Nationalisation of train operators ‘tackling deep-rooted problems'
The operator, which runs services between London Fenchurch Street and south Essex, has been owned by Italy's state-owned rail company Trenitalia since 2017.
The Department for Transport (DfT) said c2c is 'consistently rated one of the best performing operators in the country'.
It achieved a passenger satisfaction rating for the overall journey of 89% in the most recent research by watchdog Transport Focus.
This was the joint sixth best performance out of 22 operators.
Ms Alexander said: 'Whether you're shopping in Lakeside or walking along the beach in Southend-on-Sea, from this Sunday you will be able to get there on a train service run by the public, for the public.
'Public ownership is already tackling deep-rooted problems we see on the railway that's led to spiralling costs, fragmentation and waste.'
Customers of a nationalised train company can use their tickets on another publicly-owned operator at no extra cost during disruption.
Ms Alexander added: 'A unified network under Great British Railways (GBR) will take this further with one railway under one brand with one mission – delivering excellent services for passengers wherever they travel.'
GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation.
Nationalised services are currently the responsibility of DfT Operator.
South Western Railway became the first operator brought into public ownership by the Labour Government in May.
It joined Northern, TransPennine Express, Southeastern and LNER, which were nationalised under the Conservative government because of performance failings by the former owners of those franchises.
Rob Mullen, managing director of c2c, said: 'We are proud of the reliable and high level of service we offer our passengers, consistently being rated as one of the best performing operators in the country.
'We now have a golden opportunity to collaborate with the wider family of publicly-owned operators, sharing our successes and best practice, but also learning from a wide range of different and diverse operators who have already benefited from public ownership, to drive even more improvements for the people and places we all serve.
'A unified and focused railway can deliver more for our communities, including better growth, jobs and houses.'
Eddie Dempsey, general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union, welcomed the nationalisation of c2c but expressed frustration that staff cleaning its trains and stations will still be employed by private company Bidvest Noonan.
He said: 'The injustice of outsourcing must end so all railway workers can reap the benefits of public ownership and greedy private contractors can no longer extract obscene profits from the industry.
'Our members working for Bidvest Noonan deserve decent pay and the same terms and conditions as their colleagues, and we will fight tooth and nail to achieve it.'
Paul Nowak, general secretary of trade union body the TUC, said: 'We need a fully integrated national rail service that works for passengers and the rail workforce.
'That means tackling outsourcing in the sector.'
The next operator to be nationalised will be Greater Anglia on October 12.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Green party leadership contest heats up as ballot opens
Today, Green party members can begin voting for their next party leader – or leaders – as ballots in the leadership contest have now opened. Voting will take place across the month before ballots close on 30 August with the result to be announced on 2 September, just a month before the party heads to Bournemouth for a three-day conference. The choice is between current co-leader Adrian Ramsay who is running on a joint ticket with North Herefordshire MP Ellie Chowns (after Bristol Central MP Carla Denyer announced she wouldn't be running again) and the party's current deputy leader Zack Polanski. Yet despite the competitors having worked closely together for years, the race has got off to a pretty disagreeable start. Ramsay and Polanski were pitted against each other on Iain Dale's LBC show last week. Over the course of 90 minutes, each made their case for the leadership and quizzed the other on their diverging proposals. Things got frosty when Dale asked Ramsay if he liked his deputy – at which point the co-leader became strangely tongue-tied. In a later hustings, Ramsay went on to compare Polanski to, er, Liz Truss. The Green co-leader worries that Polanski's proposals will break from a strategy that has in recent years seen the Greens quadruple their seats in Westminster (albeit from one to four), ousting a shadow cabinet member in the process. Polanski is less bothered about persuading soft Conservative voters to back the environmentalists, and instead has pushed a more radical 'eco-populism' campaign using social media platforms and prominent voices on them to help draw people to his cause. While not quite at Nigel Farage levels of TikTok followers, he has 45 times more followers than Ramsay. Left-wing media outlet Novara Media has suggested that the Green party membership has grown by 'at least 8 per cent' since Polanski launched his campaign – while the deputy leader himself recently boasted he had secured the backing of election campaign organisers and managers. Yet recent YouGov polling suggests that the Green leadership team remains relatively unknown not just among the wider population, but their own voters – with