Big discount store selling popular snack everyone loves when on holiday in the UK
A new snack discovery at Home Bargains hints at even more exciting treats to come
SNACK ATTACK Big discount store selling popular snack everyone loves when on holiday in the UK
A FOODIE has discovered a packet of BBQ-flavoured Lays crisps at their local Home Bargains store, expressing excitement among snack enthusiasts across the UK.
Home Bargains, a popular discount retailer, has been expanding its snack offerings, and the introduction of Lays crisps has caught the attention of many.
3
The post quickly garnered attention, with members of the Facebook group sharing their enthusiasm
Credit: Extreme Couponing and Bargains UK group/Facebook
3
Several users tagged their friends in the post, saying 'Running' in anticipation of the new snack
Credit: Alamy
Typically associated with international markets, Lays crisps are now making their way into British stores, much to the delight of fans.
The find was shared in the Extreme Couponing and Bargains UK Facebook group, where one user posted: 'Don't know if anyone has posted this before but Home Bargains are doing Lays crisps.'
The post quickly garnered attention, with members of the Facebook group sharing their enthusiasm.
One user commented: 'Oh yep just had some sour cream and chive ones for lunch, yum yum.'
Another added: 'My favourite when I'm abroad lol.'
Others expressed their fondness for the brand, noting: 'Love Lays, Walkers from a different country,' and 'Oh these are amazing how much.'
The excitement didn't stop there.
Several users tagged their friends in the post, saying 'Running' in anticipation of the new snack.
This surge of interest highlights the growing trend of international snack brands gaining popularity in the UK market.
In a recent comparison of discount retailers, Home Bargains often offers lower prices on everyday essentials, including snacks like crisps.
Walkers confirm they've discontinued fan favourite flavour
For instance, a six-pack of Walkers crisps was priced at £1.95 in both Home Bargains and B&M, compared to £2.20 at Morrisons.
The arrival of Lays crisps in UK stores is part of a broader trend of international snack brands making their mark in the British market.
As consumers continue to seek new and exciting flavours, retailers like Home Bargains are responding by expanding their product ranges to include popular international brands.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
8 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trade war: UK exemption from 50% steel tariffs is conditional, Trump warns
The UK's exemption from a doubling of duties on most US steel and aluminium imports is dependent on the ratification of May's trade pact between the two countries, the White House has warned. Tariffs of 50% were imposed on all shipments from early on Wednesday morning, except those arriving from UK shores which will still be subject to a 25% rate. Donald Trump decided to "provide different treatment" to the UK as he doubled down on the rates that had been in place since March as part of his early trade war salvoes which are designed to encourage more domestic production. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said of the move: "We started at 25 and then after studying the data more, realised that it was a big help, but more help is needed and so that is why the 50 is starting." The decision to spare UK products from the hike currently amounts to a reprieve of just over a month, however, as the clock ticks down to a US deadline of 9 July when wider tariff pauses for US trading partners could be applied. President Trump's executive order said of the UK situation: "On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminium consistent with the terms of the EPD [economic prosperity deal], or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD". 2:45 Even if the trade pact agreed with the UK was to be fully enacted by that time, quotas within that agreement could still technically mean that a higher rate will apply in future. The government of Sir Keir Starmer has said it is continuing to work with US officials to agree the terms. A spokesperson said: "The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our Plan for Change. "We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed." The UK steel industry was cautious in its own response, while welcoming the reprieve. 2:42 Gareth Stace, the director general of UK Steel, said: "Continued 25% tariffs will benefit shipments already on the water that we were concerned would fall under a tax hike. "However, uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates, and now US customers will be dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders. "The US and UK must urgently turn the May deal into reality to remove the tariffs completely."
