logo
‘It's hard to find work': Marlee Matlin on making Hollywood history but waiting for change

‘It's hard to find work': Marlee Matlin on making Hollywood history but waiting for change

The Guardian3 hours ago

In 1987, at the age of 21, Marlee Matlin became the youngest person ever to win a best actress Oscar. Footage of her victory appears early in Marlee Matlin: Not Alone Anymore, a new documentary on the trailblazing actor's life and career: Matlin, remarkably fresh-faced even for 21, in her very 80s purple dress, her brunette hair swept up by a floral headpiece, black-rimmed glasses on, appears stunned as William Hurt, her co-star in Children of a Lesser God and her boyfriend at the time, reads her name. Thunderous applause. The camera captures fellow nominee Jane Fonda mouthing 'that's so great' as Matlin, the first and still only deaf actor to win the award, approaches the podium and kisses Hurt. As she delivers her speech in American Sign Language (ASL), she seems almost too shocked to emote, overcome with the gravity of the moment.
Matlin's win was indeed groundbreaking, a watershed moment for deaf representation. But as Not Alone Anymore explains, it was also much more complicated than a feelgood story of societal triumph, or a turning point for deaf creatives. Nor was it one of personal glory. Halfway through the film, the scene is replayed again, this time with the sound taken away – the thunderous applause muted to just a simulation of Matlin's own thunderous heartbeat as she walked to the stage. 'I was afraid as I walked up the stairs to get the Oscar,' Matlin recalls on screen in ASL. 'I was afraid because I knew, in my gut, that he wasn't that happy.' Hurt, 16 years her senior and an established Hollywood star, was intensely jealous of her success, and had already begun physically abusing her. Without sound and with context, what once read as overwhelming shock on her face instead appears as something darker, shaded with fear.
The twist, of sorts, is one of many decisions by director Shoshannah Stern to subvert the hearing perspective that most viewers automatically assume. 'I wanted to return to her Oscar-winning moment twice,' Stern, a deaf actor herself, told me through an interpreter, 'because sound does limit people. There are a lot of things that I feel hearing people miss when they are just listening with their ears and not listening with their eyes.' When I first watched Matlin's win, I assumed, as Stern expected, that 'it's this roaring applause, so we're celebrating'. Without sound, the picture is clearer. 'You could see in that moment how scary it is,' said Stern. 'And it's right there. It's been in front of us this whole time.'
Stern's intrinsic understanding of the deaf perspective was the reason Matlin, who went on to a long career on such shows as Seinfeld, The West Wing, The L Word and, most recently, the Oscar-winning film Coda, decided to make the film at all. 'Almost none of the documentaries that I've seen that have to do with a subject matter like myself have not been done right,' she told me over Zoom via her interpreter, Jack Jason, who has worked with Matlin since 1985. When PBS's American Masters approached her about a documentary, she had one demand: the director had to be deaf, and it had to be Stern, a longtime friend and occasional collaborator who co-created the show This Close. As she did with early financiers of Coda who wanted to cast big-name hearing actors for two deaf roles, Matlin stuck to her guns. Deaf participation, take it or leave it.
'I wanted to have that type of conversation I could [with] Shoshannah, where I could feel free and sign and not worry about an interpreter voiceover, not worry about my surroundings, not worry about any of that, just be there,' Matlin said. 'That was the first time that I felt at ease.'
Much of Marlee Matlin: Not Alone Anymore, which first premiered at the Sundance film festival, features Stern and Matlin in conversation unlike in any prior documentary I've seen, even with deaf subjects. The two women sign without voiceover, just subtitles for hearing viewers. Any ASL interpreters were not only off camera, but in a different room, communicating via earpieces. 'I wasn't accustomed to that approach. I've never seen that,' said Matlin. 'I'm accustomed to being voiced over, because that's how it's been in my entire career. That's the hearing perspective.'
As the first Oscar-winning deaf actor and still the most famous, Matlin knows how, as Stern puts it, 'the world often tries to force perspectives on people, put the weight of explaining an entire community's experience on one person'. Voiceover and interpreters 'are another forced perspective', she said. 'When I'm interviewed by hearing people, I have to look at the interpreter. Where are they? How is my language being translated into English? And then I'm limiting myself. I'm thinking in a way that the hearing interviewer or the hearing director is thinking. I'm not thinking as myself.'
'It wasn't what I wanted Marlee to say in our documentary, it was how she spoke, how that changes when our expectations and our perspectives change,' she added. 'Accessibility is for everyone. It's not just for us as deaf people, but a lot of times that responsibility, that weight, is put on one person.'
