Wales to be a Marmot Nation to tackle health inequalities
The move follows the earlier adoption of the Marmot principles in Torfaen, which became a Marmot region when the wider Gwent area took up the approach.
Sarah Murphy, the minister for mental health and wellbeing, said: "Becoming a Marmot Nation is about acknowledging that health inequalities are mostly shaped by the social determinants of health – the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age.
"In Torfaen, we can see positive change at community level due to organisations working together innovatively.
"By adopting these eight Marmot principles nationally, we will be taking action across government to support better health and wellbeing for all."
The Welsh Government will now work with the Institute of Health Equity, led by Professor Sir Michael Marmot, to embed health equity into all areas of policy and decision-making.
Sir Michael's eight Marmot principles address the root causes of health inequalities by focusing on factors such as education, employment, living standards and community wellbeing.
The decision builds on Wales' Well-being of Future Generations Act, which places a legal duty on public bodies to consider the long-term impact of their decisions on social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing.
Sir Michael Marmot said: "A society that meets the needs of its members will have good health and relatively small inequalities in health.
"Healthcare is, of course, important for health.
"More important are social circumstances, as summarised in the eight Marmot Principles.
"The policy implications are clear.
"Health policy is for the whole of government, not just for the health department or the NHS."
The Canada-UK Council's UK co-chair, Professor Nicolas Maclean, also welcomed the announcement.
Professor Maclean said: "The Canada-UK Council warmly welcomes this important new initiative by the Welsh Government, which follows our annual colloquium hosted last December in Cardiff by leaders such as Jeremy Miles and Mark Drakeford.
"The theme of our colloquium, chaired by Sir Michael Marmot, was 'overcoming unequal health outcomes in the UK and Canada.'
"Today's announcement will set an example around the world."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Amy Hamm was a hard-working nurse. Now she's a case study in Canada's descent into tyranny
Canada used to be known as a bastion of free speech. It's even supposed to be protected as a 'fundamental freedom' under Canadian law. Unfortunately, the reality today is rather different – as the case of nurse Amy Hamm starkly demonstrates. Hamm has been a nurse in British Columbia for 13 years and, as she wrote in an essay for the online magazine Quillette in April 2022, she had 'never had a patient complaint, or otherwise received any type of workplace discipline'. Nevertheless, the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives placed her under investigation. Her supposed offence? Her 'off-duty statements' – specifically social media posts and articles that expressed her perfectly legitimate view that there are only two biological sexes. The fact that she had placed a billboard in September 2020 that contained the simple message 'I [HEART] JK Rowling' also came under scrutiny. Hamm wrote in Quillette that two people had complained to BCCNM that her views made her incapable of 'provid[ing] safe, non-judgemental care to transgender and gender diverse patients'. She was flabbergasted. 'I have worked with countless transgender patients. I am not transphobic by any reasonable or defensible definition of that word. Yet I now could lose my job because activists claim that I am a bigot.' An investigation into Hamm commenced. BCCNM wrote a lengthy report that examined her social media posts, freelance writing and more. Did they find anything egregious? Some might have found some of her posts offensive, but most will have considered them mainstream expressions of gender-critical opinions. But that didn't stop the college from making bizarre interpretations of what she said and wrote. One remark, 'trans activists determined to infiltrate or destroy women-only spaces,' was found to be discriminatory because the disciplinary panel felt it had a 'negative connotation of improper, illegal, aggressive, and destructive conduct'. Another post – is 'there anything more embarrassing than straight people going by they/them, getting a dumb haircut, and calling themselves trans and queer?' – was cited because it 'indirectly disparages transgender people '. Hamm, a single mother of two, wrote in the National Post – where she is a fellow columnist – that some colleagues 'created a public campaign' last year 'to get me fired over my political views – which I only ever expressed outside of work – and shared my exact work location'. She said someone threatened to find her at the hospital and 'beat me to a pulp with a baseball bat'. Many people mobilised to help Hamm. She was aided in her lengthy legal battle by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. JK Rowling gave moral support, tweeting '#IStandWithAmyHamm,' and sent Hamm a handbag last Christmas with a follow-up post: 'fabulous women deserve fabulous bags'. The academic Kathleen Stock testified in Hamm's defence. It was all for naught. The disciplinary panel ruled that Hamm had made 'discriminatory and derogatory statements' about transgender people and that her comments were designed in part to 'elicit fear, contempt and outrage against members of the transgender community'. Hamm was ordered to pay close to 94,000 Canadian dollars in costs and disbursements within two years, and was suspended for one month. What a ridiculous decision. It doesn't matter what you think about Hamm's views on gender identity, or the billboard that praised Rowling. She has the right to express these opinions in a free society, particularly when she is outside work. Free speech isn't a one-way street: it's the defence of ideas that are either objective or objectionable. Intellectual discourse will be severely limited if those who disagree with Hamm believe the right approach is to punish and silence her, rather than debate her. It is shocking that Hamm has been denied her basic right. It is positive, at least, that Hamm's case has drawn attention to the reality of free speech in Canada today. The Conservative Party leader, Pierre Poilievre, has written on social media this week that 'this is authoritarian censorship. We must restore free speech and free thinking in a free country.' Let's hope that's possible, because if an intelligent, thoughtful nurse like Hamm can't express her non-violent, non-hateful opinions outside the workplace, the chill that has descended on Canadian free speech may soon turn into an Ice Age.
