logo
Why England football fans have turned on Keir Starmer

Why England football fans have turned on Keir Starmer

Telegraph10-06-2025
When Sir Keir Starmer became Prime Minister during last summer's European Championship, hardcore England fans summed up the expectations of much of the country.
'Not long after Labour won in 1997 England won Le Tournoi. It's coming home,' one member of the England Supporters Travel Club (ESTC) wrote on its official Facebook group.
That the post attracted dozens of laughter emojis and comments such as 'every cloud I suppose' suggested hopes were not high the party's landslide general election victory would usher in a new golden age for the UK.
At the same time, there was no sign of any open hostility from England 's most loyal fans towards Labour or its leader.
That all changed dramatically on Saturday when many of the 7,000 of them who attended the country's 1-0 World Cup qualifying win against Andorra loudly and repeatedly branded Starmer a 'c---' and 'w----r'.
Never before had a Prime Minister been singled out for that scale of abuse at a football match. Not Margaret Thatcher after the Poll Tax, Tony Blair after the Iraq War, Boris Johnson after 'Partygate' or Liz Truss after she 'crashed the economy'.
Exactly why Starmer was targeted on Saturday is known only to those who took part in the chanting, but the game was played weeks after he lost his first by-election since becoming Prime Minister – as well as scores of seats in local government – to Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
It also took place days after the Prime Minister signed a deal with the European Union that political opponents called a 'betrayal' of Brexit and the crossing of the channel by 1,200 migrants in small boats across a single day.
'Reform have got themselves elected on immigration'
Among those at Saturday's match was Simon Harris, a veteran member of the ESTC who was also, until recently, a Conservative member of Shropshire Council.
Harris, who has followed England home and away for more than a quarter of a century, told Telegraph Sport he did not hear the abuse of Starmer and had not spoken to anyone involved.
But the 67-year-old, a 'one-nation' Tory who voted Remain in the EU referendum, said that much of the England fanbase was pro-Brexit.
He also acknowledged Starmer's ongoing failure to 'Smash the gangs' responsible for small-boat crossings would not have gone unnoticed by those who had put up 'Stop the Boats' stickers in Germany during Euro 2024.
'When the tide goes out, the immigration thing, it's what Reform have got themselves basically elected on,' Harris added.
Watching Saturday's match on television was Richard Caborn, the Labour sports minister for six years in the Blair government.
He speculated the reason behind the chanting may have been either the 'rise of Reform or right-wing nationalism coming back into play', adding: 'We've had the National Front and all them who've tried to infiltrate football.'
Indeed, footage was posted to social media before Saturday's game purporting to show England fans in a bar in Spain serenading far-right firebrand Tommy Robinson.
Downing Street did not respond to requests for comment on why it thought Starmer had been targeted, while Farage told Telegraph Sport simply: 'I have never known a Prime Minister viewed with such contempt by working people.'
Unrest over Starmer's EU deal and small-boat crossings are not the only possible reasons for Saturday's chanting about a Prime Minister who took office four days after Jude Bellingham's dramatic overhead kick rescued England from one of their worst ever defeats.
Their Euro 2024 last-16 victory against Slovakia ensured a dream start to the job for arguably the most committed football supporter ever to become Prime Minister.
Diehard Arsenal supporter Starmer had made his fandom a key plank of his election campaign and he continued to exploit it during England's march to the tournament's final.
After their quarter-final penalty shoot-out win over Switzerland, he joked they had 'not missed a penalty under a Labour Government in 2024'.
He was photographed watching their last-gasp semi-final win over the Netherlands during a Nato summit in Washington.
And he attended the final against Spain, raising hopes of a Bank Holiday if England ended their near 60-year wait for a major trophy – which they did not.
A Euro 2024 triumph was always unlikely to buy Starmer an extended honeymoon given the Southport stabbings that followed days later and the riots that ensued. This violence led to him being branded 'two-tier Keir' by Elon Musk over allegations white protestors were being treated more harshly than minorities by the police.
#TwoTierKeir
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 6, 2024
The summer had not yet finished when news first broke of what became known as the Labour freebies scandal.
It was later reported that Starmer had accepted more than £107,145 worth of gifts, benefits and hospitality since the previous General Election in 2019 – including tickets to Arsenal matches and concerts by Taylor Swift and Coldplay. That is two-and-a-half times more than any other MP during the same period.
His use of the directors' box at the Emirates Stadium after becoming Prime Minister caused particular controversy, a move he defended by arguing it would cost the taxpayer more in security for him to sit in his normal seat.
With many seeing Labour's landslide election win as less of an endorsement of Labour and more an indictment of Tory sleaze, the freebies scandal could hardly have been a worse start to life in Number 10 for Starmer.
It has been followed by the likes of further rows and protests over two-tier policing and sentencing, an inheritance tax raid on farmers and the removal of winter fuel payments to pensioners.
Even moves by Starmer to prevent a repeat of the European Super League debacle that caused one of the biggest ever revolts by English football fans has become mired in controversy. An investigation has been launched into accusations of cronyism against Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy's proposed choice to lead the game's new independent regulator.
All this and more could be among the reasons England supporters engaged in anti-Starmer chanting less than a year since he took office.
'He needs to convince them he's doing a good job'
How much the Prime Minister needs to worry about that with another four years to go until the next general election – after England co-host the next Euros in 2028 – is even more open to debate.
These are the same group of fans, after all, who continue to sing 'No Surrender' in the national anthem more than a quarter of a century after the Good Friday Agreement and chant 'Ten German Bombers' following Thomas Tuchel's appointment as England manager.
They also unveiled a new song during Saturday's match about Germany having 'never won a war' and, by the end of what was a dull game, were chanting 'Ian, Ian, Ian' at Andorra defender Ian Olivera.
Harris said Starmer should be most concerned about the views of those members of the fanbase who had not abused him on Saturday, particularly those who would have once been seen as traditional Labour or working-class Tory voters.
'I think he needs to win them,' he said. 'The centre, which is Keir Starmer, needs to win and convince those people that he's doing a good job. I don't think that is happening.'
He added: 'I think he does have a problem. I think all centrist politicians have a problem at the moment. And I think what you may be seeing is a sort of reaction to that and that sense of disengagement which people have got.'
Caborn warned it would be wrong to overplay how much those involved on Saturday represented the wider football fanbase, never mind the country at large, but he did say that Starmer should have concerns about his standing among England supporters.
'A Prime Minister that didn't would not be serious,' he said. 'You always take these things seriously and you want to find what the root causes are.'
Stressing why football was so important to governments, he added: 'They see that is where their constituency is. It's as simple as that, in my view. What is it Bill Shankly said? Life, death and football.'
Asked if Starmer would have a real cause to worry if Saturday's chanting spread to the wider fanbase during England's friendly against Senegal at Nottingham Forest's City Ground on Tuesday night, Caborn replied: 'Absolutely, yeah.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MP removed from New Zealand parliament in heated debate over Palestinian recognition
MP removed from New Zealand parliament in heated debate over Palestinian recognition

