logo
Rep. Baird hasn't ruled out a reelection bid. Still, another Republican is jumping in the race

Rep. Baird hasn't ruled out a reelection bid. Still, another Republican is jumping in the race

Two years ago, Mooresville Republican Craig Haggard, a first-term state representative, raised his hand to say he was interested in the 4th Congressional District seat if incumbent U.S. Rep. Jim Baird decided not to run.
Baird, also a Republican, did run, and he has implied he will run for a fifth term in 2026, saying his mission is to earn the 4th District's support in 2026. But things are different now. Haggard is officially running for the May Republican primary, too, having formally kicked off his campaign with a friendly gathering of supporters in Plainfield Aug. 12.
It's off to the races for what could be the most competitive, and already contentious, congressional contests in Indiana this cycle. Because of the makeup of the district, whomever wins the primary is likely to win the general election.
"I'm sick and tired of people going to D.C. and worrying more about a vote based on them being reelected than doing the right thing," Haggard said, situated before an American flag and the restored nose of the jet he flew as a fighter pilot in the Marine Corps. "I want to go and fight. I want to go and represent you."
The 4th Congressional District stretches from Morgan County in the south to Jasper and Newton counties in the north.
Though he only just filed his formal candidacy on Aug. 8, Haggard has already reported about $50,000 of contributions from the first half of 2025 and has $84,000 in the bank as of June 30. Baird raised $68,000 the same period, and has about $140,000 cash on hand.
The race is already tense. Haggard has noted that Baird's congressional mailers have included images of his son, Beau, and have increasingly left off his first name ― a move Haggard has interpreted publicly as Baird subtly introducing his son as a successor to his seat. The younger Baird has been rumored to be a potential future candidate for the seat after his father leaves.
The elder Baird, in a fiery press release the afternoon of Aug. 12, set the record straight: It is he who will court voters in 2026 and he will "not be distracted by political games."
He condemned Haggard's comments as "baseless" and "disgusting," mentioning four times in the press release that he is a two-time Purple Heart recipient and Vietnam veteran.
"I have never wavered in my commitment to my community and my country. I will continue that fight on the House floor to ensure the people of the 4th District have a strong voice in Washington," Baird said. "My mission remains serving the people of the 4th District and earning their support in 2026."
He also stressed that President Donald Trump has endorsed him in each of his races since 2018. Trump has yet to make an endorsement for the 2026 race.
Haggard told reporters at the event that whether his opponent is the congressman or his son, he will run the same campaign.
"If the congressman runs, great. And if his son runs, great," Haggard said. "Either way, doesn't change what I'm doing. I'm always going to run like I'm behind. I'm going to work my tail off; I'll be working every day from here until May 5."
Haggard, a Marine and Indiana Air National Guard veteran, was elected to his Statehouse seat in 2022, serving parts of Morgan, Hendricks and Johnson counties. He is also a small business owner and commercial broker.
He was also Indiana's field representative for the National Rifle Association for six years.
There was a sizeable labor union presence at his rally, particularly from the Central Midwest Regional Council of Carpenters. Political director Jerome Stanford said Haggard came to their training facility in Greenwood years ago and instantly hit it off.
He said Haggard proved he is an honest broker when he voted against a bill in the Statehouse seeking to restrict project labor agreements, a bill the unions saw as anti-union. Stanford also appreciates that Haggard has friendships across the political aisle ― something unions themselves have been making in recent years, too ― and is accessible and available. It helps that a lot of his union members are into guns, too.
"He's a roughneck just like the rest of us," Stanford laughed.
Though the soaring national debt is one of Haggard's top concerns, his main promise to supporters was that he would be reachable and respond to every constituent while in office.
"And if we don't," he told the crowd, "throw it on Facebook."
Those constituents could change if lawmakers heed Trump's call to redraw Indiana's congressional maps before the midterm elections. Nomatter what new lines may be drawn, Haggard said he plans to still run for the 4th ― or whatever new number is assigned to it.
"I've worked on this for two years. I met with thousands of people, I'm going to continue to."
More: Gov. Mike Braun on Trump's redistricting pitch: 'I'm listening to the legislators'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The House is awash in subpoenas as Epstein inquiry expands
The House is awash in subpoenas as Epstein inquiry expands

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The House is awash in subpoenas as Epstein inquiry expands

