Stan Grant launches an explosive attack on the ABC
The veteran broadcaster and journalist also shared his thoughts on the failure of the Voice referendum, the future of treaties in Australia and the recent boing of the Welcome to Country ceremony at the Melbourne ANZAC Day dawn service in a wide-ranging and nuanced interview with TVNZ's Jack Tame.
Grant, 61, quit his role as host of the ABC's Q+A in May 2023 after being subjected to 'relentless racial filth'.
In a parting shot, he accused the ABC of 'institutional failure' over how he was treated when he was being bombarded with abuse during the Voice referendum.
'I became a target, my family became a target and the level of abuse just grew louder and louder and louder,' he said.
'Being misrepresented, hateful comments made to me, my wife, my children, my parents. And death threats against us. And a person arrested and charged.
'And throughout it all, I have to say with some sadness, a failure on the part of my employer to handle that and to be able to show proper duty of care to someone in my position who was exposed in ways that I couldn't control.'
Grant said his decision to quit was to protect his family and his own sanity.
But he insisted he held no one at the ABC personally responsible.
'I didn't feel protected and supported as I should have done with my employer. I don't necessarily blame them,' he added.
'I think they were swimming in waters that were far too deep for them.'
After leaving the ABC, Grant said he retreated into Yindyamarra, an Aboriginal philosophy encompassing respect and sitting in silence as a way of trying to understand others and the world around you.
The period of deep contemplation allowed him to change how he viewed the failure of the Voice referendum.
'There was something existential about this vote for us as Aboriginal people,' he said.
'It wasn't just a constitutional amendment, it felt like a vote on us. Inevitably, it does.
'We live in a country where we are three percent of the population. We are the most disadvantaged people, we are the most impoverished, we are the most imprisoned.
'We come out of very hard history. And that's almost unknowable to many Australians because Australia is a postcard, and it's beautiful, and it's rich and it's successful, and it's multicultural and it's peaceful. And they're phenomenal achievements.'
He said he now saw the Voice as a a 'political failure, rather than a moral failure'.
Grant also praised New Zealand for its approach to reconciliation with the Maori people.
'It's interesting being in New Zealand and the ease people move in out of the shared space.
'You know that you are in a place that is founded on something that is very vertical, very deep and very shared - contested, yes and not evenly distributed - and I think the treaty goes a long way to that,' he said.
He was referencing the Treaty of Waitangi, the foundational document in New Zealand's history which established a relationship between the Maori and the British Crown.
'Australia doesn't have that. We don't have treaties. We don't have a constitutional recognition,' Grant said.
'There is still the overhang of Terra Nullius (meaning 'nobody's land' in Latin) that it was claimed because we simply weren't there in a legal sense. They are existential wounds that we have no dealt with.'
Grant said that he was faced with a choice between having to 'imagine the Australia that I want or live in the Australia that I have'.
'To imagine a treaty, the likes of which you have here (in New Zealand), in the Australian context is just not possible. We are not made that way.'
'I navigate this now as more of a question of The Voice being a political failure rather than a moral failure.'
Grant was also asked about the ugly scenes during the ANZAC Day dawn service in Melbourne where the air of reverence was broken during Bunurong elder Mark Brown's Welcome to Country, when loud heckles and boos threatened to drown him out.
'The wonderful thing about that is that the people who applauded the welcome and showed respect, far outweighed the small number of neo-Nazis, which is what they are, who had booed that Welcome,' Grant said.
He said his immediate, gut reaction was to think 'Australia hates us' but his considered response allowed him to realise those who opposed the booing far outweighed the minority who were doing it.
But he criticised Peter Dutton for trying to score political points by seizing on the national discussion to say he thought Welcome to Country ceremonies were sometimes 'overdone'.
He accused the former Opposition Leader of a 'moral failure'.
To take that and land that in the midst of a culture war where once again Aboriginal people were a political football and it backfired.'
He added: 'The conservative side of politics sought to inflict a moral injury out of what was a very hateful act from a very small number of people.'
Grant went further, claiming that opposition and criticism of Welcome to Country ceremonies was actually a 'failure of Conservatism'.
'What deeper conservative tradition could there be than a Welcome to Country that is thousands of years old? That is joined with an ANZAC service that is a solemn acknowledgment of sacrifice for the greater good,' he said.
'And to put those two beautiful traditions together creates a sacred space that we can all share in and any decent conservatism would seek to preserve that as a common good.'
Grant also turned his sights on the media in general, which he claims is responsible for 'generating conflict and polarising debate'.
'I really had to confront what I was doing and what I saw, I thought, in the complicity of media in the conflicts of our age,' he said of his decision to quit the public broadcaster.
'I started to see that the media in many ways was the poison in the bloodstream of our society.'
