'Sharp rise' in kids in custody in NSW, data shows 60 per cent of children in youth detention are Indigenous
The assessment from NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOSCAR) executive director Jackie Fitzgerald comes just months after the state government strengthened bail laws for minors.
According to data from BOSCAR, the state now houses 234 children in detention centres across NSW.
In the past two years data showed the number of juveniles in state detention has risen by 34 per cent, Ms Fitzgerald told the ABC.
"Aboriginal children make up 60 per cent of the youth detention population now. That's a considerable increase, its amongst the highest number we've ever seen.
"And we can see that the increase is really considerable — 36 per cent over the past two years for Aboriginal young people."
Three out of four children on remand in the state are being held in custody after being denied bail, according to BOSCAR.
Ms Fitzgerald said the system for juveniles had now become "a space for young people waiting for court as opposed to a sanction for an offence".
"Were moving in the wrong direction absolutely for that, and quite considerably off track to meet that [closing the gap] target now," she said.
Redfern Legal Centre chief executive officer Camilla Pandolfini said new bail laws introduced in NSW last year, and renewed this year, have made it harder for children to remain in the community while facing criminal charges.
"I'm shocked, it's a shocking statistic," she said.
"All of us should be concerned. Especially when the Australian government and the NSW government have committed to closing the gap.
The NSW government extended strict bail laws for young offenders accused of repeat car thefts and home invasions in March this year.
At the time, it claimed the change was "crucial to reduce youth crime and minimise young people's long-term contact with the justice system".
The changes restricted bail for minors between 14 and 18 if they are charged with car theft or break and enter if they were already on bail for similar offences at the time.
It was originally introduced in April 2024, in conjunction with a $26 million community safety package for youth outreach programs.
"We can see this law is working and that's why we've extended it — to make sure we break the cycle of youth offending and strengthen community safety," Attorney General Michael Daley said at the time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
'Sovereign citizens' threaten safety, stability of society, WA Chief Justice Peter Quinlan says
Western Australia's top judge says everyone should be concerned about the rise of 'sovereign citizens' who do not believe in the law, warning of the risks to "the safety and stability" of society. A Four Corners investigation yesterday highlighted the growing trend of so-called sovereign citizens, who believe the government is illegitimate. "I've seen it personally, every judge of this court and every other court in the state will have encountered it as well," WA Chief Justice Peter Quinlan told the ABC in a rare interview. While not one unified group, sovereign citizens use pseudo-law — a collection of legal-sounding concepts that have no basis in actual law — to target government institutions which they see as oppressive. In June, a WA judge sentenced two sovereign citizens to a month in jail for breaching court orders, believed to be the first sentence of its kind. Justice Quinlan said the group — which he characterised as a spectrum ranging from those who do not recognise the authority of the legal system, through to those getting conflicting messages on social media — was "one of the emerging challenges that the courts face". "As with any other institution of government, the courts depend for their function on trust and public confidence," he said. "People who you can broadly describe as sovereign citizens are people who, by definition, do not have that trust or confidence because they deny the legitimacy of the courts. More directly though, Justice Quinlan said those who did not believe in the authority of the courts often became "agitated or disruptive". "Judges are able to deal with people of all kinds, but it can't help but have an impact, particularly if there are actual threats, which there are from time-to-time," he said. "The impact on court staff can be very pronounced because they're at the coalface, they're on the registries, on the other end of the phones, they're in the court buildings with people. "It can have a very significant adverse impact on court staff having to deal with people who … can become very agitated by the fact that their view of what the law is does not accord with what the law actually is." But Justice Quinlan said many pseudo-law adherents were also harming themselves by maintaining their beliefs, despite having genuine legal claims or defences. "It's very difficult then for the courts to be able to identify where they do have legitimate claims or complaints or defences and to be able to deal with those claims on the merits," he said. "We do our best to get behind it, to find out what the real issues are, but it can be very difficult if a person is resistant to any kind of interaction or exchange with our current system." Premier Roger Cook also expressed his concerns about the growing group. "I think they represent a significant threat to both social cohesion in Western Australia and also the rule of law," he said. "The police do everything that they can to monitor those who think that they're above the law, that they have their own law to implement separate from the rest of the community. "We intervene when we see laws broken. We make sure that we do everything we can to ensure that they don't represent a risk to the community." Above policing and trying to support individual cases through the legal system, Justice Quinlan said institutions which sovereign citizens did not trust had a role to play too. "It's important that the institutions themselves respect one another, that the governments respect the courts, courts respect governments, and the different roles of different institutions within our society are properly understood," he said. "Because that level of trust and confidence which, if you like, the sovereign citizen does not have, really comes from the top down, that all of us are responsible for understanding and for supporting our institutions of government, be they the executive government, the parliaments or the courts." Justice Quinlan said while that was more under threat in other parts in the world, Australia was not immune. "In a world with a lot of social media content where ideas like this can disseminate very rapidly and very broadly, it's important for us to be vigilant about ensuring that our systems of government are understood and that we do have confidence in them," he said. "I still like to think that in Western Australia and in Australia more broadly there is good community understanding and acceptance of both the courts and the other arms of government. "But we can never be complacent about that, because we see in other parts of the world when respect for the rule of law breaks down, very quickly everything else breaks down as well. "So, remain confident but vigilant that these are challenges that our community faces." Western Australia's most senior judge also urged people to look at non-lawyers trying to offer legal advice with a critical eye. "If you are involved in legal proceedings or you're caught up in legal proceedings, go to a community legal centre, seek out some legal assistance," he said. "If something on the internet or on social media about dealing with the courts looks too good to be true, it probably is and it's probably not going to do you any help to be going down that route."

ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Federal politics live: Experts descend on parliament for three-day productivity summit
Business, union and industry groups have arrived at Parliament House ahead of the government's three-day productivity summit. Follow our live coverage below.

ABC News
33 minutes ago
- ABC News
Liberals turn to Frank Pangallo in bid to recapture 'blue ribbon' seat of Waite
Photographs capture triumphs but then turn them into ironies — a point proved by the above snapshot taken in the aftermath of the 2018 South Australian state election. It shows SA Best founder Nick Xenophon and the party's successful upper house candidates Frank Pangallo and Connie Bonaros on the steps of SA parliament, where they had gathered to bask in the glow of electoral glory. Did it occur to them that this particular instant might become a hostage to fortune, and acquire a considerably different hue as the years elapsed? "A photograph is only a fragment, and with the passage of time its moorings come unstuck," wrote American essayist Susan Sontag. In the case of the SA Best trio, the process of disbandment lasted somewhat longer than a mere moment, but it was relentless nonetheless. Mr Xenophon — whose bid to enter parliament as the member for Hartley, in Adelaide's eastern suburbs, had been thwarted by Liberal incumbent Vincent Tarzia — was the first to walk away, telling The Advertiser in late 2018 that his resignation from the party he created had been "very amicable". Five years later, two turned into one — Mr Pangallo left SA Best in 2023, citing differences with Ms Bonaros, who has retained the party's branding. But in a twist of fate, Mr Pangallo has now sworn allegiance not only to the Liberal Party, but to the same man that Mr Xenophon failed to unseat in 2018. "I've got a lot of confidence in Vincent," Mr Pangallo said on Sunday of Mr Tarzia, who is now the Liberal leader. "I have known Vincent a long time and … he's dynamic, he's a family man. He holds all the values that I hold." Mr Tarzia was equally effusive in his praise of Mr Pangallo, who was this week revealed as the Liberal candidate for the seat of Waite, and will contest it at the 2026 state election. "Frank has got great strengths," Mr Tarzia said. "He knows how to get results." Mr Pangallo's arrival in the Liberal fold was hardly unexpected. It had, in fact, been anticipated for weeks, with Channel Seven — where Mr Pangallo worked as a journalist for more than 20 years — reporting in July that he was "considering joining the Liberals". His original path into parliament went via Today Tonight, where he gained a reputation for reporting on (among other things) crimes and cold cases. The seven-day search for the missing Beaumont children that was conducted at a former Adelaide factory site earlier this year, but failed to unearth any remains, was organised — at least in part — by Mr Pangallo. The rationale for the excavation was a hunch which he had promoted and pursued during his time at Channel Seven, but which was not vindicated by the subsequent search. "Unfortunately, we haven't turned anything up," Mr Pangallo said in March. "There is a tinge of disappointment in my voice … but at the same time I am gratified and satisfied that we gave this one hell of shot." While broadsheet enthusiasts don't always approve of the tabloid style, it would be difficult to deny (notwithstanding the outcome of the Beaumont dig) its popular appeal. On Sunday, Mr Pangallo was eager to emphasise the continuities between the worlds of prime-time current affairs and parliamentary advocacy. Styling himself as "the watchdog", and wearing a custom-made political T-shirt emblazoned with the image of a vigilant canine with its ears pricked up, Mr Pangallo quipped that he would be let "off the leash" in the lead-up to the 2026 poll. "My beliefs are grassroots — working for people and helping people. That's what I've done all my career," he said. "You can talk to any of my former colleagues in journalism and they'll tell you that." That approach may have its audience, but political analyst Rob Manwaring questioned whether it would be of benefit to the state opposition. "That watchdog role particularly resonates well for non-major parties," the Flinders University associate professor told the ABC on Sunday. "However, to say that you're going to be a watchdog within the Liberal Party actually undermines the message that they're a serious party to run office. "It says that, for the next term, they see themselves as performing a watchdog function rather than actually offering a new platform, an alternative platform to the Malinauskas government. "For me, it's probably the wrong framing." The electorate of Waite is currently represented by Catherine Hutchesson, who secured a swing of more than 11 per cent towards the ALP, in the two-party preferred vote, at the 2022 election. The first-term MP is the only candidate to have won the seat for Labor since it was created in the early 1990s — its three other victorious MPs were all elected as Liberals. But to describe Waite as traditionally "blue ribbon" would be to risk telling only part of the story. While Martin Hamilton-Smith, who held it from 1997 to 2018, and Sam Duluk, who then held it until 2022, both entered parliament as Liberals, they left it as independents. If elected, Mr Pangallo would, in a sense, buck that trend — he would hold the seat not as a Liberal-turned-independent, but as an independent-turned-Liberal. "It is unusual for an independent to join a major party," Dr Manwaring said of Mr Pangallo's move. "Generally speaking, people are in a major party and then become independents — and in fact, that's been a real trajectory with the Liberal Party." Government frontbencher Tom Koutsantonis seized on Mr Pangallo's candidacy as evidence of a "massive identity crisis" within Liberal ranks. "It's the type of move of a person who's coming to the end of their political career, who's just rolling the dice. It's not about Waite," he said. "No-one knows what they believe in and what they're going to do, and today's an example of that." News cameras at the announcement of Mr Pangallo's candidacy on Sunday captured a mood of confidence — at some points, Mr Pangallo and Mr Tarzia smiled, and at others they wore looks of determination and defiance. In seven months' time, these pictures will not have changed by a single pixel — but they may possess a completely different meaning in the aftermath of the March election. Outcomes alone will determine whether we look back on Mr Pangallo's move to the Liberals as a gamble that didn't pay off or an inspired piece of party politics.