Memorial Day brings remembrances of those who served and those who gave all
While acknowledging Memorial Day is held to remember those who gave their lives in the service of their nation, a small group assembled at Colony Hill Cemetery to remember the former military personnel buried there.
'This is our way of saying thank you for everything that they've done,' said Rich Lyles, who organized the small ceremony. Joining him were his daughter Sadé, along with Kenny Heaton and Manzel McGhee of the Small Business Development Center in Abilene.
"You know, it's important that we remember our fallen, and this cemetery, you know, I had no idea it was here," said McGhee, an Air Force retiree. "This is important. I'm going to pass this on to my fellow veterans and let them know; that way maybe they'll include this cemetery in the future when they do their wreath layings."
Located opposite 3420 FM 1750, about halfway between Colony Hill Road and Hardison Lane, the oldest grave in the cemetery appears to be from 1889. The five veterans buried here are William Samuel Beam III, Henry 'Mit' Milford Day, D. McDougald, and Clarke Putnam Orr. Some died as early as 1914 while others were as recent as 2015.
Monday at 11 a.m. will see a larger Memorial Day ceremony at Abilene's Texas State Veterans Cemetery at 7457 W. Lake Road. Parking usually extends onto the road outside the cemetery so an early arrival is recommended.
The observance will be hosted by the Dyess Chiefs Group and will feature the Abilene Community Band, West Texas Patriot Guard Riders, the Dyess Air Force Base Honor Guard, and Big Country One flyover.
This article originally appeared on Abilene Reporter-News: Memorial Day remembers those who served and those who gave all
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Democrats decry move by Pentagon to pause $800 million in nearly done software projects
By Alexandra Alper WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrats took aim at the Trump administration after Reuters reported on Wednesday that the Navy and Air Force were poised to cancel nearly completed software projects worth over $800 million. The reason for the move was an effort by some officials at the services to steer new projects to companies like Salesforce and Palantir, in what could amount to a costly do-over. 'The Pentagon has yet to show that it had a good reason for halting these contracts in the last inning and scrapping work American tax dollars have already paid for," Democratic Senator Tim Kaine said in a statement. "If it can't show its homework, then this announcement - just days after Palantir's CEO spoke at Mike Johnson's Wyoming donor retreat - reeks of corruption.' Punchbowl reported this month that Palantir CEO Alex Karp planned to address Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson's annual big-donor retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. The Pentagon and Air Force did not respond to requests for comment. The Navy declined to comment. Trump officials have said the administration is striving to make the contracting process more efficient. The comments show growing concern among Democratic lawmakers over waste at the Pentagon, even as Donald Trump took office vowing to rid the government of waste and abuse. The website of the Department of Government Efficiency, the agency he created to spearhead those efforts, lists over $14 billion in Defense Department contracts it claims to have canceled. But seven months into his presidency, some of his own actions have complicated DOGE's work, from firing the Pentagon's inspector general to issuing an executive order prioritizing speed and risk-taking in defense acquisitions. 'If you're serious about cracking down on waste, fraud, and abuse, the last thing you'd do is cancel $800 million in projects that are nearly ready to roll out just to turn around and steer the same work to corporations of your choosing," said Democratic Representative Maggie Goodlander, who sits on the House Armed Services Committee and served as an intelligence officer in the United States Navy Reserve. "This maneuver is an insult to taxpayers and servicemembers across America," she added. Salud Carbajal, another House Democrat who sits on the Armed Services Committee, said the behavior was part of a pattern of waste at the Pentagon under Trump. 'I understand that our military's acquisition and procurement processes aren't flawless, but this administration has repeatedly shown a blatant disregard for the responsible use of taxpayer dollars,' said Carbajal, citing "lavish" military parades and "unnecessary" troop deployments in Los Angeles. Democratic U.S. Representative Jill Tokuda, who also sits on the committee, echoed Carbajal's remarks. "Stripping away critical oversight guardrails is unnecessary and downright reckless," she said, adding that after many delays, the Pentagon was finally poised to implement military pay systems that could pass an audit. "Taxpayers should not fund sweetheart deals for the well connected."
