
How a coastal Maine town almost became part of Canada
When U.S. President Donald Trump started talking about annexing Canada to make it the 51st state, people in Castine, Maine, took notice.
The town, after all, was twice occupied by Great Britain two centuries ago.
The British wanted to carve out a new colony that would be part of British North America — in effect doing the opposite of what Trump has been musing about.
"When I do walking tours, I jokingly tell people that this could have been Canada very easily," said Lisa Lutts, the recently retired executive director of the Castine Historical Society.
"If the War of 1812, if the Treaty of Paris had been different, this would have been Canada. And I always joke and say, well, I would have had better health care. That's my joke, and people love it."
Castine's history of occupation is visible in the historical markers and remnants of British forts that dot its small grid of streets overlooking Penobscot Bay.
Kamala Harris beat Donald Trump here by 47 percentage points in the presidential election last fall, and the president's aggressive comments about Canada were deeply unpopular in Castine and nearby coastal communities.
"This isn't how you treat your allies," said Pete O'Brien, a resident of nearby Rockland who was showing relatives from California the earthworks of Fort George, built by British troops in 1779.
"We're about as close as it gets to you politically, culturally, geographically."
Liam Riordan, a historian at the University of Maine at Orono and an expert on the revolutionary period, said Trump's rhetoric represents "a failure to understand the close ties and close relationships that we share."
"I think in Maine, the reaction to that has really been one of being appalled and embarrassed."
WATCH | 'I see us as a borderland': Occupied Maine then and now:
The Maine town that almost became a Canadian border community
1 hour ago
Duration 4:58
The British occupied eastern Maine twice. Americans who live there have thoughts on U.S. President Donald Trump's annexation talk.
Castine's elevated geographical location at the tip of a peninsula on the eastern side of Penobscot Bay made it a strategic location for colonial powers fighting over North America.
A newspaper correspondent referred to its capture in 1814 as "perhaps one of the most admirable military positions in the world."
In the 1600s, present-day Castine was the western edge of the French colony of Acadia, with the British-held Massachusetts Bay Colony on the other side of the bay.
France gave up all its North American territory in 1763, but when it backed the rebels in the American Revolution, the British seized Castine in case the French decided to take it back.
A revolutionary fleet sailed to Castine to push out the British but failed miserably.
"A lot of Americans have no idea about the Penobscot expedition and the battle that took place here, because we lost," Lutts said. "We remember the ones that we won."
When the revolution ended and the British recognized U.S. independence, "any reasonable person during the treaty negotiations … would have said almost certainly the Penobscot River would be the border," Riordan said.
But John Adams, one of the negotiators, pushed for the St. Croix River to be the border because he recognized how Castine would give the Americans better access to lucrative fish stocks and trade routes.
Four hundred loyalists who had come to Castine during the Revolution to remain under the British Crown moved again, this time settling what would become Saint Andrews, N.B.
Several even moved their houses there on boats and placed them on a street grid similar to Castine's, the reason the two towns resemble each other.
Three decades later, during the War of 1812, the British returned to capture Castine again.
The story goes that American troops at Fort Madison knew they were outnumbered, fired one perfunctory cannon shot for honour's sake and quickly fled.
A local pastor, William Mason, grabbed a white table cloth from his dining room and headed down to the harbour to wave it as a signal of surrender.
Castine was a boomtown under British occupation thanks to trade with other British ports such as Halifax and Saint John.
"Business is brisk and speculators are daily flocking in from every quarter," the Hartford Courant reported in November 1814. "The war, or rather peace, with the British is becoming very popular here."
But the treaty that ended the War of 1812 returned Castine to the U.S. again.
Thousands of pounds collected by the British customs house in Castine remained with the British and was used by Nova Scotia's governor, Lord Dalhousie, to establish a college that later became Dalhousie University.
"Another reason why we feel very close to Canada is that our money is up there at that university," Lutts joked.
"They're not letting us in for free though. They should let Castiners in for free, don't you think?"
The end of that war also marked the end of Castine changing hands, but the town's history remains a touchstone for residents to this day.
"We understand ourselves by thinking about our relationship with the past," Riordan said. "And Castine really leans into this more than many other local towns."
Some local residents aren't sure life would be that different here if history had taken a different turn.
"If the Canadian border had been here, I don't think a lot would have changed, because when I look at Maine, I see us as a borderland between Canada and the United States anyway," O'Brien said.
"I think there's also a lot of understanding and acceptance and appreciation of the Canadians down here as well. And so it would have just pushed all of that a little farther south, right?"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
24 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone,' Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.

National Post
24 minutes ago
- National Post
Maine state senator's pitch for western provinces to join U.S. is ‘nonsense,' says ‘enraged' B.C. MLA
Article content VICTORIA — A British Columbia legislator said he went from 'disappointed' to 'enraged' after receiving a pitch from a Republican state senator for Canada's four western provinces to join the United States. Article content Brennan Day, with the Opposition B.C. Conservative Party, said his office had to first confirm the authenticity of the 'nonsense' letter from Maine Sen. Joseph Martin after receiving it last week. Article content Article content Martin's three-page pitch said if B.C., Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba were to seek admission to the United States after referendum votes, it would have to be as full American states. Article content 'This would not be annexation. It would be adoption — welcoming home kindred spirits, who were born under a different flag but who desire to live under our Constitution and accept our responsibilities, customs, and traditions,' he wrote in the letter shared by Day. Article content Martin said in the letter that his appeal is not a 'fantasy of empire' but a 'vision deeply rooted in American tradition' that would give the four provinces a chance to 'leave behind failing ideologies.' Article content 'For too long, Canadian citizens have been subjected to an illusion of freedom administered through bureaucratic means,' he wrote, adding that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 'while lofty in rhetoric, provides no absolute protection.' Article content He said this was in contrast to the U.S. Bill of Rights. Article content Martin said 'millions of people currently frustrated by central authority, moral decay, and bureaucratic suffocation' would be rewarded by 'liberty' if the four provinces were to join the United States. Article content 'The welcome mat is out,' he concluded. Article content Day said the most shocking part of the letter was its attack on Canadian institutions, like the Charter of Rights, parliamentary government, monarchism, bilingualism, multiculturalism, and the dismissal of those cornerstones as 'political baggage.' Article content Day said in an interview that Martin needed to look at 'how heavy his luggage' is. He said Martin's party was 'hauling around wheeled trunks' of baggage in the United States where the Constitution was 'being torn up by Republicans.' Article content Day said it was not clear why Martin wrote to him, but suspected it might be due to 'rhetoric' coming out of Alberta that led Martin to believe British Columbians would be interested. Article content Martin did not immediately respond to a request for comment left by voice mail and text. Article content Day said he had written a response to Martin, in which he acknowledged that Canada has problems. Article content 'But we don't fix them by surrendering our identity, as you suggest,' Day said in his response. 'We fix them by doing what Canadians have always done — rolling up our sleeves, listening to each other, and finding common ground.' Article content


CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Putin's maximalist war goals in Ukraine
U.S. President Donald Trump met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska to try and find a way to end the fighting in Ukraine, but as CBC's David Common explains, it won't be easy to navigate Russia's maximalist war goals.