logo
Andrew Cuomo concedes to democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in Democratic primary for New York's next mayor

Andrew Cuomo concedes to democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani in Democratic primary for New York's next mayor

Yahoo5 hours ago

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist and state lawmaker, is on track to win the Democratic primary for New York City's next mayor, marking a major upheaval of the city's political landscape with all eyes on the future of the fractured party.
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo — widely considered among pundits to be the front-runner against a field of progressive candidates who urged supporters to keep him off their ballots — called Mamdani to concede Tuesday night after more than one million Democratic voters cast their ballots for the next chief executive of the largest city in the United States.
'Tonight was not our night,' Cuomo said in remarks to supporters. 'Tonight is his night. He deserved it. He won.'
Mamdani's campaign — fueled by a groundswell of grassroots support that stretched across the boroughs — had 'inspired them and moved them and got them to come out and vote,' Cuomo said.
'He really ran a highly impactful campaign,' he said.
Mamdani received 43.5 percent of first-place votes in the city's ranked-choice voting system to Cuomo's 36.3 percent, according to early results from the New York City Board of Elections on election night.
The board will continue tallying votes from ranked-choice ballots, which allow New Yorkers to pick up to five candidates in order of preference, with votes for lower-ranked candidates adding to top choices in subsequent counts. The system is designed to avoid a runoff election by having voters rank their top five candidates for citywide races.
Cuomo has said that, if he loses the primary, he would consider running as an independent in November's general election on a ballot that will also include current scandal-plagued Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent.
Curtis Sliwa is expected to run as the Republican candidate for New York City mayor. Sliwa, who founded the nonprofit Guardian Angels, ran for mayor in 2021 and lost to Mayor Adams.
A poll released on Monday by Emerson College showed Cuomo leading with 35 percent on election night, followed by Mamdani at 32 percent, and New York City comptroller Brad Lander at 13 percent.
But in a simulation of the city's ranked-choice voting system, Mamdani came out on top throughout eight rounds, with 52 percent to Cuomo's 48 percent.
Unlike Cuomo, Mamdani worked alongside other Democratic challengers, including cross-endorsing with Lander, urging voters against ranking Cuomo at all.
Cuomo, who was pulling ahead in public opinion surveys in weeks leading up to the race, was powered by a multi-million dollar political action campaign that flooded mailboxes and the airwaves with anti-Mamdani advertisements.
Mamdani, meanwhile, relentlessly focused a campaign around affordability, including no-cost childcare, freezing rent in tens of thousands of rent-controlled apartment units, boosting taxes on the wealthiest residents to fund free buses, and creating city-owned grocery stores to avoid a growing cost of living crisis in one of the country's most expensive places to live.
His social media savvy campaign included more than 50,000 volunteers who canvassed across the city.
If elected, Mamdani would be the New York's first Muslim and Indian American mayor.
Cuomo, 67, had sought to revive a political career after the once-ascendent Democrat drew international attention for his state leadership designed to contrast Donald Trump's presidency at the onset of the Covid-19 crisis.
He announced his resignation from the governor's office in 2021 in the wake of widespread reports of sexual harassment allegations, investigations into nursing home deaths, and the possibility of a weeks-long impeachment investigation should he remain in the state's capital.
In the years that followed, he launched an effort to defend himself and undercut the credibility of the women who accused him of misconduct.
Should he secure the Democratic nomination, Mamdani — buoyed by endorsements from prominent progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — could join a crowded and complicated field of candidates in a general election despite the dominance of Democratic voters in New York politics.
The explosion of money into a campaign against Mamdani is likely to roll into a general election, with attacks targeting Mamdani for his opposition to Israel's war in Gaza and his support for pro-Palestinian activism.
But the primary race and Mamdani's massive upset against Cuomo's multi-million dollar machine serves as the highest profile Democratic primary election yet since Trump returned to the White House this year — and could serve as a litmus test for the kind of Democratic campaigns to challenge Trump as well as other Democrats that Americans believe have insufficiently stood up to a centrist establishment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with Republican Legislature in fight with governor
Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with Republican Legislature in fight with governor

Associated Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Wisconsin Supreme Court sides with Republican Legislature in fight with governor

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court handed a victory to the Republican-controlled Legislature on Wednesday in a power struggle with Democratic Gov. Tony Evers. The court, in a unanimous ruling where the four liberal justices joined with three conservatives, struck down Evers' partial veto of a Republican bill in a case that tested both the limits of his broad veto powers and the Legislature's ability to exert influence by controlling funding. The court also ruled that the Legislature can put money for certain state programs into an emergency fund under the control of its budget committee. Evers had argued such a move was unconstitutional. The ruling against Evers comes after the court earlier this year upheld Evers' partial veto that locked in a school funding increase for 400 years. The court last year issued a ruling that reined in some powers of the Legislature's budget committee, while this ruling went the other way. Evers clashes with Legislature Evers, in his seventh year as governor, has frequently clashed with the Legislature and often used his broad veto powers to kill their proposals. Republican lawmakers have tried to take control away from the governor's office by placing money to fund certain programs and state agencies in an emergency fund controlled by the Legislature's budget committee. That gives the Legislature significant influence over that funding and the implementation of certain programs within the executive branch. Evers argued that the Legislature is trying to limit his partial veto power and illegally control how the executive branch spends money. The state Supreme Court on Wednesday disagreed. It ruled that Evers improperly used his partial veto on a bill that detailed the plan for spending on new literacy programs designed to improve K-12 students' reading performance. The court also sided with the Legislature and said the budget committee can legally put money into an emergency fund to be distributed later. That is what it has done with the $50 million for the literacy program. Evers and Republican lawmakers did not immediately return messages seeking comment. Fight over literacy funding In 2023, Evers signed into law a bill that created an early literacy coaching program within the state Department of Public Instruction. The bill also created grants for schools that adopt approved reading curricula to pay for changing their programs and to train teachers on the new practices. However, Republicans put the $50 million to pay for the new initiative in a separate emergency fund controlled by the Legislature's budget committee. That money remains in limbo amid disagreements about how the money would be used and who would decide how to spend it. Evers argued that the Legislature didn't have the power to withhold the money and the court should order it to be released to the education department. The Legislature has been increasing the amount of money it puts in the emergency fund that it can release at its discretion, but it remains a small percentage of the total state budget. In the last budget, about $230 million was in the fund, or about half of a percentage point of the entire budget. Republicans sue to stop veto Evers used his partial veto power on another bill that created the mechanism for spending the $50 million for the new program. He argued that his changes would simplify the process and give DPI more flexibility. Evers also eliminated grants for private voucher and charter schools. Republican legislators sued, contending that the governor illegally used his partial veto power. State law allows only for a partial veto of bills that spend money. For all other bills, the governor must either sign or veto them in their entirety. Because the bill Evers partially vetoed was a framework for spending, but didn't actually allocate any money, his partial vetoes were unconstitutional, lawmakers argued. Evers argued for a liberal interpretation of his veto powers. He said that by challenging it, the Legislature was trying to weaken his powers. A Dane County judge sided with Evers, determining that the bill in question qualified as an appropriations bill subject to partial vetoes. But in a win for the Legislature, he did not find fault with the Legislature's budget committee putting funding for the program under its control. The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed with the lower court that putting the money into the emergency fund was legal. But the court also said Evers' veto was illegal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store