
Celebrating Oktoberfest in Brazil
Now here's a quiz question that will baffle those Klugscheißer (clever-dicks) down the pub.
Where is the world's second-biggest annual beer festival? The biggest of course is the Munich Oktoberfest, held in September because… well, Germans always like to be ahead of the game. Their Christmas markets are in November, after all.
The second biggest beerfest – is it in Las Vegas? Hamburg? Prague? Wrong, wrong, wrong. It's in Brazil, in the little town of Blumenau.
Apart from the weather – 39C today and with the humidity of a rainforest – most aspects of Blumenau are distinctly German. The architecture is dominated by Fachwerk (half-timbered) buildings dating back to the 19th century, when the intrepid pharmacist and explorer Dr Hermann Blumenau left his home in Braunschweig and sailed up the Itajaí River with 17 settlers to found a colony.
They set about building German-type industries, too – the glass crystal works, the textile mills, the coal mines and the brewery quickly established a familiar, Middle European way of life in Santa Catarina province. Germans from Pomerania (now Poland) landed nearby and built a rival settlement, Pomerode.
The native Xokleng people paid a terrible price for the German emigrants' prosperity. Murderous bands of bugreiros (bounty hunters) attacked their villages. The slaughter was horrendous.
Official apologies to the victims of German colonialism are on the agenda for the current government. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier and chancellor Olaf Scholz have already crossed off Tanzania, Zambia, Namibia and Ghana from their grim bucket-list for former colonial targets that are due an apology.
However, it's not likely that they will visit Blumenau any time soon – unless they plan private trips, to savour the Oktoberfest in an atmosphere of traditional Gemütlichkeit (cosiness) with a warm breeze and a whiff of exotic flowers.
However, Ulf Ueberschaer, a German former adviser at the São Paulo branch of Commerzbank, did make the trip. 'I actually liked it better than the Munich Oktoberfest,' he said.
'In Munich it's all about the beer, but in Blumenau there's more of a carnival atmosphere. I don't think they are just putting on a show for the tourists – this is their culture, their heritage. What I found very weird was… the people who live there speak German. The old German, the language as it was spoken in the 19th century.
'My wife – she is Brazilian – found it especially weird. And I struggled to understand some of it.'
In the theme-park-like German Village there's a carnival parade, live bands and DJs performing until 5am. Revellers get in for free if they are wearing traditional Bavarian Lederhosen (leather breeches with embroidered braces) or dirndls (low-cut gingham dresses with matching aprons).
Oom-pah brass bands, schnitzel and sausage complete the picture. The whole town is awash with beer. Seasoned drinkers compete to down a chopp em metro (yard of ale). But don't be fooled – this is a non-alcoholic brew, just for fun.
Oktoberfest is the highlight of the year, but during the other 49 weeks the German influence remains in evidence. Schools teach in German and Portuguese. Walking around, you will spot many blue-eyed blondes, which is unusual for Brazil.
The town certainly trades on its heritage. There are no fewer than 16 museums, and the granddaughter of Hermann Blumenau, the actress Edith Gärtner, endowed a botanical garden and zoo to celebrate the natural history of the region. Still, she is best remembered for the memorial to her pets – a cemetery where her 50 cats are interred.
This year's Oktoberfest starts on October 8 and more than 500,000 visitors are expected to flood into the town of 360,000. So it pays to book early for tickets and accommodation. Obviously, the Germans have already booked theirs.
Jane Whyatt is a journalist, newsreader and independent TV producer
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
6 hours ago
- Daily Record
Serious beach warning issued to anyone visiting Benidorm this summer
You could receive a hefty fine or worse lose all your belongings should you not follow these strict rules Benidorm is a popular sun-soaked destination for Brits in the summer but a recent warning should put every tourist on high alert. TikTok user frankthestagman, who regularly shares travel advice to his followers, has some top tips on how visitors to the Spanish resort can avoid hefty fines — and worse, lose all their personal belongings. One of Spain's most popular attractions and it's easy to see why with its sandy beaches which are typically full to the brim with those after top-ups to their sun tan during the day. But did you know they are sometimes just as busy during the night, and not for the reasons you think? Whether it's chilling on a sun lounger after having one too many, going 'skinny dipping' for a bit of adventure, or fooling around with others, it's not uncommon to spot someone if you keep your eyes peeled when the sun goes down. But before you even think about following suit, there's something you need to know. In one of his TikTok videos, Frank alerts travellers to the costly penalties that could be incurred if caught on Benidorm's beaches after dark. It's a very sneaky rule that can cost you in more ways than one. "You can get heavily fined if you're found on the beach at night after hours," he warned. "Being honest with you, I've never seen, or known of anyone, who's ever had an issue with that." Frank also highlighted the risks of visiting certain areas of the beach where people often go for late-night escapades, warning of thieves dubbed "serpientes". They typically 'slither' under the sun loungers and prize away any valuables, like phones and wallets, that have been left unattended. He advises people to stay vigilant, stating there's "a very good chance" this happens during late-night swims. So keep your wits about you and look after your personal belongings before they 'disappear'. The TikToker explained: "The people that do that sort of stuff target people that are going down onto the beaches at night for fun. And, of course, those who are going skinny dipping, so be warned. "It's a proper serious warning, because there are people who do it night after night as they're out there to steal your stuff." Users flooded the comment section of the video, which has been viewed over 100,000 times, with confusion, questions and sheer shock. One remarked: "I'm only hearing negative things [about Benidorm] and I'm getting worried," while another questioned: "Wait, what, you get fined for going to the beach at night?" "It also happened to me in Tenerife," someone else recalled. "I was sharing a loving moment with an ex and my bag got stolen!" Any Benidorm visitors who choose to go to the beach at night should remember two things: there's a chance you could receive a fine, which typically range from €40 to €1,500, and you need to watch over your 'stuff' closely.


