Texas governor threatens arrest of Democrats absent at Monday redistricting vote
The exodus of more than 50 Democrats from the Texas legislature staging a kind of temporary political exile in Democratic-led states was intended to deny Republicans in Austin the quorum necessary to vote on the redistricting plan, championed by President Donald Trump.
By redrawing district lines in hopes of flipping some seats in the U.S. House of Representatives currently held by Democrats, the Republican Party aims to protect its narrow majority in next year's congressional midterm elections.
Trump has told reporters he expects the effort to yield as many as five additional House Republicans.
During Monday's statehouse session in Austin, the Republican speaker of the Texas House of Representatives issued civil warrants for the wayward Democrats - most of whom have gone to Illinois, New York or Massachusetts - to be brought back to Austin.
"To ensure compliance, I ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans," Abbott said in a statement.
But the warrants apply only within the state, and breaking quorum is not a crime that would allow Texas authorities to pursue extradition from other states.
On Sunday, Abbott cited an opinion by the state's attorney general that Texas district courts may determine whether legislators have forfeited their offices "due to abandonment," saying that would empower him to "swiftly fill vacancies." But even if Abbott succeeded in ousting the absent Democrats, it would take time to hold new elections.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told Fox News on Monday that he expected the Texas Supreme Court to ultimately weigh in on any abandonment cases he files. "And they're obviously a Republican court," he added.
In another possible tactic, Abbott said any lawmaker who solicited funds to pay the $500-per-day fine that Texas House rules impose on absent legislators could violate bribery laws. He vowed to try extraditing any "potential out-of-state felons."
Adding to the dynamics of the standoff, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he and his state's Democratic-led legislature were ready to "fight fire with fire" against Trump's Texas redistricting maneuver.
He said California Democrats were preparing a rare mid-decade congressional redistricting plan of their own that he said could offset any gains Republicans might hope to achieve by redrawing Texas maps.
But Newsom said the California plan, assuming it musters the required support of two-thirds of the state legislature, would carry a "trigger" to place it on the November 2026 ballot for voter approval only if Texas moves forward with its plan.
Countering Abbott's assertions that Texas Democrats were shirking their duties, Newsom accused Trump and the Republicans of gaming the political system.
"These folks don't play by the rules. If they can't win playing the game with the existing set of rules, they'll change the rules. That's what Donald Trump has done," Newsom said.
Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House, with four vacancies. A stronger Republican majority in the U.S. House would enable Trump to further advance his agenda.
The special session in Texas - also called to address flood prevention and relief - was due to reconvene on Tuesday afternoon. Democrats have threatened to stay out of state until the end of the 30-day special session, which began July 21.
Gene Wu, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said the current congressional districts in Texas already dilute the voting power of racial minorities in the state, and the new redistricting plan represented "turbocharged racism."
Abbott in a Monday morning appearance on Fox News, called Wu's accusation "bogus," saying redistricting would create more Hispanic-majority districts. He argued it also was necessary to give Trump voters in Democrat-majority districts the ability to elect Republicans.
A White House official told Reuters that Trump supports Abbott's threat to remove absent Democratic lawmakers and wants "whatever is necessary" done to get the new map passed.
States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the U.S. Census, but the current Texas map was passed just four years ago by the Republican-led legislature. Mid-cycle redistricting is usually prompted by a change of party control.
Under Texas' current lines, Republicans control 25 out of 38 congressional seats, nearly two-thirds of the districts in a state that went for Trump last year by a 56% to 42% margin.
