logo
Former Biden spokeswoman quits Democratic party

Former Biden spokeswoman quits Democratic party

Yahoo2 days ago

Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has quit the Democratic party after its "betrayal" of Joe Biden to become an independent, her publisher said in a statement Wednesday announcing a new book.
Jean-Pierre, 50, who served under Biden for two years, will explain the decision in her book, titled "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines," publishing house Hachette said.
Jean-Pierre blazed a trail as the first Black and gay presidential spokesperson.
"Jean-Pierre didn't come to her decision to be an Independent lightly," the Hachette statement said as it announced the book, which will be published on October 21.
"She takes us through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision," the statement added.
Biden, who was 81 at the time, dropped his bid for a second term after a disastrous debate performance against Republican Donald Trump renewed concerns about his health and mental acuity.
Jean-Pierre strongly defended Biden after the debate, when a series of senior Democrats including former House speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed him to step aside.
But she and other former White House aides have since faced questions about whether they covered up the impact of Biden's age, fanned by the publication of another book by two journalists, "Original Sin."
The revelations have also prompted a bout of Democratic infighting as party members seek to distance themselves from Biden's legacy and fight back against Trump ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Jean-Pierre's book will however also push back at what her publisher called a "torrent of disinformation and misinformation."
She would also urge people to look beyond "blind loyalty" to the current two-party system and share "why Americans must step beyond party lines to embrace life as Independents."
dk/st

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

time18 minutes ago

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.

Readers sound off on the Knicks' season, attacks on Jews and the mayoral debate
Readers sound off on the Knicks' season, attacks on Jews and the mayoral debate

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Readers sound off on the Knicks' season, attacks on Jews and the mayoral debate

