New laws aim to strengthen Indigenous education and language revitalization efforts
Nora Mabie and Kaiden Forman-WebsterMontana Free Press + ICT
Two bills aimed at strengthening the state's commitment to Native American education and language revitalization recently became law.
Sponsor Sen. Jonathan Windy Boy, D-Box Elder, described the bills as complementary, as both relate to state initiatives that stem from Article X of Montana's Constitution, which reads in part, 'The state recognizes the distinct and unique cultural heritage of the American Indians and is committed in its educational goals to the preservation of their cultural integrity.'
In 1999, the state Legislature enacted the Indian Education for All Act to implement that constitutional mandate, requiring K-12 public schools to teach Native American history and culture.
And in 2013 the Legislature established the Montana Indian Language Preservation program to support tribes' language revitalization efforts.
The Legislature appropriates money each biennium for both programs, and Windy Boy's bills — now law — enact measures to improve financial accountability and elevate the role of tribal governments.
Enacting Indian Education for All has not been easy.
Since 2007, the Legislature has appropriated about $3.5 million annually to Montana school districts to implement IEFA. According to the original legislation, schools are supposed to use the funds for curriculum development, class materials and teacher training.
In 2021, a group of Montana students and tribes sued the state Office of Public Instruction and Board of Public Education, alleging that districts were improperly using funds meant to support IEFA. One school, according to court documents, used IEFA funds to pay a portion of librarians' salaries. Others allegedly used the funds to purchase books unrelated to Native American culture or history.
'School districts and schools have no incentive to fully and accurately report their IEFA expenditures because there is no penalty for failing to do so,' the plaintiffs claimed.
While the Board of Public Education recently reached a settlement agreement in the case, the class action lawsuit continues against OPI, which is responsible for distributing IEFA funds.
Windy Boy has brought several bills across multiple legislative sessions that aim to bolster the state's commitment to IEFA. In 2023, he brought a bill that required, rather than encouraged, school districts to implement IEFA. The bill, which was signed into law, also stipulated that IEFA funds can be revoked if districts fail to report how the funds are spent.
This year, Windy Boy successfully carried Senate Bill 181, which adds new mechanisms of financial accountability.
If a school district fails to submit an annual report showing how IEFA funds were spent, or if an annual district report shows improper IEFA expenditures, OPI is authorized to reduce the district's IEFA funding until a report is submitted. The law requires OPI to publish an annual report listing any districts that fail to submit satisfactory IEFA reports. It also requires the Board of Public Education to note IEFA reporting failures in a school's accreditation status report.
In a March House Education Committee hearing, Windy Boy testified that the legislation is 'about accountability and transparency.'
'If you get a dollar, then you should provide a report for what you're spending it on,' he said.
The new law also enhances tribal consultation and the role of Native language specialists in the development of IEFA curricula. And it requires OPI to create and manage an online portal by which parents, students and educators can submit feedback on IEFA implementation.
Rep. Peter Strand, D-Bozeman, who carried the bill in the House, said the legislation 'creates mechanisms that ensure that the money we give to schools for Indian Education for All goes where it's supposed to go.'
SB 181 cleared both chambers, and Gov. Greg Gianforte last week signed it into law.
Another Windy Boy bill, which revises laws related to Native language revitalization, was also recently signed into law.
The Montana Indian Language Preservation (MILP) program aims to help revitalize Native American languages by encouraging tribes to create resources that perpetuate language usage. The program has a biennial budget of $750,000. Several Native languages in Montana are considered critically endangered, meaning the youngest speakers often are elders who speak the language infrequently.
Windy Boy successfully brought legislation in 2023 that elevated the role of tribal governments in administering the MILP program. This year, he sponsored Senate Bill 182, which grants more flexibility in such partnerships, allowing tribes to decide whether to partner with local school districts, rather than requiring them to do so. SB 182 encourages tribal governments to use MILP funds for professional development for staff and collaborations and stipulates that tribal language education materials produced by the tribes be housed at the Montana Historical Society for conservation.
'We should be preserving what we have left,' Windy Boy said in a January committee hearing.
