‘They didn't vote for this': Support erodes as ICE targets noncriminal immigrants
At a rally in Hialeah in 2023, Trump made a pledge in a city where three-fourths of residents are foreign-born: to end the 'invasion' of the United States by undocumented immigrants.
Now in his second term, Trump is carrying out a mass deportation campaign that his administration says focuses on criminals — 'the worst of the worst,' according to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
But under the current Trump administration, the idea of who is considered a 'criminal' has broadened to include all undocumented people. And in Florida, the governor was quick to assist the president make the leap from 'bad hombres' to anyone without papers.
In February, at the first meeting of his State Board of Immigration meeting, Gov. Ron DeSantis said, 'If you are here illegally that is a crime too, OK? You can't just say you have free range to be here illegally until you commit some type of felony. I want you out before you commit the felony.'
ICE raids and arrests of undocumented immigrants, regardless of their criminal history, has ignited fear and anger from Hispanic communities across the country, a diverse voting bloc Trump made inroads with in 2024. Recent national polling shows Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of immigration. Some South Florida Republican elected officials now find themselves in a precarious situation: stay loyal to Trump's agenda or answer to their immigrant voter base.
'There's this huge upsurge of sentiment that this is a country of immigrants, that these immigrants are not all bad,' said Eduardo Gamarra, a political science professor at Florida International University. 'And that even those who are being deported should be treated in a more humane way.'
'Everyone is basically at risk'
While on a recent report for the New York Times, a reporter watched as ICE officers in Miami looked for an undocumented man. They arrested him when they found him, along with brother who happened to be with him.
'That brother that was arrested today, although [...] he hasn't committed a crime, that doesn't mean that he can't potentially commit a crime,' Carlos Nuñez, an ICE officer in Miami told the New York Times. 'And as I see it, he's committed a crime the minute he enters the United States without admission.'
Under previous presidential administrations, Fort Lauderdale immigration attorney Mark Hamburger said, there was an understanding that migrants who commit serious crimes should be prioritized for deportation over undocumented people with clean records and families in the country that depend on them. 'There is no line anymore. Everyone is basically at risk,' Hamburger said.
'Trump wants to group all immigrants into this category of criminals, but that's just not true,' he said. 'I'm sure they'd love to say, 'They're all criminals, they all have records.' But they don't even say that anymore. Now, what the press secretary says is, 'Well, they're here unlawfully and that in itself is a crime, so we're detaining anyone who's here unlawfully.''
By targeting undocumented people in general, Hamburger said, the Trump administration has overwhelmed the court system and stoked fear, ultimately to push immigrants to self-deport.
One of Hamburger's clients was a woman from Nicaragua who came to the United States in 2022 seeking political asylum, which her sister and cousin were able to secure. She had been living in Los Angeles, but was feeling paranoid amid the ICE raids and anti-ICE protests.
Hamburger called her before her trial, which was finally set for last month. She was noticeably nervous over the phone and hung up. When he called back, she confessed: 'I'm in Honduras right now.'
Though she had a strong political asylum case, Hamburger said, the stress was making her sick. She gave up on her case and left the country.
'I have many other cases like that where people are just slowly putting up the white flag,' Hamburger said. 'The chaos, the psychological torture, it reaches a certain point for immigrants where it starts to manifest physically as illness. And some people, ultimately, just give up.'
Americans soften on immigration
U.S. Rep. María Elvira Salazar from Miami, is walking a tightrope. How does a Republican abide by the MAGA rulebook while appealing to her largely immigrant constituency? Her solution: the Dignity Act.
Salazar, along with Democrat Rep. Veronica Escobar of Texas, resurrected the Dignity Act of 2023, which, if passed, would grant undocumented immigrants living in the country for more than fiveyears with no criminal record a legal status that protects them from deportation. While its passage remains unlikely in a polarized Congress, it marks a notable attempt by Salazar to distance herself from the full scope of Trump's immigration crackdown.
At a July 15 press conference, Salazar sang the praises of the Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, a sweeping piece of legislation that significantly increase funding for ICE and border security, while acknowledging the roughly 10 million undocumented immigrants that work in construction, hospitality, agriculture and food production 'who are not criminals.'
