logo
Russia talks peace while troops threaten new region in Ukraine

Russia talks peace while troops threaten new region in Ukraine

Boston Globe21-02-2025

The Ukrainian backpedaling can be seen in the westward relocation of the aid station where medics of the 33rd Mechanized Brigade treat wounded soldiers. Late last year, they retreated three times in as many months, hauling medical beds and blood banks in trucks with them.
Advertisement
The medics never thought they would be forced to entirely abandon Donetsk, an area where their unit had fought for a year, and retreat over its western boundary into Dnipropetrovsk.
Earlier this year, that became a reality. Now, the medics fear Moscow's troops will soon follow.
'It always happens this way,' said Lieutenant Vitalii Voitiuk, head of the brigade's medical unit. 'When medical units start moving into an area, it means the front line isn't far behind.' He was speaking at his new aid station near the front line where injured soldiers receive lifesaving care before being sent to a hospital farther behind the lines.
Outside the aid station, the distant rumble of outgoing artillery fire echoed through the night. 'That alone tells you the war is getting closer,' said Voitiuk, a burly 34-year-old.
Civilians, too, are bracing for the fight. Some have already evacuated — including those who fled the war in the east earlier and do not want to be caught in the violence again — while others are making plans to relocate.
Advertisement
'When we read the requests to evacuate people from Dnipropetrovsk, it felt terrifying,' said Bohdan Zahorulko, a worker at East SOS, a Ukrainian nongovernment organization helping internally displaced people. 'But it was also a wake-up call about the reality of the fight.'
Russia's push toward Dnipropetrovsk, an area of more than 3 million people with major steel mills, builds on six months of rapid advances in Donetsk. Since August, its troops have captured an average of about 180 square miles of territory each month in Ukraine, nearly four times the size of San Francisco, according to the Black Bird Group, a Finland research company. Most of those gains were in Donetsk.
In recent weeks, Russia's advance has slowed. Franz-Stefan Gady, a Vienna-based military expert who recently returned from a research trip in eastern Ukraine, attributed the slowdown to bad weather hindering Russian mechanized assaults and airstrikes. He also noted Ukraine's effective use of drones to hit troops and armored vehicles.
'But drones can't hold territory,' said Lieutenant Colonel Vadim Balyuk, commander of the Shkval Special Forces Assault Battalion in Ukraine's 59th Brigade. Speaking from a small wooden house in the border area, where he monitors live battlefield footage on screens, he said his unit's job is to do what drones cannot: secure control of villages and clear a path for Ukrainian infantry to move in.
Balyuk said his unit had recently cleared two settlements of Russian forces, which could have been used to support their push toward Dnipropetrovsk. But he had no illusions that the fight was over. 'The enemy is just regrouping now,' he said.
Advertisement
Soldiers returning from the Donetsk front said Ukraine's biggest battlefield challenge remains unchanged: an enemy whose overwhelming manpower advantage allows for relentless assaults.
Dmytro, 35, an infantryman with a concussion, was evacuated to the 33rd Mechanized Brigade's aid point one recent night. He described a four-hour trench battle so fierce that he could not lift his head above the parapet to spot attacking Russian troops. But from the incoming fire, he said, he could tell they were advancing in small groups, methodically closing in.
'All the soldiers from my section of the trench were evacuated,' said Dmytro, who declined to give his last name per military rules.
In Mezhova, a small town in Dnipropetrovsk standing in the path of the Russian advance, the number of soldiers at times appears to outnumber civilians — they queue at the post office and crowd into cafes, and their olive-green pickups line the streets.
The new reality weighs heaviest on refugees who fled the Donetsk region earlier in the war and resettled in Mezhova and nearby settlements. Over the past three years, the population has surged from 14,000 to 21,000 with their arrival.
'For so long, we thought this place was safe,' said Nelia Seimova, who moved to Mezhova in August after escaping Novohrodivka, which is now under Russian occupation. 'I had plans — buying a house, getting a job, sending my child to school. A normal life.'
Now, Seimova, 33, is planning to move again, farther west. She knows from experience not to wait for the town to be hit with regular bombardment. 'We've been through this before,' she said, tears filling her eyes.
Advertisement
Volodymyr Zrazhevsky, the mayor of Mezhova, is also worried about airstrikes, particularly glide bombs — powerful weapons carrying hundreds of pounds of explosives that Russia often uses to level towns before ground assaults.
Each day, Zrazhevsky studies a battlefield map marked with circles indicating which cities are within the range of the bombs as Russian forces advance. For now, Mezhova is safe. 'But we understand that if it happens — and it will at some point — we'll need to take drastic measures,' he said, possibly mandatory evacuations.
This article originally appeared in
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Spy surge sparks Trump visa crackdown on Chinese students
Spy surge sparks Trump visa crackdown on Chinese students

