The Australian and New Zealand militaries are monitoring 3 Chinese warships off Australia
The Australian government revealed a week ago that the warships had traveled through Southeast Asia and the Coral Sea and were approaching northeast Australia.
Defense Minister Richard Marles said Thursday that the Chinese ships — the naval frigate Hengyang, cruiser Zunyi and replenishment vessel Weishanhu — were 'off the east coast of Australia.'
Defense officials did not respond to a request for comment on a Financial Times report that the task group from China's military, the People's Liberation Army, was 150 nautical miles (278 kilometers) east of Sydney.
'There is no doubt that this is, not unprecedented, but an unusual event,' Marles told Sky News television.
Australia says Chinese warships entitled to deploy off Australian coast
Marles said Australian navy ships and air force planes were monitoring the Chinese ships' movements through international waters that are in Australia's exclusive economic zone, the area beyond its territorial waters where a nation has exclusive economic rights.
'They're entitled to be where they are; Australia is also entitled to be prudent and we are monitoring very closely what the activities of the task group are,' Marles told reporters.
'What we will do whenever this mission is over on the part of the Chinese task group is engage in a full assessment of what the Chinese were seeking to achieve in respect of this mission,' he added.
In Beijing, China's foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun was asked at a media briefing on Wednesday about the Chinese warships' location and replied he was not aware of the situation. The Chinese Embassy in Australia did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday.
Australia engages with Papua New Guinea and New Zealand over Chinese warships
Marles said Australia had engaged with its nearest neighbor Papua New Guinea over its response because the Chinese had traveled around the South Pacific island nation's coast on their way to Australia's exclusive economic zone.
Australia was also 'working very closely' with New Zealand, which is separated from the Australian east coast by the Tasman Sea, he said.
New Zealand's military was also monitoring the Chinese ships 'in coordination with Australia,' New Zealand Defense Minister Judith Collins said in a statement.
'We have not been informed by the Chinese government why this task group has been deployed into our region, and we have not been informed what its future plans are,' she added. 'We will continue to monitor these vessels.'
She did not specify how the New Zealand military would monitor the Chinese shipping.
Experts says China's navy is projecting power around the world
Jennifer Parker, an expert associate of Australia's National Security College and a former Australian naval officer, said Chinese warships rarely traveled so far south along the nation's east coast.
'This is part of a broader power projection from the PLA-Navy and we should expect to see more of this in the Pacific and in the Indian Ocean,' Parker said.
The Chinese deployment comes as the head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Adm. Samuel Paparo visits Australia this week.
Parker said the timing was likely coincidental given the Chinese deployment would have been planned well in advance and the United States doesn't release information about their senior officers' travel until close to the visit.
'Without knowing exactly where the ships are going, the point of this deployment, I think, is to demonstrate to Australia that they have the capability to come down and operate in our maritime domain,' Parker said.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told a news conference he was not worried by reports of Chinese warships off Sydney.
'The Chinese naval ships are complying with international law, but as we do, we are monitoring the situation and observing what is going on, as you would expect,' Albanese said.
Relations between the Chinese and Australian militaries remain dangerous
Three Chinese warships visited Sydney Harbor in 2019. But their voyage had been approved by the Australian government.
Australia's diplomatic and trade relations with China have improved in recent years, but relations between the two militaries are dangerous.
Australia protested what it described as an unsafe interaction last week over the South China Sea where a Chinese fighter is accused of releasing flares that endangered an Australian military surveillance plane.