As she pitched the Dignity Act to the American public — and Trump himself — Salazar reiterated a crucial point that undoubtedly resonates with her constituents in Miami: not all undocumented immigrants are criminals.
'Yes, they broke the law, but someone gave them a job because they needed those workers, workers who are still needed today,' she said.
The timing is notable. A growing body of polling shows that the public mood is shifting — and fast.
A July 11 Gallup poll found that Americans are becoming more positive about immigration, reversing four years of rising concern. In June 2024, 55 percent of respondents wanted immigration reduced. By July 2025, that number dropped to just 30 percent. Among Hispanic voters, Trump's approval on immigration now sits at 21 percent, well below his national average.
A separate CBS News poll conducted that same month found that a majority of Americans believe Trump's administration is targeting 'people who aren't dangerous criminals' for deportation — and that his second-term policies have gone further than many voters expected.
'They didn't vote for this'
What's behind this big change in public opinion? 'A lot of it has to do with overreach,' said Mike Madrid, a Republican political commentator and expert on Latino voters.
'[Trump's] numbers are still very strong with Republicans. I think the vast majority of Republicans did vote for this and like it, and frankly, think he probably could still be more aggressive,' Madrid said. 'But the voters that he needs to get to a majority — young voters, Hispanic voters, independents — they have fled in pretty historic numbers. The collapse is pretty spectacular, especially given a very short time frame.'
The optics overall are bad. Many are critical of the Trump administration for circumventing due process and sending military vehicles to cities like Los Angeles, Madrid said. Americans have also been inundated with harrowing anecdotes in the news and on social media of undocumented immigrants being detained by ICE and separated from their families.
Immigration attorneys across the country are hustling to help clients who have been swept up in the crackdown despite having no criminal history. Hamburger told the Herald most of his clients either have no criminal history or have been charged with misdemeanors, the most common being driving without a license. Two clients of his were arrested while fishing without a license, he said. Now, they're in Alligator Alcatraz, the state-run immigration detention facility built in the Everglades where detainees reportedly face harsh and disgusting conditions.
Hundreds of detainees who earlier this month were held in Alligator Alcatraz or scheduled to be sent there had no criminal convictions or pending charges in the United States, the Herald reported this month.
Salazar, who represents a diverse swath of Miami-Dade County with large populations of Cubans, Haitians, Caribbeans, Colombians and Venezuelans, is 'in a bind,' said Gamarra, the FIU professor. While Gamarra said the Dignity Act bill is unlikely to pass, 'it helps her public stance.'
Salazar will have to answer to that large constituency in the mid-terms, though Gamara said it's too early to tell exactly how Latino voters in Miami will respond to South Florida Republicans.
But there are some notable trends emerging. An FIU survey Gamarra conducted in May among Venezuelans in Florida showed real disillusionment among a third of Trump voters with his administration's immigration policy, particularly the ending of Temporary Protected Status and humanitarian parole.
'I can tell you from looking at the Venezuelan data that there is a degree of sentiment, very deeply held sentiment, that they were betrayed, that they didn't vote for this,' Gamarra said. 'They thought it was going to only be criminals because they made that distinction that 'we're not criminals.' But they didn't anticipate the broader definition of 'criminal' behavior that the administration has adopted.'
Madrid thinks its unlikely for Democrats to regain the Latino support they once had. Still, he said, there are 'fascinating' shifts occurring in different Latino communities.
For the first time in his career, Madrid said he is seeing the Cuban American community respond to this moment the same way the Mexican American community is, despite their very different histories in the United States and typical political beliefs. He recalled attending a recent press conference where Cuban and Venezuelan community leaders called on FIFA to protect attendees from ICE the way the Dodgers' did in Los Angeles.
'That same fear, that same terror, is not something we normally see from the Cuban American community with a Republican president!' he said. 'We've never seen that before.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who is Erika McEntarfer, the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner fired by Trump?