Fox News

time12 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Spy surge sparks Trump visa crackdown on Chinese students

The Trump administration has intensified its scrutiny of Chinese nationals studying at U.S. universities after several instances in recent years of students from the communist country engaging in alleged surreptitious activity while in the United States. The incidents, which have involved allegations of espionage, conspiracy and misleading federal officials, occurred as a result of Chinese nationals or others with Chinese ties participating in joint education programs between the United States and China. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Wednesday the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security plan to "aggressively revoke" student visas of Chinese nationals, "including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party." A Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson blasted the new policy in a statement Thursday on X, saying the move was "fully unjustified" and damaging to the United States' reputation. "Citing ideology and national security as a pretext, the move seriously hurts the lawful rights and interests of international students from China and disrupts people-to-people exchanges between the two countries," spokesperson Lin Jian said. Nearly 300,000 Chinese nationals have student visas in the United States. It is unclear if the State Department plans to target all of them or only some. Fox News Digital reached out to the department for clarity. Below is a look at some recent incidents involving Chinese nationals at universities. The DOJ brought charges against five University of Michigan students last year after a sergeant major encountered them at Camp Grayling in 2023. The students had cameras with them and were discovered as the U.S. National Guard was conducting a massive training operation at the site with Taiwanese military members, according to a complaint. They were all Chinese nationals attending the University of Michigan as part of the school's joint program with a Shanghai-based university, an FBI official wrote in the complaint, noting some of them had taken photos of Camp Grayling's military installations and operations. The FBI asked the court to issue arrest warrants for the students for making false statements and destroying records. Two Chinese nationals who were graduate students at the University of Michigan pleaded guilty in 2020 after they were caught illegally entering and photographing defense infrastructure at a naval air station in Key West, Florida. Fengyun Shi, a Chinese national studying at the University of Minnesota, was convicted in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia last year of unlawfully using a drone to take photos of naval bases in Norfolk, Virginia. Shi was sentenced to six months in prison and a year of supervised release, and the Biden administration revoked his visa in response to the charges. ICE announced in May that it deported him to China. While not a Chinese national, Charles Lieber, former chair of Harvard's chemistry department, was convicted in 2021 of making false statements to authorities and failing to report income from his work with China's Wuhan University of Technology and a contract he had with China's Thousand Talents Program. Ji Chaoqun, a Chinese national and one-time student at the Illinois Institute of Technology, was sentenced to eight years in prison after he was convicted by a jury in 2022 of attempting to commit espionage and theft of trade secrets. Ji was found to have gathered information on defense contractors, engineers and others as part of a broader effort by high-level Chinese intelligence officials to obtain inside access to U.S. technology advancements. Rubio's announcement also comes after Harvard filed a lawsuit alleging the Trump administration improperly banned all foreign nationals from the Ivy League school by revoking its student visa certification. A judge temporarily blocked the administration from carrying out the ban as the case plays out in the courts. ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons told Harvard in a letter made public through court filings that the revocation was a result of the alleged prevalence of antisemitism on campus but also a result of the administration's "serious concerns" that the university has "coordinated with the Chinese Communist Party." Lyons cited several examples, including Harvard accepting $151 million from foreign donors since 2020, working with "China-based academics" on projects funded by an "Iranian government agent," partnering with Chinese universities and using public funds to do so and collaborating with people "linked to China's defense-industrial base." "This coordination is a valid and substantive reason for withdrawing Harvard University's [Student Exchange Visitor Program] certification to enroll foreign students," Lyons wrote. Harvard attorneys argued during a court hearing Thursday that the Trump administration did not give the university a chance to rebut the claims about antisemitism and CCP ties before the foreign student ban was enacted. The administration agreed to give Harvard one month to respond to those claims while the ban remains on hold.