Spectator
11 hours ago
- Spectator
How a Luxembourg village divided Europe
I am in the most EU-ish bedroom in the EU. That is to say, I am lying in a refurbished room in the handsome 14th-century Chateau de Schengen, in the little village of Schengen, Luxembourg. From my casements, opened wide onto the sunny Saarland afternoon, I can see the exact stretch of the river Moselle where, on a boat floating between Germany, France and Luxembourg, the Schengen Agreement was signed in 1985. This was the agreement that sealed Free Movement as Europe's defining ideal – one whose consequences are still unfolding. I've been in Luxembourg for a week, on assignment, and this week has given me an insight into why the nations of the EU undertook their bold, remarkable experiment of no more borders. The first and obvious motivator was war. Luxembourg can look oddly new, or newish. Ancient-sounding villages are full of blocky 1960s houses. Supposedly medieval churches are clearly modern, lacking the rich patina of age. This is because they were all flattened in war – especially the last German offensive of the second world war, the Battle of the Bulge – which raged across snowbound Luxembourg from December 1944 to January 1945. As a result, much had to be rebuilt or heavily restored. Reviving international trust took even longer, as the war here was brutal. In little towns like Diekirch, teenage Nazi conscripts casually gunned down innocent civilians in the streets. The angered Allies felt no huge need thereafter to take German prisoners alive. The yearning to overcome this evil trauma – and reconcile – was one big driver of the EEC, which reached its frontierless, post-national apotheosis here in Schengen. But another was sheer practicality. Yesterday, my local guide, Anna, told me how she once had to show her passport every day to cross the Moselle to and from Germany. She can remember the queues and frustration. She recalls a crimped, claustrophobic Europe – like an office with too many cubicles. Nowadays the quaint old customs houses have been turned into tourist bureaux or posh chocolatiers, and everyone breezes between countries with total freedom. The other day I drove a meandering route through the rustling green winelands and must have crossed between Lux and DE half a dozen times, barely noticing. At its best, Schengen is indeed wonderful. But there's the geopolitical rub. Schengen at its Platonic best is magnificent. In practice, it may be turning into a tragic failure. A primary reason is migration – not within Europe, but without. To illustrate my point, Anna told me another story of Luxembourg. She explained how, in the 1970s, the now-prospering little Duchy required workers. As she put it, with bracing candour: 'We chose the Portuguese because they were poor and wanted the work, but also because they are European, Christian, Catholic, like us. We felt they would assimilate.' And so they have. You can see unexpectedly good selections of Douro wines in Luxembourg supermarkets. Otherwise, the 15 per cent of the population that is Portuguese is barely discernible. Schengen might, perhaps, be in much less trouble if every other country had followed those careful Luxembourg policies. But they didn't. France drew people from its old empire – Algeria, Morocco, sub-Saharan Africa. Germany imported millions of Turks, then another million Syrians under Merkel's idealistic Willkommen policy of 2015. Britain turned to the Caribbean, then Pakistan, India, Bangladesh. Combining open internal borders with sovereign external migration policies – inviting millions from far outside Europe – was, in retrospect, bound to create a problem. It's like a flat share where everyone agrees to leave their doors open and split the rent, but each person gets to invite their own guests, who then stay forever, use the bathroom, and host loud parties. Irritation is guaranteed. Some housemates will get seriously annoyed. Take, for example, the Somali migrant population in Holland. Tens of thousands of them moved to the UK under Free Movement. The UK could do nothing to stop this – as Britons duly noted. This is one example of how Free Movement, which peaked with Schengen, led quite directly to Brexit. It was perhaps sheer bad luck that Schengen coincided with one of the most ill-conceived experiments of recent times: multiculturalism plus mass immigration. Or maybe it wasn't coincidence, and they derive from the same well-meaning, liberal universalism – only this time taken too far. Frontiers are intrinsically sad – divisions within humanity made all too real Whatever the case, as I write this in my room in the Chateau de Schengen, I can also read the daily and unhappy news that springs from Europe's mass immigration experience: of riots and deaths in France following the football victory of Paris Saint-Germain; of another call for an inquiry into rape gangs in the UK; of a hard-right Polish politician becoming president, vowing to keep Poland migrant-free; of once-peaceful