WASHINGTON (AP) — The head of the agency that compiles the closely watched monthly jobs report usually toils in obscurity, but on Friday, the current holder of that job was loudly fired by the president of the United States. Erika McEntarfer, a longtime government employee, bore the brunt of President Donald Trump's unhappiness with Friday's jobs report, which showed that hiring had slowed in July and was much less in May and June that previously estimated. He accused her without evidence of manipulating the job numbers and noted she was an appointee of President Joe Biden. McEntarfer, a longtime government worker who had served as BLS head for a year and a half, did not immediately respond to a request for comment by The Associated Press. But her predecessor overseeing the jobs agency, former co-workers and associates have denounced the firing, warning about its repercussions and saying McEntarfer was nonpolitical in her role. Here's what to know about Erika McEntarfer: McEntarfer has a strong background on economics McEntarfer, whose research focuses on job loss, retirement, worker mobility, and wage rigidity, had previously worked at the Census Bureau's Center for Economic Studies, the Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the White House Council of Economic Advisers in a nonpolitical role. She has a bachelor's degree in Social Science from Bard College and a doctoral degree in economics from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. She was confirmed as BLS head on a bipartisan vote McEntarfer was nominated in 2023 to serve as BLS head, and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions recommended that her nomination go to the full Senate for a vote. She was confirmed as BLS commissioner in January 2024 on a bipartisan 86-8 Senate vote. Among the Republican senators who voted to confirm her included then-Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, who is now Trump's vice president, and then-Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is now Trump's secretary of state. Before her confirmation hearing, a group called the Friends of the BLS, made up of former commissioners who served in both Democratic and Republican administrations, members of statistical associations and credentialed economists, said McEntarfer's background made her a great choice for the job. 'The many reasons to quickly confirm Dr. McEntarfer as the new BLS Commissioner all boil down to this: the agency, like the entire statistical system, is undergoing an intense, significant period of change and Dr. McEntarfer's wealth of research and statistical experience have equipped her to be the strong leader that BLS needs to meet these challenges,' Friends of the BLS wrote. Her former associates and co-workers decry her firing William Beach, who was appointed BLS commissioner in 2019 by Trump and served until 2023 during President Joe Biden's administration, called McEntarfer's firing 'groundless' and said in an X post that it 'sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' Former Labor Department chief economist Sarah J. Glynn, who received regular briefings from McEntarfer about BLS findings, said McEntarfer was generous with her time explaining what conclusions could or couldn't be reached from the data. If the data didn't support something an administration official was saying, McEntarfer would say so, Glynn said. She also never weighed in on how the administration should present or interpret the data, Glynn said — she would simply answer questions about the data. 'She had a sterling reputation as someone who is concerned about the accuracy of the data and not someone who puts a political spin on her work,' Glynn said. Heather Boushey, a senior research fellow at Harvard University, served with McEntarfer on the White House Council of Economic Advisers and said McEntarfer never talked politics at work. 'She showed up every day to focus on the best analysis and the best approach to her field and not get political. That is what I saw from her time and again. She is brilliant and well-respected among labor economists generally,' Boushey said. 'She wasn't coming into my office to talk politics or the political implications of something. She definitely wasn't engaging on that side of things.' ___ Olson reported from New York. Associated Press writer Christopher Rugaber in Washington contributed to this report. Fatima Hussein And Alexandra Olson, The Associated Press


Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Afghan US army interpreter detained by ICE is accused of being a national security risk. His lawyer said ICE hasn't disclosed why.
