
Business owner accuses neighbouring motor mechanic of 'rabid racism'
Ms Justice Eileen Roberts heard allegations that a motor mechanic and neighbouring Lithuanian businessman, Vilmantas Zutkis, was responsible for 'rabid racism' against Stanley Abayeneme who owns the car cleaning business.
Barrister Femi Daniyan, who appeared with Waheed Mudah of Kevin Tunney Solicitors, Tallaght, told Judge Roberts that Mr Abayeneme was seeking a restraining order against Zutkis, regarding the alleged racism, and against John McLaughlin, the landlord to both businessmen, regarding his alleged blocking of Abayeneme's valeting unit by placing a 40 foot long steel container in front of it.
Although interim restraints were sought by Abayeneme in the absence of both Zutkis and landlord McLoughlin, of Coolfadda House, Laurel Walk, Bandon, Co Cork, Judge Roberts granted only an order for short service of proceedings against both defendants.
Mr Abayeneme told Judge Roberts in written evidence that he rented Unit 2 Greenhills Bungalows, Blessington Road, Tallaght, from McLoughlin and Zutkis rented the adjoining Unit 1 for his car servicing business.
Abayeneme stated:
I have always been subjected to racial and physical violence (by Zutkis) and have made a number of complaints to Gardaí and the landlord with nothing done by either of the two.
He said Zutkis's conduct was aggressive and obstructive and included direct racial abuse of him in front of his customers, threats to his employee and interference to footfall with his business.
'(Zutkis) will come to my unit and racially abuse me and my worker, John Onuigbo Obinna, calling us monkeys, placing bananas in front of our shop and threatening (us) with deportation back to Nigeria in a container,' Mr Abayeneme told the court.
Although Zutkis had claimed not to have any English he would make racist slurs at every opportunity trying to provoke a reaction, Abayeneme claimed.
He had suffered daily stress, reputational damage and financial loss and, although having reported him to their landlord, McLoughlin had failed to intervene but had admitted to placing the container in an attempt to get him out and instructing him to vacate the unit.
He said both Zutkis, by parking cars, and McLoughlin by placing the container, were obstructing access to and even the view of his unit. Last week his unit had been burgled and tyres, tools and cash worth €200,000 had been taken.
Anti-social behavior
Counsel opened correspondence between Kevin Tunney Solicitors for Abayeneme and Dillon Eustace, on record for Mr McLoughlin, of the REMCOLL Group, in which it was alleged Abeyeneme was responsible for anti-social behavior.
Dillon Eustace stated in a letter of August 5 last that Mr McLoughlin had video evidence of Abayeneme attacking Zutkis with a stick and visibly breaking it on his leg; throwing a ladder at Mr Zutkis and damaging property by spray-painting windows.
Judge Roberts heard that Mr Abayeneme had made seven different complaints to gardaí at Tallaght, quoting Pulse numbers, and instead of any action having been taken by them on his behalf, he was now facing prosecution for the alleged breaking of two window panes in Zutkis's unit.
Judge Roberts directed that notification of short service of the application for injunctions be made to Mr Zutkis and Mr McLoughlin and returned the proceedings until Friday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Examiner
26 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
'Trying' is not good enough when it comes to children's lives
Earlier this month, the High Court determined a failure to provide the transport a child needed to attend a school appropriate to his educational needs, did not amount to a breach of his constitutional and statutory rights. The child in question had been able to access the transport required to attend school 13 days in the school year, with 10 of those being for July tutoring. This case marks the latest in a series of judicial review proceedings being taken by families of children with disabilities in relation to their educational access needs. It goes hand in hand with the exponential rise in cases being taken under the Disability Act in relation to Assessments of Need and section 67 under the Education Act, in relation to the allocation of school places. In refusing the declaratory relief sought, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger outlined a belief that this was not comparable to cases where 'little or nothing has been done'. Respectfully, I must disagree. In 2018, a Leaving Cert student successfully brought judicial review proceedings in relation to her results. Mr Justice Richard Humphreys focused on the "untold stress" of losing "initial crucial weeks" of a third-level course due to a marking error. One could be forgiven for wondering how the same system could produce this entirely different result in a case of a primary aged child who missed an entire year of school. Ms Justice Bolger outlined that everyone was trying here, the school tried to hire an escort to accompany the child, the bus company tried to find a taxi, the State eventually granted a home tuition grant (so the parents could hire their own teacher) over halfway through the school year. It all sounds terribly familiar though, doesn't it? These failures are not that of Bus Éireann or the schools. These are failures in the system itself that drive these children en masse out of their communities and then