
Could there be a robot in every home by 2030?
In a suburb of Shanghai, there is a hub for tech companies where they are slowly but surely creating a robot revolution.
We visited what they call the "training centre" of Agibot, where we watched as a team of operators helped put the human into humanoid robots.
Through repetitive tasks, they are generating data which will eventually allow a fleet of robots to be programmed to do everything from making a sandwich to restocking supermarket shelves.
There was also a room where a robot was being guided to make a bed, but unfortunately, it looked like they were not yet close to mastering that mundane task.
It is when you visit companies like Agibot that you get the sense of AI moving from something abstract into the physical realm of our everyday lives.
According to the company's director of testing, Ruan Cheng, the aim is to relieve humans of repetitive, dangerous, and dirty jobs. He believes that by the end of this decade every home, at least in China, will have a robot.
And key to China's rise as a robotics superpower has been its huge manufacturing base, which is switching from traditional machinery and manpower to high-tech automation at breakneck speed.
'We have market capabilities, manufacturing strength, and world-leading AI expertise,' said Ruan. 'We believe the future of robots is in China.'
From the dancing robots featured in the Chinese New Year Gala to robots attempting a half-marathon last month, 2025 has already been a showcase of China's robotic ambitions. UBTECH, one of the country's leading tech firms, recently unveiled what it sees as the factory floor of the future where there is not a human being in sight.
China's ambitions in robotics were laid out as part of a ten year strategy called Made in China 2025. That strategy set out to make the country a global leader in ten different industries, of which robotics was one and it has become one of the hottest technological battlegrounds between China and the United States.
That strategy has been pushed from the very top of China's leadership team. During a recent visit to Shanghai tech hubs, President Xi Jinping urged workers to power China's technological rise, saying the nation's success depends on them.
The continued success of China's AI and robotics industry comes in spite of tech restrictions placed on the country by the US government.
In 2022, the Biden administration effectively banned exports of advanced microchips, and equipment to produce advanced chips by Chinese chipmakers, as part of an effort to stifle China's semiconductor industry and, in turn, the military.
The boss of Nvidia, one of the world's leading chip makers, said on Wednesday that such policies had been a ''failure'' and had only forced Chinese companies to boost investment and develop a supply chain that does not reply on foreign manufacturers, namely the United States.
Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang said the tech restrictions had lost American companies, including his own, billions of dollars.
What China is doing in robotics mirrors the strategy used to dominate electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing — building a new industry from the ground up with heavy investment, strong industrial policy, and global ambition.
The country has become a runaway leader in EV production and has overtaken Japan as the biggest car exporter in the world.
While US President Donald Trump has called for a revival of traditional manufacturing jobs in America, China is instead investing in automated alternatives.
There are hundreds of firms developing AI-powered robotic systems for industries, ranging from healthcare to logistics.
According to Lin Tao from Soft Robot Tech in Beijing, there is one key advantage in China - talent.
Every year, over four million Chinese students graduate with degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).
'A large number of engineers majoring in automation and mechanical engineering graduate each year in China,' Lin Tao of Soft Robot Tech told ITV News.
'This provides us with a very rich talent pool and as the technology develops, they are improving their skills, in many different areas to help advance the number of potential uses.'
But while companies like Soft Robot Tech welcome the annual influx of fresh young talent, their products are also being viewed as a solution in a country with an ageing manual workforce.
While automation is being resisted in other parts of the world, where it is seen as a threat to jobs, in China there has been little resistance.
This is partly due to the lack of labour unions and limited space for protest. However, it is also the case that in China there is a more open attitude towards technology.
People here tend to embrace the advancements and accept them as a sign of progress - particularly when they come from Chinese companies.