The Guardian

time22 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

MP removed from New Zealand parliament in heated debate over Palestinian recognition

New Zealand parliamentarian Chlöe Swarbrick was ordered to leave parliament on Tuesday during a heated debate over the government's response to the conflict in Gaza. An urgent debate was called after the centre-right government said on Monday it was weighing up its position on whether to recognise a Palestinian state. Close ally Australia on Monday joined Canada, the UK and France in announcing it would recognise a Palestinian state at a UN conference in September. Swarbrick, who is co-leader of the Green party, said New Zealand was a 'laggard' and an 'outlier' and the lack of decision was appalling, before calling on some government members to support a bill to 'sanction Israel for its war crimes'. The bill was proposed by her party in March and is supported by all opposition parties. 'If we find six of 68 government MPs with a spine, we can stand on the right side of history,' said Swarbrick. Speaker Gerry Brownlee said that statement was 'completely unacceptable' and that she had to withdraw it and apologise. When she refused, Swarbrick was ordered to leave parliament. Brownlee later clarified Swarbrick could return on Wednesday but if she still refused to apologise she would again be removed from parliament. New Zealand has said it will make a decision in September about whether it would recognise Palestine as a state. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been strongly critical of growing international moves to recognise a Palestinian state. 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole, just like that, fall right into it,' he said earlier this week. 'This canard is disappointing, and I think it's actually shameful. But it's not going to change our position.' Netanyahu went on to claim Israel was 'actually applying force judiciously, and they know it'. Foreign minister Winston Peters told parliament that over the next month the government would gather information and talk to partners, which would inform cabinet's decision. 'We'll be weighing this decision carefully rather than rushing to judgment,' Peters said. Along with the Green party, opposition parties Labour and Te Pati Maori support recognition of a Palestinian state. Labour parliamentarian Peeni Henare said New Zealand had a history of standing strong on its principles and values and in this case 'was being left behind'.

