Guatemala: UN HRC Adopts Landmark Decision On Transgenerational Harm For Mayan Peoples Suffering Forced Displacement
GENEVA (8 May 2025) – The UN Human Rights Committee has found Guatemala internationally responsible for not implementing resettlement agreements and other reparation measures reached with members of the Mayan People for their continuing forced displacement.
A total of 269 members of the K'iche', Ixil and Kaqchikel Mayan Indigenous Peoples, who have been forcibly displaced from their communities during the 'scorched earth' operations of the internal armed conflict in the 1980s, turned to the Committee in 2021, claiming their rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were violated. Although the victims had reached a settlement with Guatemala and agreed on a number of reparation measures under the 2011 National Compensation Programme, the programme, which foresaw, in particular, the resettlement and construction of alternative housing, was never implemented.
'Forced displacement is permanent in nature until the victims benefit from a safe and dignified return to their place of habitual residence or are voluntarily resettled elsewhere,' Committee member Hélène Tigroudja said.
In its decision, the Committee found that the victims were violently uprooted from their traditional lands and forced to seek refuge in Guatemala's capital city, in violation of their right under Article 12 of the ICCPR. Amid this different cultural setting, they were also forced to conceal and ultimately change their identities in violation of Article 27.
'The uprooting of the victims from their natural environment and lands had a deep, devastating, and lasting impact as they were irremediably stripped of their cultural identity,' Tigroudja said. 'They had to abandon their cultural practices, stop wearing their traditional clothing and stop speaking their language, which also constitutes an irreparable loss for their children and grandchildren,' she added.
In a new approach, the Committee considered that the State violated not only the rights of the individuals who were forcibly displaced but also the rights of third-generation children born in displacement after the events, to whom the trauma of displacement was transmitted.
'Indigenous Peoples' rights are, by definition, intergenerational. Transmission is a key condition for the continuity of Indigenous Peoples' existence and cultures,' Tigroudja said.
In its decision, the Committee also highlighted that the forced displacement and accompanying violence resulted in the victims having to leave behind the buried bodies of their relatives. Moreover, they were unable to perform funeral rituals for family members who were executed, died or forcibly disappeared during the conflict, in violation of their right under Article 7 not to be subjected to torture and inhumane treatment.
'In Mayan culture, not performing funeral rites is considered a moral transgression which can lead to spiritually caused illnesses that can manifest as physical diseases and can affect the entire lineage,' Tigroudja added. 'These are not only performative ceremonies and rituals but an integral part of the physical, moral and spiritual integrity of members of the communities as well as of the communities as a whole,' she said.
The Committee requested Guatemala to search for and hand over the remains of the disappeared family members to the complainants so that they could perform funeral rituals in accordance with their cultures. The Committee also requested Guatemala to build the houses according to the agreed specifications; to provide the victims, their children and grandchildren with the necessary medical, psychological and/or psychiatric treatment; to also provide them with scholarships if they wish so; and to carry out a public act of acknowledgement of international responsibility in which it should apologise for the violations.
Guatemala is also requested to translate the decision into the Mayan K'iche', Mayan Ixil and Mayan Kaqchikel languages.