Times
12 minutes ago
- Times
Starmer handed five-week reprieve from Trump's steel tariffs
President Trump exempted British steel and aluminium exports from new 50 per cent tariffs while giving ministers five weeks to finalise details of a trade deal with the United States. In an executive order, Trump said UK exporters would be spared from the doubling of tariffs that are due to come into effect on Wednesday, but appeared to set a new deadline of next month for the deal to be finalised. The order stated that if the UK had not complied with 'relevant aspects' of the Economic Prosperity Deal signed last month, then the US 'may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 per cent … on or after July 9'. Trump said: 'I have further determined that it is necessary and appropriate to allow for the implementation of the US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal of May 8, 2025, and to accordingly provide different treatment for imports of steel and aluminium articles, and their derivatives, from the United Kingdom.' Trump's move came after steel manufacturers warned ministers that 'highly damaging' delays to implementing the trade deal were already costing them millions of pounds in lost business. Trade from the US has dried up, they said, as American importers put orders on hold in the hope of escaping current tariff levels of 25 per cent, which is still being applied to UK exports. Senior government figures have blamed the US side for delays in getting the deal over the line, saying that negotiations on the technical aspects of the steel and aluminium quotas have been 'complicated'. Almost a month since Starmer and Trump agreed in principle to spare Britain's steel, car and aluminium industries from US tariffs, officials say they are still some way from completing the deal. The government said ministers were 'pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs'. It added: 'We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25 per cent US tariffs on steel removed.' However, the Conservatives have accused ministers of 'misleading the public' over the deal. Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour told the British public we had a deal with the US, but one month on, there is no deal in sight, meaning British businesses and workers continue to suffer because of Labour's failed negotiations. 'After snatching the winter fuel payment, lying about not increasing taxes, and misleading the public by saying the US trade deal was done, the public will rightly not trust a word Labour says.' Trump's move came after Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, held talks with his US counterpart, Jamieson Greer, to discuss the difficulties in finalising the agreement. However, officials admitted it could take a number of weeks to get the agreement over the line. Speaking after the meeting, a government spokesman said both sides agreed that they wanted to implement agreements 'on sectoral tariffs as soon as possible'. 'The pair agreed that businesses and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic must start to feel the benefits of the deal soon, with both sides committing to work closely to make that happen,' the official said. Under the much-vaunted trade agreement announced last month, Britain could continue to export steel, aluminium and cars to the US free of tariffs, in return for dropping tariffs on American beef and ethanol exports. However, exact quotas for different types of steel and aluminium products were not specified. There were also unanswered questions over whether steel products only partially made in the UK would be covered by the deal. Speaking to MPs before the announcement, Russell Codling, a director at Tata Steel, said the firm currently supplied about £150 million worth of steel to the US that was now being hit by tariffs. 'The 25 per cent tariff was a big shock to us and the 50 per cent tariff is really quite devastating,' he said. 'Where do we go next? What is the future for our business?' Codling added that his message to the government was to 'act as quickly as possible' to get the deal over the line. Andy Richardson, the managing director of Special Melted Products, said that his firm had suffered a 'complete cessation of orders' since tariffs came into effect. 'We are losing business rapidly,' he said. 'Even if the trade deal was fully clarified tonight, I have significant concerns for the job security of people who work in my plant and other metal producers around the UK. It needs to happen really, really quickly.' Chrysa Glystra, director of trade and economic policy at UK Steel, said: 'The delay in implementing the deal is highly damaging to UK industry.' UK Steel welcomed Trump's decision to keep tariffs at 25 per cent on imports of British steel and aluminium for now, describing it as 'a welcome pause', but said that 'uncertainty remains' over the final rate. Gareth Stace, its director general, said that Reynolds had acted swiftly, recognising that steel trade stability and security between the two nations is 'of utmost importance'. Stace said: 'Continued 25 per cent tariffs will benefit shipments already on the water that we were concerned would fall under a tax hike. However, uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates, and now US customers will be dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders. 'The US and UK must urgently turn the May deal into reality to remove the tariffs completely. 'At an already crushing time for our steel industry, with global oversupply and weak demand, we must continue to work together to support sales levels in our second most important export market. 'It is also time for the UK government to take decisive action domestically on trade defence. There is plain evidence of trade diversion switching gears into the UK after the EU stepped up its trade defences, and now we must do the same. 'Imports are flooding into the UK market, depressing steel prices and taking away market share. We must not lose sight of our domestic market while battling to stabilise exports to the US.' Trump confirmed the rise in import duties for the rest of the world, arguing the 50 per cent tariffs would stop 'foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States market'.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Things will only get incrementally better for Keir Starmer