Police ordered to consider revealing ethnicity of suspects
Police ordered to consider revealing ethnicity of suspects

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Police ordered to consider revealing ethnicity of suspects

Police should consider disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects when they are charged in high-profile and sensitive cases, new national guidance says. Coming into force today, it says there must be a policing reason to release the information, such as where there are high levels of disinformation, if it will improve public safety, or if it is significantly in the public interest. A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they will support the new guidance by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information if appropriate. The change comes after two men charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton were reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, sparking protests. Warwickshire Police did not confirm the immigration status, leading to Reform UK accusing them of a cover-up, something the force strongly denied. Responding to the row, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said last week she wanted police to be more transparent, and that new guidance was being worked up. 2:41 How high-profile cases sparked debate When considering what information to release, police must consider contempt of court laws which aim to give defendants a fair trial, as well as media guidance from the College of Policing. Until now, the media guidance said once a suspect has been charged, police can give out information such as their name, date of birth and address. It did not mention anything about ethnicity, nationality, or immigration status. The Southport murders committed by Axel Rudakubana last July led to speculation about his ethnicity and immigration status, fuelling riots in many parts of the country. While the details were not initially released in that case, when a car ploughed into crowds celebrating Liverpool's Premier League win earlier this year, Merseyside Police were quick to say the suspect was a white British man. In the Nuneaton case, Reform leader Nigel Farage said retaining the "basic and sober facts" was "a cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings". Warwickshire Police said officers "did not and will not cover up such criminality", and followed national guidance. How will new guidance work? The new guidance says it is at the discretion of the police force to decide whether to release ethnicity and nationality details, and that they must consider the ethical and legal implications. It says it is not the job of police to verify a suspect's immigration status, which rests with the Home Office. The advice has been developed by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing, in consultation with the Home Office and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Deputy chief constable Sam de Reya, the NPCC lead for communications and media, said: "We saw during last summer's disorder, as well as in several recent high-profile cases, what the major, real-world consequences can be from what information police release into the public domain. "We have to make sure our processes are fit for purpose in an age of social media speculation and where information can travel incredibly quickly across a wide range of channels. "Disinformation and incorrect narratives can take hold in a vacuum. It is good police work for us to fill this vacuum with the facts about issues of wider public interest." 3:31 'A chilling message' The guidance is interim, and will be considered as part of a wider review of the College of Policing's authorised professional practice for media relations later this year. Chief constable Sir Andy Marsh, the college's CEO, said officers will continue to police "without fear or favour". But the guidance is likely to provoke backlash from anti-racism campaigners. Last week, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants warned that revealing ethnicity and migration status would "send a chilling message: that some people are inherently more 'suspect'". 'Public trust requires transparency' A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News they welcome the new guidance, adding: "Public trust requires transparency and consistency from the authorities that serve them." They added: "The public, and police forces themselves, want greater clarity on when, why and how information is released and the legitimate and compelling reasons it may need to be withheld. "The Home Office will support that effort by authorising the release of relevant accompanying immigration information in future cases, where it is appropriate to do so, and where the police have requested it. All cases will of course take account of consultation with the police and CPS. "The government also asked the Law Commission at the end of February to speed up the elements of its review around the law of contempt in relation to what can be said publicly ahead of a trial."

Small boat migrant 'gives step-by-step guide on how to cross the Channel' on TikTok from his four-star hotel - then urges others to 'risk their life and spend their money' on the illegal journey
Small boat migrant 'gives step-by-step guide on how to cross the Channel' on TikTok from his four-star hotel - then urges others to 'risk their life and spend their money' on the illegal journey

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Small boat migrant 'gives step-by-step guide on how to cross the Channel' on TikTok from his four-star hotel - then urges others to 'risk their life and spend their money' on the illegal journey

