Vietnam expresses willingness to combat trade fraud in US tariff talks
HANOI, May 23 (Reuters) - Vietnam said on Friday its trade minister met with the U.S. Commerce Secretary and senators during a visit to the United States, pledging during talks on tariffs to narrow their trade gap and combat trade fraud and illegal transhipment.
Vietnam and the United States this week concluded a second round of trade negotiations, as the Southeast Asian industrial hub seeks a deal to avoid a 46% tariff rate on Vietnamese goods, imposed largely due to its big trade surplus with Washington.
During the meeting with the U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Trade Minister Nguyen Hong Dien also urged the United States to recognise Vietnam as a market economy soon and to remove it from its strategic export control lists, the ministry said.
Despite Vietnam consistently being one of Asia's fastest-growing economies in the past two decades and its multiple free-trade agreements, the United States still recognises it as a non-market economy, despite Hanoi arguing it has made sufficient reforms to justify an upgrade.
The United States is Vietnam's largest export market and its trade surplus with Washington exceeded $123 billion last year, a trade gap Hanoi says it is committed to narrowing.
"This would bring practical benefits to both countries and help improve bilateral trade in a fairer, more harmonious and more sustainable manner," the ministry said in a statement.
Dien also separately met U.S. senators, including Ted Cruz and Steve Daines, and pledged during the meetings to promote more balanced bilateral trade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US judge dismisses California's tariff lawsuit, teeing up appeal
NEW YORK, June 3 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge dismissed the state of California's challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs, allowing the state to file an appeal over the court's ruling that the dispute should have been filed in a specialized U.S. trade court in New York. The ruling, handed down late on Monday by U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Corley in San Francisco, did not delve into the merits of California's lawsuit. Now, three separate U.S. appeals courts may simultaneously consider the legality of Trump's sweeping tariffs on U.S. trading partners and a separate set of tariffs targeting imports from China, Mexico and Canada. Since February, Trump has issued new tariffs, paused tariffs from taking effect, and raised and lowered rates as he attempts to negotiate new trade deals with other nations. The on-again and off-again tariffs have whipsawed businesses who work with international suppliers. Although legal experts expect that the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately decide the legality of the tariffs, rulings from different intermediate courts in the meantime could further sow confusion. A panel of three judges in the Manhattan-based U.S. Court of International Trade and a federal judge in Washington D.C. have already declared that Trump did not have unilateral authority to impose tariffs without input from Congress. The Trump administration has appealed both rulings, in cases brought by 12 U.S. states and several small businesses. Corley's ruling is more limited than either of those decisions and does not address the legality of Trump's tariffs. Instead, Corley ruled that California should have sued in the Court of International Trade, which has exclusive jurisdiction over tariff disputes in the U.S. California, which opposed the transfer, had asked the judge to dismiss its case rather than transfer it, which will allow it to appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. has temporarily paused the trade court's ruling, which allows the tariffs to remain in place for now, while it considers whether to impose a longer term stay while an appeal of that ruling plays out. California argues that any federal court can hear the case because it raises constitutional objection to Trump's use of tariff powers that are reserved for Congress unless delegated to a president. The law that Trump has cited to justify the tariffs, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, does not authorize tariffs at all, so it can not force California to litigate in the trade court, California's Attorney General Rob Bonta said. "Our argument is straightforward. Trump doesn't have the authority to impose these destructive tariffs,' Bonta said in a statement. The lawsuits challenge Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs on imports from most U.S trading partners, as well as a separate set of tariffs levied on China, Mexico and Canada. The latter are related to his accusation that the three countries were facilitating the flow of fentanyl into the U.S., allegations the countries deny.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
US is heading for a sharp economic downturn, OECD warns
Donald Trump's aggressive trade policies have sent the global economy into a downturn, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development has warned. The US economy will be among the hardest hit with growth slowing from 2.8 percent in 2004 to just 1.6 percent this year, according to the group's new forecasts. The Paris-based organization also predicted on Tuesday that Trump's tariffs will hit the global economy harder than expected, slashing its growth forecast for the year down to 2.9 percent compared to 3.3 percent last year. If consumer price expectations become de-anchored the Fed could even be forced to raise rates again, the report warned. 'Weakened economic prospects will be felt around the world, with almost no exception,' OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira said in the report. Uncertainty from the rapidly changing policies is also hitting consumer confidence and holding back investment, according to the report. The Economic Outlook report said that besides the US the slowdown will be concentrated in Canada, Mexico and China, countries hardest hit by Trump's tariffs. The OECD has called on governments to ease trade tensions and work to eliminate uncertainty. 'Agreements to ease trade tensions and lower tariffs and other trade barriers will be instrumental to revive growth and investment and avoid rising prices,' the OECD said. 'This is by far the most important policy priority.' The report comes as its members, including US trade representative Jamieson Greer, prepare to meet in Paris for their annual meeting. The OECD also criticized other key Trump policies including his vast reductions in the federal workforce and curbs on immigration, both of which are also dragging on the economy.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US factory orders slump in April
WASHINGTON, June 3 (Reuters) - New orders for U.S.-manufactured goods dropped sharply in April and business spending on equipment appeared to have lost momentum at the start of the second quarter as the boost from front-loading of purchases ahead of tariffs faded. Factory orders fell 3.7% after an unrevised 3.4% jump in March, the Commerce Department's Census Bureau said on Tuesday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast factory orders declining 3.1%. They rose 2.0% on a year-on-year basis in April. Manufacturing, which accounts for 10.2% of the economy, has been pressured by President Donald Trump's aggressive tariffs. An Institute for Supply Management survey on Monday showed manufacturing contracted for a third straight month in May and suppliers took the longest time in nearly three years to deliver inputs to factories. Trump sees the tariffs as a tool to raise revenue to offset his promised tax cuts and to revive a long-declining industrial base, a feat that economists argued was impossible in the short term because of labor shortages and other structural issues. Commercial aircraft orders plunged 51.5% in April. Orders for motor vehicles, parts and trailers dropped 0.7%, helping to depress transportation equipment orders by 17.1%. Orders for computers and electronic products gained 1.0%, while those for electrical equipment, appliances and components slipped 0.3%. Machinery orders rose 0.6%. Excluding transportation, orders fell 0.5%, matching March's decline. The government also reported that orders for non-defense capital goods excluding aircraft, which are seen as a measure of business spending plans on equipment, decreased 1.5% in April rather than 1.3% as estimated last month. Shipments of these so-called core capital goods fell by an unrevised 0.1%. Business spending on equipment rebounded sharply in the first quarter, largely driven by front-running of information processing equipment ahead of tariffs.