The Committee's findings were assisted by Third-Party Interventions submitted by the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, a judge attached to the Special Jurisdiction for Peace of Colombia, and the NGO Indigenous Peoples Rights International.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
India: Government Arbitrarily Detained & Forcibly Transferred Rohingya Human Rights Defender In Defiance Of U.N. Ruling
Bangkok, 27 May 2025 The Government of India arbitrarily detained Rohingya human rights defender Mohammad Arfat for more than four years without due process, the U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention ruled, Fortify Rights said today. The recent ruling, which responds to a complaint filed by Fortify Rights in May 2024, calls on Indian authorities to provide Mohammad Arfat with reparations, prevent future violations, and cooperate with the U.N. Refugee Agency to ensure his protection and potential resettlement. More than 40 days after the Working Group issued its decision, Indian authorities defied the U.N. ruling, forcibly transferring Mohammad Arfat to another country, where he now remains in hiding due to ongoing threats to his security. 'India's prolonged and arbitrary detention of Mohammad Arfat was both unlawful and unconscionable. He should never have been detained, let alone forcibly transferred out of India following the ruling,' said John Quinley, Director of Fortify Rights. 'The U.N. Working Group's opinion reaffirms what we have known all along—India violated international law by detaining a recognized refugee for years, and then put him even further in harm's way.' In the published opinion, adopted during its 101st session, the U.N. Working Group determined that India's detention of Mohammad Arfat since 2018 was arbitrary, lacked any legal basis, and deprived him of due process. The opinion finds that his detention was based solely on his status as a Rohingya refugee and that India violated key provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—to which India is a state party and legally bound to uphold— including Articles 9 and 14, which protect against arbitrary detention and ensure the right to a fair trial. Upon his release from arbitrary detention, Mohammad Arfat told Fortify Rights: I was beaten by Indian police when I was first detained. … My health [after years] in Indian detention was not good, and I could not see a doctor. I became very sick over the years. … Now [after my release and transfer] I feel mentally and physically unwell. The U.N. Working Group is a body of independent human rights experts established by the U.N. Human Rights Council to investigate and provide opinions on cases of deprivation of liberty that are allegedly arbitrary or inconsistent with international standards. Fortify Rights filed the 20-page complaint to the Working Group on May 30, 2024, along with an annex of more than 90 pages supporting Mohammad Arfat's case and his right to liberty. The U.N. Working Group's opinion in response to Fortify Rights' submission expressed grave concern for Mohammad Arfat and recommended that Indian authorities: [E]nd the arbitrary detention of Mr. Arfat by immediately and unconditionally releasing him and to liaise with UNHCR to grant him protection and a remedy, befitting his status as an asylum-seeker, which could include resettlement in a third country. The U.N. Working Group also recommended that the Indian government provide 'compensation and other reparations, in accordance with international law,' for the harm caused to Mohammad Arfat, and that those responsible for the violation of his rights be held accountable, urging the Government 'to ensure a full and independent investigation of the circumstances surrounding the arbitrary deprivation of liberty of Mr. Arfat and to take appropriate measures against those responsible for the violation of his rights.' Instead, India forcibly transferred Mohammad Arfat to another country shortly after the ruling. In addition to Mohammad Arfat's case, beginning on May 6, 2025, Fortify Rights documented how Indian authorities carried out mass arrests of Rohingya refugees in New Delhi. The next day, the authorities forced at least 40 of them back to Myanmar, where the military junta has been carrying out a genocidal campaign and where the Arakan Army — an ethnic resistance army fighting the Myanmar military junta in an ongoing revolution — has also carried out atrocities against the Rohingya people. In this instance, the India Navy dumped the refugees into the sea near the Myanmar border, placing their lives at grave risk in violation of international law. During the same crackdown, India also forcibly deported other Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh, which hosts more than one million Rohingya refugees in crowded and tightly controlled camps. On May 15, 2025, Tom Andrews, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, called India's forcing Rohingya into the sea 'unconscionable' and 'outrageous' and, in response, he launched an inquiry. Andrews said in a statement that forced returns to Myanmar are a 'serious violation of the principle of non-refoulment, a fundamental tenet of international law that prohibits states from returning individuals to a territory where they face threats to their lives or freedom.' Furthermore, on March 3, three U.N. experts, including Special Rapporteur Andrews, raised concerns about India's 'widespread, arbitrary and indefinite detention of refugees from Myanmar' in a letter to the Indian government: Conditions in places of detention are reportedly dire. Detainees from Myanmar, the majority of whom are Rohingya, are reportedly held in severely overcrowded cells, and do not receive adequate nutrition, clean water, or medical care. Facilities are reportedly unsanitary. Detainees lack clean clothes, bedding, and access to sunlight. Many detainees are reportedly suffering from illness, infections and other medical problems and are unable to access adequate medical care. India must immediately end its arbitrary and indefinite detention of refugees and provide reparations to all harmed by the government's reckless and violent crackdown on their rights, said Fortify Rights. India is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention nor its 1967 Protocol and lacks a domestic asylum law; however, it remains obligated to respect the international customary law principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits the forced return of refugees to situations where they are likely to face persecution and other serious human rights abuses. India's forcible return of Rohingya refugees to Myanmar—where they face grave risks of persecution, violence, or death—also violates several international treaties to which India is a state party, including the ICCPR (Articles 6, 7, and 9), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Articles 6 and 22), and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Article 5). Forcibly returning Rohingya refugees to Myanmar also violates the Genocide Convention, to which India is a state party, said Fortify Rights. By returning victims of genocide to a country where that genocide is ongoing, India may be failing in its obligation to prevent genocide under international law. Moreover, by knowingly contributing to the continuing genocide through the forced return of survivors, India risks legal complicity in the very crimes the Convention is meant to prevent. 'India has legal obligations to protect Rohingya refugees under treaties it willfully entered into,' said John Quinley. 'India should immediately and unconditionally free all refugees in detention and provide compensation for any harms inflicted.'
