logo
I timed how long it took to update to iOS 26 vs Android 16 — and the results shocked me

I timed how long it took to update to iOS 26 vs Android 16 — and the results shocked me

Tom's Guide20-06-2025
Since my job involves dealing with phones, I spend a lot of time updating the software — especially during beta software season.
One of my longstanding complaints has always been that iPhone updates take too long, especially during the reboot phase, but I never actually sat down and figured out how long the phone was out of commission.
Turns out my love of complaining got the better of me. After timing how long it takes to install the iOS 26 developer beta compared with Android 16, I realized that Apple updates aren't nearly as bad as I thought.
Or, at least, they're a lot less intrusive than they used to be. And apparently faster than updating to Android 16.
Android and iPhone updates aren't all that dissimilar, once they're actually available that is. Apple devices, of course, have much easier access to new software on account of the sheer number of Android phone makers and the fact they all control if and when updates are released.
The whole process involves downloading updates, optimizing the device and then actually physically installing it. The key difference is that a lot of Android phones have an update feature pioneered by Google Pixels, where all the updating is done behind the scenes.
Once that whole process is finished, the phone does an ordinary restart. This should take the same amount of time as any other restart. iPhones on the other hand take things differently, and once the restart process begins you need to sit and wait for a progress bar to fill up — during which the phone is totally unusable.
It hasn't always been this way, but Android's seamless update feature has been around since the release of Android 7. Not every phone maker got on board right away, and Samsung didn't include this until the release of the Galaxy S25, but for the most part it's made Android updates a little less painful.
But as I found out, they're no faster at getting things done.
As sensible as it might be to simply update my phones overnight, I tend not to do that. Mainly because a big part of my job includes testing out new features (or bugs) that come with new updates. So I usually end up triggering them manually, and then having to sit and wait while the software gets itself ready.
Don't get me wrong, mobile updates are not fast — it doesn't matter which platform you're using. What always bugged me was that iPhone updates always seemed to cut you off from your phone for much longer.
But as I timed the whole process, with a simultaneous install of Android 16 and the iOS 26 developer beta, I found that my attitudes may have been slightly wrong. Not only did the iPhone update take significantly less time than Android, the phone was only out of commission for about 10 minutes.
That's a lot longer than my Pixel 9 Pro, which restarts in around 45 seconds, but it's not as long as I'd actually thought. I can go 10 minutes without access to a phone, and it's highly unlikely that anything that does come through while the phone is restarting is so important that it can't wait 10 minutes.
Overall the iOS 26 update, which, according to The Times of India, is around 15GB, was done within an hour. Meanwhile the Android 16 update, which included the June Pixel Drop, took an hour and a half — even though the file size was around 1.5GB — 10 times smaller.
That's pretty poor performance from Google, I have to say, and it seemed to be because my Pixel spent quite a long time processing the update after it had been downloaded. Which is not ideal.
If you're going to sit and wait for devices to update, then you're going to have a bad time.
It's a long, tedious process that is better suited to being done overnight when you're asleep. It doesn't actually matter which platform you use, the only reason not to do this is because you're a bored phone critic that needs to see if his Pixel is going to get bricked for no apparent reason.
But at least I now have the peace of mind that, despite the extra downtime, iPhone updates are not as bad as I had always assumed. Maybe it's down to Apple improving the process, or maybe I'm just extremely impatient.
Either way it means I can get on with my day, and start complaining about the true evil update mastermind: Windows.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Substack turns on iOS in-app payment option for all paid newsletters
Substack turns on iOS in-app payment option for all paid newsletters

Engadget

time24 minutes ago

  • Engadget

Substack turns on iOS in-app payment option for all paid newsletters

Substack now lets users subscribe to any paid publication via an in-app purchase from the official iOS app. The news comes after the company tested the feature with 30,000 creators. This makes subscribing to something a much speedier affair, with the entire process taking just a few taps on the old smartphone screen. Prior to this, it wasn't always possible to upgrade to a paid subscription directly in the app. Showing off that it's more expensive to use iOS. (Substack) However, there's a fairly major caveat. It's likely that subscriptions paid for by in-app purchases will be more expensive than usual. That's to accommodate Apple's cut of the revenue. Substack says it "automatically sets" iOS app prices higher so creators take home approximately the same amount. These creators can dive into the settings to lower the price. There's another way to subscribe to your favorite Substack creators without burning too much time. Apple now allows iOS apps in the US to include external payment links, which stems from a legal ruling following a lawsuit from Epic Games . This isn't quite as speedy as an iOS sub, but the prices are right.