Texas Democratic lawmakers have previously tried the strategy of leaving the state to block a redistricting plan. Some fled in 2021 in a bid to deny Abbott the quorum needed to pass a voting restriction measure. That bill passed after three lawmakers returned, saying they had achieved their goal of bringing national attention to the issue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
GOP congressman who represents one of the most impoverished districts in PA recently bought a new helicopter
Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Rob Bresnahan, who represents one of the swing state's poorest congressional districts, has been accused of concealing the fact that he recently bought himself a personal helicopter. NOTUS reports that Bresnahan, 35, has not yet listed his 'secret' 2024 Robinson R66 chopper among his financial disclosures, with the model in question retailing for between $1 million and $1.5 million. The site was able to confirm the congressman's acquisition of the aircraft based on information garnered from Federal Aviation Administration records and commercial flight data. NOTUS adds that Bresnahan, a multimillionaire who recently sold control of his family's electrical contracting business, acquired the helicopter late last year and has already used it for dozens of flights, some of which have taken him to New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island. While there is nothing illegal about representatives buying personal aircraft, 'it's incumbent on members of Congress to be transparent about these kinds of things,' said Philip Hensley-Robin, executive director of the government watchdog group Common Cause Pennsylvania. 'We don't know if it's being used for official purposes, campaign purposes – it's a mystery.' Hannah Pope, the congressman's spokesperson, told NOTUS: 'In emergency situations such as downed power lines or washed-out roads, helicopters play a critical role in inspecting infrastructure and identifying areas in need of urgent repair. 'His goal was to work toward a commercial pilot certificate with a rotorcraft-helicopter rating and use the aircraft to provide emergency response and inspection services that help keep seniors warm, hospitals powered, and schools open.' She added, 'Since being elected to Congress, those business plans have been put on hold. No taxpayer or campaign funds were used to purchase the aircraft, and no taxpayer or campaign funds are used to store, operate, or maintain the aircraft.' The Independent has also reached out to Rep. Bresnahan for comment. The congressman represents the Keystone State's 8th District, which ranks second-to-last in median household income, $61,140 as of 2023, according to U.S. Census data. Bresnahan has previously sought to emphasize his everyman credentials, describing a childhood of plowing snow for neighbors and helping out at his parents' bowling alley and grandparents' electrical store in addition to completing his studies and participating in high school ice hockey practice. 'I will fight to protect working-class families in northeastern Pennsylvania and stand with President Trump in opposing gutting Medicaid,' he said in a statement in March. 'My position on this has not and will not change.' He nevertheless voted for Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which the president signed into law on Independence Day and which threatens to cut welfare for millions of Americans, leading to angry scenes at a Scranton town hall earlier this week organized to draw attention to his 'broken vows.' Bresnahan also faced questions in July after allegedly buying shares in defense companies ahead of Trump's strikes on Iran, despite previously pushing to block lawmakers from trading in stocks.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The NHL preached inclusion. So why has it got into bed with Donald Trump?
'Diverse representation within inclusive environments is proven to advance innovation, creativity, and decision-making – all of which are critically important to the growth of the sport and our business,' NHL commissioner Gary Bettman wrote in his introduction to the NHL's first – and only, so far – diversity and inclusion report, which it released in 2022. 'Recognizing these facts, we are working to better understand and accelerate our engagement across all layers of diversity – including nationality, race, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, and religion – and their nuances and intersections,' Bettman continued. Last week, Bettman was named alongside NHL legend Wayne Gretzky, Florida Panthers' captain Matthew Tkachuk and various representatives of other sports as a member of Donald Trump's sports council. The council will be responsible for – among other things – playing an 'important role in restoring tradition to college athletics, including … keeping men out of women's sports.' Not what you'd call an opportunity for Bettman et al to gain a better understanding of the nuances of gender identity, by the sounds of it. This is not the first time Bettman has given mixed messages around social issues. In 2023, for example, the NHL tried to host a career fair aimed at recruiting a more diverse workforce (its inclusivity report noted that the league's employees were roughly 84% white and 93% straight). The event, attached to that year's All Star Game in Florida, quickly caught the attention of the governor's office, which accused the NHL of discrimination – against white people. The league cancelled the career fair. A few weeks later, the NHL again had the opportunity to stand for its diversity values when a handful of players refused to wear their team's Pride-themed warmup jerseys. Instead, the NHL retreated meekly, encouraging 'voices and perspectives on social and cultural issues.' That June – Pride month, no less – Bettman cancelled the Pride jerseys altogether, calling the furor around them 'a distraction' from the intended message. One wonders what he will call his own foray directly into the culture wars or, for that matter, how the NHL may characterize this particular moment of self-expression from the commissioner. It's likely that Bettman's participation in Trump's sports council will fall into the 'voices and perspectives on social and cultural issues' category the league talked about during the Pride jerseys fiasco. But seeing as Trump seems fixated on getting trans women out of college sports – even though there are fewer than 10 transgender athletes in college sports, according to the president of the NCAA – this feels like a very specific kind of perspective on a cultural issue, doesn't it? What's so aggravating about repeated allowances for anti-LGBTQ+ perspectives from the NHL under the guise of simply letting all opinions flourish equally, is how it pretends that these views are all morally equivalent when they're not. Sure, the players who refused to wear a Pride-themed jersey can't be forced to wear them, but it's not like it was simply a fashion choice. Fundamentally, those players made that decision based on a worldview that refuses to accept LGBTQ+ people, including their fellow hockey players, as being equal to them and everyone else. It's not the jerseys that were the problem – but they did a great job highlighting it. Earlier this spring, Harrison Browne, the first transgender player in professional hockey, wrote that while in the NCAA, he was offered the option to have his own locker room and change his pronouns on the roster. 