more than 84 per cent unaware of Ramsay, Chowns or Polanski. The creation of the as-yet-nameless Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana party also poses identity problems for the environmentalists. Polling has shown that those stuck on whether they should back Corbyn's group or the Greens have expressed a desire to see the latter outfit become more left-wing than environment-focused. This is where Polanski may win out over Ramsay and Chowns: he is widely seen as being more progressive on culture war issues and has shared social media clips of Corbyn and left-wing commentator Owen Jones heaping praise on him. Where Polanski is open to an electoral pact with the new left-wing party, Ramsay has warned against the Greens becoming a 'Jeremy Corbyn support act'. For his part, Jezza has this week ruled out an alliance with the Greens – saying that the group is 'not a socialist organisation' – but admitted his new party wouldn't rule out working with them 'on social justice issues'. The matter is already dividing those on the left, with some taking aim at James Schneider, the former director of communications for Corbyn's Labour party, over his support for a left-wing pact with the Greens on the background he is married to Keir Starmer's press secretary. If there's one thing on which the left is unrivalled, it's fighting amongst itself. It certainly seems unlikely that the Green party will emerge from this leadership contest unscathed.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Wes Streeting office vandalised with windows smashed
A trans rights group – who call themselves Bash Back – has taken credit and shared a series of images to social media site BlueSky this afternoon which show the front of the Health Secretary's office. Spraypainted on one window are the words "child killer" while several other windows appear to also be smashed. The post (below) reads: 'We refuse to sit and watch as trans young people have their healthcare stripped from them. We refuse to allow Streeting to cover up their suicides. We refuse to endure the violence and humiliation. They will have to go through us.' Our statement on the actions at Wes Streeting's office last night. We refuse to sit and watch as trans young people have their healthcare stripped from them. We refuse to allow Streeting to cover up their suicides. We refuse to endure the violence and humiliation. They will have to go through us. [image or embed] — BASH BACK (@ 1 August 2025 at 13:39 A statement was also released which said it was in response to his "continued abuse of trans people in the medical system, and attempts to cover up the suicides of trans young people under his watch as Health Secretary". Streeting, meanwhile, condemned the vandalism and said it was "unfair" to his staff and an "attack on democracy". The NHS announced in March last year that children would no longer be prescribed puberty blockers at gender identity clinics. In May, following the publication of the Cass Review, the Conservative government introduced a ban with emergency legislation, preventing the prescription of the medication from European or private prescribers and restricting NHS provision to within clinical trials. The move was then made indefinite in December under the new Labour Government – with Streeting as Health Secretary. He said in April this year that he is 'genuinely sorry' for the 'fear and anxiety' felt by the transgender community following the ban. But he added: 'I would challenge anyone in my shoes to say, as a politician, that you would overrule clinical advice, especially when it comes to medicines that are challenged on the basis of whether they are safe or not for children. 'I know people disagree with that decision. I know it's caused real fear and anxiety in our community, and that certainly doesn't sit easy with me.' Commenting on the vandalism, Streeting said: "From day one as Ilford North's MP I've had an accessible and visible constituency office to serve my local community. "Repeated criminal damage is unfair to my staff and an attack on democracy.I will not be commenting further while there is a live police investigation." The Met Police have been approached for comment. The full statement from Bash Back reads: "On July 31st, a group of activists representing BASH BACK took action against Wes Streeting's office in Ilford, in response to his continued abuse of trans people in the medical system, and attempts to cover up the suicides of trans young people under his watch as Health Secretary. "In the months since the puberty blockers ban, we have seen huge backpedals in the healthcare rights afforded to trans people and young people especially - in an NHS system that was never kind to us in the first place. "Under Streeting's rule, GPs have been banned from conducting blood tests on trans patients accessing HRT, and trans people have been banned from accessing hospital wards that fit their gender, leading necessarily to poorer quality of care across the board. "Streeting, along with NHS England, the EHRC, and Hilary Cass, have paved the way for state-mandated conversion therapy, which has since led to the Department for Education's proposed introduction of a Section 28 style bill, preventing discussion of transness in the classroom. "It is clear now that Wes Streeting and the Labour government intend to erase trans people from public life, and will go out of their way to do so, no matter how many bodies lay in their path."
