
Less aggressive treatment for low-risk breast cancer ‘just as effective'
More than 37,000 women have radiotherapy for breast cancer in the UK every year.
The treatment uses radiation to kill cancer cells and is usually given after surgery to reduce the risk of the disease coming back.
However, side-effects can include changes in breast size and shape, swelling in the arms or breast, and pain.
The Import Low trial, led by The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and the University of Cambridge, found limiting radiation to the tumour area, rather than treating the whole breast, was just as effective.
The study included 2,018 women across 30 radiotherapy centres in the UK, who were monitored for 10 years after treatment.
It compared three radiotherapy approaches; whole-breast, partial-breast and a reduced-dose.
After a decade, cancer recurrence rates in the group given partial radiotherapy was 3%, the same proportion as those who had been treated with a more aggressive approach.
Patients who had targeted radiotherapy were also less likely to experience long-term changes in breast appearance.
Some 15% reported noticeable changes at five years compared with 27% in the whole-breast radiotherapy group.
Dr Anna Kirby, consultant clinical oncologist at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, and reader in breast cancer radiotherapy at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, said: 'The long-term results of this study confirm that a less aggressive approach, limiting radiotherapy to the tumour rather than the whole breast, is just as effective as traditional whole-breast radiotherapy.
'Patients receiving partial-breast radiotherapy experience fewer side-effects while maintaining excellent cancer control.'
Charlotte Coles, a professor of breast cancer clinical oncology at the University of Cambridge, honorary clinical oncology consultant at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and chief investigator of the Import Low study, said the trial has 'transformed' how early breast cancer is treated.
Following the study, which is published in the Lancet Oncology, partial-breast radiotherapy has been integrated into NHS treatment guidelines.
It is hoped that more than 9,000 women in the UK could benefit from more targeted treatment.
'By targeting the area around the tumour, rather than the whole breast, we have demonstrated that patients can achieve the same outstanding long-term outcomes with fewer complications,' Prof Coles said.
'This approach is now widely adopted across the NHS, sparing thousands of women from unnecessary radiation exposure.
'The results of this study have not only shaped UK clinical practice but also informed international guidelines, ensuring that women worldwide benefit from this personalised, evidence-based treatment.'
Hilary Stobart, now 70, was diagnosed with ER-positive breast cancer in December 2008, with a 2cm tumour in her left breast.
Ms Stobart, who was 54 at the time, was offered the chance to take part in the trial after surgery and was treated with partial radiotherapy.
'I had three weeks of radiotherapy, but suffered no side-effects, other than some soreness in my breast and nipple in the first few weeks,' she said.
'Ten years on, I am doing fine. I have no side-effects and no recurrence of disease.
'For me personally, I am very thankful to have received the lowest dose of radiotherapy.
'Whilst I may have had some niggling worries in the early days, having seen the results of the trial, I feel positive and optimistic now. I know that I was lucky enough back then to have had the best treatment, a treatment that other women will be routinely offered now.'
Dr Fay Cafferty, lead statistician at The Institute of Cancer Research, London, added that the findings are 'crucial in reinforcing the long-term safety and effectiveness of partial-breast radiotherapy'.
'Long-term data is vital to ensure we know there's no greater risk of breast cancer returning after this targeted radiotherapy treatment,' she said.