China and the US may have agreed a ceasefire in their trade war, but when it comes to technology, robotics has become one of the fiercest battlegrounds.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
23 minutes ago
- NBC News
China hits back at Trump, saying U.S. actions 'severely undermine' trade truce
HONG KONG — China on Monday accused the United States of breaching the 90-day trade truce agreed by the world's two largest economies, after President Donald Trump said it was Beijing that had 'totally violated' the agreement. Last month, the U.S. and China announced a 90-day pause on most of their tit-for-tat tariffs, which had reached higher than 100%. Trump initially hailed the truce as a 'total reset' but said Friday in a post on his Truth Social platform that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED' the deal. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce struck back at Trump's remarks Monday, saying that while China had implemented and actively upheld the deal, the U.S. had introduced a series of 'discriminatory and restrictive measures against China' that 'severely undermine' the agreement. The ministry said those measures included AI chip export controls, a reported pause on the sale of chip design software to China, and the announcement of U.S. plans to revoke the visas of Chinese students. 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, it has falsely accused China of violating the consensus, which is a serious distortion of the facts,' the ministry said in a statement. 'China firmly rejects these groundless accusations.' The ministry urged the U.S. to 'immediately correct its erroneous practices' and vowed to take 'strong and resolute' measures if Washington 'insists on acting unilaterally and continues to harm China's interests,' without providing details. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that China was 'holding back' exports of rare earths that it had agreed to release as part of the truce. 'That is not what a reliable partner does,' he said on the CBS news program 'Face the Nation.' Rare earth minerals are a crucial component of products that cut across the U.S. economy, including the tech sector, the energy industry and automobile manufacturing. China supplies 60% of the world's rare earth elements and is responsible for the refining of 90% of them, according to the International Energy Agency. Bessent, who said last week that U.S.-China trade talks were 'a bit stalled,' said he was 'confident' that rare earths exports and other details could be 'ironed out' in a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman,' Bessent said, referring to Xi. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, also suggested Sunday that the two leaders could speak as early as this week. 'President Trump, we expect, is going to have a wonderful conversation about the trade negotiations this week with President Xi,' he said on the ABC news program 'This Week.' Hassett said he was unsure whether a specific date for that conversation had been set. The last publicly known conversation between the U.S. and Chinese presidents was on Jan. 17, days before Trump's inauguration.


The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump tariffs are not going away amid legal battles: White House
Lutnick predicted Trump would win on appeal. But he also referenced other tariff authorities if the higher courts agree with the trade court that Trump can't invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to bypass Congress to issue the tariffs. Trade whiplash: Appeals Court allows Trump to keep tariffs while appeal plays out "Rest assured, tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said. "He has so many other authorities that even in the weird and unusual circumstance where this was taken away, we just bring on another or another or another." In addition to the trade court's ruling, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the Trump administration from collecting tariffs from a pair of Illinois toy importers, also ruling that the same 1977 law didn't grant Trump the powers to impose tariffs as he claimed. Trump addressed the legal battles in a Sunday post on Truth Social: "If the Courts somehow rule against us on Tariffs, which is not expected, that would allow other Countries to hold our Nation hostage with their anti-American Tariffs that they would use against us. This would mean the Economic ruination of the United States of America!" Amid the tariff whiplash from the court rulings, Trump announced on May 30 that he's doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from a 25% rate to 50%. 'Nobody's going to get around that': Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% "I think it cost us a week - maybe cost us a week," Lutnick said of the court decisions, arguing that other countries still want to make trade deals with the United States. "Everybody came right back to the table. Everybody is talking to us. You're going to see over the next couple of weeks really first-class deals for the American worker." For two months, Trump and White House officials have boasted about their prospects of using tariffs to secure trade agreements with other nations. So far, the administration has only secured a deal with the United Kingdom, in addition to a pact with China to slash massive tariffs on each other for 90 days. Trump later accused China of violating the tariff agreement on May 30, White House officials: Trump and China's Xi Jinping to speak soon, iron out trade fight Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that he expects Trump to soon talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping, expressing confidence trade issues will be "ironed out," including over critical minerals he said Beijing is refusing to open to trade. "They are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement," Bessent said. "Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman." The Chinese government said Xi has not spoken to Trump since his Jan. 20 inauguration. "I believe we'll see something very soon," Bessent said when asked whether a meeting is scheduled for Trump to talk to Xi. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