Sweden – now 'the bombing capital of the West'. Or I can read about de facto blasphemy laws in Britain and Denmark, introduced to placate militant Islam. And I can read of endless terror shifting across Europe untracked, leading even mainstream politicians in Germany, Austria, Italy to argue for the suspension of Schengen. Yes, of course there are multiple good, successful stories of integration and assimilation across Europe. But for many Europeans, judging by the remarkable electoral shift to the hard right, the good is now majorly outweighed by the bad. Is there any hope for that faded but shimmering Schengen ideal of a borderless Europe? I'd like to think so. Frontiers are intrinsically sad – divisions within humanity made all too real – even if Robert Frost knew what he was talking about when he said 'good fences make good neighbours'. The day is closing here in the Chateau de Schengen, and the summer sun sets lazily over the Auxerrois vines. They have a nice restaurant in the hotel, which has a classic French menu. I want to eat French food in Luxembourg while looking at Germany. It feels Schengen-y. But as the waitress brings my tranche de foie gras maison, the capricious Luxemburg weather turns. It's been in the forecast for a while – now it has arrived: a cold wind from the Ardennes is sweeping down the Moselle valley. The rain lashes the ancient gardens, and the waiters drift toward the windows, watching as the parasols surrender to the storm.


Daily Mirror
13 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Passengers flying with major airlines to face new 4 hour rule at airports
In a huge blow to Brits, EU countries have green-lighted controversial plans to lengthen the wait time before delayed passengers can claim compensation for both short and long-haul journeys Customers flying with some big name air operators on short-haul flights have been hit with a brutal four-hour warning over a controversial shakeup. After 12 years of wrangling, EU countries have green-lighted plans to lengthen the wait time before flyers can lodge claims for delayed flights. Currently, passengers have to be delayed by more than three hours before qualifying for compensation. However, under the new stipulations - which still have to be negotiated with the European Parliament before they become law - short-haul travellers will only be eligible to claim compensation after being delayed by four hours or more, while those on longer journeys will have to sit tight for a six-hour hold-up before they can lodge a compensation claim. It's not all bad news though, as EU nations have also agreed to increase the amount of compensation for those delayed on short-haul journeys from €250 (approx £210.47) to €300 (£252.56). But, passengers hit with delays on long-haul flights could see their compensation reduce from €600 (£505) to €500 (£420). The trade body Airlines for Europe (A4E), which represents companies such as Ryanair, easyJet and Lufthansa, and The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, both slammed the rules - arguing it would deprive the majority of passengers from being able to claim compensation. This is because most delays are only between two and four hours. "Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to deliver," A4E said. "Member states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity." According to Yorkshire Live, German members of the European People's Party have also expressed their disapproval, stating that 'decreasing the rights to compensation for air passengers would be a step in the wrong direction'. "Reimbursement after a three-hour delay has been standard for many years and should remain so," they added. A senior EU diplomat is believed to have said that 'no politician wants to say more than four hours' at risk of dampening Europeans' holiday plans. The news comes amidst accusations by 16 consumer protection associations from 12 Member States against seven budget airlines for imposing unfair charges on passengers' hand luggage. "The European Court of Justice has made it very clear that hand baggage is an integral part of the basic ticket price. Normally, there is no surcharge on the price as long as the hand luggage is of a reasonable size," explained Steven Berger, a solicitor with the European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC). "All we're seeing is a proliferation of airlines charging for this baggage... We're calling for very clear rules. Passengers must be able to take one piece of luggage, a small suitcase or a rucksack." He added: "At the moment, there are two different opposing positions among the member states in the Council. On the whole, you have the camp of the member states that are going to defend the three hours to be able to benefit from the right to compensation and others that are going to ask for five hours and nine hours based on distance. So right now this is really the big source of conflict." *Prices based on EUR to GBP conversions at the time of writing.