Probe into Aviva's £3.7bn deal for Direct Line launched by competition watchdog
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had kicked off an initial probe into the deal to look at whether it would result in a 'substantial lessening of competition' in the sector.
The CMA said it will report back with its findings by July 10.
The watchdog will now gather comments on the deal from all interest parties, with a deadline for responses of May 29.
FTSE 100 firm Aviva and its smaller rival Direct Line agreed the deal on December 23 last year, after a £3.3 billion bid was turned down in November.
The combined group would be a significant force in the motor insurance sector, estimated to cover more than a fifth of the total UK market.
Direct Line owns the Churchill and Green Flag brands, as well as its namesake brand as part of a portfolio offering car, pet, home and other insurance policies.
We've launched an investigation into Aviva's purchase of Direct Line.
Read more:https://t.co/Y9C4mFiq6G pic.twitter.com/GV4xrLLweF
— Competition & Markets Authority (@CMAgovUK) May 14, 2025
But the scale of the combined group and its share of the market has caught the attention of the CMA.
The takeover has also caused concerns among workers at the two firms after Aviva revealed at the end of last year that around 2,300 jobs would be at risk after the Direct Line deal amid cost-cutting efforts in the wake of the deal.
The takeover will see Aviva pay 129.7 pence in cash and 0.2867 of its own shares for each Direct Line share.
It will also pay up to 5p in dividend payments per share to Direct Line shareholders as part of the deal.
Aviva shareholders will own approximately 87.5% of the new company while Direct Line shareholders will own about 12.5%.
Before the Aviva deal was agreed, Direct Line had already fended off a takeover attempt by Belgian company Ageas earlier in 2024.
Chief executive Adam Winslow had joined Direct Line in March with the goal of turning it around, having been appointed following the ousting of Penny James from the top job.
Direct Line has since announced £100 million of cost cuts and axed 550 jobs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Do markets accept ongoing conflict now as a fact of life?
What is happening in the Middle East is so terrible in human terms that it seems wrong to be discussing the implications for investment. But that is what markets have to do. However horrible things are, and however huge the uncertainties, the plain fact is that the markets have to try to work out what might happen to the economies of different countries, to the price of the various types of assets, to interest rates, inflation, and so on – and all amid the fog of war. While we cannot know what will happen in the coming months, there will clearly be a period of extended conflict. This isn't just about the immediate consequences of last week's Israeli strike. The practical question facing us all is how best to invest in an increasingly dangerous world. Some short-term reactions have already become evident, but they have been strangely muted. The gold price has jumped, though it's still a little below its all-time peak in April. Oil prices climbed too, but at $75 a barrel on the Brent measure, they are down on where they were at the start of this year. As for shares, naturally they too took a hit, but the FTSE 100 index is still close to the all-time high it reached on Thursday. It is almost as if the markets are accepting continuing conflict as a fact of life, just another of the string of things they have learnt to cope with. Can that be right? There are two responses to that. One is to say the world economy is huge and regional tensions will always burst out, as we have seen in the past three years. What happened last week was part of that pattern. But because the global economy is so big, the ability of these conflicts to inflict damage beyond the countries and people affected is limited. To put the point harshly, the argument is that while this is horrible for the people caught up in the conflict, it is manageable as far as the wider economy goes. The other response is to say this is far too complacent. Quite aside from its human toll, war destroys wealth. Resources have to go into reconstruction and additional defence spending afterwards. Money that goes into military hardware and armed service salaries is money not available for education, health and all the other things that government supports. Though these conflicts are regional, and we hope against hope they will remain so, it would be naive to suppose we will not feel the effects across the developed world. That leads to practical implications for us all. Disruption is never good. It puts up the cost of everything. It leads to higher government borrowing – yes, even higher – for we are already in a mess across the developed world on that score. That inevitably puts up interest rates to higher levels than they would otherwise have been. And since the central banks will probably not put up rates by enough, I'm afraid the outcome must be higher-than-expected inflation. So what should we do? I take comfort in looking at what happened after the Second World War, which saw the destruction of life and wealth far beyond anything on the distant horizon now. Industry and commerce recovered quite swiftly and, after a lag, share prices reflected that. House prices took a while to steady, before starting their long, if uneven, march upwards. Inflation was suppressed at first but eventually burst out even more viciously than we have seen in the past five years. And anyone who held cash or bought government securities lost their shirts. So we should go on saving and investing. We should hold as little cash as practicable, and I personally hate the idea of holding gilts – UK Government bonds – even at their apparently decent yields. Property may not be a great buy at the moment, with stamp duty changes, non-doms pulling out, landlords selling up and punitive council tax rises. But we all have to live somewhere, and a mortgage is a form of forced saving. On a long view, owning one's home must make sense. And then there are equities, and note this. If, after everything that has been thrown at big British companies, the FTSE 100 index is hovering around its all-time high, what on earth would it do if the clouds lift a little?
Glasgow Times
a day ago
- Glasgow Times
Rangers confirm departure of key backroom staff member
The Belgian joined the Ibrox club at the start of the year to assist his fellow countryman, Philippe Clement. However, after Clement's sacking and a mutual agreement, Charai has now left the club after less than six months. Read more: A statement said: "Rangers can today confirm the departure of Issame Charai from the men's first-team coaching staff. "Charai, who joined the club in January to assist Philippe Clement, remained on the coaching staff through Barry Ferguson's spell in charge. "However, following the appointment of Russell Martin as head coach, it has been mutually agreed for Charai to move on with the best wishes of everyone at Rangers." CEO Patrick Stewart added: "I want to place on record the sincere thanks of both the club and I to Issame for his work over the past six months. "Through the managerial transition in February and beyond, he handled himself superbly and was a real asset to Barry and his staff during their period in charge of the team. "As the men's first-team moves forth into this new era under Russell, it has been agreed between the club and Issame for him to move on. "For whatever comes next for him, I want to wish him the very best of luck. "He will always be welcome back at Ibrox." Charai, who was part of Barry Ferguson's backroom team after Clement's exit, said: "As I leave Rangers, I want to thank everyone at the club for their support during my time here. "This is a really special club, and as it enters a new era, I want to wish everyone associated with the club the very best for what comes next."
The National
a day ago
- The National
Rangers confirm departure of backroom figure as CEO reacts
The Belgian joined the Ibrox club at the beginning of this year, not long before the sacking of his fellow countryman, Philippe Clement. Read more: Now, after a mutual agreement was reached, Charai has left Rangers after less than six months. A statement read: "Rangers can today confirm the departure of Issame Charai from the men's first-team coaching staff. "Charai, who joined the club in January to assist Philippe Clement, remained on the coaching staff through Barry Ferguson's spell in charge. "However, following the appointment of Russell Martin as Head Coach, it has been mutually agreed for Charai to move on with the best wishes of everyone at Rangers." CEO Patrick Stewart gave his reaction: "I want to place on record the sincere thanks of both the club and I to Issame for his work over the past six months," he told "Through the managerial transition in February and beyond, he handled himself superbly and was a real asset to Barry and his staff during their period in charge of the team. "As the men's first-team moves forth into this new era under Russell, it has been agreed between the club and Issame for him to move on. "For whatever comes next for him, I want to wish him the very best of luck. He will always be welcome back at Ibrox."