In January, Patrick Yawakie, a lobbyist for the Blackfeet, Fort Belknap and Chippewa Cree tribes, told members of the Senate Education and Cultural Resources Committee he wished a program like MILP had existed when he was young.
'Having access to Indian education growing up would've been a great opportunity for myself, definitely, to understand parts of my identity that I'm still learning today,' he said.
In the same hearing, former lawmaker Sharon Stewart Peregoy testified that Little Big Horn College, the Crow Tribe and area school districts have used MILP funds to provide 'the needed materials to teach the Crow language.'
'The language is the conveyor of the culture,' she said. 'If you don't have the language, the worldview does not come across.'
As the language program continues to grow, Windy Boy said he hopes tribes and OPI can eventually create a language curriculum for all teachers to use.
'Teachers that go in to teach math, science, history, or whatever, they walk into the room and they've already got a set curriculum. Why can't we?' Windy Boy told Montana Free Press in a January interview. He said he hopes to focus on that issue in the 2027 legislative session.
This story is co-published by Montana Free Press and ICT, a news partnership that covers the Montana American Indian Caucus during the state's 2025 legislative session.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Manchester school board warns language in budget trailer bill could cost city schools $10.2M
The Manchester school board is sending a letter to state legislators sounding the alarm about a small section — six lines, to be exact — in the state budget trailer bill (HB 2) that would cost the school district approximately $10.2 million next fiscal year. Page 70 of the bill includes language establishing what is essentially a cap on targeted aid for larger school districts. For districts with 5,000 or more students, the bill seeks to subtract from targeted state aid until the amount decreases to $3,750 per student. The cap would effectively cut Manchester's adequacy aid from $127.8 million under current law to just under $117.6 million — a cut of more than $10.2 million. By comparison, the city of Nashua would see its targeted aid jump by more than $1.2 million under the new language, from $83.2 million to $84.4 million. 'As far as we can tell, Manchester is the only municipality in New Hampshire that stands to lose money because of this cap on targeted aid,' the letter from Manchester's school board to the Legislature's Committee of Conference says. 'Such a loss would put at risk our ability to best serve the educational needs of our students.' The state's education aid formula was tweaked in response to Manchester getting a bonus from the introduction of the Extraordinary Needs Grant in 2021, a more than $30 million annual increase. The amendment limits that bonus and will lead to Manchester getting more than $10 million less than it gets now. The amendment received support from members of both parties, because the $10 million is being shared by other income- and property-poor communities like Berlin, Claremont and Franklin. Manchester Mayor Jay Ruais said Tuesday he has been in contact with some of the committee members, who will likely begin meeting later this week. "I am reaching out to the conferees to gather information and develop a course of action to address this issue," Ruais said. School board member Bob Baines, a former mayor and educator, said he spoke to Gov. Kelly Ayotte about the targeted cap last week. 'We've been in touch with various representatives, but this needs to be watched very, very carefully in the (Legislature's) Committee of Conference,' Baines said. 'Can you imagine the devastation that will occur in Manchester, the most significant devastation possible in our public schools. We all need to work on that with our representatives, because I think in any big government bill — no matter how big and beautiful it is — some people don't read it and don't understand. 'Why would Manchester be singled out as the only community in the state of New Hampshire that would lose funding? If you care about Manchester, we should get that funding — we planned on it.' School board member Sean Parr drafted the letter and gathered the signatures of fellow board members this week. 'We are hoping to reach out to the Committee of Conference to let them know that it has this particular effect only on Manchester,' Parr said. 'I think it would be good for us to at least explain the situation, tell them that it's a significant impact to our budget in its current form, and to ask that they reconsider that part of the budget proposal.' In the letter, school board members urge committee members to reconsider the 'targeted cap' portion of the bill, warning the proposed budget could lead to 'harmful cuts and reductions to student services.' School officials point out that despite being the largest school district in New Hampshire with nearly 12,000 students, Manchester ranks at the bottom of the state in per-pupil spending, with over 53% of students qualifying for free and reduced-price meals, 20% multilingual learners, and 23% special education students. 'The proposed reductions would therefore have devastating consequences for our students, our educators, and ultimately, the future of our city,' the letter says. 'We welcome the opportunity to engage in continued dialogue, and we hope that you will collaborate in crafting a budget that reflects the values, priorities, and long-term vision of a thriving state with excellent public schools.' pfeely@
