‘Desperate for change' – but is UK gen Z really disillusioned with democracy?
A Mail on Sunday poll of 18- to 27-year-olds found 67% were in favour of chemically castrating sex offenders and 45% supported the death penalty. A study for Channel 4 found 52% of gen Zers thought 'the UK would be a better place if a strong leader was in charge who does not have to bother with parliament and elections'.
The Channel 4 report, Gen Z: Trends, Truth and Trust, also found 33% of those aged 13-27 agreed that the UK would be better off 'if the army was in charge', and 47% agreed that 'the entire way our society is organised must be radically changed through revolution'.
But is the younger generation really so keen on authoritarian leadership?
Prof Linda Woodhead, a co-author of Gen Z, Explained: The Art of Living in a Digital Age, said her research had found 40% of those surveyed in the UK and the US did believe the political system needed major reform, and 15% felt it was entirely broken. Their disillusionment was rooted in what they saw as the failure of the political establishment to tackle existential crises such as climate breakdown.
This dissatisfaction was exacerbated by the jarring contrast between the freedom gen Zers enjoyed online and the frustrations they encountered offline when dealing with establishment institutions, such as government bureaucracy and political parties, added Woodhead, the head of the theology and religious studies at King's College London.
'Online, they get a lot of voice from the minute they get their hands on a smartphone. They find it disillusioning when they don't have that same level of recognition and influence in traditional institutions,' she said.
'Democracies are slow and inefficient. In old political systems you had to work your way up from the local level through membership and you might be 30 before you have a voice. This generation is not used to that. They have a sense of urgency because the world is burning up and it's all going wrong.'
Dr Daniel Evans, a sociologist and lecturer in criminology at Swansea University, said the recent surveys' findings reflected a generation struggling with high living costs and poor employment prospects and 'desperate for change'.
This frustration was most acute among middle-class young people who saw their prospects as inferior to their parents', he said. While they had been perceived to be 'generation left' owing to their support for Jeremy Corbyn, in 2025, Evans said, they saw neither a more centrist Labour nor a Reform-lite Conservative party as offering the urgent reform they desired.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
'As Leon Trotsky said, 'the feverish petty bourgeoisie can turn to the right or to the left',' said Evans. 'In 2017, they had a populist-left alternative in Jeremy Corbyn. But they don't have that now. I don't think it's any coincidence young people are looking at the rise of 'strong men' like Trump across the world and thinking, 'well, at least these people are saying they're going to do something'.'
Prof Bobby Duffy, director of the Policy Institute at King's College London, said claims that gen Z supported dictatorship risked demonising them as being uniquely weird. Most evidence showing their dissatisfaction with the political system was consistent with that expressed by previous generations of young people, he said.
The World Values survey, which the Policy Institute helps to produce, found a higher level of support for democracy among gen Z than among millennials, said Duffy, the author of Generations: Does When You're Born Shape Who You Are?. He predicted this support would increase as they aged, as it had among previous generations.
'It looked like millennials were much less into having a democratic system back in 2008 when they first came into the adult population, but since then, they've come nearly completely into line with the rest of the adult population,' he said.
Some sociologists and polling experts believe surveys like the one produced by Channel 4 are flawed and risk exacerbating generational divisions.
In a thread on Bluesky, Dr Chris Prosser, a co-director of the Economic and Social Research Council-funded British Election Study, said its most recent research showed gen Z was 'the least likely generation to support a strong leader', with just 13% in favour last year.
Dr Jennie Bristow, a reader in sociology at Canterbury Christ Church University, said attitudinal research was often used as a weapon to justify prejudices against certain generations, such as claims baby boomers were out of touch and held offensive beliefs.
She said: 'The boomers used to be the villains. I think what you're seeing now is rather than society facing up to its problems, it's just going, 'oh well, it's these nihilistic youth who are the problem'. They're being constructed as the barbarians of populism.'
