KDA Chairman demands early implementation of SEP
In a letter written to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and concerned education ministers of the state, he said that the SEP Commission had given a 'very comprehensive' education policy, in a first-of-its-kind exercise. 'If the report is implemented properly, the state's education sector will change radically over the next decade,' he said.
Further, he stated that several studies have confirmed that the three-language formula forcibly imposes Hindi and does not help improve the cognitive and academic ability of students. 'In this context, the SEP report, which has recommended a two-language policy with Kannada and English for the State, is a very timely step,' Prof. Bilimale said.
'It is important to note that the commission had not ignored non-Kannada and non-English languages while recommending a two-language policy. The report states that Kannada and English languages will remain mandatory as the first or second language, and that interested students will be allowed to learn their mother tongue as a third language,' he explained, adding that this was much needed in 'today's complex linguistic environment'.
'The recommendations of the SEP are mainly based on the Constitution of India, the Kannada Language Comprehensive Development Act, 2022, The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, The Kannada Language Learning Act, 2015 and all aspects of the National Education Policy 1968, 1986, 1992 and 2020, among other policies and laws. This is a constitutionally sound policy and can serve as a model education policy for the country,' he said, demanding its early implementation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Expelled SP MLA Pooja Pal says she won't join BJP, for now
Chail MLA Pooja Pal, who was recently expelled by the Samajwadi Party for anti-party activities, said on Sunday that she would not be joining the BJP as of now, and will take the next political step after discussing with members of her community. Chail MLA Pooja Pal had called on UP CM Yogi Adityanath at his official residence in Lucknow on Saturday.(ANI Grab ) She had called on Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath a day ago. Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Pal asserted that she was associated with "the Samajwadi Party of Akhilesh Yadav" and not of Mulayam Singh Yadav. When asked whether she has closed the door on Samajwadi Party, Pal told PTI, "They closed the door themselves, and it was a good thing. If I join any party, it would be based on the 'vichaar' (ideology), and your vichaar should be clear." She added that when Akhilesh Yadav-led government was in power from 2012 to 2017, the party had kept mafia at a distance. "I was not associated with the Samajwadi Party of Mulayam Singh Yadav. I was associated with the Samajwadi Party of Akhilesh Yadav, because he had kept the mafia away," Pal said. She added that the party had questioned the encounter of Asad Ahmed, son of gangster-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed who was shot dead in 2023. On her next political move, the three-time MLA said she will talk to members of the Pal community before taking a decision. When asked if she plans to join the BJP, Pal said, "Not as of now." The Chail MLA had called on Adityanath at his official residence in Lucknow on Saturday. Both the office of the chief minister and Pal posted about the meeting on microblogging site X. "Honourable MLA of Chail assembly constituency of Kaushambi district, Pooja Pal, made a courtesy visit to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in Lucknow today," the office of Yogi Adityanath said in a post in Hindi. Sharing a photograph of the meeting, Pal also wrote in Hindi, "I once again thank the honourable chief minister. Under his leadership, goons and mafias are shown their rightful place, which is very important for a progressive society." In a long X post earlier on Sunday, Pal detailed how she was being targeted politically. "There are some people who always comment on my personal life and keep writing about it. I have no problem if they do, but they should write the truth, because I contested the election from their party, their leader knows everything..." "They knew I lost the election in 2017. Taking this as an opportunity, some party leaders -- Atiq Ahmed and my maternal relatives, who wanted to contest the MLA election -- started working to end my political career. I was unable to fight Raju Pal's (her husband) case. A conspiracy was hatched against me by Atiq, in which my own family members were involved," the post read. She further wrote that after Atiq Ahmed was murdered, her brothers took up her case. "They told me to get married, that they are with me. But a few days after the marriage, I came to know the truth. These same people were sitting somewhere and talking that now all the cases against Atiq will be closed. But I will not back off." She also mentioned that she has applied for a divorce. Pooja Pal's husband, Raju Pal, a former BSP MLA from Prayagraj West, was shot dead nine days after their wedding in January 2005, in an attack linked to Atiq Ahmed. Ahmed, a former MP and multiple-time MLA from Allahabad West, was serving a life sentence when he and his brother Ashraf were shot dead at point-blank range by three assailants in full media view while they were being escorted by police for a medical check-up in Prayagraj on April 15, 2023. "Now, when I spoke the truth in the assembly, despite knowing everything, out of irritation and revenge, they hatched a conspiracy to tarnish my image and kept writing about my personal life," the Chail MLA's post continued. "The people of my city -- Prayagraj West and Chail -- know everything about my sorrows. That is why their support is still with me. Out of fear of this, some 'samajwadis' are using all kinds of tricks to tarnish my image," she added. Pooja Pal was expelled from the Samajwadi Party on Thursday, just hours after she praised Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in the Assembly for "reducing Atiq Ahmed to dust". During the 24-hour special discussion on 'Vision 2047' at the ongoing monsoon session of the Assembly, Pal had said that the present government's anti-crime policies had brought her husband's killers to the ground. "The chief minister has done the work of reducing my husband's murderer to dust. He saw my hidden tears, which no one saw for years," she had told the House.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Inaccuracies flagged in Class IV textbook