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State plans to decrease its payments to the needy
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — The South Dakota Department of Social Services has announced its intention to cut by 10% the amount of welfare aid paid to several thousand households receiving public assistance. DSS will hold a public hearing on Friday, June 20, at 11:00 a.m. CT at state government's new One Stop Center at 1501 S. Highline Avenue in Sioux Falls. The number of South Dakota families receiving payments from the Temporary Assistance to Needy Families program varies month to month, according to DSS statistics. In April, the most recent month for which data was publicly reported, there were 2,487 families. That was down from a 12-month high of 2,567 in October. New Spring Creek owner shares golf course plans The department's proposed TANF cuts come at the same time that the Legislature gave state government employees a 1.25% pay raise that takes effect July 1. State aid to K-12 education and for health-care providers will rise 1.25% as well. DSS officials say the proposed cuts result from the Legislature reducing the department's general funding for the coming year by $5.3 million. Actually, then-Gov. Kristi Noem had recommended in her December budget proposal a $5,168,200 general-fund reduction for the economic assistance division in DSS that oversees TANF payments. The department, in turn, planned to use a similar additional amount of federal funds as an offset, according to page 20 of a presentation made on January 21 to the Legislature's Joint Committee on Appropriations. That presentation referred to the maneuver as 'Temporary Assistance to Needy Families Fund Swap.' The document made no mention of any proposed cut to TANF payments. The department's then-chief financial officer, Jason Simmons, didn't speak about it either. 'This year, in working with the governor's office and BFM (Bureau of Finance and Management), with revenues down and having to fund things like FMAP (federal medical assistance percentage) change and different things, our directive is to spend down some of that carryover. So this would be more of a temporary solution,' Simmons told the committee. He continued, 'This is not something that we're going to be able to do for many, many years, but it's something we can do in a pinch for a few years to get us through, to spend down that carryover and continue to deliver these services.' Five minutes later, DSS Secretary Matt Althoff expanded on those remarks. Responding to a question from Democratic Rep. Erik Muckey, Althoff said, 'We're going to examine our benefits and say, Is there a way we can reduce those as well? So we'll continue to look at that. We've got a preliminary plan that, as recommended, would take effect July first.' One of the panel's co-chairs, Republican Rep. Mike Derby, asked Simmons to go through the mechanics of the TANF fund swap one more time. Simmons explained that money left over from the federal block grant that the department receives each year can be placed in a carryover account. Simmons said the department gets $21.2 million of federal funds each year and state government puts in $8.5 million for a total TANF funding of $29.7 million. At the end of fiscal 2024, the department had $23.4 million of carryover funds available. Simmons said the plan was to tap the federal carryover to offset reductions in state general funds, spending the oldest layer of federal funds first. Noem's $34,665,498 recommendation of general funds for the new budget year that starts July 1 would have returned the division's general funding to roughly the $34,415,895 actually spent in 2024. State lawmakers in March ultimately appropriated $34,517,352 of general funds to the economic assistance division for the 2026 budget year. That was slightly more than the amount actually spent in 2024 and slightly less than the amount Noem had recommended. Asked Monday about the proposed TANF cuts, Republican Sen. Ernie Otten told KELOLAND News that he expects to see the department make reductions in other areas too. Otten and Derby co-chair the Legislature's Joint Committee on Appropriations that assembles state government's budget each year. DSS never came back to the committee with a detailed plan or a change from what they presented, according to information that Derby received from the Legislature's chief fiscal analyst Jeff Mehlhaff and forwarded on Tuesday to KELOLAND News. Mehlhaff told Derby, 'We have reached out to the Secretary of DSS multiple times with no response.' An average of 2,460 households per month received TANF payments during the 2024 budget year, according to the DSS fiscal note that was prepared for the proposed 10% cut. The average monthly amount was $518.06. Altogether, those payments totaled $15,293,131.20 in annual TANF costs, the department said, and a reduction of 10% from the current TANF payment standards equals $1,529,313.12. A statement signed by Secretary Althoff says the proposed financial cuts in TANF payments would have 'no impact' on small businesses. 