
Wild mushrooms, onions or pecans? Foraging bill passes State Senate unanimously
A bill that would allow Oklahomans to forage for wild growing food on state property has passed the Oklahoma senate unanimously and now makes its way to the House for reconciliation and a possible trip to the governor's desk.
Senate Bill 447's house author is Danny Sterling, who joined forces with Norman Senator Mary Boren. After passing the Senate, the bill will go back to the House. If no amendments are added, it will go on to Governor Kevin Stitt's desk.
Senate co-author Boren, of Norman, said an adventure of her elderly mother–led her to file the bill. While out at Lake Thunderbird with Boren's mother-in-law, the two happened upon pecans growing wild at the park and they picked some up to bring home. That's when the park ranger told them they were breaking the law.
'The park ranger came up and kind of scolded them, and said, 'Y'all aren't supposed to be doing that,' Boren said. 'They talked themselves out of getting in trouble and kept the pecans, and they came home and with a little sparkle in their eye telling this story of how naughty they were for picking up pecans. But that got me thinking…Surely that's not really a law that people can't pick up pecans at a state park.'
Turns out, it is generally against the law to forage for wild food at state parks, wildlife areas, or other state property, no matter how plump those persimmons, how green that poke salat is, or how savory those wild onions. Folks are mostly not allowed to pick them up.
So, they tried a bill that would allow 'harvesting' wild foods, but it ran into trouble. Harvesting suggested equipment, combines, commercial operations. Probably not what her mother was trying to accomplish at Lake Thunderbird with the pecans. Instead, they tried a different word, 'forage,' which seems to fit the meaning.
'I wanted foraging to be legal. I didn't want harvesting, so I changed the bill,' Boren said. 'Then we defined what forage meant and it was just basically not for commercial purposes and you know, what one person could take.'
This version went through the agricultural committee and the wildlife department. There were rules suggested that proper clothing be worn so foragers wouldn't get shot by turkey hunters; the kinds of things a country-oriented bill ought to be. They also ran into a 'morel' issue.
'Morel mushrooms come out right after turkey season,' Boren said. 'They were concerned that morel mushroom hunters would disrupt turkey nests and habitats because I guess they start nesting right after turkey season. They were also concerned about just foraging during deer season and all of that.'
Rules were added not allowing foraging on prison grounds or the side of the interstate. Senator Julie McIntosh, a physician, asked Boren a question about the bill.
'She said, why don't you have fungi?' Boren said. 'I intended for mushrooms to be included and I just thought that they were under the definition of plants. Then she goes, 'Oh no. They are fungi.' and then I asked Siri, I said, 'Hey, Siri, are mushrooms, plants?' Nope, it's fungi. And so I amended my bill to include that word.'
And the bill passed. Boren said she hopes that the bill will get a good reaction from Stitt's office. Wild foods are part of life in Oklahoma, she said. For instance, there's the staffer who has the Seminole recipe for wild onions. There are those who love to go pick blackberries, or 'dewberries' in the spring. Persimmons. Poke salat.
'Because just like the story about my mother and my mother-in-law, their story of going and getting pecans, people have stories of going out on horses and looking for blackberries and going out and looking for peaches and all kinds of really neat stories,' Boren said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why is the USS The Sullivans' dry docking being delayed?
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — While the USS The Sullivans have survived war, time and tens of thousands of miles, another winter Buffalo's waterfront may be its most dangerous battle yet. The community, Buffalo city leaders and Paul Marzello, the president of the Buffalo and Erie County Naval and Military Park, spoke about what is hopefully in store for future restoration efforts after the announcement of another dry docking delay. 'We've got $21 million to move forward and we're getting the question all the time. 'Why aren't we moving forward?' Marzello said. 'The simple answer is, we don't control the process. The city owns the ships. The city owns the buildings. The city owns the grounds. It's a city park.' After the ships partially sank in April, 14, 2022, New York State Assembly Majority Leader Crystal Peoples-Stokes announced $500,000 and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer secured $7.5 million in funding for repairs. Gov. Kathy Hochul also announced $10 million to repair the ships in August 2024. Marzello said due to holdups on the city level of insurance and 'administrative challenges,' plans to drydock and restore the historic ships have been pushed back to October 2026 at the earliest. He also said the city and the council chose a marine engineering firm in February to handle the project. 'That's where we are now. Nothing has been done for the last four months,' he said. ' It's very frustrating for our board, for us as an organization.' 'The city is moving diligently to put over $20 million in funding towards this project,' said Nate Marton, Buffalo's Department of Public Workers commissioner, in a statement WIVB News 4. Marton said there are no deadlines in place that the city has missed at this time. Buffalo Common Council Member Mitch Nowakowski said he works closely with the naval park and understands this is a big task. 'That's where I'm going to step in as a district member to say, 'Hey, where are we and how do we move this timeline to make sure that these assets are protected?' Nowakowski said. 'Why I have such confidence in the naval park is the dedication they have on their board and their executive director, so if they're showing us engineering reports that there needs to be an expeditious timeline to make sure that these are saved, I'm yielding to their expertise.' Visitors of the naval park said on Wednesday that they believe the ships need to be cared for to ensure they don't just become a part of Buffalo's past history. 'My grandpa was in the Navy and it was his captain's ship and I remember hearing stories from him, so [it's] really cool just to be able to visit the history and explore the area,' said Hamburg resident Hannah Meader. Others said the ships should remain in Buffalo. 'The history behind the Sullivans — every mother's heartbreak is in that ship. We really need to keep this — the ships, the planes, everything,' said Akron resident Margie Keller. 'It's so important for history for everybody to remember and for the little kids that don't know about it, it's just phenomenal. It breaks my heart to think we might lose them.' City leaders and naval park officials said they have similar goals in mind when it comes to the restoration project. To see all of News 4's past coverage on the USS The Sullivans, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - The ‘big, beautiful bill' would secretly dismantle the civil service