Stamford, Conn.: As the New York Knicks head into the offseason, it's only fitting to congratulate them on an outstanding season that brought pride and excitement to their exceptional fan base. In a time marked by division, uncertainty and political turmoil, professional sports take on greater significance. They offer a welcome reprieve from the noise of a fractured society and serve as a powerful reminder that competition doesn't have to breed tribalism. Watching displays of sportsmanship, dignity and professionalism reminds us that people can disagree while maintaining mutual respect. The NBA Eastern Conference Championship series filled me with pride and admiration for our hometown team. I was moved not just by the Knicks' performance, but by the sheer beauty of elite athleticism. We witnessed an inspiring display of teamwork with talented individuals uniting in pursuit of a shared goal. Win or lose, the Knicks can hold their heads high for a season that showcased heart and skill. They brought together fans from across the political and social spectrum and, for a brief moment, reminded us that mutual respect and kindness are still possible, even in disagreement. For those uninterested in sports, understand that it's not just about the three-point shot, the elegant pass or the final score. It's about the community coming together to blow off steam, cheer for something bigger than ourselves and shake hands when the game is over. This series brought out the best in us and should serve as a model for how we approach challenges both on and off the hardwood. Peter Janoff Woodland Park, N.J.: President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill will leave millions of people uninsured and will add trillions to our already hefty national debt. It looks like Trump will soon add the United States to the list of his other six bankruptcies. John Dent Manhattan: Once this bill passes and the debt goes up, it's on House Republicans, the Senate GOP and the president. I always believed that Republicans thought of themselves as the debt-conscious party. This proves that House Republicans and the Senate GOP are financially inept. Edward Drossman Smithfield, Pa.: Haven't we all wondered what we would have done in Germany under the Nazis? Well, here we are. Families ripped apart, people consigned to prisons where life itself is uncertain without hope of release, all without due process of law, much of this against people who are documented or even citizens. Now I see why the Germans closed their eyes as the Holocaust picked up speed. Do we close ours and pursue our normal daily lives, hoping that something will happen to fix things and that we are not the next to go? This administration hates women and people of color and despises anyone not wealthy. This madman and his posse are the true foreigners — foreign to any sense of decency, any sense of what we are as a nation. Take action, speak out and don't be silent, as silence is the death of us. Mary Terry Huntington, L.I.: Elon Musk is like the farmer who closes the barn door after all the animals have escaped. Leonard Stevenson Yonkers: I look forward to reading your articles and at times your editorials regarding Chuck 'The Liar' Schumer. Each and every time I do, I laugh harder and harder — not so much at his erroneous 'facts,' but more so his daily endeavors to derail Trump. This man should be voted so far out of office that it would take NASA to bring him back. He's done nothing since his law school graduation but incite malice via erroneous information that best suits him and his trove of gullible supporters. Give us a break, Chuckie. Retire and become an author of fairy tales and fiction. Ralph A. Manente Philadelphia: It's always great to hear from regular Voice of the People contributors like right-wing MAGA Voicer Bob Cavaliere griping about Dems and free stuff for taxpayers. How about letting everyone know how you feel about spending several million taxpayer dollars every weekend for Trump and his billionaire pals to play golf at the nearest Trump golf properties? An aside to everyone else: Have you ever heard as much whining and crying about anything and everything as you do now from the white male MAGA crowd? Talk about snowflakes. Duane Doberman Manhattan: To Voicer Lauren Shapiro: Are you any relation to the fellow, also with the last name Shapiro, mentioned in Mary Trump's book about her uncle, who took Donald's SATs to allow him to get into an Ivy League school? W.T. Bredin San Francisco: Since Oct. 7, 2023, antisemitism in America has escalated exponentially. It began with Palestinian supporters coldly tearing down posters of Israelis — including children — kidnapped by Hamas during its murderous terrorist attack. It progressed as activists on college campuses intimidated Jewish and pro-Israel students. Finally, it turned violent: In April, Pennsylvania's Jewish Gov. Josh Shapiro and his family were targeted in an arson attack during Passover. In May, Israeli embassy staff members Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim were murdered at a Jewish cultural event in Washington by a man who shouted 'Free, free Palestine!' And in June, a man who reportedly wanted to 'kill all Zionists' firebombed people in Boulder, Colo., marching peacefully to raise awareness of the 58 Israelis still held hostage in Gaza by Hamas. What if worse is still to come? Never again is now! Stephen A. Silver Yonkers: Re 'Shootings and killings in May haven't been so low in 30 yrs.' (June 4): In New York City, shootings and crime may be down, but look who's lurking in the shadows ready to pounce: none other than God's gift to New York, Andrew Cuomo, who thrashed cash bail, blessed New York with the Raise the Age law, and even gave Gov. Hochul to all of New York. The other problem is the New York voter who continues to get robbed, raped and murdered and keeps coming back for more. Nicholas Maffei Bayside: I watched the mayoral debate. Waste of time. The moderators were very inexperienced. Why did Cuomo get most of the airtime? All of the candidates want to provide the impossible — more housing, police, counseling for mental health, and the greatest promise: guaranteed income. As a senior citizen who worked his whole life, please be advised that the only guarantees are death and taxes. No ideas for who is going to pay for all these promises? My conclusion: All the candidates hate Trump, which doesn't do me any good as a citizen of New York City. Timothy Collins Whitestone: New York City is most certainly in trouble. Look at this panel of Democratic mayoral candidates. One is more pathetic than the next. I hope come Election Day in November, New Yorkers use common sense and vote for the right candidate. Please don't vote for the party line, but for the right person. That's the only way we're gonna get New York City back. Gene O'Brien North Babylon, L.I.: There are key environmental bills stuck in the Assembly that Speaker Carl Heastie must act on. The Senate has already seen the light. We need the NY HEAT Act to lower our gas bills and clean our air and to stop spreading toxic sludge on farmlands that poisons our food supply and waterways. It's critical that we limit plastic packaging that contains toxic chemicals, doesn't break down and can't be recycled. Instead, tiny particles of plastics are building up in our bodies and brains. These bills all sound like no-brainers, but industry is against them. Why should large companies be in charge of our budgets and health? One specious argument of the food industry is that the cost of new packaging will make food more expensive for Black and Brown communities. Yet, these communities bear the brunt of plastics pollution and are least able to manage its ill effects. Alexa Marinos