Photo by Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street Britain's political doom loop remains unbroken – perhaps one of the last things about us that is. A country whose economy has been too weak and growing too slowly to give people the living standards and services they believe they deserve, that chews up and spits out wildly different forms of leadership, year after year after year. Now it's Keir Starmer's turn. YouGov reports that the proportion of voters with an unfavourable opinion of the Labour leader has risen to 69 per cent, giving him a net favourability rating of minus 46 – his worst so far. The good news is twofold: he still has four years left, and when it comes to unpopular British leaders, it's 'join the club'. But that is about it. With a tough Spending Review on 11 June, and Labour MPs in mutinous mood about benefits cuts, gleeful speculation has already begun about how long Starmer will last, and about where the putsch is coming from. Let's deal with that later, but start by asking: even during days dominated by the hugely important defence spending review, what is the biggest issue for Downing Street? It is, simply, an electorate that feels skint. One key Starmer adviser tells me he thinks the very phrase 'cost-of-living crisis', popularised with the spike in energy prices after the invasion of Ukraine, grossly undersells the problem: 'This is a profound living-standards crisis.' He goes on to sketch a married couple in their fifties living in the suburbs. Their standard of living – the holidays they can take, the car they drive, the restaurants they can afford to eat at – is lower than it was 15 years ago, when annual pay rises came regularly, loans were cheap, the high street still worked, and technology was getting cheaper. Looking back, they are angry. Looking forward, they keep pulling the political levers to get change – Cameron, Brexit, Johnson, Labour – and nothing happens. The causes are well known, from the financial crash to spiking energy costs, Vladimir Putin's war, and decades of underinvestment. But voter rage, based on daily experience, doesn't blow away. It leads, next, to Reform with its fantasy economics and further in-built disappointment. The only Labour answer, so it follows, is to invest, to bring good jobs and grow the economy. Increased defence spending helps. But refiring the growth engine is not something that any government can do in a single year. So, cost of living is what dominates Downing Street strategy to the exclusion of all else. Until recently, that wasn't clearly so: Keir Starmer was the (successful) Prime Minister for Abroad. If there was a prime minister for the home department, it was Rachel Reeves. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe At the heart of government, perhaps the most significant shift has been a greater focus by the Prime Minister on domestic spending and economic decisions, following a series of bilateral meetings with Reeves in May. He is becoming steadily more assertive with those around him. When Liz Lloyd, the Blair-era policy chief, for instance, tried to get rid of Stuart Ingham, Starmer's veteran policy adviser, she was rebuffed. It is Starmer who has driven a rethink on the two-child cap and a bigger autumn announcement on child poverty, and who buried the winter fuel allowance error so publicly himself. To put it crudely, Starmer's greater engagement has seen a slight tilt leftwards in different policy areas. The more involved he has been, the more backing Bridget Phillipson has received on her academy reforms. Similarly, he has been pushing back against the cancellation of net zero as a political distraction: see the use of 12,000 predicted new green energy jobs planned for Lincolnshire as a way of combating Reform. This has immediate policy results. Soon we should see an intermediate package of extra help for families in poverty – more money for the household support fund, perhaps, and for breakfast clubs and school meals. That is not enough to make up for the two-child benefit cap, likely to be abolished when the poverty strategy is announced this autumn. But it is a direction-of-travel signal. In the Spending Review, we should expect the announcement of the commercial competition to build Britain's new, small modular reactors to be followed by some serious funding, including for the Acorn carbon capture project in Aberdeenshire, vital for Scottish Labour MPs stung by Reform's rise there. The way ahead begins with those policy reversals over winter fuel and the child benefit cap, then moves towards big infrastructure announcements across the north and Midlands of England. Summer will be difficult, but ministers believe the headroom exists to make the autumn feel a little easier. Though cabinet members tell me the Spending Review will be 'tough, not terrible', none of the above cancels the brutal spending squeeze on non-priority departments, including, crucially, local government and housing. The Environment Secretary, Steve Reed, is, by all accounts, having a horrible time. Angela Rayner is still fighting – one of her allies reminds me: 'Never forget, Angela is a trade union negotiator.' Downing Street is open to suggestions for ways to raise more money. Rayner's leaked tax memo had useful suggestions but would only have raised a few billion a year. The New Statesman has discussed ways of expanding National Insurance, a gambling or banking tax, and the case for a major rating revaluation – economically strong, politically dangerous. In cabinet, some want tax rises to focus minds towards 'on your side, not their side' politics. That leads, inexorably, to sensitive discussions about wealth. Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary, free to speak openly at a recent conference held by the think tank Compass, urged Reeves to 'deliver a proper wealth tax. When the wealthy don't pay their fair share, everyone else picks up the tab.' Such a tax, she argued, would reward work, close loopholes and give Labour the means to invest: 'We must acknowledge that our tax system is perverse. It punishes earned income but barely touches the real driver of inequality – wealth.' There is a fight ahead on tax and spend, as in a Labour government there should be. But it is practical, not ideological. As one senior figure puts it: 'This isn't Healey and Benn.' Crucially, there is no sign of a serious challenger to Starmer from inside the government. Ed Miliband to his left, has a deep personal loyalty. Rayner, hugely popular inside the Labour family, would struggle to reach voters outside it. Wes Streeting, for all his energy and eloquence, doesn't have the union or constituency support to take colleagues in a Blairite direction. Only Andy Burnham, a mayor not a cabinet minister, has made serious public criticisms of the government, speaking at the same conference as Haigh. And there is underlying agreement. After the local elections hammering, ministers and advisers from very different Labour factions say that living standards are their key test. 'This is becoming a more lively cabinet, but it is a pretty loyal cabinet,' one member says, adding: 'We have time, but it is a long, slow haul and we have to own our past policy mistakes.' It is also, of course, a cabinet of politicians who watched the Tories destroy themselves in successive leadership fights which offered easy answers to deep problems. It's a cabinet able to make its own mistakes, no doubt, but unlikely to make that one. Now that Starmer has at least a brief break from the pressure of overseas crises, some of the incoherence that his government has suffered from should begin to clear. Anger in the country will not abate quickly and will probably get much worse during 2025. But it won't be answered, this time, by major factional feuding, a putsch or a deep division in the cabinet. [See also: Rachel Reeves should fear the bond market vigilantes] Related
