logo
Las Vegas sergeant pleads not guilty in alleged bathroom ‘fetish' case

Las Vegas sergeant pleads not guilty in alleged bathroom ‘fetish' case

Yahoo09-04-2025

LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — A Las Vegas Metro police sergeant pleaded not guilty and invoked his right to a speedy trial in his third criminal case on Wednesday.
Kevin Menon, 43, appeared in court to plead not guilty to 28 counts of capturing the image of a private area of another person.
Las Vegas police sergeant set up cameras in bathrooms to fulfill 'fetish,' prosecutors say
Clark County District Court Judge Mary Kay Holthus set a trial date of June 2.
Menon allegedly installed two cameras in his home bathroom, according to Clark County Chief Deputy District Attorney Chris Hamner. Police found 96 recordings of women using the restroom, Hamner said. The victims, who included Menon's wife and sister-in-law, were unaware they were being recorded, according to Hamner.
A Clark County grand jury indicted Menon after reviewing evidence, which included videos of Menon appearing to install cameras. Hamner noted Menon was out of custody on bond at the time on his two ongoing criminal cases.
Hamner said Menon appears to have a 'fetish' and a 'sickness,' and detectives found Menon's searches for images of teenagers urinating.
Las Vegas judge says he should remain on case against police sergeant despite daughter's claims of abuse
In his first case, the Clark County District Attorney's Office alleges Menon abused his power by creating fake scenarios that resulted in citizens, mainly Black men, being detained on the Las Vegas Strip.
Menon had been leading a team of officers on the Las Vegas Strip. Body camera and surveillance videos showed Menon dressed in plain clothes while officers were dressed in uniform.
Detectives said when they seized Menon's electronic devices for the investigation, they found child sexual abuse material, also known as child pornography. This resulted in a second criminal case against Menon for child pornography-related charges.
Police first arrested Menon on Aug. 30. A Clark County grand jury later indicted him for 13 charges related to the alleged abuse of power and then four felony sex crimes charges in the second case.
Videos show alleged illegal Las Vegas Strip arrests; sergeant charged
In court documents, Menon claims he tried to expose racism within the police department and is being retaliated against.
Menon remains out of custody after posting bond in all three cases. After his initial arrest, the department placed Menon on leave with pay and suspended his police powers pending an investigation. The department has since stopped paying him.
Prosecutors have filed a motion to increase Menon's bail. Holthus scheduled a hearing for Monday.
Menon's legal team filed a motion to disqualify Clark County District Court Judge Ron Israel from handling the first two cases due to allegations of abuse by his daughter. The judge responded that he was unaware of any active investigations regarding his daughter's claims. A hearing is also scheduled for Monday.
To reach investigative reporter Vanessa Murphy, email vmurphy@8newsnow.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victim's family reacts to convicted killer being ruled competent to be executed
Victim's family reacts to convicted killer being ruled competent to be executed

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Victim's family reacts to convicted killer being ruled competent to be executed