'This latest analysis confirms that partial breast radiotherapy remains a safe and effective treatment option, supporting its continued adoption as the standard of care in the UK and globally.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Eight babies born from pioneering IVF technique to prevent devastating disease
Eight babies have been born in the UK thanks to a groundbreaking three-person IVF technique to prevent devastating disease, world-first data shows. Four boys and four girls, including one set of identical twins, have been delivered and are all doing well following treatment by a team in Newcastle, who pioneered the technique. One other woman is currently pregnant. The scientific method, known as mitochondrial donation treatment, is designed to prevent children from being born with devastating mitochondrial diseases that are passed down from their mothers. These illnesses can be fatal and often cause devastating damage to organs including the brain, muscle, liver, heart and kidney. Of the eight babies born, three are now aged under six months, two are aged six to 12 months, one is 12 to 18 months old, one is aged 18 to 24 months and one child is aged over two. All the babies are healthy and are meeting their milestones, according to the team from Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle University and Newcastle Fertility Centre. None of the eight babies shows signs of having mitochondrial DNA disease, which tends to affect around one in 5,000 births. The scientists said disease-causing mitochondrial DNA mutations, picked up in three of the children, are either undetectable or present at levels that are very unlikely to cause disease. The main lab method used by the team, known as pronuclear transfer (PNT), involves taking the egg from an affected mother, sperm from her partner and an egg from a donor who is free from disease. The mother of a baby girl born through mitochondrial donation said: 'As parents, all we ever wanted was to give our child a healthy start in life. 'Mitochondrial donation IVF made that possible. After years of uncertainty, this treatment gave us hope – and then it gave us our baby. 'We look at them now, full of life and possibility, and we're overwhelmed with gratitude. Science gave us a chance.' The mother of a baby boy added: 'We are now proud parents to a healthy baby, a true mitochondrial replacement success. This breakthrough has lifted the heavy cloud of fear that once loomed over us. 'Thanks to this incredible advancement and the support we received, our little family is complete. 'The emotional burden of mitochondrial disease has been lifted, and in its place is hope, joy, and deep gratitude.' Professor Sir Doug Turnbull, from Newcastle University and part of the team of researchers, said: 'Mitochondrial disease can have a devastating impact on families. 'Today's news offers fresh hope to many more women at risk of passing on this condition who now have the chance to have children growing up without this terrible disease.' In all the cases, the Newcastle team used the PNT technique after the egg was fertilised. For this, scientists transplanted the nuclear genome (which contains all the genes essential for a person's characteristics, such as hair colour and height) from the egg carrying the mitochondrial DNA mutation into an egg donated by an unaffected woman that had had its nuclear genome removed. Thanks to the procedure, the resulting baby inherits its parents' nuclear DNA, but the mitochondrial DNA is mainly inherited from the donated egg. Scientific progress in this area led Parliament to change the law in 2015 to permit mitochondrial donation treatment. Two years later, the Newcastle clinic became the first and only national centre licensed to perform it, with the first cases approved in 2018. Approval is given on a case-by-case basis by the UK's Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). The new findings on the eight births, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, show that all the babies are developing normally. Aged 18 months, tests are carried out in areas such as gross motor skills, fine motor skills, cognitive and social development and language skills to check the babies are hitting milestones. The researchers will also check the children when they are aged five. Professor Bobby McFarland, director of the NHS Highly Specialised Service for Rare Mitochondrial Disorders at Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said he was confident the children would carry on developing normally. He added: 'If we're not picking up subtle signs of problems at five, then we're really very clear that is not going to be a problem.' He added: 'In my work…I see children in intensive care units up and down this country and that's not pleasant. 'It's very difficult for families to deal with these diseases, they are devastating… 'To see babies born at the end of this is just amazing really.' Mary Herbert, professor of reproductive biology at Newcastle University, added: 'PNT happens in the small hours of the morning – those long nights. And it has paid off. 'It's fair to say it's rewarding. In science though, periods of joy are fleeting and brief because you're always thinking what is the next challenge? How do we optimise it further?' She said the slight DNA mutations seen in three of the children are 'way, way below the threshold that would cause disease'. Peter Thompson, chief executive of the HFEA, said: 'Ten years ago, the UK was the first country in the world to licence mitochondrial donation treatment to avoid passing the condition to children. 