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Like Sadiq Khan, I'm a Heathrow nimby – here's what I'd really like to do to the airport…
Andrew Adonis once told me that the third runway at Heathrow would never be built because the airport is surrounded by housing: 30 per cent of homes in the whole of Europe affected by aircraft noise louder than 55 decibels are around Heathrow. This was after he had been transport secretary in the last Labour government, when he was trying to get it built, so he knew what he was talking about. He thought there were just too many votes too close to the airport to make it a viable option. But the jumbo project does seem to be, finally, lumbering towards take-off. The Conservatives were against it, when David Cameron was in his green chameleon phase, but then they were in favour. Boris Johnson, the green convert and former mayor of London who had promised to lie in front of the bulldozers, had to be sent on a trip to Afghanistan while parliament voted for it to go ahead. Then came the coronavirus lockdowns; the skies over London were silent and people could hear birdsong again. The project was put back in the hangar. Now it is taxiing again, as the Labour government has confirmed that it supports a third runway plan. Ed Miliband, the keeper of the party's green conscience, opposed it while Labour was in opposition, but is now in favour of it. Heidi Alexander, the current occupant of Adonis's musical chair, will decide later this year between rival bids: a full-length third runway going over the M25, or two cheaper plans for a short runway that won't involve re-routing a motorway. Whatever she decides won't be built until at least 2035, which seems an absurdly early estimate. As my colleague Simon Calder explains, there will be a public consultation and legal challenges, including from Sadiq Khan, Johnson's successor as mayor of London. I agree with Sadiq. The really courageous decision by Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves would be to cancel the plan now. Save us the delays and legal fees and paperwork and vast quantities of clever people's time. It would be right because the case for Heathrow expansion is weak, and it would be brave because the unthinking consensus is that Britain should build more infrastructure to stimulate economic growth. This is infrastructure, therefore we should build it. No, we shouldn't. To build one bit of infrastructure is to choose not to build another. I think there is better infrastructure to build. People only want to build this one because the existing airport is 'full'. But that is the classic 'predict and provide' fallacy. We have learned that it doesn't work for roads. If a road is congested and another road is built, it creates more traffic until that road is congested, too. When Heathrow's third runway is 'full' there isn't anywhere to put a fourth, so that game would have to come to an end. Why not bring an end to it now? Any model of growth that depends on ever-increasing air travel is one that is not worth having, in any case. I am not a fan of the net zero carbon target, but I am in favour of reducing greenhouse gas emissions if there are low-cost ways of doing so. One low-cost way would be to avoid increasing air travel. That might have some effect on GDP in the 2040s, but that is a trade-off worth making compared with some of the costs being loaded on energy bills now. We should make that trade-off as economically productive as possible by embracing the free market: as runways around London are a scarce resource, we should charge more for them so as to ensure that resource is allocated most efficiently. Miliband's argument that the environmental rules will ensure that airport expansion is compatible with his climate-change policies is unconvincing, and may well be the basis of a successful legal challenge to Heathrow expansion – because those climate-change targets have been written into law. There is no low-carbon alternative to flying apart from doing less of it. Everyone knows that sustainable aviation fuel is magical thinking: flying planes on vegetable oil is never going to be economic. But it is not just the green case against air travel that makes Heathrow expansion such a bad idea: it is that it is another example of the HS2 fallacy – 'the railways to and from London are full; we must build some more; London must be made even more privileged in the UK economy'. If air travel is good for growth, let us have more of it in other parts of the country. London is a successful city, the best city in the world, partly because of the constraints of the green belt and runway and road space. It does not need any more runways in its back yard.