Not Alone Anymore illustrates that weight, which Matlin felt acutely as a very young person experiencing rapid professional success. Cast in Children of a Lesser God fresh out of high school, Matlin was new not only to screen acting but the world beyond her small community in suburban Chicago. The youngest of three children in a hearing family – Matlin became deaf at 18 months, for unknown reasons that, she recalls, nevertheless left her parents guilt-stricken – she attended a mixed deaf/hearing school and began acting at age seven; she was inspired, in part, by Henry Winkler, a lifelong mentor she first met backstage at a school show at age 12. (In 1993, Matlin married Kevin Grandalski, a cop she met on the set of Reasonable Doubts, in the Winklers' back yard. They have four children.)
Matlin's family was not fluent in ASL, and it took years for her to understand the loneliness and isolation at home. She coped by smoking marijuana. At 19, she began dating Hurt, who was then 35. Her drug use escalated with the physical and emotional abuse; she has said she smoked 20 joints a day, plus cocaine. In the midst of her awards season run, she entered rehab. She emerged sober, and also the face of a deaf community she did not totally understand. 'I didn't realize that there were more deaf people out there, outside of Chicago, a whole community. It was bigger than what I even realized,' she said.
Not Alone Anymore powers through cringey clips of interviewers asking Matlin to explain deafness. How did it feel to be deaf? Had she come to terms with it? Matlin powered through as best she could. She quickly became an activist, successfully pushing legislation in the US requiring closed captioning on TV and streaming sites. But she struggled as the lone representative of deafness for hearing people. The film lingers on backlash from the deaf community when Matlin spoke at the 1988 Oscars, which many felt encouraged the stereotype that deaf intelligence was connected to one's ability to imitate hearing speech. Matlin says the incident, fanned by hearing media attention, drove her away from the deaf community for over a decade. 'I had no guidance in terms of someone to sit down to me and explain about the language that was being used, about the language that I used,' she said. 'I had to find out the hard way.'
Matlin faced similar media blowback, though of a different tenor, when she disclosed Hurt's abuse, as well as incidents of molestation by a babysitter and teacher in her childhood, in her 2009 memoir, I'll Scream Later. Not Alone Anymore again assembles very pre-#MeToo clips in which interviewers discounted or dismissed her experience. In one clip, Joy Behar asks about 'spectacular' sex with Hurt. 'Marlee has always been ahead of the curve,' said Stern of Matlin's willingness to speak up years before it became more common to do so.
When Hurt died in 2022, at the age of 71, Matlin found her name once again brought up in his wake. 'On social media, I had to look at both sides of the conversations,' she recalled. In posts and comments, some people accused her of lying about the abuse; others were mad at those who accused her of crying wolf. 'They were trying to define me,' she said. 'And I would have none of that. I wanted them to stop, but at the same time, I decided to step away from the conversation' during Coda's press run. Did she wish now that she said anything? 'No, I don't,' she answered, after a beat. 'Because nothing would satisfy these people. And why should I have to? I didn't trust what would happen if I did get involved, because of my past experience of being ignored, of being overlooked, not getting any help. But it was interesting to observe, to see the two factions fighting about me thinking that they knew me.'
It's a typically strident answer from Matlin, who has never minced words, particularly on how her Oscar did not open up more opportunities for deaf actors – the film's title comes from her emotional reaction to Coda costar Troy Kotsur's supporting actor Oscar in 2022, becoming only the second deaf actor to win. As with Matlin's 1987 trophy, Kotsur's win hasn't changed much. 'I'm not seeing more opportunities open up,' said Stern.
'It's still up to deaf people or people from a minority group to explain their experience to the majority,' she added. 'We continue to say what is expected of us, which is: 'Great story. Representation has changed! There's going to be so many job opportunities!' That's what people are expecting us to say. And if we say that, nothing's going to change.'
'My least favorite question is: Are you working? What's next?' said Matlin. 'I hate answering that question. I say, 'Oh, well, I have this.' I try to change the subject, talk about something else because they won't understand what I'm going through.
'It's hard to find work,' she said, but still insists: 'This is something I love to do. This is a business that I love being in. I love acting. I love it all.'
Naturally, she can't say what is next – 'waiting for a yes or no, an answer, that's typically what I do' – beyond press for a film she and Stern both hope challenges some perspectives. 'I hope it makes people think. I hope that people feel seen,' said Stern. 'I hope people know that they have value in how they see the world, and you don't just have to accept how things have been done for so long.'
Marlee Matlin: Not Alone Anymore is out now in US cinemas