Wales Online
10 hours ago
- Wales Online
Hospital hides the truth about 'strangers being let in to watch ops'
Hospital hides the truth about 'strangers being let in to watch ops' There has been a complete lack of transparency after serious allegations from whistleblowers The University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff (Image: Huw Evans Agency) Earlier this year we revealed allegations that staff at University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff had invited their own friends and family members into operating theatres to watch surgery on unaware patients. When we put this to Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, it vowed to investigate the claims and called them "deeply concerning". Five months on, we feel the same description applies to the health board's handling of the situation. It has concluded its investigation but won't tell us the outcome because of "s tandard HR practice". It refuses to even say whether the allegations were found to be true, or whether any changes will be made to prevent a repeat. The Welsh Government simply parroted the health board's line but our sources at the hospital — as well as politicians from Plaid Cymru and the Tories — are furious. To understand why, it's important to look at a wider context of scandals around Wales' biggest hospital. When we first reported on the claims of unauthorised spectators, we also revealed claims of illegal drug use, racism and bullying in the hospital's operating theatres. Those claims were probed in a separate investigation — a "comprehensive service review" — which concluded in May with a damning 22-page report that found: An "atmosphere of fear" had gone "a long way to destroying the bonds which allow people to work effectively together". Some anaesthetic practitioners were not always in theatre for the whole operation, instead watching Netflix in the anaesthetic room. Female staff felt unable to leave anything of value in the changing room because of the "regularity" of theft, which included money, phones, computers and clothing going missing. Staff felt there were "no consequences" after an illegal drug — understood to be speed — was allegedly found in the locker of one employee. There were "several occasions when pigeons were found in the trauma theatre or on the theatre corridor" as well as concerns over chronic leaks, faulty equipment, poor lighting and infection control problems. "Inappropriate and racist remarks" were made by a senior leader who said a group of Indian nurses needed name badges because they "all looked the same". When I attended the press conference for the release of that report, I asked questions about disciplinary matters — and, crucially, I did get answers. Health board bosses told me what had happened to the staff member accused of possessing speed (he continued to work at the hospital after a "full disciplinary process") and the manager who allegedly made racist comments ("removed from practice while a formal investigation occurred", then returned to work). Article continues below They also told me there could still be disciplinary action over some of the other findings. So why, a few months on, is the health board hiding behind "HR practice" to justify concealing its findings into the claims of strangers watching ops? Bear in mind the 22-page report went into lengthy detail on all kinds of allegations while still leaving the door open for disciplinaries. What makes this different? It's not clear why the unauthorised viewing of operations wasn't covered in the comprehensive service review, and instead got its own investigation. The complete lack of transparency after that investigation will inevitably lead to suspicions of a cover-up. 'An absolute joke' In 2023 the Welsh Government set up Llais, an independent body aimed at giving the public more influence in shaping health and social care. After the scathing report into operating theatre practices, Llais demanded "full openness and independent checks to make sure improvements happen". Yet when we raised the issue of the latest findings being kept secret, the Welsh Government would only say: 'We take all concerns about patient safety seriously. The health board has completed its investigation and the matter is now concluded subject to its HR process.' So the health secretary, Jeremy Miles, is content with the findings remaining hidden? When we asked, his spokeswoman simply said it was "a matter for the health board". One hospital whistleblower told us that stance "just boils my blood", adding: "Those people were in theatre when they shouldn't have been. It's an absolute joke. Why won't they tell us the outcome?" Andrew RT Davies, MS for South Wales Central and former leader of the Welsh Tories, questioned why the findings could not be made public with names redacted. He told WalesOnline: "Many service users feared that a health board-led investigation would result in a cover-up, and the failure to share the outcome of the investigation will only add to those fears. 'This failing health board has been found wanting in numerous reports, and hiding behind HR processes will do nothing to restore the confidence patients and staff need to have in the senior management team. 'Clearly an investigation should have been made by an external body but, in any case, there is no reason why the health board should not share the outcome of this investigation, with appropriate redactions, so service users can understand what happened and why following the shocking revelations that came out of the Heath hospital earlier this year. 