In a statement, Channel 4 said its survey on gen Z was 'a robust, reliable and carefully thought-through piece of research'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Labour's Civil Service proposals are unfair and misguided
That the Civil Service is in dire need of a shake-up is accepted, at this point, across much of Westminster. The frustrations are justified. The public sector is, as George Staunton found Imperial China, felt to be staffed by those who feel that 'everything is excellent' and 'proposals for improvement would be superfluous'. This agreement stretches only as far as the sense that something must change, however. The proposals on the table for reform are deeply contested, and potentially harmful. Labour's proposal to limit Civil Service internships to those from ' lower socio-economic backgrounds ' is a retrograde step which would impoverish the pool of talent available to ministers by restricting entry based on family circumstance, and would represent another blow to the idea that parents should work for their children's futures. The Government would be better advised to hark back to the Northcote-Trevelyan report, which attempted to address a Civil Service which attracted the 'unambitious', 'indolent' and 'incapable' who did not fancy 'the competition of their contemporaries', but were attracted by 'the comparative lightness of the work'. The solutions put forward included, among other things, entrance examinations open to all, merit-based promotion, and ensuring that civil servants were fully employed to the full extent of their abilities. Such an embrace of meritocracy would surely be morally and practically preferable to further clumsy attempts at social engineering.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Scottish Tories eye Reform electoral pact
Senior Scottish Conservatives have discussed striking an electoral pact with Reform UK for the Holyrood elections next spring. One figure backing a deal told The Telegraph it could help avoid splitting the vote on the Right and kick the SNP out of power in Scotland. The deal, which would not need to be made public, would see the Tories either not stand candidates or go easy in areas where Reform is better placed to win and vice versa. It comes as Nigel Farage 's party sits above the Conservatives in third place in opinion polls for the Scottish Parliament elections next May. A pact does not have the backing of Russell Findlay, the Scottish Tory leader, whose team released a statement ruling out the possibility when approached by The Telegraph. But the fact a deal is being considered at senior levels in the party underscores the scale of Reform's popularity surge north of the border and the concerns it has triggered among Tories. In Scotland, Reform now has 15 councillors, 14 of whom used to be Conservatives. It is in marked contrast to other political parties previously run by Mr Farage, such as the UK Independence Party (Ukip), which struggled to get a foothold north of border. One Tory MSP has privately spoken of a defection 'watch list' in Holyrood of those suspected of switching to Reform. Mr Farage also waved away the idea he would agree to any such pact, telling The Telegraph: 'No chance. The Tories are dying in Scotland and I've got no desire to do a deal with them whatsoever.' The idea of some form of agreement, public or private, between the Conservatives and Reform has become a common discussion point in Westminster. Average UK-wide voting polls have Reform in first place on 30 per cent of the vote, with the Tories in a distant third on 17 per cent. Labour is in second place on 22 per cent. Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has ruled out a pre-vote deal with Mr Farage, but speculation continues with the next general election not due until 2029. The recent by-election result for the Scottish Parliament seat of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse underscored the challenges of Right-wing parties splitting the vote. Labour won the seat with 32 per cent of the vote, followed by the SNP on 29 per cent. Reform came third on 26 per cent. Had the Tories, who got 6 per cent, not stood a candidate, it is possible Reform would have beaten Labour and taken the seat, though pollsters often caution against hard conclusions when predicting voter behaviour. Mr Farage has agreed to election pacts before. The Brexit Party, the precursor to Reform which Mr Farage led, had criticism of the Tory handling of the issue of Europe as its heart. Yet he still agreed not to stand candidates against sitting Conservatives at the 2019 general election to help Boris Johnson win and get a Brexit deal through the Commons, securing the UK's departure from the European Union. Despite interest in some quarters of the Scottish Conservative Party, other figures strongly played down the possibility of a pact. One Scottish Tory politician who has spent years in influential positions said: 