SALT LAKE CITY () — Ralph Leroy Menzies, a Utah man convicted of kidnapping, robbing, and killing a woman in the 1980s, is competent to be executed, a court ruled. It's been nearly four decades since a Utah woman and mother of three Maurine Hunsaker was kidnapped and killed. Her family says after the judge's decision on Friday, justice is being served. 'She was my world, she was everything to me and that's why for all these years I've never given up the fight because of what she meant to me and what I lost,' her son Matt Hunsaker told It is a fight Hunsaker has been chasing for nearly four decades. 'The system has failed, 40 years, that's a long time,' Hunsaker said, referring to the nearly 40 years Menzies has been on death row. PREVIOUSLY: Court rules that convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed On Friday, Judge Matthew Bates ruled Ralph Menzies is competent enough to be executed despite having dementia. This is news Hunsaker had been hopeful for. 'We were waiting for what was coming out and we knew it was a pivotal decision that was going to change lives honestly,' Hunsaker said. He also says it is bringing him relief. 'Wanting my mom to be proud of me for fighting as hard as I did. It helped my drive and kept me focused to make sure my mom is remembered,' Hunsaker said. Menzies has been on death row since 1988 for the murder of Hunsaker's mother, Maurine. She was kidnapped from her job at a convenience store in Kearns in 1986 and later found in Cottonwood Canyon, tied to a tree and with her throat slit. Matt was 10 years old at the time. Salt Lake City faces soaring water demand and officials urge conservation as summer nears 'He took from me I will never get back, and I will never stop fighting unless there is no fight to fight for,' Hunsaker said. On the other hand, Menzie's attorney, Lindsey Layer, says they plan to fight too, by appealing to the Utah Supreme Court. She said her 67-year-old client suffers from dementia and severe memory loss, which was the reason behind the competency hearing. Layer called it 'deeply troubling' that Utah plans to 'remove Menzie from his wheelchair and oxygen tank, strap him to an execution chair, and shoot him to death,' she said in a statement to However, Hunsaker said it is not just about punishment, it is about finally turning the page on a lifetime of loss. 'We were at peace either way, but now let's see this execution happen, let's get this over with, and let's let the family close this chapter and move on,' Hunsaker said. Hunsaker said he hopes this next phase of appeals goes quickly and he plans on showing up to any possible scheduled execution. Victim's family reacts to convicted killer being ruled competent to be executed Owner reunited with lost dog after 6 years: 'My heart was racing' New mammoth exhibit to open at Utah Natural History Museum on Saturday Residents react to 4.8 earthquake in Caliente, Nevada Escaped inmate known as 'Devil in the Ozarks' found a 'short distance' from prison: sheriff Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Former DC police officer sentenced to 18 months for lying about leaking info to Proud Boys leader

time3 hours ago

Former DC police officer sentenced to 18 months for lying about leaking info to Proud Boys leader

WASHINGTON -- A retired police officer was sentenced on Friday to serve 18 months behind bars for lying to authorities about leaking confidential information to the Proud Boys extremist group's former top leader, who was under investigation for burning a Black Lives Matter banner in the nation's capital. Shane Lamond was a lieutenant for the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, D.C., when he fed information about its banner burning investigation to then-Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio. Last December, after a trial without a jury, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington, D.C., convicted Lamond of one count of obstructing justice and three counts of making false statements. Tarrio attended Lamond's sentencing and later called for Trump to pardon Lamond. 'I ask that the Justice Department and the President of the United States step in and correct the injustice that I just witnessed inside this courtroom," Tarrio said outside the courthouse after the sentencing. Prosecutors recommended a four-year prison sentence for Lamond. 'Because Lamond knew what he did was wrong, he lied to cover it up — not just to the Federal Agents who questioned his actions, but to this Court," they wrote. "This is an egregious obstruction of justice and a betrayal of the work of his colleagues at MPD.' Lamond's lawyers argued that a prison sentence isn't warranted. "Mr. Lamond gained nothing from his communications with Mr. Tarrio and only sought, albeit in a sloppy and ineffective way, to gain information and intelligence that would help stop the violent protesters coming to D.C. in late 2020, early 2021," they wrote. Tarrio pleaded guilty to burning the banner stolen from a historic Black church in downtown Washington in December 2020. He was arrested two days before dozens of Proud Boys members stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Tarrio wasn't at the Capitol that day, but a jury convicted him of orchestrating a violent plot to keep President Donald Trump in the White House after he lost the 2020 election. Lamond testified at his bench trial that he never provided Tarrio with sensitive police information. Tarrio, who testified as a witness for Lamond's defense, said he did not confess to Lamond about burning the banner and did not receive any confidential information from him. But the judge did not find either man's testimony to be credible. Jackson said the evidence indicated that Lamond was not using Tarrio as a source after the Dec. 12, 2020, banner burning. 'It was the other way around,' she said. Lamond, of Colonial Beach, Virginia, retired in May 2023 after 23 years of service to the police department. Lamond, who met Tarrio in 2019, had supervised the intelligence branch of the police department's Homeland Security Bureau. He was responsible for monitoring groups like the Proud Boys when they came to Washington. Prosecutors said Lamond tipped off Tarrio that a warrant for his arrest had been signed. They pointed to messages that suggest Lamond provided Tarrio with real-time updates on the police investigation. Lamond's indictment says he and Tarrio exchanged messages about the Jan. 6 riot and discussed whether Proud Boys members were in danger of being charged in the attack. 'Of course I can't say it officially, but personally I support you all and don't want to see your group's name and reputation dragged through the mud,' Lamond wrote. Lamond said he was upset that a prosecutor labeled him as a Proud Boys 'sympathizer' who acted as a 'double agent' for the group after Tarrio burned a stolen Black Lives Matter banner in December 2020. 'I don't support the Proud Boys, and I'm not a Proud Boys sympathizer,' Lamond testified. Lamond said he considered Tarrio to be a source, not a friend. But he said he tried to build a friendly rapport with the group leader to gain his trust.