2 days ago
New Air Force policy denies transgender troops hearings before they're discharged
WASHINGTON -- The Air Force says in a new memo that transgender airmen ousted under a recent Trump administration directive will no longer have the chance to argue before a board of their peers for the right to continue serving their country. The memo dated Tuesday says military separation boards cannot independently decide whether to keep or discharge transgender airmen and instead 'must recommend separation of the member' if the airman has a diagnosis of gender dysphoria — when a person's biological sex does not match up with their gender identity. Military legal experts who have been advising transgender troops told The Associated Press that the new policy is unlawful, and while they were not aware of the other services releasing similar memos, they fear it could serve as a blueprint across the military. Advocacy groups say the change threatens to weaken trust in the military's leadership. It is the second policy change the Air Force has taken in recent weeks to crack down on transgender service members. The Associated Press reported last week that the Air Force would deny transgender troops early retirement benefits and was moving to revoke requests already approved. The Air Force declined to answer questions about the policy and its legal implications. The service provided a statement saying the new guidance 'is consistent with and responsive to Department of Defense policy regarding Service members with a diagnosis of, or history of, or exhibiting symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria.' The boards traditionally offer a quasi-legal hearing to determine if a service member set to depart is still of value to the military and should stay on. Fellow service members hear evidence of whatever wrongdoing occurred and about the person's character, fitness and performance. The hearings are not a formal court, but they have much the same structure. Service members are often represented by lawyers, they can present evidence in their defense and they can appeal the board's findings to federal court. The Pentagon's policy on separating officers notes that they are entitled to 'fair and impartial' hearings that should be 'a forum for the officer concerned to present reasons the contemplated action should not be taken.' This impartial nature means that the boards can sometimes reach surprising conclusions. For example, the three active-duty Marines who were part of the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, were retained. The commanding officer of the USS McCain, a destroyer that collided with an oil tanker in the Pacific in 2017, killing 10, was not recommended for separation in 2019. Priya Rashid, a military lawyer who has represented service members before hundreds of separation boards, said she 'has never seen an order like this.' 'I've seen people with three DUIs retained, I've seen people that beat their wives retained, I've seen all kinds of people retained because the board is empowered to retain anyone for any reason if they feel it's in the best interest of the service,' she said. Rashid said she and other lawyers working with transgender troops view the guidance as telling the boards to automatically order separation based solely on a diagnosis or symptoms of gender dysphoria. She said that constitutes an unlawful command by the Air Force and upends impartiality. 'This instruction is essentially saying you will not make a determination of whether somebody has future potential in the service,' Rashid said. The new Air Force guidance also prohibits recording the proceedings. Rashid said the lack of an independent transcript would not only prevent Air Force leaders from reviewing the hearings to ensure they were conducted appropriately but would undercut any meaningful chance to appeal. Pentagon officials say 4,240 troops have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which the military is using as an identifier of being transgender. The Pentagon got the green light from Supreme Court in May to move forward with a ban on all transgender troops. It offered two options: volunteer to leave and take a one-time separation payout or be discharged at a later date without pay. Some transgender troops decided to fight to stay by turning to the boards. Senior Master Sgt. Jamie Hash, who has served in the Air Force since 2011, said she 'wanted to face an objective board to be evaluated on my years of proven capability.' 'I wanted the board to see the assignments overseas and at the Pentagon, the deployments to different Combatant Commands, the service medals and the sustained operational and mission effectiveness,' she said in an interview. But now, she said, that 'the path ahead feels more uncertain than it ever has.' Logan Ireland, a master sergeant in the Air Force with 15 years of service that includes a deployment to Afghanistan, was planning to retire early until his request was denied last week. After that, he decided he would take a stand at the separation board. 'I chose the involuntary route because I believed in the promise of a fair hearing — judged on my service, my record and the facts,' he said. 'Now that promise is being ripped away, replaced with a process designed to decide my fate before I even walk in the room,' he said, adding that 'all I'm asking for is the same fairness and justice every service member deserves.' Both Ireland and Hash said they have yet to hear from their immediate superiors on what the new policy will mean for them. Lawyers are worried it will set a precedent that will spread throughout the military. Rashid said both the Army and Navy are 'going to look at what the Air Force is doing as a standard of law … is this the minimum standard of law that we will afford our service members.' Col. Bree Fram, a transgender officer in the Space Force who has long been seen as a leader among transgender troops, argued that the policy is a threat to other service members. In an online post, Fram said it 'swaps judgment for automation.' 'Today it's gender dysphoria; tomorrow it can be any condition or class the politics of the moment calls for,' she argued. If the new policy is allowed to sideline 'evidence of fitness, deployment history, awards, and commander input — the very material boards were built to evaluate,' Fram said, it sends a message that performance is no longer relevant to staying in the military. Cathy Marcello, interim director for Modern Military Association of America, said the change adds to a 'growing loss of trust' because outcomes are determined by politics, not performance. The organization advocates for LGBTQ+ service members, military spouses, veterans, their families and allies. 'It's a signal that identity, not ability or achievement, determines who stays in uniform and who gets a fair shot,' she said.
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
New Air Force policy denies transgender troops hearings before they're discharged
WASHINGTON — The Air Force says in a new memo that transgender airmen ousted under a recent Trump administration directive will no longer have the chance to argue before a board of their peers for the right to continue serving their country. The memo dated Tuesday says military separation boards cannot independently decide whether to keep or discharge transgender airmen and instead 'must recommend separation of the member' if the airman has a diagnosis of gender dysphoria — when a person's biological sex does not match up with their gender identity.