Guo, the Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson, accused the Australian aircraft of 'deliberately' intruding into airspace over the disputed Paracel Islands, which China claims.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
27 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
India's Modi meets China's top diplomat as Asian powers rebuild ties
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi met China's top diplomat on Tuesday and hailed the 'steady progress' made in improving the bilateral relationship after a years-long stand-off between the nuclear-armed Asian powers. Mr Modi also noted 'respect for each other's interests and sensitiveness' in a statement on social media after meeting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Advertisement China's foreign ministry said the countries have entered a 'steady development track' and the countries should 'trust and support' each other. Mr Wang arrived in India on Monday and has met with foreign affairs minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar as well as national security adviser Ajit Doval about the countries' disputed border in the Himalayan mountains. India's foreign ministry said Mr Wang's meeting with Mr Doval discussed 'de-escalation, delimitation and boundary affairs'. Narendra Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping (Manish Swarup/AP) Relations plummeted in 2020 after security forces clashed along the border. The violence, the worst in decades, left 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers dead, freezing high-level political engagements. Advertisement 'The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interest of the people of our two countries. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored in the borders,' Mr Wang said. Mr Modi emphasised the importance of maintaining peace and tranquillity on the border and reiterated India's commitment to a 'fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable resolution of the boundary question', his office said in a statement. The rebuilding of India-China ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington after US president Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on India, a long-time ally seen as a counterbalance against China's influence in Asia. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the US, along with Australia and Japan. Advertisement The chill in relations after the deadly clash in 2020 between troops in the Ladakh region affected trade, diplomacy and air travel, as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Some progress has been made since then. Last year, India and China agreed to a pact on border patrols and withdrew additional forces along some border areas. Both countries continue to fortify their border by building roads and rail networks. In recent months, the countries have increased official visits and discussed easing some trade restrictions, movement of citizens and visas for businesspeople. Advertisement In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. Both sides are working to restore direct flights. Last week, the spokesman for India's foreign ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, said India and China were in discussions to restart trade through three points along their 2,167-mile border. 'Settling the boundary issue between the two countries requires political compromise at the highest political level,' said Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. He also served as a member of the advisory board for India's National Security Council. Advertisement The thaw between Beijing and New Delhi began last October when Mr Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping met at a summit of emerging economies in Russia. It was the first time the leaders had spoken in person since 2019. Mr Modi is set to meet Mr Xi when he travels to China late this month — his first visit in seven years — to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, a regional grouping formed by China, Russia and others to counter US influence in Asia. Earlier this year, Mr Xi called for India and China's relations to take the form of a 'dragon-elephant tango' — a dance between the emblematic animals of the countries. Last month, India's external affairs minister visited Beijing in his first trip to China since 2020.
Western Telegraph
33 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
India's Modi meets China's top diplomat as Asian powers rebuild ties
Mr Modi also noted 'respect for each other's interests and sensitiveness' in a statement on social media after meeting Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi. China's foreign ministry said the countries have entered a 'steady development track' and the countries should 'trust and support' each other. Mr Wang arrived in India on Monday and has met with foreign affairs minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar as well as national security adviser Ajit Doval about the countries' disputed border in the Himalayan mountains. India's foreign ministry said Mr Wang's meeting with Mr Doval discussed 'de-escalation, delimitation and boundary affairs'. Narendra Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping (Manish Swarup/AP) Relations plummeted in 2020 after security forces clashed along the border. The violence, the worst in decades, left 20 Indian soldiers and four Chinese soldiers dead, freezing high-level political engagements. 