HBCU administrator responds to sexual assault allegations
HBCU administrator responds to sexual assault allegations

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

HBCU administrator responds to sexual assault allegations

The post HBCU administrator responds to sexual assault allegations appeared first on ClutchPoints. Texas Southern Athletic Director Kevin Granger is denying all allegations of sexual assault after a lawsuit was filed by Tony Buzbee's law firm. Granger has been placed on leave as the university continues to investigate the incident. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of a Texas Southern staff member who alleges that Granger groped her vagina and breast and used vulgar language towards her while she was in his office. Granger is being represented by Attorney Letitia Quinones-Hollins, who released a statement saying that the claims against Granger are untrue. 'These are serious allegations, and they deserve a serious response, which we will make at the appropriate time and in court,' Quinones-Hollins wrote. 'In the meantime, I can tell you that no sexual assault occurred, and any indication that it did is false. Dr. Granger is an incredibly well-respected part of the TSU community, and his work there, over many years, has created opportunities for the school and its students that did not exist before.' According to the lawsuit, Granger solicited a staff member for sex when she was in his office, claiming that doing so would 'help her career.' According to the lawsuit, Granger began by improperly feeling the victim down in inappropriate places and inquiring whether she was wearing a wire or filming him. For thirty-two years, Granger has been associated with Texas Southern first as a standout basketball player and then as an athletic administrator. In 2019, he was promoted to the position of athletic director. Granger has not commented on the allegations. On June 3, however, the university issued a press release claiming that it is aware of the accusations and is looking into them. 'Texas Southern University became aware of the allegations involving a senior member of the leadership team following the filing of civil litigation,' said the statement from Communications Manager Kerrigan Williams. 'The University takes all allegations of misconduct seriously, as the safety of our students, student-athletes, and employees is our top priority. As a standard practice, the University does not comment on pending litigation.' On the other hand, Buzbee's sexual misconduct cases against prominent Black men, such as former Texans quarterback Deshaun Watson and rap moguls Jay-Z and Sean 'Diddy' Combs, have made him a more contentious figure. Also, on June 3, his office released a statement claiming that Granger used inappropriate language with the victim, who has not been named. 'The Buzbee Law Firm filed suit today in Harris County State Court on behalf of [the alleged victim] against Kevin Granger, Athletic Director for TSU. The case alleges that on April 30, 2025, Athletic Director Granger invited [the alleged victim] to his office. While there, Granger repeatedly asked [the alleged victim] if she was 'recording him' or 'wearing a wire' while he proceeded to inappropriately pat her down. The statement continued, 'The lawsuit further alleges that Granger continued to question [the alleged victim] about her relationship history and if she had ever been romantically involved with a colleague. According to the suit, Granger's questions became increasingly vulgar and graphic. As set forth in the lawsuit, Granger ultimately propositioned [the alleged victim] seeking sex while at the same time groping her breasts and vagina and manipulating her hand onto his erect penis. According to the facts set forth in detail in the suit, Granger told [the alleged victim] if she would comply with his requests, he could 'help her career.' 'The lawsuit further details that [the alleged victim] bravely resisted Granger's advances and was ultimately able to extricate herself from Granger's office. 'Reports have been made with the Houston Police Department, the EEOC, and the Human Resources department at TSU.' Related: Fisk University gymnastics program set to end next year Related: Kenny Latimore & Chanté Moore's son graduates from an HBCU

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store