iPhone 18 Reportedly Won't Launch until 2027 Because of Foldable iPhone
iPhone 18 Reportedly Won't Launch until 2027 Because of Foldable iPhone

CNET

time24 minutes ago

  • CNET

iPhone 18 Reportedly Won't Launch until 2027 Because of Foldable iPhone

The yearly iPhone launch schedule reportedly is going to become very confusing -- or exciting -- depending on how you look at it. According to a report from ET News, the premium versions of the iPhone 18 series -- but not the base model -- will be released in September 2026, along with the first foldable iPhone. The base iPhone 18 will be launched in the first half of 2027, the report said. Read more: Best iPhone in 2025: Here's Which Apple Phone You Should Buy This decision would have no bearing on the release of iPhone 17, iPhone Pro, iPhone Pro Max and iPhone Air this September. There's no exact date for those releases yet. If the rumors and reports become reality, this would be the launch schedule over the next couple of years: September 2025: iPhone 17, iPhone Pro, iPhone Pro Max, iPhone Air First half of 2026: iPhone 17e (entry-level version, ala the iPhone 16e) September 2026: First foldable iPhone, iPhone 18 Air, iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max First half of 2027: iPhone 18 base model, iPhone 18e A representative for Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Kumar Priyadarshi, founder of training and consulting firm TechoVedas, said having two launches per year "could work -- if Apple does it right. By splitting the release, Apple stays in the news for a longer time, which could help keep sales steady all year." Apple saw a 2% decline in shipments of its iPhones in the second quarter of this year. Priyadarshi said the new launch schedule could also be smart from a customer perspective. "People who want the newest, most advanced models will buy in the fall, while the spring release can attract buyers looking for a more affordable upgrade," Priyadarshi said. "But Apple needs to clearly explain things so that buyers of the regular model don't feel like they're just waiting for a 'lesser' iPhone."

Substack writers can now direct U.S. readers to (often cheaper) web-based subscriptions on iOS
Substack writers can now direct U.S. readers to (often cheaper) web-based subscriptions on iOS

TechCrunch

time24 minutes ago

  • TechCrunch

Substack writers can now direct U.S. readers to (often cheaper) web-based subscriptions on iOS

Newsletter subscription platform Substack will begin taking advantage of an option on the U.S. App Store that allows users to make purchases outside of Apple's in-app purchasing system. This functionality is permitted by a change to the App Store's rules in May, as a result of Epic Games' antitrust lawsuit against the tech giant. Since then, a number of top apps have moved to offer in-app purchase links that point to their own websites, including Spotify, Patreon, and the Amazon Kindle app, among others. In Substack's case, support for external payments will benefit both the company, which no longer has to pay the App Store a commission on those web sales, and consumers, who will have access to reduced pricing. Meanwhile, Substack creators will be able to offer their readers the option of whether they want the convenience of Apple's in-app payments system (IAP) or the web payment option, which is now accessible without having to leave the app. Image Credits:Substack Substack explains it will automatically adjust its customers' iOS app price higher to account for Apple's fees, allowing creators to take home the same amount of money as a web subscription. However, Substack writers can disable this feature if they choose. (Substack will continue to take its own 10% fee based on the web subscription price, as before.) The company said it's also offering its writers migration tools to help them move their subscribers off Apple's payments system and onto its web-based system. Currently, more than 30,000 publications on the platform have in-app purchases enabled; Substack says early tests of the expanded set of payment options have driven a boost in paid sign-ups. It did not, however, share specific numbers related to this. Image Credits:Substack The public launch of the external payments option will only impact new Substack subscriptions. Substack writers don't have to take any action unless they want to lower the prices for those using Apple's payments system. Per Apple's App Store rules, fully opting out of offering IAP is not allowed. While the changes impact the Substack app in the U.S., the company says it's still evaluating if it makes sense to switch to the more complex rules Apple offers in the EU and U.K. for developers who want to forgo IAP.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store