logo
Kamala Harris slammed over insanely mean-spirited way she treated JD Vance's children

Kamala Harris slammed over insanely mean-spirited way she treated JD Vance's children

Daily Mail​2 days ago
JD Vance revealed that his family's transition into the vice president's residence was awkward, after Vice President Kamala Harris ignored the tradition of inviting his family to visit the property before the inauguration.
'They had never seen this house and Usha really wanted to show them,' Vance revealed.
He said that he and his staff knew the politics of the situation could be uncomfortable, but proposed the idea of Usha and the kids visiting the home to Harris and her staff.
'They were rebuffed,' Vance said.
The vice president's residence is a 9,000 square foot Queen Anne style home with 33-rooms, a wraparound porch, grand staircases and elegant turrets.
Modern vice presidents typically host the incoming vice president and their families to introduce them to the residence that is about two miles from the White House.
Vice President Dick Cheney and his wife Lynn welcomed incoming Vice President Joe Biden in 2009 and the Bidens extended the same courtesy to the Pence family in 2016.
The Pence family didn't host Harris and her husband Doug Emhoff to the residence in the aftermath of the 2020 election. The coronavirus pandemic and the politically tumultuous environment surrounding Trump's challenge to the results complicated a meet-up.
Sources close to Harris at the time explained that she and Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff were preoccupied with pressing matters—namely a canceled overseas trip and the wildfires in California, according to CBS News.
But some people view Harris' response to Vance as a snub, which the vice president addressed in an interview with the Katie Miller podcast.
'Wow, Kamala's already dodging basic courtesy?' wrote one user on social media, 'Refusing to let the kids see their future home is just petty.'
'Very telling. Thank goodness we literally dodged that bullet,' wrote another person.
'It's probably just as well that his sweet young children weren't exposed to that woman & her dysfunctional family members,' another Vance supporter unloaded.
Vance said that Harris left a 'nice note' in his office that was 'boilerplate' and 'not particularly profound' but very 'polite.'
Not since Vice President Al Gore and his family moved into the home in 1993 have young children lived in the vice president's residence.
The Bidens frequently hosted his grandchildren in the building and Harris welcomed her young nieces for visits.
But the Vance family have now made the home their own, complete with desks for the kids to do school work and a golf simulator for the vice president.
'It actually feels like a real home now,' he said.
Vance said that Usha Vance still liked to go grocery shopping, but that they still had a staff to keep the house stocked with food and prepare meals.
'It's kind of a crazy new world we live in, but there are definitely perks to it,' he admitted.
He conceded he still liked to make breakfast for the kids to keep some normalcy around the house.
'I try to have as many of these rituals as possible that just remind the kids, I'm still your dad, we still have a mostly normal family life, even though there are cameras constantly around,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pam Bondi names DEA administrator as 'emergency' DC police chief
Pam Bondi names DEA administrator as 'emergency' DC police chief

BBC News

time21 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Pam Bondi names DEA administrator as 'emergency' DC police chief

Washington DC is suing the federal government over its takeover of the police force, after US Attorney General Pam Bondi named the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as the district's "emergency police commissioner".The city's attorney general, Brian Schwalb, wrote on X that the US government had illegally declared a takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and was "abusing its temporary, limited authority under the law". The lawsuit asks a judge to void Bondi's order and stop the DEA head from "assuming any position of command within MPD". President Donald Trump on Monday declared he would use federal law enforcement to crack down on crime in Washington. He has since sent in hundreds of National Guard members and other federal agents to clear homeless encampments, run checkpoints and otherwise bolster law enforcement, citing a 1970s law known as the Home Rule Act that allows him to use MPD for "federal purposes" that he "may deem necessary and appropriate."Late Thursday, Bondi wrote in an order that DEA Administrator Terry Cole would assume "all of the powers and duties" of local Police Chief Pamela Smith. The chief "must receive approval from Commissioner Cole before issuing any further directives to the MPD", according to the order. Almost immediately, Washington DC Mayor Muriel Bowser and Schwalb struck back, saying the order was "unlawful" and telling Smith she did not have to follow it. In the last few days, armoured vehicles have lined up near monuments and other tourist sites, and drivers have been stopped on a popular nightlife corridor. Officials have said that, altogether, 800 troops are expected to be deployed to the district, as well as 500 federal law enforcement agents, such as the a Democrat, has said there is no emergency and Trump's "unnecessary and unprecedented" move is an "authoritarian push". Speaking on Fox News on Thursday to announce her appointment of Cole, Bondi said federal officers had made 156 arrests and seized 27 firearms this week. Trump has said crime has worsened in Washington DC, but analysis by BBC Verify suggests a different trend. Violent offences fell after peaking in 2023, and in 2024, they hit their lowest level in 30 years, according to figures published by DC police. They are continuing to fall, preliminary data for 2025 crime overall has fallen 26% this year compared to the same point in 2024, and robbery is down 28%, according to the police department.