'The setbacks we experienced in the past few years were not in the interest of the people of our two countries. We are heartened to see the stability that is now restored in the borders,' Mr Wang said. Mr Modi emphasised the importance of maintaining peace and tranquillity on the border and reiterated India's commitment to a 'fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable resolution of the boundary question', his office said in a statement. The rebuilding of India-China ties coincides with friction between New Delhi and Washington after US president Donald Trump imposed steep tariffs on India, a long-time ally seen as a counterbalance against China's influence in Asia. India is part of the Quad security alliance with the US, along with Australia and Japan. The chill in relations after the deadly clash in 2020 between troops in the Ladakh region affected trade, diplomacy and air travel, as both sides deployed tens of thousands of security forces in border areas. Some progress has been made since then. Last year, India and China agreed to a pact on border patrols and withdrew additional forces along some border areas. Both countries continue to fortify their border by building roads and rail networks. In recent months, the countries have increased official visits and discussed easing some trade restrictions, movement of citizens and visas for businesspeople. In June, Beijing allowed pilgrims from India to visit holy sites in Tibet. Both sides are working to restore direct flights. Last week, the spokesman for India's foreign ministry, Randhir Jaiswal, said India and China were in discussions to restart trade through three points along their 2,167-mile border. 'Settling the boundary issue between the two countries requires political compromise at the highest political level,' said Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. He also served as a member of the advisory board for India's National Security Council. The thaw between Beijing and New Delhi began last October when Mr Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping met at a summit of emerging economies in Russia. It was the first time the leaders had spoken in person since 2019. Mr Modi is set to meet Mr Xi when he travels to China late this month — his first visit in seven years — to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, a regional grouping formed by China, Russia and others to counter US influence in Asia. Earlier this year, Mr Xi called for India and China's relations to take the form of a 'dragon-elephant tango' — a dance between the emblematic animals of the countries. Last month, India's external affairs minister visited Beijing in his first trip to China since 2020.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Four-day work week? Six weeks of holidays? Australians have a choice about how to bank productivity gains
One of the ideas that has captured many peoples' attention amid the flurry of proposals ahead of the economic roundtable is the Australian Council of Trade Unions' vision of a four-day working week. The peak union body argued that working less could actually be productivity enhancing, although the studies behind those claims aren't too rigorous. While many Australians would certainly welcome a three-day weekend, Jim Chalmers has made it clear that working towards a national four-day working week is not on the government's agenda, while reaffirming Labor's commitment to flexible work. Employer groups have been scathing, and it's not likely to be a big discussion point on day two of the three-day roundtable. Clearly not on board with the treasurer's 'open hearts and open minds' approach to this week's talkfest, the Australian Industry Group's chief executive, Innes Willox, called the four-day working week idea 'another populist, anti-productivity thought bubble'. Willox calculated that at the current dismal rate of productivity growth it would take 26 years to get to the point where we could drop a day's work without going backwards economically. But as the ACTU secretary, Sally McManus, explained to the Conversation's Michelle Grattan: the labour movement doesn't expect a revolution in the working week to happen overnight. 'To be clear, we weren't asking for a change to the workplace laws for the government to do something,' McManus said. 'We were raising this in the context of a discussion both around productivity and around AI as an important part of the distribution of the benefits of productivity growth or, for that matter, productivity growth out of less jobs, out of AI.' The longer arc of Australian history has been towards shorter working weeks and longer holidays. But that progress stopped a few decades back, settling on the current set-up of a 38-hour full-time job, two-day weekend and four weeks' paid leave. But there has been progress in other ways (assuming 'progress' is working less – many believe hard work is an end in and of itself). For example, since the turn of the century, the share of full-time employed Australians who say they work longer than 50 hours weekly has gone from 25% to 15%. Meanwhile, part-time work has flourished, fed in particular by a surge in women entering the jobs market. (Which means households overall are probably working harder.) Since the turn of the century, the female employment to working-age population ratio has climbed from 50% to over 60%, according to data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. (The equivalent workforce participation rate for men is just under 68% and hasn't moved much over 25 years.) Of course, the working from home phenomenon that emerged with Covid has been a revolution for many, particularly working families. Thankfully, employers are on board and hybrid work looks set to stay. But to many Australians juggling work and other commitments, time still feels like the greatest luxury. In which case, why shouldn't the reward for lifting productivity growth be fewer working hours for the same pay? Some fascinating research earlier this year by Rusha Das, an economist at the Productivity Commission, showed we would have a three-day working week today if we had collectively decided in 1980 to spend all the productivity gains of the following decades on leisure time instead of higher incomes. Das calculated that Australians used only a quarter of the productivity 'dividend' from the past 40-plus years to work less, while we banked the remaining three-quarters as higher income. 'We have largely traded it for higher incomes, and more and better stuff,' she said. One of the great things about a more efficient and dynamic economy is that it can give us more choices about what we want to do – how much more we want to buy, how much more we want to work and how much more we want to devote to family, hobbies or helping others. This may be getting ahead of ourselves – we have to raise our economic speed limit before we decide how much faster we want to drive. But we'd be mad to limit our thinking to the notion higher productivity is all about generating more income. The ACTU's four-day work week proposal is a good reminder of that.