Scoop
29-05-2025
- Scoop
Democracy Denied: Te Pāti Māori Slam Govt For Silencing Māori And Tangata Tiriti On The Regulatory Standards Bill
Press Release – Te Pati Maori The system is broken-again. It couldnt handle the tidal wave of Mori opposition last year, and its collapsing under the same pressure now said Te Pti Mori co-leader Rawiri Waititi. Today, Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi slammed the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee's refusal to extend the public submission period for the Regulatory Standards Bill, calling it a deliberate act to silence whānau, hapū, iwi, and community voices. Waititi had urged the Committee to extend the submission period by four weeks, citing both procedural fairness and technical failures- after the submissions portal repeatedly crashed on day one, echoing the same systemic failures experienced during last year's Treaty Principles Bill. 'The system is broken-again. It couldn't handle the tidal wave of Māori opposition last year, and it's collapsing under the same pressure now' said Waititi. 'This is already one of the most unconstitutional bills ever put before this House. Rushing it through only adds insult to injury- it's not just bad law, it's a bad process.' This morning, Government members on the Committee voted down every attempt by Te Pāti Māori to extend the submission deadline or retain the standard six-month review process. They have instead locked in a shortened four-month timeframe and a hard deadline of 23 June 2025. 'Make no mistake- this is legislative sabotage. The Government is not only advancing the most dangerous bill in Aotearoa's parliamentary history, they're doing it with their foot on the gas and their hand over our mouths.' 'We are not surprised- we've seen this playbook before. But we are not powerless. We know how to mobilise. We know how to fight back.' Waititi issued a national call to action: 'There are still 25 days left. Flood the system. Overwhelm it with our voices. Let them choke on the very democracy they're trying to dismantle. 'Rally your whānau, your hapū, your iwi, your communities. Let's shut this bill down the way we shut down every other attempt to erase us. Submissions are our weapons- use them' concluded Waititi.
Scoop
29-05-2025
- Scoop
Democracy Denied: Te Pāti Māori Slam Govt For Silencing Māori And Tangata Tiriti On The Regulatory Standards Bill
Today, Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi slammed the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee's refusal to extend the public submission period for the Regulatory Standards Bill, calling it a deliberate act to silence whānau, hapū, iwi, and community voices. Waititi had urged the Committee to extend the submission period by four weeks, citing both procedural fairness and technical failures- after the submissions portal repeatedly crashed on day one, echoing the same systemic failures experienced during last year's Treaty Principles Bill. 'The system is broken-again. It couldn't handle the tidal wave of Māori opposition last year, and it's collapsing under the same pressure now' said Waititi. 'This is already one of the most unconstitutional bills ever put before this House. Rushing it through only adds insult to injury- it's not just bad law, it's a bad process.' This morning, Government members on the Committee voted down every attempt by Te Pāti Māori to extend the submission deadline or retain the standard six-month review process. They have instead locked in a shortened four-month timeframe and a hard deadline of 23 June 2025. 'Make no mistake- this is legislative sabotage. The Government is not only advancing the most dangerous bill in Aotearoa's parliamentary history, they're doing it with their foot on the gas and their hand over our mouths.' 'We are not surprised- we've seen this playbook before. But we are not powerless. We know how to mobilise. We know how to fight back.' Waititi issued a national call to action: 'There are still 25 days left. Flood the system. Overwhelm it with our voices. Let them choke on the very democracy they're trying to dismantle. 'Rally your whānau, your hapū, your iwi, your communities. Let's shut this bill down the way we shut down every other attempt to erase us. Submissions are our weapons- use them' concluded Waititi.