After an error in the teacher text for Class IV Environmental Science kicked up a row, inaccuracies in English and Malayalam Environmental Science textbooks for students have also been flagged. In the Malayalam medium 'Parisara Padhanam' textbook, Chapter II titled 'India Ente Rajyam' has an activity in which students have to write the names of the leaders related to certain facts. A query requires students to name the first woman president of the Indian National Congress with a descriptor terming her the 'Nightingale of India.' The answer would be Sarojini Naidu, but she was the first Indian woman president of the Congress. Annie Besant was the first woman president of the INC. Similarly, the textbook asks students to name the person who formed the Indian National Army and fought against the British with a descriptor that says 'Netaji.' However, Subhas Chandra Bose revived the INA; it was founded by Mohan Singh. A map of India too has inaccuracies, with Assam finding no mention. SCERT Director Jayaprakash R.K. says the errors in textbooks have come to their notice. For instance, the question on the Congress woman president inadvertently left out the word Indian. Again, the map did not leave out Assam; only its name went missing. Teachers had also been given instructions during their training regarding the errors that had cropped up. The printed textbooks, though, continue to carry the factual error. He said that usually when errors in textbooks come to their attention after printing, these are immediately corrected on the SCERT website. Teachers are then informed about it during their next cluster training. However, when the SCERT website was checked, it was found that the correction had been made only in the Malayalam textbook, while the English version still asked the name of the first woman to become president of the Indian National Congress, not the first Indian woman. Similarly, the Malayalam textbook online asks students to name the person who reorganised the Indian National Army and fought against the British, but English one does not mention reorganised; only that he formed the INA. Case of Assam The map in the Malayalam textbook online fails to mention Assam, though its capital Dispur is marked. Both Assam and its capital are marked in the English textbook. Dr. Jayaprakash reiterated that directions to make corrections in the text online had been given as soon as it came to the SCERT's attention. The Kerala School Teachers' Association alleged a deliberate bid to rake up a controversy. Necessary corrections had been made in the textbooks online, it said. Asked about steps to correct the errors in the printed textbook, organisation general secretary T.K.A. Shafi said an option was to make available to students the relevant pages with the corrections. It had been done in the past, but no such decision had been taken as yet, he said. Recently, the teachers' handbook for Environmental Science for Class IV had mentioned that freedom fighter Subhas Chandra Bose fled to Germany 'fearing' the British. After the sentence kicked up a storm, the SCERT corrected it.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Putin, Trump break the ice, Kyiv feels the chill
It was a meeting of the two titans. On the morning of August 15, Russian president Vladimir Putin landed at Anchorage Airport in Alaska. US president Donald Trump stood on the carpet awaiting his guest's arrival, and Putin, alighting from the plane, set the tone and tempo for the summit with his 'dear neighbour'. So far, Trump hasn't accorded the honour of a personal welcome to even any of his Western allies. Many started drawing positive conclusions about the summit from the body language of the two leaders. But the Alaska summit, of which expectations had been high, failed to reach a conclusion and has left behind a fog of new concerns. There's a host of reasons for such a conclusion. The summit was expected to last for five to six hours, but it ended within three hours. A day earlier, Trump had said he wouldn't be happy if a ceasefire (in the Ukraine war) didn't materialise from the summit. He had even threatened Russia with harsher sanctions if there was no ceasefire. However, his threats proved ineffective. During the press conference, he grudgingly accepted that while they made some progress, many important issues remained unresolved. Putin said he hoped both the countries could work together on key concerns. The summit should be seen as a diplomatic thaw with little concrete outcomes. At most, Alaska can pave the way for another discussion. Trump said as much when he announced that he would be talking to the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and Nato allies to fix a date and venue for further talks. In an interview to Fox News just before the summit, Trump hinted that now it's up to Zelensky to take a call on the future of his nation. Could Zelensky end up isolated? Remember how Trump and his deputy, JD Vance, bullied Zelensky in full media glare at the White House? Experts argue that last year in Istanbul, Turkey, Russia and Ukraine were on the verge of a deal but Zelensky stopped short of it on the assurance of full US support. Ukraine is surviving with the help of European nations, but as the conflict slides into an endless morass, Europe will find it difficult to keep supporting. Putin understands this and is in no hurry for peace. During the Alaska summit, Trump interestingly seemed to have controlled his usual urge to hog the limelight by offering the opening address to Putin. In a 12-minute presser, Putin spoke for a little over eight minutes while Trump took less than four minutes. He ended in his characteristic style saying, 'Vladimir, I hope we meet soon'. Not missing the opportunity, Putin quickly replied in English: 'This time, in Moscow'. The statement caught Trump off guard. No media questions were allowed. It was clear both the leaders did not have much to say. The summit did not reach any conclusion because Putin isn't budging from his four core demands: A large portion of land annexed by Russia from Ukraine be recognised as Russian territory; annexed Crimea be recognised similarly; immediate ban on Nato's expansion; and urgent lifting of sanctions on Russia. Trump can neither accept these demands nor does he have the political capital to force Ukraine or his Western allies to accept these. Contrary to his claims, Trump is not bothered about lives being lost in Ukraine or in any conflict areas. His eyes are set on Ukrainian minerals and agricultural products, and he's wary of the increasing closeness between Moscow and Beijing. He also perceives a new threat in Brics. If the group keeps gaining heft, it may end up being a threat to the US in future. The combined economic strength of China, India, Brazil and Russia is almost twice that of Europe. These statistics don't favour the US in a changing global scenario. Trump knows that tariffs and economic sanctions alone can't contain Russia. Many of his predecessors failed in their attempts to tame Russia. This is the reason the US maintains the façade of sanctions on Russia but uses back-channel diplomacy to increase trade with it. Since Trump's second presidency, Russia-America trade has witnessed a 20% surge. As for India, after the Alaska summit, Trump said he may not impose 'additional tariffs' as a penalty or punishment on countries buying Russian oil. It's not clear whether he was talking about the 25% penalty he imposed or any new tariff that he was working on. With the Alaska meeting having ended as a damp squib, New Delhi is keenly watching. Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. The views expressed are personal