An illegal migrant has shared a 'step-by-step guide' on how to cross the Channel on a small boat before telling others to 'spend their' money making the illegal journey. The man shared videos of his journey on TikTok, gaining nearly one million views, as he boasted about entering the UK illegally. Known as Alexandra420, he shared videos of himself on the small boat before live streaming in an asylum hotel. There, he told followers he was in 'the best place' while broadcasting from his free accommodation near Heathrow Airport. Alexandra left Calais at around 4am on Saturday, The Sun reported. He first shared a 13-second clip from the middle of the Channel, which showed a French lifeboat alonsgide which was also full of migrants making the dangerous crossing. In a second clip, he shared a video of himself grinning in an orange jacket and pointing to the sky. He then showed the boat as it was surrounded by huge freight ships, set to the theme tune of US drama Prison Break. It comes as the number of small-boat migrants reaching Britain under Labour passed 50,000. Keir Starmer was slammed for 'incompetence' over the handling of the Channel crisis, with the soaring figure a clear indication of the lack of a plan since he axed the Tories' Rwanda deportation scheme on his first day in power. Former Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith blamed the Tories, claiming: 'What is happening is the result of the last government.' Yesterday, Reform Leader Nigel Farage criticised the Prime Minister on social media. He wrote: 'As I predicted 5 years ago, unless we deport illegal migrants the invasion will be huge. 50,000 since our weak Prime Minister took office and there is no sign of it stopping.' Alexandra was one of more than 400 arrivals on Saturday and was taken in by Border Force officials to be processed in Kent. He was then taken to the four-star Crowne Plaza Hotel near Heathrow, where he started live streaming to his followers. In the stream, he gave viewers a tour of his room, with two single beds and an en suite bathroom. He said: 'This is dedicated to those haters who were happy thinking we either drowned or ended up dead.' Alexandra later claimed the boat he illegally travelled on began to deflate halfway through the journey and would have sank if Border Force officials had not rescued them. He said: 'It was dangerous. Our boat sank. It was punctured. The water came from the inside of the boat. 'On the other side, three people pumped the water. If the British boats hadn't come in an hour, we would have been in trouble.' Despite nearly facing serious danger, he encouraged others to pay the people-smugglers to risk the dangerous crossing. He said: 'I risked my life, I spent my money, I came. Your country is not your mother. 'Those who want to come, this is the best place. Don't be stingy. Your country is not your father, that you are so stingy. Live your life. 'Tell your four friends to come. Why are you so stingy? Being stingy is not good for God. You see, I risked my life! Why don't you come? My wish was to come to this hotel and live. I came here just for this.' He claimed that after being told about the risk of deportation, he told officials 'I will commit suicide. Alexandra finished his video by spinning on his chair and shouting 'welcome to London'. The Government's 'returns deal' with France appears to have done little to deter those determined to get to Britain, with the latest total including more than 1,500 arrivals in the seven days since the 'one in, one out' scheme launched. Official figures revealed there were 474 arrivals on Monday alone, bringing the total since the general election on July 4 last year to 50,271, despite the Prime Minister's promise to 'smash the gangs' behind the trafficking trade. The milestone was passed seven months earlier than under his Conservative predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Baroness Smith – who is now an education, women and equalities minister under Sir Keir – said: 'It is a completely legitimate claim to say that what is happening is the result of the last government that chose to focus on gimmicks with the Rwanda scheme.' Asked if the crossings were not Labour's fault, she insisted that the Government was taking responsibility now, but added: 'I don't believe it is our fault that it was enabled to take root in the way in which it has done by a government who failed to do what was necessary at that point. 'The last government enabled this hideous criminal activity to really get its roots into Europe. There was a lengthy period at the time in which the criminal gangs... behind this had the opportunity to have this operation set up and really embedded. 'And that's the task that this Government now has – to deconstruct that.' However, her attempt to evade responsibility was met with incredulity. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'The Government has confirmed 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power – the worst crisis in our history. 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill.' Labour scrapped the Tories' Rwanda asylum deal – designed to deter migrants from crossing – as one of its first acts, pledging instead to 'smash the gangs' by boosting law enforcement. However, small boat numbers are soaring, with 27,029 arrivals this year, up by 47 per cent on the same point last year and 67 per cent on the same point in 2023. Since the start of the crisis in 2018, 178,167 migrants have reached Britain, with only about four per cent of them removed. A Home Office spokesperson told The Sun it is unacceptable 'to promote the criminal services of people-traffickers or for social media companies to allow it'. The Home Office has been contacted for further comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store