'If the health board refuses to release the outcome, the Welsh Government must step in, conduct their own investigation, and release the facts to the public.' Also calling for transparency is Plaid Cymru MS and health spokesman Mabon ap Gwynfor, who said: "The health board must ensure that the scenes that played out in University Hospital of Wales are never repeated. We must now see appropriate and effective action taking place which means proper transparency in regards to their findings. "It's clear that there are fundamental issues within our NHS regarding institutional transparency and the power of the patient voice. That is why Plaid Cymru is committed to reforming the governance of our health system, to strengthen oversight and accountability so that patients receive a better outcome." 'Brushed under the carpet' Earlier this year the health board told us that "previous concerns regarding unauthorised people in theatres had been raised but not thoroughly investigated or completed", adding: "Following the deeply concerning allegations made around allowing members of the public to watch operations, the health board has launched an internal investigation." The concerns were understood to have started as far back as the Covid pandemic. Staff told us they had been ordered not to speak about the matter as it was "brushed under the carpet" . A whistleblower claimed: "They had no background checks and it was during Covid. The very little PPE [personal protective equipment] was being used by unnecessary people. They would have been a huge infection risk to not only staff but vulnerable patients." One source said the concerns over operations being watched had been "raised so many times" since the pandemic but had only been investigated after WalesOnline reported on the matter. The health board has now said: "The investigation is complete and, subject to HR process, has been concluded by the health board. As is standard HR practice, we cannot comment on confidential matters. The report relates to specific individuals who are subject to an internal process following the appropriate employment policy. This process must remain confidential, and the health board is not in a position to share this in the public domain. 'We would like to reassure patients that their privacy, dignity and safety when undergoing surgical intervention remains our highest priority and steps have been, and continue to be, taken to ensure that this is consistently achieved.' What those steps are — and exactly why they needed to be taken — remains a mystery. If public confidence in this troubled health board is to be restored, that has to change. Article continues below If you would like to speak to WalesOnline about anything we should be investigating, email us at
Pembrokeshire Herald
a day ago
- Pembrokeshire Herald
Davies hits out at junk food ad ban
WELSH CONSERVATIVE Senedd Member Andrew RT Davies has criticised a move by the Vale of Glamorgan Council to ban unhealthy food advertising, calling it 'silly' and a distraction from core responsibilities. The Vale is expected to approve restrictions on so-called 'junk food' adverts in public spaces, in line with growing public health campaigns against obesity. Davies, who represents South Wales Central, said: 'It's about time town hall bosses stop treating residents like children. People know that too many sweets and burgers can be bad for you, but council tax paying adults can make decisions about their lifestyles themselves without being parented by the politicians they pay for. 'At the end of the day, lots of places in the Vale are visited by tourists who fancy an ice cream or a cone of chips, and with the tourism tax already coming down the tracks in Wales, traders need to be able to advertise their snacks. The Vale Council should focus on keeping council tax low and delivering essential services rather than these silly distractions.' Thinks idea is bonkers: Andrew RT Davies MS Public health arguments Supporters of advertising restrictions argue that reducing the visibility of high-fat, high-salt and high-sugar foods is an important step in tackling poor diets and obesity, particularly among children. Wales has some of the highest rates of obesity in the UK, with Public Health Wales warning that one in four children is overweight or obese by the time they start school. The Welsh Government has already signalled its intention to curb junk food promotions, mirroring measures in Scotland and parts of England. Local authorities are being encouraged to take action in their own areas. Could Pembrokeshire follow suit? Locals and tourists queue up for a tasty fish and chip supper in Tenby (Image: File) Pembrokeshire County Council has not announced any plans to introduce a ban on unhealthy food advertising. However, with other councils in Wales moving in this direction, campaigners will be watching to see if the authority considers similar measures. Traders in Pembrokeshire's coastal towns rely heavily on the sale of ice creams, chips and fast food to tourists during the summer months, meaning any restrictions could prove controversial. The debate highlights the growing tension between public health initiatives and concerns over local economies, with councils under pressure to balance both.