'TANF is a needs-based program for families with children under age 18 (or under age 19 if the child is in high school) who need financial support because of the death of a parent; a parent is absent from the home; or the physical or mental incapacity or unemployment of a with serious financial needs may qualify for TANF monthly payments,' the statement says. Public comments at the June 20 hearing about the TANF reductions can be made in person at the Sioux Falls One Stop Center or by telephone at 1-605-679-7263 and using conference code 183 579 146 #. Written public comments can be sent through June 30 to Teresa Schulte, Administrative Rules C219, Department of Social Services, 1501 S. Highline Ave., Sioux Falls, SD 57110 or can be emailed to DSSAdminRules@ Many lawmakers also were upset during the 2025 legislative session after learning about the Noem administration's decisions to enter long-term leases for new One Stop centers in Sioux Falls and Rapid City. Most of state government's local offices including those of DSS in the two communities have since moved to the centers. Noem resigned as governor in January after she received U.S. Senate confirmation as the new federal Homeland Security secretary. After she left, the Legislature unanimously adopted a new law requiring lawmakers' approval of any lease longer than 15 years and costing more than $5 million in total or more than $50,000 per month. Leases for One Stop centers in Sioux Falls and Rapid City are for 30 years and will cost an estimated $200 million more during that time than had state government continued with previous leases for locations scattered throughout the communities. The new law however doesn't apply to any past lease agreements. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proposal to protect children from online harassment and 'doxxing' advanced by Maine lawmakers
Jun. 10—AUGUSTA — A proposal to protect children from online harassment and "doxxing" advanced in the Maine Legislature Tuesday. The bill would allow families to file a lawsuit or seek a protection from harassment order if a child is targeted. Lawmakers in the House of Representatives voted 78-69 in support, followed by the Senate voting 18-14 in support. It will face an additional round of votes before it could be sent to Gov. Janet Mills for her consideration. "Doxxing is harmful," said Rep. Melanie Sachs, D-Freeport, the bill's sponsor. "It is hurtful, and no child should be subjected to it." The proposal moves forward after Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, was censured by the House in February for posting photos on Facebook of a transgender student as she led calls for the state to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls' high school sports. The incident has added to the momentum behind the bill, though it was submitted prior to Libby's post. Sachs said she introduced the bill because of a separate case in 2023 in which an adult was targeting a different student in Freeport through social media posts, website content and podcasts. "I was horrified," said Sachs, who said she was also surprised to learn that there were no Maine laws that mentioned doxxing, which is the knowing or reckless disclosure of personal information that causes physical harm or property damage, constitutes stalking or causes the targeted person to fear for their safety. The bill, LD 537, allows for civil lawsuits against a person who engages in doxxing of a minor and also would allow a minor to obtain a protection from harassment order. Debate on the bill in the House Tuesday was brief. Lawmakers opposed to it said they support the idea but took issue with the way the bill was written. In the Senate, several Republican lawmakers who ended up opposing the measure asked questions and said they were unclear how the proposal differs from what is already allowed in Maine law. Sen. Anne Carney, D-Cape Elizabeth, responded saying that while the bill doesn't provide for any criminal penalties, it does offer an avenue for civil action in cases that might be hard to prosecute and allows for injunctive relief, which is a court order prohibiting someone from doing something. "This is a piece of legislation that won't apply to a lot of cases because the elements of the civil action are hard to establish, and intentionally so. But the reality is children are being coerced in these ways, and we need to protect them," Carney said. At a public hearing in March, lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee heard overwhelming support from students, educators and mental health professionals about the need for the bill. They also received written testimony in support from Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey. Frey said that doxxing is difficult to regulate because of the First Amendment. "But the language in this bill is carefully crafted to anticipate any potential First Amendment concerns and can be defended against a constitutional challenge," he wrote. Several people who testified at the hearing cited Libby's post as a reason the legislation is needed. Libby has defended her actions, saying the state track championship she posted about was a public event and that photos were already posted elsewhere online. She used the student's first name but not their last name. The bill initially approved Tuesday does not cover photos of children if the photos were taken in a public place or previously made public, unless the photos are accompanied by the minor's name or other personal information such as contact information or the address of their home or school. Copy the Story Link