What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically

time27 minutes ago

What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into pardons and other executive actions issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden — launching an extraordinary effort to show that the Democrat hid his cognitive decline and was otherwise too mentally impaired to do the job. Trump, who turns 79 this month, has long questioned the mental acuity and physical stamina of Biden, and is now directing his administration to use governmental investigative powers to try and back up those assertions. Biden, 82, and now undergoing treatment for prostate cancer, dismissed Trump's actions as 'ridiculous.' Here's a look at what Trump is alleging, what impact it could have, and why the country may never have seen anything like this before. Trump directed his White House counsel and attorney general to begin an investigation into his own allegations that Biden aides hid from the public declining mental acuity in their boss. Trump is also casting doubts on the legitimacy of the Biden White House's use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. It marks a significant escalation in Trump's targeting of political adversaries, and could lay the groundwork for arguments by leading Republicans in Congress and around the country that a range of Biden's actions as president were invalid. 'Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president,' Trump said Thursday. He then went further, suggesting that rogue elements within the Biden administration might have effectively faked the president's signature and governed without his knowledge — especially when it came to pushing policies that appeased the Democratic Party's far-left wing. 'He didn't have much of an idea what was going on,' Trump said, though he also acknowledged that he had no evidence to back up those assertions. A Trump fundraising email released a short time later carried the heading, 'A robot ran the country?' Legal experts are skeptical about that the investigation will do much more than fire up Trump's core supporters. 'I think it's more of a political act than one that will have any legal effect,' said Richard Pildes, a constitutional law scholar at New York University School of Law. He added: 'I think it's designed to continue to fuel a narrative that the administration wants to elevate, but courts are not going to second-guess these sorts of executive actions' undertaken by Biden. Trump has long questioned the legitimacy of pardons his predecessor issued for his family members and other administration officials just before leaving office on Jan. 20, people whom Biden was worried could be targeted by a Trump-led Justice Department. But Trump has more recently suggested Biden was unaware of immigration policies during his own administration, and said Thursday that aides to his predecessor pushed social issues like transgender rights in ways Biden might not have agreed with. It is well-established that a president's executive orders can easily be repealed by a successor issuing new executive actions — something Trump has done repeatedly since retaking the White House. That lets Trump wipe out Biden administration policies without having to prove any were undertaken without Biden's knowledge — though his predecessor's pardons and judicial appointments can't be so easily erased. 'When it comes to completed legal acts like pardons or appointing judges,' Pildes said, a later president 'has no power to overturn those actions.' Autopens are writing tools that allow a person's signature to be affixed automatically to documents. The Justice Department, under Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognized the use of an autopen by presidents to sign legislation and issue pardons for decades — and even Trump himself acknowledges using it. 'Autopens to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country and you want to get them back,' Trump said Thursday. Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt said the 'consensus view is that, as long as the president has directed the use of the autopen in that particular instance, it is valid.' 'The only issue would be if someone else directed the use of the autopen without the President's approval,' Kalt, an expert on pardons, wrote in an email. Yes. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution bestows the president with the power 'to grant Reprieves and Pardons.' 'A president's pardons cannot be revoked. If they could, no pardon would ever be final,' American University politics professor Jeffrey Crouch, author of a book on presidential pardons, said in an email. 'There is no legal obstacle I am aware of to a president using an autopen on a pardon.' Kent Greenfield, a Boston College law professor, said, 'Once you pardon somebody, you can't go back and un-pardon them.' 'If it's done with a president's authority, I don't think it matters whether it's done with an autopen or not,' Greenfield added. 'The president's authority is the president's authority.' Trump's suggestions that Biden's administration effectively functioned without his knowledge on key policy matters go beyond questions about pardons and the president using the autopen. Even there, though, the Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution. At the time, Trump celebrated the ruling as a 'BIG WIN' because it extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against him on charges he plotted to overturn his 2020 election loss. Such immunity would likely cover Biden as a former president. It might not extend to Biden administration officials allegedly acting without his knowledge — though Trump himself acknowledged he's not seen evidence of that occurring. Biden has dismissed Trump's investigation as 'nothing more than a mere distraction.' 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he said in a statement. In a word, no. There have been allegations of presidents being impaired and having their administrations controlled by intermediaries more than the public knew — including Edith Wilson, who effectively managed access to her husband, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson, after his serious stroke in 1919. Wilson's critics grumbled about a shadow presidency controlled by his wife, but the matter was never formally investigated by Congress, nor was it a major source of criticism for Wilson's Republican successor, Warren G. Harding. More recently, some questioned whether President John F. Kennedy struggled more than was publicly known at the time with Addison's Disease and debilitating back pains while in office. And there were questions about whether dementia might have affected Ronald Reagan during his second term, before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994, five years after he left office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store