Congress has been rightly criticized for not pushing back sooner against executive branch encroachments on first branch constitutional prerogatives. Congress's relative somnolence is understandable though not wholly excusable. The silence on the Hill has been due in large part to the unilateral party control of both houses of Congress and the presidency. There is a certain grace period observed at the outset of a new administration while it gets its ducks in a row on policy and legislative priorities. Missteps and overreach inevitably occur and usually are met by majority party tolerance and inaction on the Hill. This Congress has followed the norm and oversight was overlooked except by the lone voices of protest on the minority party side of the aisle. Last month we witnessed the first cracks in the stone dam. It occurred on July 22 in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. There, in the Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement chaired by Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), ranking member Summer Lee (D-Pa.) offered a motion to subpoena the Justice Department for the complete files of Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died by suicide in prison in 2019. The motion surprisingly carried on an 8-to-2 vote with three Republican members joining all Democrats to adopt the motion. Two of the subcommittee's Republicans, including Chairman Higgins, voted against the motion. The subcommittee subsequently adopted by voice vote a motion offered by Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) to subpoena the deposition testimony of a host of former government officials from both parties, including former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, six former attorneys general and two former FBI directors. One of the subpoenaed former officials, Obama Attorney General Eric Holder, was asked on ' Meet the Press ' last Sunday whether he would comply with the subpoena. He wouldn't commit, explaining that conversations were ongoing to determine exactly what information the committee wanted. Program moderator Kristen Welker pressed him, noting that he was the first attorney general in history ever to be held in contempt of Congress in 2012 for his refusal to testify on 'Operation Fast and Furious,' tracking illegal gun sales. 'Do you have any regrets about that now,' and, 'will that be informing your decision now?' Holder explained that the information sought in that instance was 'confidential' internal executive branch communications and, presumably privileged (though only the president can invoke executive privilege). The White House and Justice Department did not attempt to prosecute Holder for criminal contempt of Congress in 2012. Whether the other subpoenaed former attorneys general and FBI directors will take their lead from Holder's decision this time will be interesting to watch. What makes the Epstein files disclosure demand especially unique today is President Trump's apparent flip-flop on the issue of disclosure from his previous use of it as one of the major issues on which he campaigned. It was a symbol of bringing down the ruling elites and draining the Washington swamp. That commitment has waned. As pressure grew, the president belatedly directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek release of sealed grand jury transcripts in the Epstein case. That request was denied by a Florida judge. Meanwhile, the president has put out the word that it's 'time to move on.' The Supreme Court's decision in McGrain v. Daugherty in 1927 held that Congress has an inherent right to compel testimony and conduct oversight as part of its constitutional lawmaking functions. The case was an offshoot of the Teapot Dome oil leasing scandal of the early 1920s. In that instance, a Senate select committee was inquiring into why former Attorney General Harry Daughety did not investigate the matter when it first broke. It had subpoenaed Mally Daugherty, the attorney general's brother and president of a bank at the heart of the scandal. When Mally refused to comply with the subpoena he was cited for contempt of Congress and found guilty. The Supreme Court reversed a lower court and upheld Mally's conviction. That 1927 decision did not turn off the spigot and witnesses today are still challenging subpoenas and inviting contempt citations. Whether a contempt citation is prosecuted is solely at the discretion of the Justice Department. The failure by the Justice Department to prosecute Holder's contempt of Congress citation in 2012 could well be a precursor to another prolonged battle of the branches. This time Congress could potentially wind-up with a sawed-off limb. Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran culminating as chief of staff of the House Rules Committee in 1995. He is author of, 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).

GOP Sen. Markwayne Mullin, former MMA fighter, skips seat belts in DC over carjacking fears
GOP Sen. Markwayne Mullin, former MMA fighter, skips seat belts in DC over carjacking fears

Fox News

time12 minutes ago

  • Fox News

GOP Sen. Markwayne Mullin, former MMA fighter, skips seat belts in DC over carjacking fears

Print Close By Alex Nitzberg Published August 14, 2025 Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma indicated that he does not wear a seat belt while driving in Washington, D.C., because he wouldn't want to be "stuck" in the event of a carjacking. "And by the way, I'm not joking when I say this: I drive around in Washington D.C. in my Jeep … and I don't buckle up," Mullin said. He made the comments during an appearance on the Wednesday episode of Fox News Channel's "The Ingraham Angle," which was guest hosted by Brian Kilmeade. GOP SENATOR WARNS DEMS DELAYING TRUMP NOMINEES 'WE CAN DO THIS THE EASY WAY OR HARD WAY' The senator explained that the reason he does not strap in while driving in D.C. is because of the possibility of carjacking — he does not want to be "stuck" in his vehicle if he needs to swiftly exit. "And I wear my seat belt all the time, but in Washington D.C., I do not because it is so prevalent of carjacking," he said. HARMEET DHILLON SAYS 'MALODOROUS HOMELESS PERSON' TRIED TO STEAL HER PHONE IN DC The lawmaker "is a former undefeated Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighter with a professional record of 5-0" and "was inducted into the Oklahoma Wrestling Hall of Fame in 2016," according to his Senate website. President Donald Trump recently moved to crackdown on crime in the city. SCHUMER GIVES PROFANITY-LACED RESPONSE TO WHETHER DEMS WILL HELP EXTEND DC POLICE TAKEOVER CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP During a press conference on Monday, he called it "liberation day in D.C.," declaring, "We're gonna take our capital back." Print Close URL

Treasury Secretary drops bombshell on Trump's Bitcoin reserve plans
Treasury Secretary drops bombshell on Trump's Bitcoin reserve plans

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Treasury Secretary drops bombshell on Trump's Bitcoin reserve plans

Treasury Secretary drops bombshell on Trump's Bitcoin reserve plans originally appeared on TheStreet. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made some revealing comments regarding the Donald Trump administration's plan for the strategic Bitcoin reserve on Aug. 14. Bessent said the administration isn't going to buy Bitcoin assets to add to the reserve; instead, it will use confiscated assets for the reserve. The administration is going to stop selling its Bitcoin holdings, he added. "I believe that Bitcoin reserve at today's prices is somewhere between 15 and 20 billion." The administration is also going to keep treating gold as a "store of value" for the American people, Bessent said. The Treasury Secretary made these remarks during an interview on the "Mornings with Maria" show on Fox Trump has vowed to turn the U.S. into the crypto capital of the world and has taken several steps toward the goal. One such step was signing an executive order in March to establish a strategic Bitcoin reserve and a digital asset stockpile. As per BitcoinTreasuries, the U.S. holds 198,022 BTC. It marked a monumental step in the direction of institutional adoption of crypto assets, also underlined by the surge in demand for crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and corporate crypto treasury strategies. The administration recently passed the GENIUS Act as well, and the CLARITY and Anti-CBDC Acts remain works in progress. Launched in 2009, Bitcoin is the world's largest cryptocurrency, which has a market cap of $2.35 trillion. The Treasury Secretary's remarks came on the heels of the king coin hitting a new all-time high (ATH) above $124,000. Treasury Secretary drops bombshell on Trump's Bitcoin reserve plans first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 14, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 14, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store