'That circumvents all due process, all hearings, all opportunity to say 'Hey, this is a mistake,'' Keating said. Advertisement Zia's detainment is the latest case of an immigrant who was in the country legally being detained by ICE. In March, immigration agents surrounded Tufts PhD student Peterson filed a petition in the US District Court of Massachusetts to nullify the expedited removal order, as well as filed a claim for asylum on behalf of Zia. A judge ordered DHS on July 18 to notify the court at least 72 hours before Zia is transferred to a different facility or deported. Advertisement Peterson said the decision gives them 'breathing room' to work on his case. 'Although the government hasn't in all cases followed judicial orders in recent months, this is a much better and more secure position to be in than we were right after my client was apprehended,' she said. Zia worked as an interpreter for US troops from 2006 to 2007, according to court filings and a copy of his special immigrant visa application. He fled across the border into Pakistan when the Taliban In a letter of recommendation for Zia's visa application, a sergeant who directly supervised him said Zia was instrumental to the success of the unit's mission and 'presents no danger' to the US. 'I would invite him into my own home with my children and not be worried anything would happen,' the sergeant wrote. 'I trust in him completely.' Zia was on track for permanent residency when he was detained by ICE for unclear reasons. 'Everything is completely legal,' Peterson said. Keating considers the army interpreter's arrest an attempt by the federal government to 'This is about the Trump administration and ICE finding one more way to push the numbers to 3,000 [arrests] a day,' the congressman said. A senior Department of Homeland Security official said in an email to the Globe that Zia was 'paroled by the Biden administration.' Advertisement 'He is currently under investigation for a serious criminal allegation,' the official wrote. 'All of his claims will be heard by a judge. Any Afghan who fears persecution is able to request relief.' An attorney for ICE officials wrote in a response to Zia's petition that ICE terminated his parole after the FBI indicated he is 'a risk to the national security of the United States' and lacks 'valid entry documents.' But his attorney said she has received no formal communication from the Department of Homeland Security about an investigation. 'It was only after media reached out to ICE or to DHS that we heard anything about that at all,' Peterson said. 'As his attorney, I don't believe there's anything to this.' She noted that other Afghan clients of hers have been called for formal interviews with the Federal Bureau of Investigation or received knocks on their doors from agents, who ask them a few questions before leaving. Zia received no such request, she said. Peterson is now crossing her fingers for an interview with an immigration officer, where Zia can prove he has reason to fear persecution if he is deported. Shawn VanDiver, the founder and president of AfghanEvac, an advocacy organization for Afghans contracted by the US military, said Zia is one of his 'priority cases' among 'well over 100″ instances of Afghans arrested by ICE. 'He is yet another person who followed all of the rules,' said VanDiver, who served in Iraq in the US Navy. He added that he wants to show Afghan allies that veterans have their backs. He has signed up more than 110 people who will be trained in the next week on how to support Afghan immigrants at their court appointments, including wearing veteran gear to sit in the courtrooms. To VanDiver, it's the least Americans can do. Advertisement 'We told them they can be Americans,' he said. 'We're making it very hard for them.' Jade Lozada can be reached at


Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
Federal judge defers ruling on Alina Habba's legal authority
A federal judge on Friday deferred ruling on Alina Habba's legal authority as a prosecutor after President Trump tapped her to lead the U.S. attorney's office for New Jersey. The big picture: A lawyer sought to get a criminal case in New Jersey dismissed by questioning Habba's legitimacy to lead the U.S. attorney's office in the state and arguing that the way the Trump administration restored her authority over the office was "unconstitutional." Catch up quick: In March, Trump appointed his then-presidential counselor Habba to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey. That allowed her to work in an acting capacity for 120 days while awaiting Senate confirmation. With Habba's confirmation stalled, the local district court appointed a new prosecutor to serve until the vacancy was filled. Attorney General Pam Bondi terminated the appointment hours later. Trump then withdrew Habba's nomination as the U.S. attorney so that she could be appointed to the position of first assistant U.S. attorney, making her the acting leader of the office. Driving the news: Judge Matthew Brann of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania wrote in the opinion that the motion to dismiss the case is both denied in part and deferred in part. The defendant, Julien Giraud Jr. who is facing charges in a drug and gun-related case, is entitled to injunctive relief "precluding Ms. Habba from participating in their prosecution if they are correct that she was appointed in violation of statute or the Constitution." That injunctive relief, the judge wrote, should extend to Assistant United States Attorneys "purporting to operate pursuant to Ms. Habba's authority." The judge added, "Because relief will be available to them if they are correct, the court should reach the merits of the Girauds' claims," Brann added. Context: Attorney Thomas Mirigliano asked the court to dismiss the indictment or stop Habba and any other attorney acting under "her purported authority" from prosecuting the case.