forces them to not only endure treatment that would be considered unacceptable for a non-disabled child, but which expects reverence and gratitude in return. This ruling is a missed opportunity for the courts to clarify that "trying" needs to stop being an acceptable defence to the flagrant disregard for the rights of children with disabilities in this country. It is clear a despondency has taken hold within our courts if we cannot see that a child unable to access an education, has in fact and in law, suffered a breach of the rights afforded to him under the constitution. It is further clear the role that parent carers in this country have subsumed has now grown so exponentially that our right to access employment is next to be sacrificed at the alter of "trying". Children denied access to education do not exist in some suspended animation until the State finds the time to meet their needs — someone still has to provide full-time care. The right to earn a livelihood does not apply to parent carers it seems, so long as someone, somewhere, is "trying". In closing remarks, it was acknowledged the minimal progress made in this case was likely as a direct result of the family initiating legal proceedings, and any parent who has been through it will instantly recognise that statement; the resources that are suddenly found once the lawyers come in. My daughter is among the many who will soon re-commence travelling across the city each morning to access a school that can meet her needs. Her brother will have the luxury of attending the local school, alongside the other children from our neighbourhood. Rebecca O'Riordan: 'My daughter is among the many who will soon re-commence travelling across the city each morning to access a school that can meet her needs.' Picture: David Keane They have access to a different childhood you see, one where parents speak at the school gates, where September brings opportunities for dance and drama classes. His childhood is not catalogued in court documents like his sister. She goes into first class in September with a mere two court cases under her belt, because in this macabre gauntlet, she's one of the lucky ones. This result is a missed opportunity and a worrying development within judicial review. These children's views are not ascertained when we design systems that dictate their existence, their dignity not considered when we design spaces that fail to account for their access requirements. When it comes to assessing their educational needs, when it comes to providing them with school places, lifesaving scoliosis surgeries, dignity-preserving adaptive equipment, all it takes is for the system to say its doing its best and it is instantly absolved of wrongdoing. We cannot stem the tidal wave of litigation in this area unless we acknowledge a failure to deliver policy is not personal. If we keep creating policies without consulting the end users, then we will continue to witness this spiral of needless suffering, where children's rights are continuously diluted. Critique of the systems that fail these children is not critique of the actors it is made up of. We do not have the time nor energy for personalisation — we merely ask that the courts acknowledge that "trying" is not good enough. Rebecca O'Riordan is a law student and full time carer

Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Gardaí investigate alleged fraudulent resale of Electric Picnic tickets
Gardaí are investigating the alleged fraudulent resale of Electric Picnic tickets reported in recent weeks and are warning people not to trust third-party sales for a sold-out event. The Electric Picnic arts and music festival is due to take place in Stradbally, Co Laois, next weekend. The festival is sold out, but reports have circulated on social media of people allegedly being scammed while attempting to purchase third-party tickets. 'It is important that people exert a great degree of caution if attempting to purchase tickets for a sold-out event through any third-party, known or otherwise,' a Garda press officer said. 'Do not trust that the tickets you believe you are purchasing are real. It is likely that they will not materialise and, in fact, do not exist.' READ MORE 'Please do not send money through any app in advance,' the spokesperson said. Anyone who believes they may have been a victim of online fraud is asked to report it to gardaí.


RTÉ News
7 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Inquiry into alleged fraudulent resale of Electric Picnic tickets
Gardaí have said they are investigating alleged incidents of online fraud - the alleged resale of event tickets - that are believed to have occurred in recent weeks. Electric Picnic returns to Stradbally on 29 August, with tickets all sold out, except for resale tickets. Gardaí said they are appealing to anyone who believes that they may have been a victim of online fraud to please report it at your local garda station in person or by phone, or alternatively call the Freephone Garda Confidential Line on 1800 666 111. In a statement, An Garda Síochána said: "It is important that people exert a great degree of caution if attempting to purchase tickets for a sold-out event through any third-party known or otherwise. "Do not trust that the tickets you believe you are purchasing are real. It is likely that they will not materialise and in fact, do not exist." "Please do not send money through any app in advance," it added.