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aston Merrygold gets emotional as sons interview him for Disney's Elio
Aston Merrygold gets emotional as sons interview him for Disney's Elio

The Independent

time36 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Aston Merrygold gets emotional as sons interview him for Disney's Elio

got emotional on the press tour of Disney 's Elio after a surprise interview with his sons, Grayson Jax and Macaulay Shay. The JLS singer was surprised by Disney who had organised for his boys to interview him about his debut role as voice actor. Aston can be seen voicing the character 'Aston' in Disney's Elio, in cinemas June 20, alongside Zoe Saldaña, Yonas Kibreab, Brad Garrett, Jameela Jamil, Shirley Henderson and Remi Edgerly. His character works with Aunt Olga played by Zoe Saldaña at Montez Air Force Base, where they find themselves hearing rumours of life outside Earth.

Celebrity nudity has gone too far
Celebrity nudity has gone too far

Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Celebrity nudity has gone too far

Am I the only one bored of nipples? From red carpets to album covers, baring it all seems to be all the rage. Over the years hems have gotten shorter, fabrics sheerer and underwear swapped for stick-on patches. At this point, what would really shock on a red carpet is long sleeves and a covered ankle. Sex sells – a story as old as time. So perhaps it's unsurprising how much nudity and sexuality is on display from movie stars and pop singers. But the response to what kind of nakedness is appropriate is interesting. Just a matter of years ago, female sexual nudity was not just condemned by priests and prudes but by feminist preachers, too. Magazines may have stopped publishing Page 3 girls, but now they're covered in semi-nude celebrities, while social media is awash with them. Last week, Sabrina Carpenter covered Rolling Stone naked, long hair covering her modesty, in tandem with a controversial cover for her forthcoming album Man's Best Friend which appears to show her on all fours at a man's feet, like a dog, with his hand pulling her hair. Meanwhile Liz Hurley celebrated her 60th birthday by posting pictures 'in her birthday suit' – as Gwyneth Paltrow did when turning 50. Kanye West's wife, Australian fashion designer Bianca Censori, attended the 2025 Grammys wearing a completely see-through mini dress without any underwear at all. This year the Cannes Film Festival went as far as to ban the 'naked dress' from the red carpet for 'decency reasons', in reaction to the number of celebrities attending the festival in little more than a g-string and some taffeta, with their breasts fully exposed. Women such as Rose MacGowan have called this kind of dressing an act of 'empowerment', while Carpenter supporters have praised her for 'subverting the male gaze' by reflecting it so brazenly. But are these powerful feminist statements or have we lost all sense of public decency? What's more, when it comes to celebrity nudity, the double standards are glaring. Who doesn't remember the picture of Kim Kardashian's bottom balancing a glass of champagne for a Paper Magazine cover that reportedly 'broke the internet'? What was so shocking about that episode wasn't that we were gazing at yet another picture of one of the Kardashians' backsides, but the fact that Labour MP and queen of the feminist morality police, Harriet Harman, praised it on breakfast television. In an interview with Good Morning Britain, Harman said the Kardashian women possess 'a kind of bravery and a pioneering… spirit to them'. But what about all those years of arguing that sexualised women should be banned from the shelves of corner shops and that the pornification of women was a disgrace worthy of legal action? In her argument, Harman seemed to suggest that Page 3 girls, in their working-class ignorance, had no idea what they were doing or why they were doing it. But the Kardashians, one of the world's richest celebrity families, 'are in control of their own agenda'. The middle-class war on working-class women's bodies was yet again evidenced in 2018, when 'walk-on girls' Charlotte Wood and Daniella Allfree were axed by darts bosses after pressure to end the 'sexist' practice of glamorous women at events. In a now infamous