'Churchill's phrase comes to mind, 'You don't negotiate with a tiger when your head's in its mouth'. We're in competition with Reform – we're not in partnership with them.' The source said Scottish Tory supporters had brought up the prospect of a deal with Reform but that there was little chance it would be adopted by the leadership. Another senior Scottish Tory said: 'Why would Reform do a deal? I can see why we might be interested in it, but why would they?' There have long been suspicions on the Right of coordination between Labour and the Liberal Democrats at general elections to maximise the chances of Tory defeats. The Lib Dems surged from winning 11 MPs at the 2019 general election to 72 MPs at the 2024 general election with almost no increase in overall vote share. The party's strategists have talked about how they ruthlessly focused on a small number of winnable seats rather than competing hard everywhere. Labour was likely to have benefited from the decreased campaigning in non-target seats. But there are reasons why striking some form of deal would be less likely in elections for the Scottish Parliament than the UK-wide Parliament in Westminster. The electoral system for the Scottish Parliament has a proportional element, meaning as well as individual constituency races a party wins some MPs for their overall vote totals. Reform, whose strategists hope to get between 10 and 20 MSPs next spring, is expected to get their victories almost entirely via this way, known as 'the list', rather than winning constituencies. That could provide a disincentive to strike a deal with the Tories, given a lower overall vote total would likely mean fewer MSPs thanks to this proportion element of the election. In polling for next spring's Scottish Parliament elections, Reform is on around 17 per cent, above the Tories on around 12 per cent. The SNP is top, followed by Labour. A year ago, it looked likely that Labour could win power in Scotland but a support slump since Sir Keir Starmer took office last summer means the SNP is now well-placed to remain in office. A Scottish Conservative spokesman said: 'Nigel Farage has said he is content with the SNP winning another five years in power and Reform stood multiple pro-independence candidates in the general election, so no, this won't be happening. 'The Scottish Conservatives want to get the SNP out of power, while Reform will gladly help the nationalists.'
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Millennial dictator' opens door to ruling forever
Fireworks erupted in the main square of the capital San Salvador, as lawmakers ratified the reform in a second late-night plenary session. 'Thank you for making history, colleagues,' said Assembly President Ernesto Castro of Bukele's party. Bukele enjoys enormous support at home for his heavy-handed campaign against criminal gangs, which has reduced violence in the country to historic lows. However, he has also drawn sharp criticism from international rights groups. The reforms came shortly after a wave of arrests targeting human rights defenders and government critics, prompting dozens of journalists and humanitarian workers to flee the country. A close ally of Donald Trump, Bukele's international image has been dented by his handling of detainees. His government held 252 Venezuelans for four months in a mega-prison he built for gang members. Many later alleged torture and abuse. Emboldened by its relationship with Trump, the Bukele administration detained human rights defenders in May and June, including prominent lawyer Ruth Lopez, who had denounced alleged cases of government corruption. 'Democracy has died' Under the ongoing emergency regime, roughly 88,000 people have been arrested on gang-related charges. Rights groups say thousands were detained arbitrarily, and more than 400 have died in custody. Bukele's 2024 re-election had already sparked concern, with critics arguing it violated the constitution and was enabled by a ruling by loyalist judges. Ruling party lawmaker Ana Figueroa, who introduced the reform, said Salvadorans 'can now decide how long to support their president'. However opposition lawmaker Marcela Villatoro denounced the move. 'Today, democracy has died in El Salvador,' she said, criticising the reforms' approval just as the country enters a week-long vacation. 'They've taken off the masks... They're shameless.' Juanita Goebertus, Human Rights Watch's Americas director, said El Salvador is 'following Venezuela's path'. 'It begins with a leader who uses his popularity to concentrate power, and ends in a dictatorship,' she wrote on social media. Miguel Montenegro of the nongovernmental Human Rights Commission said the reforms 'completely dismantle what little democracy remained'. In a speech marking the first year of his second term, Bukele said he does not care if people call him a dictator, brushing off international criticism over the arrest of humanitarian activists.