Since he quit the ABC two years ago, Grant has written a book about the failure of the Voice called Murriyang: Song of Time and has served as the Vice Chancellor's Chair of Australian-Indigenous Belonging at Charles Sturt University.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Deranged inmates volunteering at an Australian animal shelter are accused of heinous act against guinea pigs: ‘Disturbing'
Prisoners volunteering at an animal shelter have been accused of eating the creatures they were meant to be caring for. The 'disturbing' allegations were uncovered when guards found guinea pig meat and carcasses in a fridge at the Wooroloo Prison farm, 45km from Perth. Inmates are believed to have skinned and slaughtered the disowned pets at the farm before smuggling the meat back into prison where it was cooked and shared around. Guinea pig meat, which are routinely eaten in South America and Asia, is considered to have a gamey flavour that tastes more meatier than rabbit. Those involved in the alleged meat trade have since been subject to lengthy interrogation and the work-release program has been shut down by jail bosses. 'All Section 95 activities from Wooroloo in the community are suspended pending the outcome of investigations,' Corrective Services Commissioner Brad Royce told The West. 'It's particularly concerning given the Section 95 community work program is an integral part of the Department's rehabilitation and reintegration efforts, demonstrating the valuable contributions prisoners can make to Western Australian communities.' Prior to the scandal breaking out, the work-release program had been considered one of the WA prison system's most successful initiatives.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Before the Australian election, both parties wanted to cut international student numbers. So why are they going up?
Last year, amid partisan debate over international student numbers, Universities Australia accused both sides of parliament of using the tertiary sector as a 'political plaything'. Fast forward to 2025, and the federal government has back flipped on its plan to cap foreign student entries, announcing last week that it would increase places by 25,000 next year. The opposition has also said it will adopt a more 'sensitive approach'. So was the election campaign rhetoric just hot air? And will the cap ever be revived? From next year, the international education sector will be allowed to grow by 25,000 additional places compared with 2025 and all providers will receive at least their current allocation of students. After the commonwealth's proposed international student cap – which would have limited new enrolments in 2025 to 270,000 – failed to receive Coalition backing, the National Planning Level for 2026 was set at 295,000 international places. The education department said that was 8% below the post-Covid peak in 2023, and that international student levels for 2025 were 'broadly on track' for the current planning level of 270,000s. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Public universities will be able to lobby for higher individual allocations by demonstrating 'increased engagement' with Southeast Asia, in line with the government's priority to 'deepen engagement in our region', or by providing additional student accommodation (the initial purpose of the proposed cap was to free-up housing). 'Strategically important' cohorts including Pacific and Timor-Leste students and scholarship holders will continue to receive high-priority visa processing, and some students, including those moving from Tafe institutes to public universities, will be exempt from the planning level. The minister for home affairs, Tony Burke, said the changes would ensure student visa processing supported 'genuine education outcomes' and strategic priorities. 'This is about backing providers who do the right things and giving them the certainty they need to grow sustainably,' he said. The federal government replaced its failed international student cap by slowing visa processing, a move the former deputy immigration secretary described as 'political point scoring'. The new Ministerial Direction 111 (MD111), rolled out in late 2024 introduced two categories of student visa processing: 'high priority' and 'standard priority', instead of capping numbers. All international providers received high priority processing up to 80% of their indicative cap, with slower processing after this. Prior to that, Ministerial Direction 107 (MD107) was employed as an arbitrary cap that gave visa processing priority to 'low risk' sandstone universities and students from 'low risk' nations, disproportionately affecting applicants from south Asia and regional universities. The education department said MD111 would be replaced with an updated ministerial direction later in 2025 to 'manage student visa prioritisation in line with the 2026 allocations'. It will continue the principles of MD111. The international education sector will be continue to be heavily regulated by the government. From 2027, the new Australian Tertiary Education Commission will manage higher education growth, subject to legislation passing, indicating there will not be a shift back to a market-led approach. For the international Vet sector from 2027, the federal government will continue to use visa processing and integrity reforms to direct the proportion of international students. The education minister, Jason Clare, said the sector was an 'incredibly important export industry' that had to be expanded sustainably. 'The new planning level gives the sector certainty to continue delivering a high-quality educational experience to international students, while addressing national priorities.' The next step is for the government to meet its 2026 target. Andrew Norton, a higher education policy professor at Monash University, said that despite the modest reforms, other migration policies in place to block or deter international students could mean the actual number falls short of 295,000. Norton noted in the Conversation that the successive migration policies had particularly decimated offshore demand for vocational education, which dropped by 75% in the first six months of 2025 compared with 2023. After consistently calling for growth in the international student market, Universities Australia's chief executive officer, Luke Sheehy, said the government's approach was 'sensible' and would provide 'stability and certainty'. 