The Rangers realisation that astounded Andrew Cavenagh as Dave King hopes board mood swings are now thing of the past
King reckons that now the grownups in charge, the boardroom moodswings that have plagued the club will become a thing of the past Say what you want about the men who've run Rangers for the past decade but you can't fault the devotion to a club most have supported since they were wearing short trousers. Around the boardroom, tens of millions have been poured into a passion first developed as children. The trouble is that much of those huge sums have been squandered by a series of blunders verging on the schoolboy. The job now for the new American regime in control at Ibrox is to return the Light Blues to the top of the class in Scotland. And if there's one thing offering re-assurance to Dave King, it's that the grown ups are now in charge. The former chairman was one of those boyhood supporters who gave his all - and most certainly his fortunes - in the pursuit of making Rangers great again. But having been born and raised in Glasgow, the Castlemilk native was as susceptible as any of the men he shared the director's table with of getting caught up amidst the reactionary mindset of the larger Ibrox faithful. He saw how a bad night in Perth or Paisley could lead to dire consequences for the manager in the dugout. But with the mature heads of Andrew Cavenagh and his partners from 49ers Enterprises now in charge, King hopes the days of boardroom mood swings are over. King - who handed over his 14 percent stake in the club last week as the US consortium concluded their £75million takeover - said: 'I remember speaking to Andrew and he was astounded by the extent to which we won a game, we lost a game, and there was doom and gloom at board level. 'As supporters you can do that, but as a board you can't be making decisions around transfer business because you lost on Wednesday night in Paisley. 'You need a proper football plan, a proper financial plan. I think sometimes when you've got too many supporters on the board, immediate results start to introduce knee-jerk thinking - 'Get him out, get him in, fire the manager'. 'You've got to be careful that you don't get caught up in that because it's dangerous. I think the new owners are going to come in with a plan and they'll stick to it. 'When things don't go well, it'll be fine. They won't throw the plan aside. I'm expecting that level of maturity because these are very mature investor business people who are looking at Rangers in a very mature way. "These are not some supporter that's coming in because the jacket, tie and brown brogues are important to them. 'They see Rangers as a great business opportunity and quite frankly, it is. 'But it was never going to be one as long as it remained a parochial cap-in-hand set-up. It can't be, 'Oh we need a couple of million quid so let's go around the directors and get a loan'. 'We had to break away from that. It's something I thought we had with 55, keeping Steven Gerrard on board and defending the title. 'I really thought we'd turned the corner, but unfortunately, it was decided to take Steven out of the picture. 'I regret that, but it is what it is. We are where we are. 'I'm definitely excited, genuinely excited about the progress the club will make now this transaction has gone through.' Cavenagh and Co have kicked-off the new era at Ibrox with a promise to inject an initial £20million into the club's transfer kitty. That will do for starters but more, a lot more, will be needed to make Rangers a serious contender for prizes. Taking on a Celtic side that have lifted 13 of the last 14 league crowns will not be easy but King is confident that new owners grasp the appetite for success which is now their job to feed. 'I do think that's an exact understanding,' he said. 'The ambition most certainly must be to win a trophy next season. 'My understanding is the expectation is to be competitive next season. 'I think the squad that we've got at the moment is way short of what we need to have a sustained run at the title while simultaneously participating in Europe. 'It's no surprise this year that the guys were up for it in Europe because that's just almost a mentality aspect of Europe. 'I don't know if some of them regarded that as being a shopping window - but the fact is they weren't quite up for going to Perth or Paisley or places like that. 'We need people that understand it the way Barry Ferguson did. 'Barry and guys like Allan McGregor understand what it takes to win league titles. 'It's not about the glamour games. It's about going away in a wet, windy, cold night to Aberdeen, to St Johnstone and grinding out an ugly 1-0 result. 'When I looked at the team, when we were down with 40 minutes to go, I wasn't seeing the leadership on the pitch. 'I wasn't seeing the characters on the pitch that were saying, come on, and grabbing them. 'If that was Richard Gough, he'd have been tackling the guys himself. 'I think we're way short on players. That's why I'm trying to moderate expectations to say as much as the 49ers are coming in to make an impact as quickly as they can and as sensibly as they can, I'm just concerned it might take a wee bit longer than we as supporters would like. 'But it doesn't mean we won't be going forward all the time.' A fresh pile of American's dollars will certainly help Rangers close the gap on Celtic. But just as valuable will be the business and sporting expertise being brought to the table by the Stateside consortium with their NFL experience. King added: 'They're not guys that are just going to throw money at the club. 'There's going to be a football plan and there's going to be a financial plan behind that. 'Andrew and the investors coming in understand there's going to have to be a substantial net investment. 'It's really how much is going in total because we have to get some guys out as well. 'We've been paying a lot of money for players, some that virtually never started and others that give us very little time on the pitch. 'If they can get them out and free up the wages and add the new money, then it could be a very, very substantial new investment.'