This popular gunmaker persuaded N.H. lawmakers to protect it from lawsuits
This popular gunmaker persuaded N.H. lawmakers to protect it from lawsuits

Washington Post

time13 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

This popular gunmaker persuaded N.H. lawmakers to protect it from lawsuits

A new law will shield the gunmaker Sig Sauer from being sued in its home state of New Hampshire by people who allege its pistol design is defective and has caused them injury — a victory that demonstrates the power of the firearms lobby in the face of high-profile lawsuits and calls for greater accountability. The firearms manufacturer, which is based in Newington, faces dozens of lawsuits from gun owners across the country who say their Sig Sauer P320 pistols fired without anyone pulling the trigger. The manufacturer has been sued at least 77 times in New Hampshire, according to the company, as well as in other states. A Sig Sauer lobbyist, at a New Hampshire legislature hearing in April, asked lawmakers for help to stem the lawsuits. The company has argued that the complaints were without merit and that fighting them was draining money from one of the state's largest manufacturers — which could, by extension, hurt local jobs. Weeks later, New Hampshire lawmakers granted firearms manufacturers protections in 'any product liability action' in the state from specific defect and negligence claims rising from a gun's lack of an external mechanical safety — in an amendment to a broader firearms bill that was swiftly passed and then signed by Gov. Kelly Ayotte (R) on May 23. The governor, who did not publicly comment upon the bill signing, did not respond to a request from The Washington Post. Many lawsuits against gun manufacturers are brought in federal, rather than state, courts, and one state lawmaker who is critical of the bill said he doubts the New Hampshire legislature has the power to limit federal lawsuits. But Republican state Rep. John Sellers, a co-sponsor of the bill, said it was necessary because the number of lawsuits against Sig Sauer was becoming unreasonable. 'We're trying to protect them because they're a major employer — not just Sig Sauer, but Ruger, too,' Sellers told The Washington Post, noting that Connecticut-based firearms manufacturer Ruger also operates a large facility in New Hampshire. 'We don't want to have so many lawsuits that it kills the corporation and makes it go bankrupt.' Sig Sauer did not respond to requests for comment. In 2023, The Washington Post and The Trace found that at least 80 people, including police officers, had alleged that they had been shot by their Sig Sauer P320 pistols. Many who filed lawsuits against Sig Sauer said the guns fired without having their triggers pulled, often while holstered, sending bullets into their legs, hips or groins without warning. Last year, Sig Sauer was found liable in two cases, in Pennsylvania and Georgia, in which juries awarded the plaintiffs millions. The New Hampshire provision doesn't affect the P320 cases underway in courts there, but it will limit future cases in New Hampshire against Sig Sauer by state residents — and others trying to sue there. Out-of-state residents have filed suit against Sig Sauer in New Hampshire because it is more efficient; existing rulings in the state on the P320 issue mean a plaintiff could get their case before a jury faster, according to Bob Zimmerman, a lawyer who has represented more than 70 plaintiffs in lawsuits over the issue. New Hampshire Democrats, who are the minority in both chambers, roundly decried the provision as an example of Republican lawmakers putting corporate interests over residents. New Hampshire Senate Minority Leader Rebecca Perkins Kwoka said in a statement that shielding Sig Sauer from certain lawsuits in the P320 mechanical safety issue 'could, and should, be seen as legislative malpractice.' 'No company should be immune from liability when their product is defective — especially when it comes to the issue of gun safety,' she said. 'It is our job as legislators to put forth legislation that serves to protect our citizens and support our public safety workers — rather than shield billion-dollar corporations.' During the May 22 House vote on the bill, Democratic state Rep. David Meuse said, 'I'm not here today to try to litigate whether this particular weapon is safe. What I am here to try to do is stop us from passing a bill that will prevent gun owners who believe they have been harmed by a defective, unmodified product from having their day in court — which is exactly what this bill will do.' The provision's success is striking because it disadvantages New Hampshire residents for the benefit of a local company, said David Pucino, the legal director and deputy chief counsel for gun safety research and advocacy group Giffords. '[The law] doesn't protect Sig Sauer around the country in the dozens and dozens of cases where owners have been injured,' Pucino said. 'It just injures the people in New Hampshire.' Bobby Cox, vice president of government affairs at Sig Sauer and a Republican member of the South Carolina legislature, told New Hampshire lawmakers at the April Senate Judiciary hearing that the pistol's design is not defective. 'All these cases that we've seen with these guns, the gun has never been defective,' Cox alleged. 'It's been user error; it's been equipment associated with the gun.' Cox added that the lawsuits were 'becoming detrimental' to the company and portrayed them as 'out-of-state plaintiffs' attorneys … attacking in-state business.' Plaintiffs in cases against Sig Sauer have argued that the lack of a mechanical safety on the P320 is a manufacturing defect that has caused a known issue of unintentional discharges. The company has argued in court that the unintentional discharges were user error — and said the absence of a mechanical safety is a design choice that consumers can avoid by buying a firearm design with the features they want. Not everyone has a choice to carry a different weapon if they don't trust the design of the P320, said Zimmerman, the attorney. 'The majority of our clients are law enforcement. They are not, generally speaking, permitted to choose their service weapon; it's issued by the department.' 'It can be argued that other claimants can go to their home states and argue there, but residents in New Hampshire — law enforcement officers in New Hampshire — they don't have another option,' Zimmerman said. Firearm manufacturers have lobbied for protections from liability for years, and 32 states offer some form of immunity, according to Giffords. More recently, efforts led by Democrats in several states have sought to counter such efforts with legislation clearing the way for plaintiffs to bring civil lawsuits against gun industry entities. Since 2022, nine states have enacted such laws, according to Giffords. Rep. Albert 'Buzz' Scherr, a retired law professor and Democrat in the New Hampshire State House who opposed the bill, said he expects debates over the law's scope if a plaintiff tries to file a related case in New Hampshire federal court. The bill's language was 'abundantly unclear,' he said, and 'needs to be tested out and determined how broad the ban is, in case law,' he said. 'Can [the state legislature] limit anyone to accessing federal court? I don't think the state legislature has that power,' Scherr said. At the same time, he said, the Republican majority in both chambers likely feels emboldened to try to 'control anything having to do with guns, be it state or federal law.'

Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center
Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center

Associated Press

time14 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Judge blocks private prison operator from housing ICE detainees at shuttered Kansas center

LEAVENWORTH, Kan. (AP) — A judge on Wednesday barred a major U.S. private prison operator from housing immigrants facing possible deportation in a shuttered Kansas City area detention center unless it can get a permit from frustrated city officials. Leavenworth County Judge John Bryant agreed after a packed hearing to grant the city of Leavenworth's request for a temporary restraining order against CoreCivic, one of the nation's largest private prison operators. CoreCivic had claimed in legal filings that halting the opening of the 1,033-bed facility on the northwest outskirts of the Kansas City area would cost it $4.2 million in revenue each month. City officials said they anticipated the arrival of detainees apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement was imminent under a Trump administration crackdown on illegal immigration. Leavenworth isn't the first city where controversy has surrounded the reopening of a private prison as an ICE detention facility. In Newark, New Jersey, Mayor Ras Baraka sued the state's top federal prosecutor on Tuesday over his recent arrest on a trespassing charge at a federal immigration detention facility in that state, saying the Trump-appointed attorney had pursued the case out of political spite. Scott Peterson, the city manager for Leavenworth, said he didn't know if the case in Kansas marked the first time a municipality had prevailed in court. 'I would point out that maybe the reason we have seen some success here today is this is not about immigration,' Peterson said. 'This is not about private prisons. This is about land use.' In late 2021, CoreCivic stopped housing pretrial detainees for the U.S. Marshals Service in the Leavenworth facility after then-President Joe Biden called on the Justice Department to curb the use of private prisons. In the months leading up to the closure, the American Civil Liberties Union and federal public defenders urged the White House to speed up the closure, citing inmate rights violations there along with stabbings, suicides and even one homicide. But with President Donald Trump pushing for mass deportations under a wide-ranging crackdown on illegal immigration, the facility that CoreCivic now calls the Midwest Regional Reception Center is in demand again. It is located just 10 miles (16 kilometers) west of the Kansas City International Airport. As part of his crackdown, Trump has vowed to sharply increase detention beds nationwide from the budgeted 41,000 beds this year. Tennessee-based CoreCivic initially applied for a special use permit from the city in February but then withdrew that application the next month, arguing in court filings that it didn't need the permit and that the process would take too long. 'It became clear to CoreCivic that there was not a cooperative relationship,' said Taylor Concannon Hausmann, an attorney for the private prison operator, speaking in court. The city sued CoreCivic, the lawsuit claiming that CoreCivic impeded the city police force's ability to investigate sexual assaults and other violent crimes. The lawsuit contended that the permitting process was needed to safeguard itself from future problems. 'Just follow our rules,' an attorney for the city, Joe Hatley, said in court. 'Go get a permit.' The first version of the lawsuit, filed in March in federal court, was tossed out in May on technical grounds. But Bryant sided with Hatley in the case refiled the same month in state court, finding that the proper procedures weren't followed. Concannon Hausmann, CoreCivic's attorney, declined to comment as the crowd filtered out of the courtroom Wednesday. Norman Mallicoat held a sign reading, 'CoreCivic Doesn't Run Leavenworth' as he left. 'I see this as basically a large company trying to bully a small city into getting what it wants and not having to follow the rules and ordinances of the city,' Mallicoat said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store