The House-passed budget reconciliation bill contains a troubling provision so dangerous and corrosive to the integrity of the federal government that it demands immediate scrutiny and swift rejection by the Senate. Buried in more than 1,000 pages of legislative text is Section 90002, a provision that strikes at the heart of the professional, nonpartisan civil service. It proposes a 9.4 percent salary surcharge on newly hired federal employees who wish to retain their civil service protections, ostensibly to pay for their retirement benefits. Those who cannot afford this effective tax on the rights that federal employees currently enjoy would be forced into permanent at-will employment. Although they would then qualify for a lower retirement deduction of 4.4 percent, as purely at-will employees they could be fired at any time, for any reason — or for no reason at all — with no legal recourse. This is not just bad policy — it is a direct attack on more than 140 years of bipartisan civil service tradition. Our professional civil service was born out of the rampant corruption of the 19th-century 'spoils system,' in which federal jobs were handed out as political favors by victorious candidates. That system came to a halt with the Pendleton Act of 1883, passed after President James Garfield was assassinated by a disgruntled office-seeker who believed he had been improperly denied a patronage job. The Pendleton Act established a competitive, merit-based hiring system and laid the foundation for the modern professional civil service that serves the nation — not the party in power. This commitment was reaffirmed and modernized by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, signed by President Jimmy Carter. That law improved efficiency and accountability and codified labor rights while protecting employees from arbitrary or politically motivated firings. It also created federal bodies — the Office of Personnel Management, the Federal Labor Relations Authority and the Merit Systems Protection Board — to safeguard merit principles and the integrity of public service. Now, with a single provision rolled out with little debate and no hearing record, the House reconciliation bill threatens to undo all this hard-won progress. If enacted, it would create a two-tier federal workforce: one class protected by civil service laws, and another completely vulnerable to the whims of political appointees. Worse still, the measure is designed to coerce new hires into giving up their rights for the rest of their careers. Faced with a 9.4 percent pay cut, most new federal employees — already earning salaries that are an estimated 25 percent lower than their private-sector counterparts — will feel they have no real choice. Many early-career workers live paycheck to paycheck; this surcharge would be an impossible burden. According to the Congressional Budget Office, three-quarters of new hires would likely be driven into at-will status. Among the 800,000 federal workers I represent as president of the American Federation of Government Employees, few if any could afford to pay the surcharge. That inability to pay is one reason why the provision raises so little money — less than $500 million annually according to the CBO — or just 0.1 percent of the cost of the bill's accompanying tax cuts. Clearly, revenue is not the point. The point is to erode labor rights and weaken the civil service. This provision is also a political time bomb. If passed, it sets a precedent that could be exploited by any future administration. Imagine a newly inaugurated Democratic president firing every at-will federal employee hired during the previous Republican administration — no hearings, no cause, no appeal. If Republicans are willing to set this precedent, they must be prepared to live under it. But the real danger is institutional. How can federal scientists, doctors, safety inspectors or law enforcement officers operate with independence and integrity if they can be dismissed on a whim? These protections are what enable civil servants to speak truth to power — even when that truth is inconvenient. This proposal is also a direct attack on organized labor. Without civil service protections, unions are hamstrung in their ability to represent their members. Workers afraid of being summarily fired are unlikely to file grievances, assert their rights or even speak candidly in meetings. Only those who can afford the surcharge would retain access to effective representation. Section 90002 isn't just misguided — it's union-busting by design. Imagine the outcry if a Democratic Congress imposed a 5 percent income tax on corporations to preserve their rights to challenge unions under the National Labor Relations Act. Republicans would rightly decry this as the weaponization of tax policy. Yet that's precisely what this bill does to federal workers — using financial coercion to undermine their legal protections. The civil service exists to provide stability, expertise and continuity regardless of the party holding office. It is one of the bedrock institutions that has sustained American democracy through wars, crises and peaceful transitions of power. The Trump administration may not like the idea of a government that can resist political manipulation — but that is exactly what democracy requires. Section 90002 is not reform. It is sabotage. Congress must reject it and reaffirm its commitment to the principles that have guided our civil service since 1883. Our institutions — and the American people they serve — deserve no less. Dr. Everett B. Kelley is national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Biden spokeswoman quits Democratic party
Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has quit the Democratic party after its "betrayal" of Joe Biden to become an independent, her publisher said in a statement Wednesday announcing a new book. Jean-Pierre, 50, who served under Biden for two years, will explain the decision in her book, titled "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines," publishing house Hachette said. Jean-Pierre blazed a trail as the first Black and gay presidential spokesperson. "Jean-Pierre didn't come to her decision to be an Independent lightly," the Hachette statement said as it announced the book, which will be published on October 21. "She takes us through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision," the statement added. Biden, who was 81 at the time, dropped his bid for a second term after a disastrous debate performance against Republican Donald Trump renewed concerns about his health and mental acuity. Jean-Pierre strongly defended Biden after the debate, when a series of senior Democrats including former House speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed him to step aside. But she and other former White House aides have since faced questions about whether they covered up the impact of Biden's age, fanned by the publication of another book by two journalists, "Original Sin." The revelations have also prompted a bout of Democratic infighting as party members seek to distance themselves from Biden's legacy and fight back against Trump ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Jean-Pierre's book will however also push back at what her publisher called a "torrent of disinformation and misinformation." She would also urge people to look beyond "blind loyalty" to the current two-party system and share "why Americans must step beyond party lines to embrace life as Independents." dk/st