-based GOP consultant Josh Novotney said. 'He's a nightmare that no one wants.' Asked for comment, Mastriano said POLITICO is 'not letting facts getting [sic] in the way of a good story.' 'I can tell you that I have President Trump's direct line,' he said in a direct message on X. 'And he ain't saying this.' Despite perennially alarming Republican leaders, Mastriano, a state senator, still appears to have a grip on MAGA voters. A private Public Policy Polling survey conducted in May and obtained by POLITICO shows him leading state Treasurer Stacy Garrity, a likely candidate favored by much of the party establishment, by 21 points. His perceived strength is springing national and Pennsylvania Republicans into action. Some state GOP operatives said they hope Trump will back Garrity in a bid to block Mastriano. For now his plans for Pennsylvania's nascent gubernatorial primary are unclear, particularly since Shapiro is widely seen as the favorite in the general election. Even if Garrity wins the nomination, several state and national Republicans expressed pessimism that anyone can defeat the incumbent, though they believe Garrity would outperform Mastriano.
Business Insider
8 hours ago
- Business Insider
An Amazon seller who earns seven figures is starting to make her product in the US due to tariffs. It'll cost more, but it's worth it after 'many sleepless nights.'
As a full-time Amazon seller, Lisa Harrington relies heavily on her manufacturer. "They can make or break your business in terms of really producing something that's high quality," the founder of Purrfect Portal told Business Insider. Harrington, who started selling dog harnesses and, eventually, interior cat doors, found her first manufacturer through Alibaba, a popular online platform for sourcing products. She worked with them for about four years before pivoting to a different factory in China that her mentor referred her to. That switch happened nearly 10 years ago, and she wasn't planning to make any changes to her supply chain — until President Donald Trump announced tariffs on all imports from China to the US in early 2025. Moving 80% of her catalog to a US-based manufacturer Trump's flip-flopping on tariffs has left business owners feeling uncertain and vulnerable. "I've honestly just had so many sleepless nights over the tariffs," said Harrington, "I've been doing this for 10 years. I've never been in a scenario where my cost of goods could double overnight or triple overnight, and I just couldn't handle that stress anymore." The only solution to alleviate her stress was to onshore a number of her products. "Starting in October, 80% of our catalog is going to be made in the USA," she said, adding that the move "was not on my bingo card, but things are changing quickly." Producing in the States — specifically, in a factory she found in Rhode Island — is "definitely going to cost more," she said. But, it's peace of mind she's after. "Not having to obsessively look at Truth Social or The Wall Street Journal to see what's happening overnight with my business costs, it's just worth it." Harrington, who is a member of various e-comm networks, including the exclusive Million Dollar Sellers community, says most business owners she's spoken to don't have the option of switching manufacturers. "I'm one of the few people who can actually onshore," she said. "There are just so many people I know who can't. They just can't because the numbers just still don't make any sense." Transitioning to a new manufacturer is expensive and time-consuming. E-commerce entrepreneur Shan Shan Fu, who sells over 100 products on Amazon in the women's clothing and accessory space, told BI in May that switching suppliers isn't feasible for her. "The 100 products come from all different factories, so to change and have another factory in, say, Vietnam, replicate what many, many factories are already making, and making it at the same quality and level, is going to take years and years and years, and it would cost more money," she said. She added that most factories require a minimum order quantity: "So they'll say, 'We can't custom-make anything for you unless you order 2,000 pieces.' But if you're a small business, often you can't buy 2,000 pieces right away; you might buy 200, then 500, then 1,000, and you scale up slowly." For many small businesses, suddenly having to place a large order with new suppliers "just isn't doable," she said. "So, we don't have a lot of flexibility to leave China." Harrington, whose closable, plastic cat doors bring in seven figures in annual revenue, said she feels extremely lucky that the economics are working out for her. "I suspect it's because it's plastic. I suspect it's because I have good margins. I suspect it's because I found a really good factory. I feel like a lot of things aligned to make it possible for me to move over," she said. "But I don't know another single person who's doing this because either they can't find a factory or they've gotten prices from American factories, and it's still much more expensive to make it here than it is to deal with the tariffs."