'Looking back, I realize how important it is for trans and non-binary student athletes to have those options, whether or not they take them,' Browne wrote in The Walrus. 'These choices provide a baseline of institutional acceptance and acknowledgment for gender-diverse athletes at all levels.' On Monday, Browne told the Guardian via email that 'to see [Bettman, Gretzky, and Tkachuk] get behind an administration that is targeting marginalized communities, especially trans people in sports, is deeply disturbing and a huge step backwards in making hockey a more inclusive sport.' And going backwards really isn't Bettman's thing, or it never used to be. When he accepted his job as commissioner in 1992, he told a room full of reporters that 'the way a league performs well is by making its product as attractive as it can to the greatest number of fans.' He believed in growth, in other words – even up until 2022. What he risks now is stagnation, regression even. On that same day in 1992, Bettman said that he wanted to make hockey, a sport that at the time was seen as violent and retrograde, more 'user-friendly.' And he acknowledged that to do it, he'd need to push some of the older owners into the future. 'It may be that we are going to head in new, progressive directions that will make sense to every one immediately,' Bettman said. 'For some, it may take a little more time.' Maybe the diversity and inclusion stuff doesn't totally make sense to Bettman in 2025 – other North American sports have decided that they don't have the stomach to fight the culture wars under Trump either, and NFL commission Roger Goodell is also on the White House sports council. But Bettman should give the league's diversity policies time to grow, rather than deliberately reversing course, hurting hockey's players and fans, and ultimately jeopardising the future success of the sport for everyone. If that's too much to ask, at the very least, if he's invited to join a club created by a hostile and retrograde president, he should by now have the smarts to just say no.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump call to oust Intel CEO Tan could sidetrack chipmaker's turnaround
Aug 8 (Reuters) - Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab CEO Lip-Bu Tan is already facing an uphill battle in turning around the ailing chipmaker. Now, U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that Tan resign over his ties to Chinese firms will only distract him from that task, two investors and a former senior employee said. Trump said on Thursday that Tan was "highly conflicted" due to his Chinese connections. Reuters reported exclusively in April that Tan had invested in hundreds of Chinese firms, some of which were linked to the Chinese military. Tan may now have to mount an effort to reassure Trump that he remains the right person to revive the storied American chipmaker, pulling his focus away from the cost cuts he's trying to implement. "It is distracting," said Ryuta Makino, analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, which, according to LSEG data, owns more than 200,000 shares in Intel. "I think Trump will make goals for Intel to spend more, and I don't think Intel has the capabilities to spend more, like what Apple and Nvidia are doing." AI chip market leader Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and iPhone-maker Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab have committed hundreds of billions of dollars to expand domestic manufacturing, which, according to Trump, will bring jobs back home. Until recently, Intel had emerged as one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 2022 CHIPS Act, as former CEO Pat Gelsinger laid out plans to build advanced chipmaking factories. Tan, however, has significantly pared back such ambitions, as the company's goal of rivaling Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC's ( opens new tab contract manufacturing chops have fallen short. Tan said last month that he would slow construction work on new factories in Ohio and planned to build factories only when he saw demand for Intel's chips, a move that is likely to further strain relations with Trump. The company, its board and Tan were making significant investments aligned with Trump's America First agenda, Intel said in a statement on Thursday, without any mention of Trump's demand. The statement was "bland", said David Wagner, a portfolio manager at Intel shareholder Aptus Capital Advisors, which owns Intel stock through index funds. "Either defend your leader, which will be the beginning of a difficult road ahead, or consider making a change," Wagner said. Having this play out over a few months is not something that Intel can afford, he said. Tan himself released a statement late on Thursday. "The United States has been my home for more than 40 years. I love this country and am profoundly grateful for the opportunities it has given me. I also love this company," he said, adding that the board was "fully supportive of the work we are doing to transform our company." Tan, a chip industry veteran, took the helm at Intel about six months ago, after the board ousted previous boss Pat Gelsinger over years of missteps and burgeoning losses. The company's shares are largely flat this year after losing nearly two-thirds of their value last year. Tan was the CEO of chip-design software maker Cadence Design (CDNS.O), opens new tab from 2008 through December 2021. Cadence last month agreed to plead guilty and pay more than $140 million to resolve charges for selling its products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear blasts, Reuters reported. The sales to Chinese entities occurred under his leadership. Reuters reported on Wednesday that U.S. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and the criminal case involving Cadence. "There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about my past roles," Tan said in his statement on Thursday. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards. My reputation has been built on trust," he said. It is not illegal for U.S. citizens to hold stakes in Chinese companies unless those companies have been added to the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List, which explicitly bans such investments. Reuters in April had found no evidence that Tan at the time was invested directly in any company on that list. But Trump's remarks have now forced the limelight on an issue that could erode investor confidence. "If you add in another layer of government scrutiny, and everybody looking into how the company is doing whatever it's doing ... that just makes it harder," said a former senior executive at Intel, who was familiar with the company's strategy under Gelsinger. The source, who declined to be named, was let go as part of Gelsinger's workforce reduction drive last year. Tan's strategy is to "get rid of all of the non-productive parts of the company and really focus on a key few products," the person said. "If (Tan) leaves, it's going to just prolong whatever Intel has to do and needs to do really quickly."