episode of This Morning, feminist writer Sally Howard told Allfree and Wood that they were 'demeaning' to women, and should be prevented from glamour modelling for the feminist cause. Perhaps the flak she got for her condescending nonsense hurt enough to make her think twice, but a cursory google shows that Howard has yet to comment on any of the other public appearances of sexualised women. The message is clear: some boobs are 'demeaning', and some are 'empowering'. These days, the darts girls look demure in comparison to what goes on. Tight dresses and high heels were about as racy as they got – in comparison to female celebrities today who seem to be allergic to bras and knickers. The fashion world might have been unsettled when organisers at the Cannes film festival banned the 'naked' dress, but perhaps punters were simply sick of seeing Bella Hadid's nipples? A celebration of female sexuality is one thing – Marilyn Monroe was a beautiful woman who knew how to dress to impress. But there is something a little bleak about seeing image after image of half-starved models with their nether regions on show. Despite it all screaming sex, none of it seems very sexy. Perhaps the best example of this de-sexing of nudity is Censori. Her nude stunts – seemingly controlled by an increasingly unhinged West – aren't shocking because she is in her birthday suit, but because she looks so pained while doing it. There is no fun or celebration to this sexualisation. In fact, some have raised suspicions about how consensual it all is. But while Censori might be the extreme end of the nudity wars, she represents the hollowing out of sex in the public eye. All these barely-there women seem bored with their own nudity. The problem with this 'nudity as empowerment' narrative is that it gets murky very quickly. The other week, Sydney Sweeney went viral for her Dr Squatch soap, which, the male grooming brand claimed, contained droplets of Sweeney's actual used bathwater. The savvy campaign capitalised, with winking irony, their Sweeney ad from the previous year, which saw the star lying in a foaming bath tub, telling 'dirty little boys' to clean up. The comments section was full of, among other things, men requesting Sweeney's bathwater, while many women criticised her for encouraging male objectification. The week the new ad dropped, Sweeney spoke to the Sunday Times about sometimes struggling to be taken seriously in the boardroom and behind-the-scenes of her production company – particularly by other women. 'A woman's body is beyond empowering and beautiful and sexy and all the things,' she said. 'And I think that one day I will be able to have control of the narrative of my body. I'll take the power.' Is it really so anti-feminist to suggest she would have more luck being taken seriously in the boardroom if she didn't sell her used bathwater to horny young men? I've never been a fan of telling women to cover up. While I might dislike most of her politics, I rallied to Angela Rayner's defence when the Right went into meltdown over her legs being on show during Prime Minister's Questions. Telling women what to wear is never a good idea – from conservatives with their knickers in a twist to finger-wagging feminists. But we should ask ourselves, are we having a good time with all this nudity? Sabrina Carpenter's album cover might be a two-fingered salute to decorum, but is it radical if we had already lost it years ago? If there are no more nipples left to free, perhaps it might be more shocking to start tucking them away.

Billy Porter says Donald Trump would be in jail if he was Black
Billy Porter says Donald Trump would be in jail if he was Black

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Billy Porter says Donald Trump would be in jail if he was Black

Billy Porter, star of Broadway and Pose, stated that Donald Trump would be in jail if he were a black man. Speaking on BBC Newsnight, Porter discussed the re-election of Donald Trump and the challenges faced by Democrats and activists in the United States. Porter speculated that Donald Trump 's re-election was a 'backlash' to the election of President Obama. He asserted that 'America is a racist country' in his discussion. Watch the video above.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store