'We'll continue to work constructively with the government to strengthen the integrity of the sector, including the design of a new ministerial direction,' Sheehy said. International students have welcomed the changes, but warned the government needs to go further to lure students back. International officer at the Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations (CAPA), Weihong Liang, said international education needed a 'reset' towards student welfare and support, 'instead of the constant rhetoric around the revenue they bring in'. He pointed out international student visa fees almost tripled since 2023, from $710 to $2,000 – and not were not directed towards university services or funding for accommodation. 'Experiences of perceived unfair treatment have lasting impacts, potentially affecting Australia's international relationships, educational partnerships and economic opportunities far into the future,' Liang said. Deputy Greens leader and higher education spokesperson, Senator Mehreen Faruqi, said during the election campaign that international students had been used as a 'political football'. 'Blaming international students for the housing crisis was pure racist dog-whistling and a far cry from reality,' she said. 'Australia's reputation was trashed by Labor's politically motivated international student caps and high visa fees, with students turning away and university rankings declining. 'Now Labor is trying to crawl back on their reckless international student caps but still without a rationale or a long-term plan to address [this] crisis.' The Coalition has also toned down its messaging. The opposition's education spokesperson, Jonathon Duniam, walked away from his party's call for Australia to slash 80,000 international student places, promising a more 'sensitive' approach this term. He said tertiary providers needed clarity on how the target was chosen, 'while ensuring that there are no losers'. 'Regional universities and high-quality specialist providers should not be swept up in a one-size-fits-all approach,' he said. 'We will work with tertiary sector to get this right.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Labor asks Deloitte to design universal childcare system as PM eyes political legacy
Labor has commissioned consulting giant Deloitte to help design a universal childcare system in Australia, launching a two-year study of demand and costs, as Anthony Albanese chases a political legacy to rival Medicare. The government could redirect billions in existing spending on the childcare subsidy and introduce a daily flat fee for families. It will spend $10.4m on the research, with Deloitte required to assess service demands and collect data across the early childhood education system, with a report due before the next federal election. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Findings by Deloitte would help the government 'make further decisions about the pathway' toward universal childcare, a long-held goal of the prime minister and something he has described as a potential legacy. The analysis would examine childcare wages and property costs, as well as the experience of operators, lobby groups and families, according to federal education department guidance. Launched in early June, the Early Education Service Delivery Prices Project requires a data-based report to be handed to the government by early 2027, more than a year before the expected date of the next election in mid-2028. It could lead to the introduction of a $10 flat fee for childcare services, similar to rules put in place in Canada in 2010. Work by the Productivity Commission suggests such a move would increase the total hours of work by single parents and secondary earners with young children by nearly 3% – the equivalent of about 17,000 additional full-time workers. Higher tax rates have long acted as a disincentive for women to return to work. In February, parliament passed changes to eligibility rules for the childcare subsidy that mean parents will be guaranteed a minimum of three days of subsidised childcare regardless of how much they work or study. The three-day guarantee begins from January 2026 for families earning up to about $530,000. Early childhood education places have increased by 50% since 2013. Nearly half of all one-year-olds and about 90% of four-year-olds are enrolled in care. Before next week's economic reform roundtable, the Productivity Commission will on Wednesday release its latest interim report on delivering quality care more efficiently. It is expected to consider the role of childcare in the economy. The childcare subsidy will cost the federal budget about $16.2bn this financial year, and that's slated to rise to $18.4bn by 2028-29. With growth of about 5.5%, it is one of the major budget measures growing faster than nominal GDP. 'The big vision is certainly there,' Albanese said of universal childcare earlier this year. 'That everyone would pay no more than a limited amount that was affordable – but we need to get there in stages.' Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion In 2024, the Productivity Commission said removing the childcare subsidy and introducing a flat-fee model of $10 a day would cost $8.3bn annually. Instead, it recommended one-child families earning less than $80,000 a year – and those with multiple children earning up to $140,000 a year – should receive three days a week of free childcare for 48 weeks of the year. That plan would cost $4.7bn annually if the existing subsidy was also limited to families with a combined income of less than $580,000. Parliamentary Budget Office costings for 50 hours of universal care a week, with funding provided directly to providers, forecast a bill of $36bn over the forward estimates period – or about $126bn over a decade. The federal treasurer, Jim Chalmers, said last week the total cost of a universal care system would depend on 'how you went about it'. 'It doesn't come cheap. You've got to make sure that any changes are affordable. If you look at the pressures on the budget, early childhood education is now one of the big half a dozen,' he said. 'We've indicated a willingness and an appetite to do more. We've got to work out how to make that affordable.' A report from the thinktank the Centre for Policy Development, released on Monday, called on Labor to commit to a 10-year plan for a universal system. It said children who accessed quality early education were more likely to succeed at school, have better health outcomes, and participate in the workforce as adults. About 95% of new operators joining the childcare system each year across Australia are private, suggesting the system would be largely for-profit without reform.