When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze
When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze

The Guardian

time21 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

When Trump tariffs hit French barrels and corks, California's winemakers feel the squeeze

Kory Burke, a small producer of high-quality wines in central California, never believed that tariffs on imports from France or Italy could help boost his business. But he knew for sure they would be a big hindrance as soon as Donald Trump announced late last month that he was slapping a 15% levy on all goods from the European Union. 'The first email I received was from my cork provider,' Burke recalled. 'He said he'd take on 2% of the additional cost of importing corks from Europe, but I would have to absorb the other 13%. Then my barrel supplier got in touch, pushing me to put in my orders as fast as possible because every new French barrel coming across the Atlantic after the tariffs was going to come with a $100 or $150 fee.' Every one of these messages was a gut punch for Burke's five-year-old family-run business, Dresser Winery, which sits on an idyllic hillside outside Paso Robles and specializes in big, bold reds. Burke sent a note out to his wine club members earlier this year telling them he did not plan on increasing prices for the fall shipment, but he realized he could no longer honor the commitment. 'If we do that,' he said flatly, 'we have to shut the business down.' It turns out even US wine producers are heavily reliant on foreign components – everything from French oak barrels, which give the wine a buttery, vanilla finish in contrast to the much less appealing brown sugar taste of American oak, to glass bottles and corks and the wine-making equipment itself. 'Every single product we use, from our pumps to the de-stemmer, comes with instructions written in six languages,' Burke explained. 'Could we produce some of these things here? Sure, but it would take three years to get production up and running, and that's not the way the specialization has been.' As another producer from Paso Robles, Paul Hoover of Still Waters Vineyards, put it: 'The only thing in my bottles made in America is the wine.' Ostensibly, Trump's tariffs on imported goods are supposed to give a competitive boost to American entrepreneurs like Burke and Hoover. But the theory does not really apply to the wine business – not only because so many of the materials used to make California wine come from overseas, but also because people do not buy wine based on price alone. 'It is a fundamental misunderstanding of wine drinkers and the wine marketplace,' the National Association of Wine Retailers said in a blistering statement in response to the 15% tariff announcement. 'Champagne is not sparkling wine. Bordeaux is not simply cabernet sauvignon or merlot … America's independent fine wine retailers understand better than most that when an American wine drinker asks for red Burgundy, they do not substitute Oregon pinot noir when the Burgundy is out of their price range or unavailable. They simply don't make a purchase.' Burke echoed this sentiment, saying he had to control his reaction recently when a Trump supporter came to his winery and told him he must be excited about the business opportunities the tariffs will create. 'People aren't buying my bottles because of tariffs on French wines, that's for sure,' he said. 'If anything, I'm competing against other Californian and American wines. With European wines, it's not a real competition at all. They're very different regions, very different products.' California wines are far from the cheapest because of the high cost of land and labour in the Golden state. For that reason, many producers live or die by the quality of what they make and the sort of subtle distinctions that come from varietals grown in a particular microclimate, or in a particular soil, or aged in a particular barrel. Price still matters, because fine wines are a discretionary spending item, and if the economy or people's personal finances are struggling it is often one of the first things that consumers stop buying. The National Association of Wine Retailers, an industry lobby group, said it was worried about tariffs generally, not just on wine, because inflation and an uncertain business climate would hurt its members' bottom line just as much. 'The increased costs of living that will result from the recently enacted tariffs, along with the significant increase in prices for wines … will only push down consumption further, thereby harming the American wine industry to a degree from which many of its participants will not recover,' the group said. In Paso Robles, which has seen an explosion in the number of wineries over the past two decades to about 250 and has become a major weekend tourist hub for wine lovers from San Francisco and Los Angeles, some of the harmful effects are being felt already. Joel Peterson, executive director of the Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance, said international orders were drying up as the reverberations from Trump's trade war echo around the globe. 'We have wine sitting in a warehouse that is specially labeled for the Canadian market that producers can't sell,' Peterson said. 