'For the first time, families with severe inherited mitochondrial illness have the possibility of a healthy child. 'Although it's still early days, it is wonderful news that mitochondrial donation treatment has led to eight babies being born. 'Only people who are at a very high risk of passing a serious mitochondrial disease onto their children are eligible for this treatment in the UK, and every application for mitochondrial donation treatment is individually assessed in accordance with the law.' Dr Andy Greenfield, from the University of Oxford, said: 'It is a triumph of scientific innovation in the IVF clinic – a world-first that shows that the UK is an excellent environment in which to push boundaries in IVF; a tour de force by the embryologists who painstakingly developed and optimised the micromanipulation methods; an example of the value of clinical expertise, developed over decades of working with children and adults suffering from these devastating diseases, being used to support a new intervention and subsequent follow-up, potentially for many years.' Beth Thompson, executive director for policy and partnerships at Wellcome, said: 'This is a remarkable scientific achievement, which has been years in the making. 'The pioneering work behind mitochondrial donation is a powerful example of how discovery research can change lives.' Professor Dagan Wells, from the University of Oxford, said the study showed established methods for avoiding mitochondrial DNA diseases, such as preimplantation genetic testing, perform well and will be suitable for most women at risk of having an affected child. 'A minority of patients are unable to produce any embryos free of mitochondrial disease, and for those women the study provides hope that they may be able to have healthy children in the future,' he added.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Supernanny's Jo Frost speaks out on 'life-threatening' health condition in candid video
Jo Frost, who shot to fame on the hit show Supernanny in the early 2000s, has opened up about a health condition she suffers with in a candid video Supernanny legend Jo Frost has bravely opened up about the "life-threatening" medical condition she battles in a heartfelt new video. The telly favourite shot to stardom in the early noughties with her hit show Supernanny, where she'd step into chaotic households to help struggling parents tackle their children's challenging behaviour. These days, Jo operates as a parenting guru, offering her expertise through online private sessions whilst sharing educational content across her social media platforms. In her most recent post, she courageously discussed her health struggles after receiving an anaphylaxis diagnosis, defiantly declaring she refuses to let the condition "define" her whilst expressing her determination to spread awareness. According to the NHS, anaphylaxis is described as a "life-threatening allergic reaction that happens very quickly" and can be sparked by food, medication or insect stings, reports the Express. When someone displays symptoms of anaphylactic shock, immediate medical intervention is crucial, as without treatment it can lead to cardiac or respiratory arrest. Opening her video, the 55 year old revealed: "I've survived more anaphylactic shocks than I'm prepared to go into detail about right now. I have anaphylaxis, a life-threatening medical condition to certain foods that will compromise my body so horrifically to the point of hospitalisation." She continued, addressing her followers: "Absolute millions of my community around the world, children and adults, live cautiously and anxiously navigating this journey with not nearly enough compassion, education, and empathy from those who do not." Jo expressed that she is "unapologetic" about her condition, comparing it to "shoving a loaded gun in her face". "I did not ask for it, and it does not define who I am and the impact that I make in the world daily. But it does impact how I live my life daily, like the precautions I take, the energy I have to use to discern with hypervigilance," she explained. Taking aim at those who disregard her condition in public settings, Jo also stressed the significance of checking food labels for safety. The television personality stated: "By the way, I speak on behalf of those who also have coeliac disease, too, because we are not all faddy eaters,' she asserted. Coeliac disease is an autoimmune disorder where ingestion of gluten leads to damage in the small intestine. "I'm not looking to be treated special; I'm looking to be treated with the same dignity and attentiveness as you just showed others." In closing, Jo urged her audience to "get curious" and "learn more" about her condition, while also asking them to refrain from leaving "passive aggressive comments" on her social media post. Jo's followers rallied around her on social media, with one expressing: "Thank you Jo. Been living with this my whole life and see how it has gotten so much worse for children now. Education is so important as well as looking at our food supply and what is in it. We need to look at the root cause and source as well." Another supporter chimed in: "Thank you for using your voice... many could benefit from empathy and understanding!! Wishing you healthy days, Jo!!"


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Equalities boss in trans doctor row 'Googled' policies of other health boards, tribunal told
An NHS equalities boss Googled the trans policies of other health boards as they did not have their own, a tribunal was told yesterday. Nurse Sandie Peggie was suspended from Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy after she complained about having to share a changing room with trans medic Dr Beth Upton. The 51-year-old nurse has since sued the health board and medic, and the landmark employment tribunal she brought against them returned yesterday. Isla Bumba, NHS Fife's equality and human rights lead officer, told the tribunal she had researched the policies of other health boards as there was no policy in place regarding trans employees in 2023. And she revealed she had been using a search engine to investigate the trans patient policies of other health boards after being tasked with writing one. As the tribunal returned for what is expected to be another eleven days, she said she would 'hazard a guess at being female' but that she has not had a chromosome test. And the NHS employee defended having the phrase 'LGBT ally' on her email signature, telling the tribunal it 'matter of fact' about herself but did not mean she was not an ally to women. Yesterday the tribunal was told in August 2023 Esther Davidson, who worked in the emergency department, had sought advice on transgender policies. Ms Bumba said she had been asked for 'very generic and informal advice' because they had a 'transgender staff member who was due to join the workforce' so was seeking advice on how to accommodate them, particularly around changing rooms. She told Jane Russell, KC, for NHS Fife: 'I said it could be deemed discriminatory to not allow a trans person access to facilities that aligned with their gender, but I recommended that it might be worthwhile having a conversation with the person directly if they had been open about their trans status to see where they would be most comfortable.' The inquiry was told Ms Bumba looked at policies from other health boards, with NHS Highland's policy saying that 'staff must be treated in accordance with their self-declared gender regardless of whether under medical supervision or have a gender recognition certificate'. As well as not having a policy for staff, they did not have a policy for patients. And Ms Bumba said: 'I had been tasked with writing a trans policy for patients, because we also did not have one at that time, and so part of my scoping I was contacting or leaning on the other equality leads. 'Having discussions with them, trying to get copies if I could, or be referenced to their existing policies if they had one and doing my own research on what other policies were - so I would have been Googling them, I could have came across English policies online, but I reached out directly to some of my Scottish colleagues for their policies.' Ms Bumba has been at the health board for just over three years, and she told the tribunal her job was to make sure NHS Fife was adhering to the Equality Act among other duties. The witness disputed the definition of biological sex when questioned by Mrs Peggie's lawyer Naomi Cunningham. She told the barrister: 'I think you've simplified what could be deemed biological sex, but in actual fact it's far more complex. 'I don't know anything about Beth's body, I didn't at the time I don't now, I don't need to know. But it wouldn't be something that I would ever have the information of exactly what she is made of biologically. 'Nor do I know what my own body is made of biologically. 'I hazard a guess that I would be female, but no one knows what their chromosomes are or their hormonal composition unless you've had that test and I at least have not and I'm not sure Beth has.' On her email signature she was listed as an 'LGBT ally', the tribunal heard, and Ms Cunningham challenged her on it. The lawyer, who highlighted other things she does not list including being a 'disability ally', said: 'Doesn't singling out LGBT ally on your email signature give the impression that the board's human rights and equality lead thinks that the protected characteristics of sexual orientation and gender reassignment are the most important ones and they come first?' But Ms Bumba, who studied at Aberdeen University, said: 'I don't think having that on my email signature suggests that its my top priority no. A priority, but not necessarily the top priority. 'Being an LGBT ally does not mean that I'm not an ally to other protected characteristics.' Following her involvement in the incident in early January 2024, Ms Bumba said she did not have any more involvement until July. The inquiry heard of a Daily Mail article which told of the incident involving Mrs Peggie and Dr Upton, 30. Ms Bumba, who said she was not aware of the identity of the nurse and doctor concerned at this point, said she told a follow up meeting: 'I did remind the group that the nurse involved was entitled to her personal beliefs and that gender critical beliefs were protected under the Equality Act specifically, however, that being said, the NHS expects its employees to conduct themselves in a certain way that aligns with our values and ethics.' The tribunal continues.