'We've had no orders from the UK since Trump's so-called Liberation Day in April. People are scared to order those wines.' Domestic retailers say they have not seen significant price increases kick in yet – for either domestic or European wines – but are already starting to struggle simply because of the uncertainty created by the White House's constantly shifting messages on where and at what rate it intends to impose tariffs. 'We're not in a recession but it's what I call a recess market,' said Jim Knight, co-owner of the Wine House in Los Angeles, which specializes in small-label boutique wines from the United States and around the world. 'People have money, they're just not spending it … If the president made a decision and stuck with it, we could plan for it. But we haven't been able to plan for it.' Knight's business has a particular problem with high-end French wines it bought in advance years ago – right after the grapes were harvested – and presold to customers with an anticipated 10% mark-up. When tariffs on European wines were briefly at 10% earlier this year, Knight was looking at his entire profit being wiped out, since tariffs are imposed when goods arrive in the United States, not when they are purchased. Now, at 15%, he's looking at taking a loss that might force him to lay off workers or otherwise shrink his business. For now, he is letting the wine sit in a temperature-controlled storage unit in France and hoping Trump might still bend to pressure from the industry to create a tariff exception for wines and spirits. An industry initiative called Toasts not Tariffs has been lobbying the White House hard to do exactly that. More broadly, Knight said he was worried that small European producers would no longer offer their limited production to the US market, and that some of the specialist importers, the ones who love the same smaller label wines he does, will go out of business. 'Importers of wine from the European Union are American businesses too,' he remarked. That helps explain why a US distributor of European wines and spirits, VOS Selections of New York, has been the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Trump's tariffs – a case that led to an initial ruling against the administration in the court of international trade at the end of May. Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University who has spearheaded the suit, said the nature of the wine business was a vivid illustration of the harm that tariffs can do. 'Many of the wines our client imports simply cannot be produced in the United States because of differences in climate, soil and other factors,' he said. 'We're not benefiting American industry, we're damaging it and hurting consumers.' Not every wine producer sees the economic outlook as uniformly gloomy. Hoover, of Still Waters Vineyards, said the cost of storing and transporting wine was a greater burden than the price of corks or bottles – particularly for California producers who have too much inventory on their hands following a post-Covid boom-and-bust cycle. He said he was relieved at a drop in fuel prices in recent months and saw opportunities if they fell further. He was modestly hopeful, for example, that he could tap into sales opportunities on the east coast where he was previously priced out. 'Before the tariffs, a boat coming from Europe could deliver wine to the east coast more efficiently than I could getting it across the United States on a truck,' he said. 'Let's see how that looks going forward. Energy costs are the key to this. Let's hope the tariffs don't monkey that up.' One of the main reasons that people in the wine business do not believe the tariffs will benefit domestic producers, as the White House is promising, is that they have seen this scenario play out before, during Trump's first term as president. In 2019, the administration imposed a 25% tariff on most European wines, among other products, in retaliation for European subsidies on Airbus passenger jets. Trump said at the time that the relatively low price of French wines was unfair to California producers, but no evidence emerged that the tariff did anything to redress that perceived unfairness. 'It did not increase my domestic wine sales at all,' Knight said.

Peter Mandelson: Let Britain host the Super Bowl
Peter Mandelson: Let Britain host the Super Bowl

Times

time21 minutes ago

  • Times

Peter Mandelson: Let Britain host the Super Bowl

Like Halloween or Thanksgiving, the Super Bowl is a quintessentially American affair. Britain has already imported commercialised versions of the former and now efforts are being made to bring the flagship sporting event across the pond too. The idea has been floated by Lord Mandelson, the British ambassador to the United States, who admitted he had been on a mission to bring the National Football League (NFL)'s championship fixture to the UK since starting his role in February. 'I've made a big pitch for the first Super Bowl outside the US to take place in Britain,' he told the Chicago Council on Global Affairs on Thursday, asking if there were any NFL workers in the audience. Mandelson with President Trump in May JIM WATSON/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES 'I want that Super Bowl in Britain. I don't care when it takes place but I want it announced while I'm ambassador,' Mandelson added, to audience laughter. 'We love it, we love it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store